Definitions

Trial

Trial 1 has follow-up at pre-op (FU.tr.1) and baseline 6 months earlier (patients from LAPPRO, QoliCOL, QoliRECT enrolled).

Trial 2 has follow-up at 3 months (FU.tr.2) and baseline at pre-op (patients from LAPPRO enrolled)

Trial 3 has follow-up at 12 months (FU.tr.3) and baseline at pre-op (patients from LAPPRO, QoliCOL, QoliRECT enrolled)

Trial 4 has follow-up at 24 months (FU.tr.4) and baseline at 12 months (patients from LAPPRO, QoliRECT enrolled).

If follow-up date is missing, but there is no pick-up after time zero patient will correctly end up in Control group

If follow-up date is missing but there is a pick-up after time zero patient will have missing on Group assignment. Since follow-up is (in theory) 3, 12 and 12 months after time zero in trial 2, 3 and 4, respectively, we could set follow-up to time-zero + 3 or 12, but since we don´t know exactly, we use a cut-off of half, that is 3/2 and
months, that is:

    - If Follow-up missing and pick-up is within (time zero + 9 months) then GROUP=ACTIVE
    - If Follow-up missing and pick-up is > (time zero + 9 months) then EXCLUDE 

Patients with no date available for time zero could not be determined whether to include or exclude (“NA”) and was therefore excluded.

Data fix

Patients with no expedition should get their expedition date ‘1970-01-01’. If there is an empty line for a patient, then it is assumed he/she did not get BB (we code it as they picked up the prescription 1970-01-01 ).

Study flow chart and demographics and patient characteristics

LPR: 3705 patients; QL: 1677 patients, QR: 852 patients. (total = 6234 patients)

Trial 3: 5598 patients has available date for both time zero and follow-up

Trial 4: 3908 patients has available date for both time zero and follow-up

Among those included, which will be included in the respective group?

Trial 1: 1114+9 excluded, 5111 included
Trial 2: 564 excluded, 3141 included
Trial 3: 1263+9 excluded, 4962 included (1263 had BB before and 9 had no time zero data)
Trial 4: 721+392 excluded, 3444 included (721 had BB before and 392 had no time zero data)

Among those included:

Trial3: 69 Active, 4873 Control (20 could not be determined due to missing FU date and BB not within 9 months after time zero).

Trial4: 95 Active, 3349 Control

LAPPRO: 3705 patients; QoliCOL: 1677 patients, QoliRECT: 852 patients. (total = 6234 patients)

For trial 3: (baseline at pre-op and follow-up at 12 months), Of 6234 enrolled patients (LAPPRO, QoliCOL, QoliRECT)

For trial 4: (baseline at pre-op and follow-up at 12 months), Of 4557 enrolled patients (LAPPRO, QoliRECT)

Q: What to present in demography table?

Statistical model

Endpoints modelled using ordinal regression assuming proportional odds. Weakly regularizing priors (\(\beta \sim N(0, 1)\)) on the logit scale were used for treatment factor (Active vs Control). Baseline value of endpoints was included, with a monotone effect using a Dirichlet distribution.

Variables adjusted för are: - Binge drinking (Drinking at least 6 glass on the same occassion, YES or NO) - Age - Mental health status (History of psychiatric health issues of prescription of anti-depressant)

Imputations using MICE (5 imputed data sets).

Study results

Analyse and present results for trial 3 and 4.

Primary:
How often in the last month have there been negative thoughts about your cancer suddenly and by itself?

Co-primary:
How severe has the sudden negative intrusive thoughts been?

Secondary 1:
Depressed mood

Secondary 2:
How would you like to describe your quality of life in the last month?

Secondary 3:
Have you experienced periods of intense anxiety, worry or panic

Secondary 4:
Have you woken up at any time during the night with worry, anxiety or an unpleasant feeling the last month?

Main analysis of endpoints

Odds ratio describes the relative (Active vs Control) of more worse outcomes. That is large values (>1) of odds ratio means that patients on Active are worse off compared to Control. Small values (<1) of odds ratio means that patients on Active are better off compared to Control.

Patients assigned to Active group had higher tendency to poor QoL (OR 2.0 and 1.6 for trial 3 and 4, respectively. Patients assigned to Active had more periods of intense axiety, worry and panic in trial 4 (OR=2.4)

Primary:

How often in the last month have there been negative thoughts about your cancer suddenly and by itself?

Large value of odds ratio favors Control. Posterior probability that odds ratio > 1 is 19%.

Co-primary:

How severe has the sudden negative intrusive thoughts been?

Secondary 1:

Depressed mood

There is a higher probabaility that patients on Active has depressed mood.

Secondary 2:

How would you like to describe your quality of life in the last month?

Patients on Active has poorer QoL

Secondary 3:

Have you experienced periods of intense anxiety, worry or panic

Patients on Active has more anxiety and worry

Secondary 4:

Have you woken up at any time during the night with worry, anxiety or an unpleasant feeling the last month?

Supplementary material

Supportive sensitivity analyses

Unadjusted and frequentist analysis

Unadjusted analysis is model with only treatment factor (Active or Control) is in the model (complete cases, no imputations).

Frequentist analysis use same adjustment variables as main analysis as well as pooled across the 5 imputed data sets

Prevalent users analysis

Patient assigned to Active if picked up at least one prescription any time before follow-up. Patient assigned to Control if picked up no prescription any time before follow-up.

If follow-up date is missing but there is a pick-up after time zero patient will have missing on Group assignment. Since follow-up is (in theory) 3, 12 and 12 months after time zero in trial 2, 3 and 4, respectively, we could set follow-up to time-zero + 3 or 12, but since we don´t know exactly, we use a cut-off of half, that is 3/2 and
months, that is:

    - If Follow-up missing and pick-up is within (time zero + 9 months) then GROUP=ACTIVE
    - If Follow-up missing and pick-up is > (time zero + 9 months) then EXCLUDE 

Unadjusted analysis.

Trial 3

t1
## 
## Control  Active 
##    4781    1439

Trial 4

t2
## 
## Control  Active 
##    3594     887

MCMC diagnostics

Primary:

How often in the last month have there been negative thoughts about your cancer suddenly and by itself?

Co-primary:

How severe has the sudden negative intrusive thoughts been?

Secondary 1:

Depressed mood

Secondary 2:

How would you like to describe your quality of life in the last month?

Secondary 3:

Have you experienced periods of intense anxiety, worry or panic

Secondary 4:

Have you woken up at any time during the night with worry, anxiety or an unpleasant feeling the last month?