This report summarizes the analysis workflow and results of an analysis of SNPs from the 1000 Genomes Project.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNPs) data in VCF format were obtained from the 1000 Genomes Project.
SNPs were downloaded using the Ensemble Data Slicer from chromosome 12 between genomic coordinates 47,871,112 and 48,111,112. This represents 0.475% of the chromosome. A total of 2504 variants genotyped in 5271 individuals were downloaded.
The VCF file was loaded into R using the vcfR package (function read.vcfR) and converted to counts of the minor allele using the function vcfR::extract.gt().
Because of the large size of the data file 10000 random SNPs were
selected using R’s sample() function. This allowed the data
to be analyzed much more efficiently while representing key features of
the data. A full analysis will require use of all of the SNPs.
Some external metadata containing the individuals, population, super-population, and gene is available for these populations. That data has been merged into with dataset. The self-identified ethnicity of each person is indicated in the row names of the dataframe. This information was extracted, cleaned with regular expressions and added as a column to the dataframe.
These SNPs were then screened for any SNPs that were invariant (fixed), resulting in removal of 1844 SNPs (features). This was done using the invar_omit() function by Rohini Saran.
NOTE: The original workflow code for removing invariant SNPs contained and error that resulted in no columns actually being removed (Brouwer, personal communication). The code was updated and a reduction in the size of the dataframe after omitting invariant columns confirmed by checking the dimensions of the dataframes before and after this process using dim().
The data were then screened for rows (people) with >50% NAs. There were no NAs in the data, so no rows were removed due to the presence of excessive NAs. Mean imputation was performed on the data to be absolutely sure there were no NAs.
The data were then centered and scaled using R’s scale() function. (Alternatively a SNP-specific centering technique common in other studies could have been applied).
The data were then saved in .csv format using write.csv() for PCA analysis.
After final processing the data contained 7109 SNPS and 2504 samples (people).
The code below carries out a PCA on the data and presents the results. The key steps are:
read.csv().prcomp().The following packages were used in this analysis:
getwd()
## [1] "/Users/eeshamukherjee/Downloads/Computaional Bio 1/Final Project"
setwd("/Users/eeshamukherjee/Downloads/Computaional Bio 1/Final Project")
# plotting:
library(ggplot2)
library(ggpubr)
# scores() function
library(vegan)
## Loading required package: permute
## Loading required package: lattice
## This is vegan 2.6-4
# 3D scatter plot
library(scatterplot3d)
Load the fully processed data:
NOTE: with 7109 SNPs, this CSV is ~208 megabytes. There are more specialized packages for doing PCA with datasets this big. I do not recommend working with more than 10,000 SNPs with basic R functions as we have done in class.
vcf_scaled <- read.csv(file = "snp_scaled.csv")
Check the dimensions of the data to confirm this is the correct data:
## TODO: Make sure that your
## introductory information above
### reflects the size of the data being load
dim(vcf_scaled)
## [1] 2504 5271
The data are scaled and ready for analysis. Only the first six column contains character data and needs to be omitted.
head(vcf_scaled[,1:10])
## sample pop super_pop sex lat lng X2 X3
## 1 HG00096 GBR EUR male 52.48624 -1.890401 -0.03462717 -0.01998402
## 2 HG00097 GBR EUR female 52.48624 -1.890401 -0.03462717 -0.01998402
## 3 HG00099 GBR EUR female 52.48624 -1.890401 -0.03462717 -0.01998402
## 4 HG00100 GBR EUR female 52.48624 -1.890401 -0.03462717 -0.01998402
## 5 HG00101 GBR EUR male 52.48624 -1.890401 -0.03462717 -0.01998402
## 6 HG00102 GBR EUR female 52.48624 -1.890401 -0.03462717 -0.01998402
## X7 X8
## 1 -0.8371421 -0.06641229
## 2 -0.8371421 -0.06641229
## 3 -0.8371421 -0.06641229
## 4 1.1940632 -0.06641229
## 5 -0.8371421 -0.06641229
## 6 1.1940632 -0.06641229
Principal Components Analysis was run using
prcomp().
