Propofol after multiple freeze-thaw cycles
Propofol samples had pH values outside of manufacturer reported values
Recent aggression in Ukraine has demonstrated the potential need for anesthesia in austere environments where temperature alternates above and below the freezing point of many anesthesia medications. A common anesthetic propofol comes in several formulations that all differ by the antimicrobial additive. One study to date demonstrated a difference in emulsion stability between two different formulations but this study has not been replicated for newer formulations.1 Our research team studied the effects of multiple freeze thaw cycles on propofol with sodium metabisulfite vs Diprivan with EDTA. Our preliminary results indicate significant bottle-to-bottle variability in both formulations with the majority of molecules being less than 5μm but containing some globular formations as large as 100μm. Significant variability in the pH of propofol with sodium metabisulfite was noted and found to be outside of the manufacturer’s stated pH.
Unexpired propofol and Diprivan bottles were obtained and assigned to one of the following categories: No Freeze/Thaw (F/T) cycles, 1 F/T cycle, & 3 F/T cycles.
After being subjected to the F/T cycles above, all samples were then subjected to the following tests: pH, microscopy, Zeta Potential, SPOS, and Laser diffraction.
| Sample | No F/T | 3 F/T |
|---|---|---|
| Diprivan | 7.346 | 7.302 |
| propofol | 4.655 | 3.774 |
Marked variation in pH was noted for generic propofol and 1 sample was outside the manufacturer specified range.
| Sample | F/T Cycles | 10th percentile (𝜇𝑚) | 50th percentile (𝜇𝑚) | 90th percentile (𝜇𝑚) | Mean (𝜇𝑚) | Largest (𝜇𝑚) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diprivan | 0 | 1.63 | 2 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 55 |
| Diprivan | 1 | 1.62 | 2 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 58 |
| Diprivan | 3 | 1.62 | 2 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 108 |
| Propofol | 0 | 1.62 | 2 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 49 |
| Propofol | 1 | 1.63 | 2 | 4 | 2.5 | 101 |
| Propofol | 3 | 1.64 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 71 |
The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or the Department of Defense.