(i) \(P(Z<-z)=0.025 \implies \Phi (-z)=0.025 \implies -z=\Phi^{-1}(0.025)=-1.96\)
Hence, \(z=1.96\)
(ii) \(P(Z>z)=0.005 \implies P(Z\le z)=1-0.005=0.995 \implies z=\Phi^{-1}(0.995)=2.58\)
Solution Since, sample size \(n\) is sufficiently large, so, according to central limit theorem (CLT) sampling distribution of \(\bar x\) will be approximately normal that is \(\bar x \sim N(\mu,\sigma/\sqrt n)\) (approx).
Solution
Here, \(n=36, \bar x=23 , \sigma= 6.7\) \(1-\alpha =0.95 , so, \alpha =0.05\) and \(z_{\alpha/2}=1.96\)
\(\sigma/ \sqrt n =6.7/\sqrt 36=1.117\)
So, \(95\%\) Confidence Interval (CI) for \(\mu\) is:
\(\bar x - z_{\alpha/2} *\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt n}<\mu<\bar x + z_{\alpha/2} *\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt n}\)
Or, \(23 - 1.96* 1.117<\mu<23 - 1.96* 1.117\)
Or,\(20.81<\mu<25.19\)
Practical Interpretation: Based on the sample data, a range of highly plausible values for mean sodium chloride concentration for seawater is \(20.81 cm^3<\mu<25.19cm^3\).
Solution
Here, \(n=64, \bar x=905\ kWh ,\ \sigma= 125\ kWh\)
Hypothesis: \[H_0: \mu \le 874\] against, \[H_A: \mu>874\ (claim) \]
Test statistic \[z_{cal}=\frac{\bar x-\mu_0}{\sigma/\sqrt n}\] \[=\frac{905-874}{125/\sqrt 64}=1.98\] P-value approach
For right-tailed test, \(P\ value=P(Z>z_{cal})=P(Z>1.98)=1-\Phi(1.98)=0.024\)
Decision
Since, \(P \ value<\alpha\); so reject \(H_0\).
Practical Interpretation: Based on the sample data it can be concluded with 95% confidence that the association’s claim is true that is the mean monthly residential electricity consumption in your town is more than 874 kilowatt-hours (kWh).