Desarrolle el siguiente ejercicio:
Se necesita construir un indicador multivariado sintético, que mida la “Seguridad Municipal” Para ello se dispone de la siguiente información:
Variable y Correlación con la variable compleja
X1 % de Negocios victimizados durante el año por - robo o hurto positiva
X2 % de Negocios victimizados durante el año - extorsión o secuestro positiva
X3 % de Negocios que consideran que el crimen fue mayor en el año actual comparado con el año anterior positiva
X4 % de Negocios que consideran que el crimen local es mayor que en los municipios vecinos negativa
X5 Erogaciones municipales per cápita en seguridad pública (US$) positiva
X6 Costo del crimen a negocios por cada US$1,000 de ventas durante el año previo negativa
X7 % de Negocios que califican a la municipalidad como buena en prevención y control del delito positiva
X8 % de Negocios que consideran que la calidad del alumbrado público es adecuada para la seguridad de los negocios en el municipio positiva
A través del análisis de componentes principales, identifique para un modelo de 3 factores:
a. Los ponderadores normalizados para cada factor.
load("C:/Users/erick/Downloads/data_parcial_2_A_rev.RData")
library(kableExtra)
mat_X<-datos_parcial_2
mat_x1<-mat_X[,c(-1,-2)]
mat_x1 %>% head() %>%
kable(caption ="Matriz de información:" ,align = "c",digits = 6) %>%
kable_material(html_font = "sans-serif")
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2 | 20.00000 | 20.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.000000 | 2 | 56.4000 |
| 10 | 6 | 62.50000 | 50.00000 | 37.50000 | 3.947368 | 11 | 147.3750 |
| 10 | 20 | 50.00000 | 50.00000 | 50.00000 | 2.564103 | 16 | 135.0000 |
| 8 | 3 | 42.85714 | 42.85714 | 14.28571 | 1.351351 | 35 | 121.1429 |
| 7 | 7 | 75.00000 | 75.00000 | 75.00000 | 9.090909 | 8 | 202.5000 |
| 6 | 13 | 30.00000 | 30.00000 | 30.00000 | 8.108108 | 25 | 81.0000 |
Normalización de los datos
library(dplyr)
##
## Attaching package: 'dplyr'
## The following object is masked from 'package:kableExtra':
##
## group_rows
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter, lag
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
##
## intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
norm_directa<-function(x){(x-min(x))/(max(x)-min(x))}
norm_inversa<-function(x){(max(x)-x)/(max(x)-min(x))}
#Seleccionando las variables con correlación positiva para la Salud Financiera
mat_x1 %>%
select(X1,X2,X3,X5,X6,X8) %>%
apply(MARGIN = 2,FUN = norm_directa) %>% as.data.frame()->variables_corr_positiva
#Seleccionando las variables con correlación negativa para la Salud Financiera
mat_x1 %>%
select(X4,X7) %>%
apply(MARGIN = 2,FUN = norm_inversa) %>% as.data.frame()->variables_corr_negativa
#Juntando y reordenando las variables
variables_corr_positiva %>%
bind_cols(variables_corr_negativa) %>%
select(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8)->datos_normalizados
head(datos_normalizados)
## X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
## 1 0.19354839 0.000000000 0.0400000 0.8000000 0.0000000 0.00000000 1.0000000
## 2 0.22580645 0.017167382 0.5500000 0.5000000 0.4285714 0.21558704 0.9010989
## 3 0.22580645 0.077253219 0.4000000 0.5000000 0.5714286 0.14003945 0.8461538
## 4 0.16129032 0.004291845 0.3142857 0.5714286 0.1632653 0.07380457 0.6373626
## 5 0.12903226 0.021459227 0.7000000 0.2500000 0.8571429 0.49650350 0.9340659
## 6 0.09677419 0.047210300 0.1600000 0.7000000 0.3428571 0.44282744 0.7472527
## X8
## 1 0.1582266
## 2 0.5167488
## 3 0.4679803
## 4 0.4133709
## 5 0.7339901
## 6 0.2551724
Matriz de Correlación & Pruebas de Barlett y KMO
#Matriz de correlación
library(PerformanceAnalytics)
chart.Correlation(as.matrix(datos_normalizados),histogram = TRUE,pch=12)
Hay una evidente correlación entre las variables propuestas en la batería de indicadores, se puede ver esto por los asteriscos.Varias de las correlaciones son significativas al 1%
#KMO
library(rela)
KMO<-paf(as.matrix(datos_normalizados))$KMO
print(KMO)
## [1] 0.67931
El valor mínimo de KMO para considerar aceptable el análisis factorial es de 0.5 y la base de datos tiene el 0.68, por lo tal es apropiado continuar con el análisis.