## omits the proper number of columns
vcf_pca <- prcomp(vcf_scaled[,-c(1:6)])
Get the PCA scores, which will be plotted.:
vcf_pca_scores <- vegan::scores(vcf_pca)
Combine the scores with the sample information into a dataframe.
# call data.frame()
vcf_pca_scores2 <- data.frame(population = vcf_scaled$super_pop,
vcf_pca_scores)
# set as a factor
vcf_pca_scores2$population <- factor(vcf_pca_scores2$population)
The following steps help us understand the PCA output and determine how many PCs should be plotted and/or used in further analyses such as scans for natural selection, cluster analysis, and GWAS.
A default R scree plot was created with screeplot().
This plot does not provide extra information for assessing the
importance of the PCs.
screeplot(vcf_pca,
xlab = "Principal Components")
The original workflow and function for making a more advanced scree plot lacked flexibility (Brouwer, personal communication). The following function and workflow simplifies things
PCA_variation() (below) on PCA
output.screeplot_snps() on the output of
PCA_variation() to make an advanced scree plotPCA_cumulative_var_plot() to show the
cumulative variation explained as more PCs are consideredThis function extacts information needed to make a more advanced, annotated scree plot.
# This is a NEW function
PCA_variation <- function(pca){
# get summary information from PCA
pca_summary <- summary(pca)
# extract information from summary
## raw variance for each PC
variance <- pca_summary$importance[1,]
## % variance explained by each PC
var_explained <- pca_summary$importance[2,]*100
var_explained <- round(var_explained,3)
## cumulative % variance
var_cumulative <- pca_summary$importance[3,]*100
var_cumulative <- round(var_cumulative,3)
# prepare output
N.PCs <- length(var_explained)
var_df <- data.frame(PC = 1:N.PCs,
var_raw = variance,
var_percent = var_explained,
cumulative_percent = var_cumulative)
# return output
return(var_df)
}
This functions makes a more advanced scree plot better suited for PCS on for SNPs.
# This is a NEW function
screeplot_snps <- function(var_df){
total_var <- sum(var_df$var_raw)
N <- length(var_df$var_raw)
var_cutoff <- total_var/N
var_cut_percent <- var_cutoff/total_var*100
var_cut_percent_rnd <- round(var_cut_percent,2)
i_above_cut <- which(var_df$var_percent > var_cut_percent)
i_cut <- max(i_above_cut)
ti <- paste0("Cutoff = ",
var_cut_percent_rnd,
"%\n","Useful PCs = ",i_cut)
plot(var_df$var_percent,
main =ti, type = "l",
xlab = "PC",
ylab = "Percent variation",
col = 0)
segments(x0 = var_df$PC,
x1 = var_df$PC,
y0 = 0,
y1 = var_df$var_percent,
col = 1)
segments(x0 = 0,
x1 = N,
y0 = var_cut_percent,
y1 = var_cut_percent,
col = 2)
}
This makes a plot complementary to a scree plot. A scree plot plots the amount of variation explained by each PC. This plot plots a curve of cumulative amount of variation explained by the PCs.
# This is a NEW function
PCA_cumulative_var_plot <- function(var_df){
plot(cumulative_percent ~ PC,
data = var_out,
main = "Cumulative percent variation\n explained by PCs",
xlab = "PC",
ylab = "Cumulative %",
type = "l")
total_var <- sum(var_df$var_raw)
N <- length(var_df$var_raw)
var_cutoff <- total_var/N
var_cut_percent <- var_cutoff/total_var*100
var_cut_percent_rnd <- round(var_cut_percent,2)
i_above_cut <- which(var_df$var_percent > var_cut_percent)
i_cut <- max(i_above_cut)
percent_cut_i <- which(var_out$PC == i_cut )
percent_cut <- var_out$cumulative_percent[percent_cut_i]
segments(x0 = i_cut,
x1 = i_cut,
y0 = 0,
y1 = 100,
col = 2)
segments(x0 = -10,
x1 = N,
y0 = percent_cut,
y1 = percent_cut,
col = 2)
}
Extract information on the variance explained by each PC.
