Propofol after multiple freeze-thaw cycles

LCDR Justin Hefley, DNP, CRNA1, LTC John Reed, PhD, CRNA2
  1. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
  2. Dwight D Eisenhower Medical Center

Diprivan and propofol showed increased globular formation after MULTIPLE freeze-thaw cycles.

Propofol samples had pH values outside of manufacturer reported values

Abstract

Recent aggression in Ukraine has demonstrated the potential need for anesthesia in austere environments where temperature alternates above and below the freezing point of many anesthesia medications. A common anesthetic propofol comes in several formulations that all differ by the antimicrobial additive. One study to date demonstrated a difference in emulsion stability between two different formulations but this study has not been replicated for newer formulations.1 Our research team studied the effects of multiple freeze thaw cycles on propofol with sodium metabisulfite vs Diprivan with EDTA. Our preliminary results indicate significant bottle-to-bottle variability in both formulations with the majority of molecules being less than 5μm but containing some globular formations as large as 100μm. Significant variability in the pH of propofol with sodium metabisulfite was noted and found to be outside of the manufacturer’s stated pH.

Methods

  1. Unexpired propofol and Diprivan bottles were obtained and assigned to one of the following categories: No Freeze/Thaw (F/T) cycles, 1 F/T cycle, & 3 F/T cycles.

  2. After being subjected to the F/T cycles above, all samples were then subjected to the following tests: pH, microscopy, Zeta Potential, SPOS, and Laser diffraction.

Results

pH

Sample No F/T 3 F/T
Diprivan 7.346 7.302
propofol 4.655 3.774

Marked variation in pH was noted for generic propofol and 1 sample was outside the manufacturer specified range.

Microscopy

Diprivan 3 F/T cycles

propofol 3 F/T cycles

Sample distribution by SPOS

Sample F/T Cycles 10th percentile (𝜇𝑚) 50th percentile (𝜇𝑚) 90th percentile (𝜇𝑚) Mean (𝜇𝑚) Largest (𝜇𝑚)
Diprivan 0 1.63 2 3.7 2.4 55
Diprivan 1 1.62 2 3.5 2.3 58
Diprivan 3 1.62 2 3.3 2.3 108
Propofol 0 1.62 2 3.9 2.4 49
Propofol 1 1.63 2 4 2.5 101
Propofol 3 1.64 2.1 3.8 2.5 71

Diprivan No F/T cycles

Propofol No F/T cycles

Diprivan 3 F/T cycles

Propofol 3 F/T cycles

Discussion

Large clumps of propofol > 5𝜇𝑚 were noted in all samples including control samples of both Diprivan and generic propofol, but this only accounted for 3-5% of total molecules in the samples. Increases in globular formation size did occur with freeze/thaw cycles. Further testing is needed to determine if shaking the vial before administering or utilizing a filter needle will reduce or remove these large molecules to increase the safety profile for those at risk of lipid embolism.


Disclaimer

The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or the Department of Defense.

  • Neither I nor my family members have a financial interest in any commercial product, service, or organization providing financial support for this research.
  • References to non-Federal entities or products do not constitute or imply a Department of Defense or Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences endorsement.
  • This work was prepared by a military or civilian employee of the US Government as part of the individual’s official duties and therefore is in the public domain and does not possess copyright protection (public domain information may be freely distributed and copied; however, as a courtesy it is requested that the Uniformed Services University and the author be given an appropriate acknowledgement).
  • References

    1.
    Han J, Davis S, Washington C. Physical properties and stability of two emulsion formulations of propofol. Int J Pharm. 2001;11(215):207-220. doi:10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00692-x