#Prueba de Barlett
library(psych)
options(scipen = 99999)
Barlett<-cortest.bartlett(datos_normalizados)
## R was not square, finding R from data
print(Barlett)
## $chisq
## [1] 1025.9
##
## $p.value
## [1] 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000046951
##
## $df
## [1] 28
El P-value es casi 0, quiere decir que no se rechaza la hipótesis alternativa, hay evidencia de correlación poblacional entre la batería de indicadores propuestas.
Análisis Factorial
library(FactoMineR)
library(factoextra)
## Loading required package: ggplot2
##
## Attaching package: 'ggplot2'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:psych':
##
## %+%, alpha
## Welcome! Want to learn more? See two factoextra-related books at https://goo.gl/ve3WBa
library(kableExtra)
Rx<-cor(datos_normalizados)
PC<-princomp(x = datos_normalizados,cor = TRUE,fix_sign = FALSE)
variables_pca<-get_pca_var(PC)
factoextra::get_eig(PC) %>% kable(caption="Resumen de PCA",
align = "c",
digits = 2) %>%
kable_material(html_font = "sans-serif") %>%
kable_styling(bootstrap_options = c("hover"))
| eigenvalue | variance.percent | cumulative.variance.percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dim.1 | 3.90 | 48.72 | 48.72 |
| Dim.2 | 1.96 | 24.55 | 73.27 |
| Dim.3 | 0.84 | 10.52 | 83.78 |
| Dim.4 | 0.50 | 6.24 | 90.03 |
| Dim.5 | 0.45 | 5.68 | 95.70 |
| Dim.6 | 0.28 | 3.45 | 99.16 |
| Dim.7 | 0.07 | 0.82 | 99.98 |
| Dim.8 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 100.00 |
Según esto se puede ver la cantidad de factores a retener:
Por el criterio de raíz latente: tendríamos 2 componentes.
Por el criterio de porcentaje acumulado de la varianza: tedríamos tres componentes ya que esas 3 son superior a las 3 cuartas partes de la varianza total.
fviz_eig(PC,
choice = "eigenvalue",
barcolor = "red",
barfill = "red",
addlabels = TRUE,
)+labs(title = "Gráfico de Sedimentación",subtitle = "Usando princomp, con Autovalores")+
xlab(label = "Componentes")+
ylab(label = "Autovalores")+geom_hline(yintercept = 1)
Por este criterio se puede observar que el punto de quiebre ocurre en los primeros dos. Los criterios de extracción se mantienen entre 2 y 3 factores.
library(corrplot)
## corrplot 0.92 loaded
#Modelo de 3 Factores (Rotada)
numero_de_factores<-3
modelo_factores<-principal(r = Rx,
nfactors = numero_de_factores,
covar = FALSE,
rotate = "varimax")
modelo_factores
## Principal Components Analysis
## Call: principal(r = Rx, nfactors = numero_de_factores, rotate = "varimax",
## covar = FALSE)
## Standardized loadings (pattern matrix) based upon correlation matrix
## RC1 RC2 RC3 h2 u2 com
## X1 -0.16 0.80 -0.03 0.67 0.3316 1.1
## X2 0.08 0.84 -0.03 0.71 0.2879 1.0
## X3 0.93 -0.09 0.28 0.95 0.0493 1.2
## X4 -0.95 0.05 -0.26 0.98 0.0208 1.2
## X5 0.43 -0.06 0.80 0.83 0.1742 1.5
## X6 0.25 -0.03 0.91 0.89 0.1142 1.2
## X7 0.07 -0.83 0.04 0.69 0.3107 1.0
## X8 0.96 -0.06 0.27 0.99 0.0087 1.2
##
## RC1 RC2 RC3
## SS loadings 2.97 2.05 1.68
## Proportion Var 0.37 0.26 0.21
## Cumulative Var 0.37 0.63 0.84
## Proportion Explained 0.44 0.31 0.25
## Cumulative Proportion 0.44 0.75 1.00
##
## Mean item complexity = 1.2
## Test of the hypothesis that 3 components are sufficient.
##
## The root mean square of the residuals (RMSR) is 0.06
##
## Fit based upon off diagonal values = 0.98
Al hacerlo con 3 factores, en la primer variable, el 0.67% de su varianza es explicada por la solución. La segunda variable, el 0.71% de su varianza es explicada por la extracción. De la tercer variable, el 0.95 de su varianza es explicada. Entonces es una solución representativa de los datos originales.