var_out <- PCA_variation(vcf_pca)
Look at the output of PCA_variation()
head(var_out)
## PC var_raw var_percent cumulative_percent
## PC1 1 11.840428 2.663 2.663
## PC2 2 10.386359 2.049 4.712
## PC3 3 9.566220 1.738 6.450
## PC4 4 8.620045 1.411 7.861
## PC5 5 8.316691 1.314 9.175
## PC6 6 8.156535 1.264 10.438
This advanced scree plot shows the amount of variation explained by all PCs. It marks with a horizontal line what the cutoff is for the amount of Percent variation explained that is useful, and a vertical line for where that line interacts the curve of the scree plot. The title indicates the percentage value of the cutoff and which PC is the last PC below that value. Though only the first few PCs can be plotted, PCs below the cut off value (“useful PCs) should probably used for further machine learning algorithms.
Make the scree plot with screeplot_snps()
screeplot_snps(var_out)
The cumulative variation plot shows how much variation in the data explained in total as more and more PCs are considered. The vertical red line shows the cutoff value from the scree plot (above). The horizontal line indicates what the total percentage of variation explained by these useful PCs is.
Make cumulative variation plot with
PCA_cumulative_var_plot()
PCA_cumulative_var_plot(var_out)
The object created above var_out indicates how much
variation is explained by each of the Principal components. This
information is often added to the axes of scatterplots of PCA
output.
head(var_out)
## PC var_raw var_percent cumulative_percent
## PC1 1 11.840428 2.663 2.663
## PC2 2 10.386359 2.049 4.712
## PC3 3 9.566220 1.738 6.450
## PC4 4 8.620045 1.411 7.861
## PC5 5 8.316691 1.314 9.175
## PC6 6 8.156535 1.264 10.438
PC 1 explains 2.663% percent of the variation, PC2 explains. 2.049%, and PC3 explains 1.738%. In total, the first 3 PCs explain only ~6.450% of the variability in the data. The scree plot indicate that the first ~225!!!!! PCs are useful explain ~60!!!!!% of the variation in the data. In further analysis such as GWAS the first 225!!!! PCs should therefore be used.
Plot the scores, with super-population color-coded
# make color and shape = "super_pop"
ggpubr::ggscatter(data = vcf_pca_scores2,
y = "PC2",
x = "PC1",
color = "population",
shape = "population",
main = "PCA Scatterplot",
ylab = "PC2 (2.049% of variation)",
xlab = "PC1 (2.663% of variation")
Note how in the plot the amount of variation explained by each PC is shown in the axis labels.
Plot the scores, with super population color-coded
# make color and shape = "super_pop"
ggpubr::ggscatter(data = vcf_pca_scores2,
y = "PC3",
x = "PC2",
color = "population",
shape = "population",
main = "PCA Scatterplot",
ylab = "PC3 (1.738% of variation)",
xlab = "PC2 (2.049% of variation")
Note how in the plot the amount of variation explained by each PC is shown in the axis labels.
Plot the scores, with super population color-coded
# make color and shape = "population"
ggpubr::ggscatter(data = vcf_pca_scores2,
y = "PC3",
x = "PC1",
ellipse = T,
color = "population",
shape = "population",
main = "PCA Scatterplot",
ylab = "PC3 (1.738% of variation)",
xlab = "PC1 (2.663% of variation")
Note how in the plot the amount of variation explained by each PC is shown in the axis labels.
The first 3 principal components can be presented as a 3D scatterplot.
colors_use <- as.numeric(vcf_pca_scores2$population)
scatterplot3d(x = vcf_pca_scores2$PC1,
y = vcf_pca_scores2$PC2,
z = vcf_pca_scores2$PC3,
color = colors_use,
xlab = "PC1 (2.663%)",
ylab = "PC2 (2.049%)",
zlab = "PC3 (1.738%)")