En los ponderadores que se han extraído, la primera variable que se construya va a tener un ponderador de 0.44, la segunda de 0.31 y la tercera de 0.25.
b. Las variables incluidas en cada factor.
correlaciones_modelo<-variables_pca$coord
rotacion<-varimax(correlaciones_modelo[,1:numero_de_factores])
correlaciones_modelo_rotada<-rotacion$loadings
corrplot(correlaciones_modelo_rotada[,1:numero_de_factores],
is.corr = FALSE,
method = "square",
addCoef.col="grey",
number.cex = 0.75)
La dimensión 1, está representada con X3, X4 y X8. La dimensión 2 está más asociada con X1, X2 y X7. La dimensión 3 está más asociada con X5 y X6.
library(kableExtra)
cargas<-rotacion$loadings[1:8,1:numero_de_factores]
ponderadores<-prop.table(apply(cargas^2,MARGIN = 2,sum))
t(ponderadores) %>% kable(caption="Ponderadores de los Factores Extraídos",
align = "c",
digits = 2) %>%
kable_material(html_font = "sans-serif") %>%
kable_styling(bootstrap_options = c("striped", "hover"))
| Dim.1 | Dim.2 | Dim.3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.25 |
Al factor 1 se le debe asignar un peso del 44%, al factor 2 un peso del 31% y al factor 3 un 25%.
contribuciones<-apply(cargas^2,MARGIN = 2,prop.table)
contribuciones %>% kable(caption="Contribución de las variables en los Factores",
align = "c",
digits = 2) %>%
kable_material(html_font = "sans-serif") %>%
kable_styling(bootstrap_options = c("striped", "hover"))
| Dim.1 | Dim.2 | Dim.3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
| X2 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
| X3 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
| X4 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.04 |
| X5 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| X6 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| X7 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| X8 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.04 |
Para el factor 1, utilice el método CRITIC para obtener los ponderadores normalizados para cada variable.
library(dplyr)
# Funciones para normalizar los datos
norm_directa_a <- function(x){
return((x-min(x)) / (max(x)-min(x)))
}
norm_inverza_a <- function(x){
return((max(x)-x) / (max(x)-min(x)))
}
# Normalización de los datos
datos_parcial_2 %>% dplyr::select(X3,X4,X8) %>%
dplyr::transmute(X3 = norm_directa_a(X3),
X4 = norm_inverza_a(X4),
X8 = norm_directa_a(X8)) -> data_factor_1
print(data_factor_1)
## # A tibble: 108 × 3
## X3 X4 X8
## <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 0.04 0.8 0.158
## 2 0.55 0.5 0.517
## 3 0.4 0.5 0.468
## 4 0.314 0.571 0.413
## 5 0.7 0.25 0.734
## 6 0.16 0.7 0.255
## 7 0.673 0.273 0.714
## 8 0.55 0.5 0.446
## 9 0.4 0.563 0.433
## 10 0.68 0.467 0.552
## # … with 98 more rows
#Cálculo de las desviaciones estándar de cada variable
data_factor_1 %>% dplyr::summarise(S3=sd(X3),S4=sd(X4),S8=sd(X8))-> sd_vector
print(sd_vector)
## # A tibble: 1 × 3
## S3 S4 S8
## <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 0.246 0.201 0.209
#Cálculo de la matriz de correlación
cor(data_factor_1)->mat_R_F1
print(mat_R_F1)
## X3 X4 X8
## X3 1.00000 -0.93872 0.95904
## X4 -0.93872 1.00000 -0.99585
## X8 0.95904 -0.99585 1.00000
#Cálculo de los ponderadores brutos
1-mat_R_F1->sum_data
colSums(sum_data)->sum_vector
sd_vector*sum_vector->vj
print(vj)
## S3 S4 S8
## 1 0.48755 0.79129 0.42517
#Cálculo de los ponderadores netos
vj/sum(vj)->wj
print(wj)
## S3 S4 S8
## 1 0.28612 0.46437 0.24951
#Ponderadores:
print(round(wj*100,2))
## S3 S4 S8
## 1 28.61 46.44 24.95
Para el factor 2, utilice el método de Entropía para obtener los ponderadores normalizados para cada variable.
mat_x1 %>% dplyr::select(X1,X2,X7)->data_norm
apply(data_norm,2,prop.table)->data_norm
print(data_norm)
## X1 X2 X7
## [1,] 0.0078125 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [2,] 0.0086806 0.00212202 0.0076923
## [3,] 0.0086806 0.00707339 0.0111888
## [4,] 0.0069444 0.00106101 0.0244755
## [5,] 0.0060764 0.00247569 0.0055944
## [6,] 0.0052083 0.00459770 0.0174825
## [7,] 0.0095486 0.00318302 0.0062937
## [8,] 0.0078125 0.00106101 0.0041958
## [9,] 0.0086806 0.00141468 0.0034965
## [10,] 0.0104167 0.00212202 0.0041958
## [11,] 0.0112847 0.00141468 0.0020979
## [12,] 0.0095486 0.00070734 0.0062937
## [13,] 0.0104167 0.00424403 0.0013986
## [14,] 0.0147569 0.00141468 0.0027972
## [15,] 0.0086806 0.00636605 0.0160839
## [16,] 0.0104167 0.00070734 0.0048951
## [17,] 0.0078125 0.00141468 0.0125874
## [18,] 0.0060764 0.00247569 0.0125874
## [19,] 0.0069444 0.00318302 0.0027972
## [20,] 0.0095486 0.00282935 0.0153846
## [21,] 0.0104167 0.00707339 0.0097902
## [22,] 0.0095486 0.00565871 0.0013986
## [23,] 0.0095486 0.00176835 0.0111888
## [24,] 0.0060764 0.01061008 0.0209790
## [25,] 0.0069444 0.00565871 0.0027972
## [26,] 0.0086806 0.00636605 0.0048951
## [27,] 0.0104167 0.00565871 0.0062937
## [28,] 0.0052083 0.01061008 0.0111888
## [29,] 0.0086806 0.06825818 0.0020979
## [30,] 0.0095486 0.00141468 0.0069930
## [31,] 0.0086806 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [32,] 0.0043403 0.00141468 0.0027972
## [33,] 0.0112847 0.01237843 0.0069930
## [34,] 0.0069444 0.00141468 0.0055944
## [35,] 0.0060764 0.00106101 0.0048951
## [36,] 0.0190972 0.00813439 0.0076923
## [37,] 0.0086806 0.00212202 0.0034965
## [38,] 0.0078125 0.00353669 0.0090909
## [39,] 0.0078125 0.01591512 0.0027972
## [40,] 0.0078125 0.00282935 0.0013986
## [41,] 0.0095486 0.00282935 0.0034965
## [42,] 0.0095486 0.00353669 0.0076923
## [43,] 0.0052083 0.00070734 0.0139860
## [44,] 0.0112847 0.00176835 0.0034965
## [45,] 0.0069444 0.04244032 0.0209790
## [46,] 0.0069444 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [47,] 0.0086806 0.00141468 0.0027972
## [48,] 0.0060764 0.00106101 0.0020979
## [49,] 0.0086806 0.00353669 0.0069930
## [50,] 0.0086806 0.00389036 0.0027972
## [51,] 0.0069444 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [52,] 0.0052083 0.00389036 0.0076923
## [53,] 0.0121528 0.00282935 0.0027972
## [54,] 0.0052083 0.00070734 0.0062937
## [55,] 0.0130208 0.00159151 0.0209790
## [56,] 0.0095486 0.00106101 0.0020979
## [57,] 0.0052083 0.00459770 0.0650350
## [58,] 0.0182292 0.00070734 0.0041958
## [59,] 0.0095486 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [60,] 0.0104167 0.00176835 0.0048951
## [61,] 0.0069444 0.00247569 0.0125874
## [62,] 0.0295139 0.08311229 0.0650350
## [63,] 0.0078125 0.00070734 0.0097902
## [64,] 0.0104167 0.06825818 0.0440559
## [65,] 0.0069444 0.00707339 0.0034965
## [66,] 0.0104167 0.01061008 0.0020979
## [67,] 0.0086806 0.06790451 0.0118881
## [68,] 0.0086806 0.00459770 0.0209790
## [69,] 0.0104167 0.00565871 0.0069930
## [70,] 0.0052083 0.00070734 0.0111888
## [71,] 0.0104167 0.01591512 0.0013986
## [72,] 0.0086806 0.00318302 0.0195804
## [73,] 0.0086806 0.00212202 0.0041958
## [74,] 0.0078125 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [75,] 0.0112847 0.00212202 0.0041958
## [76,] 0.0086806 0.00212202 0.0020979
## [77,] 0.0086806 0.06790451 0.0013986
## [78,] 0.0086806 0.00247569 0.0041958
## [79,] 0.0086806 0.00106101 0.0027972
## [80,] 0.0069444 0.00636605 0.0125874
## [81,] 0.0078125 0.01061008 0.0209790
## [82,] 0.0295139 0.08311229 0.0650350
## [83,] 0.0060764 0.06861185 0.0034965
## [84,] 0.0095486 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [85,] 0.0086806 0.00176835 0.0034965
## [86,] 0.0060764 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [87,] 0.0052083 0.00106101 0.0027972
## [88,] 0.0130208 0.00176835 0.0062937
## [89,] 0.0086806 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [90,] 0.0138889 0.00212202 0.0069930
## [91,] 0.0078125 0.00176835 0.0062937
## [92,] 0.0043403 0.00141468 0.0013986
## [93,] 0.0034722 0.00141468 0.0020979
## [94,] 0.0121528 0.05057471 0.0027972
## [95,] 0.0078125 0.00141468 0.0048951
## [96,] 0.0199653 0.00247569 0.0048951
## [97,] 0.0086806 0.00141468 0.0027972
## [98,] 0.0078125 0.00247569 0.0048951
## [99,] 0.0095486 0.00282935 0.0440559
## [100,] 0.0295139 0.08311229 0.0650350
## [101,] 0.0060764 0.00106101 0.0034965
## [102,] 0.0052083 0.00141468 0.0020979
## [103,] 0.0104167 0.00106101 0.0013986
## [104,] 0.0104167 0.00565871 0.0020979
## [105,] 0.0060764 0.00070734 0.0013986
## [106,] 0.0104167 0.00636605 0.0125874
## [107,] 0.0026042 0.00282935 0.0111888
## [108,] 0.0095486 0.00212202 0.0020979
#Fórmula de entropía
entropy<-function(x){
return(x*log(x))
}
apply(data_norm,2,entropy)->data_norm_2
print(data_norm_2)
## X1 X2 X7
## [1,] -0.037906 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [2,] -0.041204 -0.0130618 -0.037443
## [3,] -0.041204 -0.0350233 -0.050270
## [4,] -0.034513 -0.0072664 -0.090806
## [5,] -0.031010 -0.0148572 -0.029013
## [6,] -0.027383 -0.0247457 -0.070744
## [7,] -0.044414 -0.0183021 -0.031898
## [8,] -0.037906 -0.0072664 -0.022966
## [9,] -0.041204 -0.0092815 -0.019776
## [10,] -0.047545 -0.0130618 -0.022966
## [11,] -0.050604 -0.0092815 -0.012937
## [12,] -0.044414 -0.0051310 -0.031898
## [13,] -0.047545 -0.0231819 -0.009192
## [14,] -0.062216 -0.0092815 -0.016445
## [15,] -0.041204 -0.0321917 -0.066426
## [16,] -0.047545 -0.0051310 -0.026040
## [17,] -0.037906 -0.0092815 -0.055071
## [18,] -0.031010 -0.0148572 -0.055071
## [19,] -0.034513 -0.0183021 -0.016445
## [20,] -0.044414 -0.0166018 -0.064221
## [21,] -0.047545 -0.0350233 -0.045293
## [22,] -0.044414 -0.0292813 -0.009192
## [23,] -0.044414 -0.0112073 -0.050270
## [24,] -0.031010 -0.0482329 -0.081068
## [25,] -0.034513 -0.0292813 -0.016445
## [26,] -0.041204 -0.0321917 -0.026040
## [27,] -0.047545 -0.0292813 -0.031898
## [28,] -0.027383 -0.0482329 -0.050270
## [29,] -0.041204 -0.1832362 -0.012937
## [30,] -0.044414 -0.0092815 -0.034705
## [31,] -0.041204 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [32,] -0.023610 -0.0092815 -0.016445
## [33,] -0.050604 -0.0543636 -0.034705
## [34,] -0.034513 -0.0092815 -0.029013
## [35,] -0.031010 -0.0072664 -0.026040
## [36,] -0.075591 -0.0391399 -0.037443
## [37,] -0.041204 -0.0130618 -0.019776
## [38,] -0.037906 -0.0199631 -0.042732
## [39,] -0.037906 -0.0658963 -0.016445
## [40,] -0.037906 -0.0166018 -0.009192
## [41,] -0.044414 -0.0166018 -0.019776
## [42,] -0.044414 -0.0199631 -0.037443
## [43,] -0.027383 -0.0051310 -0.059716
## [44,] -0.050604 -0.0112073 -0.019776
## [45,] -0.034513 -0.1340968 -0.081068
## [46,] -0.034513 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [47,] -0.041204 -0.0092815 -0.016445
## [48,] -0.031010 -0.0072664 -0.012937
## [49,] -0.041204 -0.0199631 -0.034705
## [50,] -0.041204 -0.0215886 -0.016445
## [51,] -0.034513 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [52,] -0.027383 -0.0215886 -0.037443
## [53,] -0.053596 -0.0166018 -0.016445
## [54,] -0.027383 -0.0051310 -0.031898
## [55,] -0.056526 -0.0102542 -0.081068
## [56,] -0.044414 -0.0072664 -0.012937
## [57,] -0.027383 -0.0247457 -0.177730
## [58,] -0.073003 -0.0051310 -0.022966
## [59,] -0.044414 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [60,] -0.047545 -0.0112073 -0.026040
## [61,] -0.034513 -0.0148572 -0.055071
## [62,] -0.103974 -0.2067470 -0.177730
## [63,] -0.037906 -0.0051310 -0.045293
## [64,] -0.047545 -0.1832362 -0.137556
## [65,] -0.034513 -0.0350233 -0.019776
## [66,] -0.047545 -0.0482329 -0.012937
## [67,] -0.041204 -0.1826396 -0.052691
## [68,] -0.041204 -0.0247457 -0.081068
## [69,] -0.047545 -0.0292813 -0.034705
## [70,] -0.027383 -0.0051310 -0.050270
## [71,] -0.047545 -0.0658963 -0.009192
## [72,] -0.041204 -0.0183021 -0.077014
## [73,] -0.041204 -0.0130618 -0.022966
## [74,] -0.037906 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [75,] -0.050604 -0.0130618 -0.022966
## [76,] -0.041204 -0.0130618 -0.012937
## [77,] -0.041204 -0.1826396 -0.009192
## [78,] -0.041204 -0.0148572 -0.022966
## [79,] -0.041204 -0.0072664 -0.016445
## [80,] -0.034513 -0.0321917 -0.055071
## [81,] -0.037906 -0.0482329 -0.081068
## [82,] -0.103974 -0.2067470 -0.177730
## [83,] -0.031010 -0.1838310 -0.019776
## [84,] -0.044414 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [85,] -0.041204 -0.0112073 -0.019776
## [86,] -0.031010 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [87,] -0.027383 -0.0072664 -0.016445
## [88,] -0.056526 -0.0112073 -0.031898
## [89,] -0.041204 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [90,] -0.059398 -0.0130618 -0.034705
## [91,] -0.037906 -0.0112073 -0.031898
## [92,] -0.023610 -0.0092815 -0.009192
## [93,] -0.019663 -0.0092815 -0.012937
## [94,] -0.053596 -0.1509303 -0.016445
## [95,] -0.037906 -0.0092815 -0.026040
## [96,] -0.078139 -0.0148572 -0.026040
## [97,] -0.041204 -0.0092815 -0.016445
## [98,] -0.037906 -0.0148572 -0.026040
## [99,] -0.044414 -0.0166018 -0.137556
## [100,] -0.103974 -0.2067470 -0.177730
## [101,] -0.031010 -0.0072664 -0.019776
## [102,] -0.027383 -0.0092815 -0.012937
## [103,] -0.047545 -0.0072664 -0.009192
## [104,] -0.047545 -0.0292813 -0.012937
## [105,] -0.031010 -0.0051310 -0.009192
## [106,] -0.047545 -0.0321917 -0.055071
## [107,] -0.015496 -0.0166018 -0.050270
## [108,] -0.044414 -0.0130618 -0.012937
#Número de variables en el factor:
ncol(data_norm)->m
#Constante de entropía:
-1/log(m)->K
print(K)
## [1] -0.91024
#Cálculo de las entropías
K*colSums(data_norm_2)->Ej
print(Ej)
## X1 X2 X7
## 4.1805 3.2029 3.7019
#Cálculo de las especificidades:
1-Ej->vj
print(vj)
## X1 X2 X7
## -3.1805 -2.2029 -2.7019
#Cálculo de los ponderadores:
prop.table(vj)->wj #es igual a usar vj/sum(vj)
print(wj)
## X1 X2 X7
## 0.39337 0.27245 0.33417
Para el factor 3, utilice el método de Ranking para obtener los ponderadores normalizados para cada variable (utilice la numeración de las variables para establecer la jerarquía).
Por Suma
library(magrittr)
#Vector de Jerarquías
rj<-c(1,2)
names(rj)<-c("X5","X6")
#Función para generar los pesos
ponderadores_subjetivos_rank_suma<-function(vector_jerarquias){
n<-length(vector_jerarquias)
vector_pesos<-n-vector_jerarquias+1
list(w_brutos=vector_pesos,w_normalizados=vector_pesos/sum(vector_pesos))
}
#Aplicando la función:
pesos_ranking_suma<-ponderadores_subjetivos_rank_suma(rj)
#Pesos brutos
pesos_ranking_suma$w_brutos
## X5 X6
## 2 1
#Pesos normalizados
pesos_ranking_suma$w_normalizados %>% round(digits = 3)
## X5 X6
## 0.667 0.333
#Gráfico de los pesos normalizados
barplot(pesos_ranking_suma$w_normalizados,
main = "Ponderadores Ranking de Suma",
ylim = c(0,0.5),col = "red")
Jerarquía Reciproca
#Vector de Jerarquías
rj<-c(1,2)
names(rj)<-c("X5","X6")
#Función para generar los pesos
ponderadores_subjetivos_rank_reciproco<-function(vector_jerarquias){
vector_pesos<-1/vector_jerarquias
list(w_brutos=vector_pesos,w_normalizados=vector_pesos/sum(vector_pesos))
}
#Aplicando la función:
pesos_ranking_reciproco<-ponderadores_subjetivos_rank_reciproco(rj)
#Pesos brutos
pesos_ranking_reciproco$w_brutos
## X5 X6
## 1.0 0.5
#Pesos normalizados
pesos_ranking_reciproco$w_normalizados %>% round(digits = 3)
## X5 X6
## 0.667 0.333
#Gráfico de los pesos normalizados
barplot(pesos_ranking_reciproco$w_normalizados,
main = "Ponderadores Ranking Recíproco",
ylim = c(0,0.5),col = "green")
Jerarquía Exponencial
library(magrittr)
#Vector de Jerarquías
rj<-c(1,2)
names(rj)<-c("X5","X6")
#Función para generar los pesos
ponderadores_subjetivos_rank_exponencial<-function(vector_jerarquias,p=2){
n<-length(vector_jerarquias)
vector_pesos<-(n-vector_jerarquias+1)^p
list(w_brutos=vector_pesos,w_normalizados=vector_pesos/sum(vector_pesos))
}
#Aplicando la función:
pesos_ranking_exponencial<-ponderadores_subjetivos_rank_exponencial(rj)
#Pesos brutos
pesos_ranking_exponencial$w_brutos
## X5 X6
## 4 1
#Pesos normalizados
pesos_ranking_exponencial$w_normalizados %>% round(digits = 3)
## X5 X6
## 0.8 0.2
#Gráfico de los pesos normalizados (por default p=2)
barplot(pesos_ranking_suma$w_normalizados,
main = "Ponderadores Ranking Exponencial",
ylim = c(0,0.5),col = "coral")
#Comparación de valores de "p"
par(mfrow=c(1,3))
for(p in 2:4){
pesos<-ponderadores_subjetivos_rank_exponencial(vector_jerarquias = rj,p = p)
barplot(pesos$w_normalizados,main = paste0("p=",p),ylim = c(0,0.7),col = "coral",cex.main=3,cex.axis = 3)
}