The following table displays the four recorded types of vehicular incidents and some relevant cooresponding data. One highly valuable piece of information that can be derived from this is the fact that the majority of incidents occur between one or two moving vehicles. With further study into, it should be possible to find ways to prevent these common and costly collisions.
| incident_type | median_auto_year | median_claim_amount | median_age | Totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-vehicle Collision | 2006.0 | 61650 | 39.0 | 419 |
| Parked Car | 2005.0 | 5490 | 36.5 | 84 |
| Single Vehicle Collision | 2005.0 | 62640 | 38.0 | 403 |
| Vehicle Theft | 2004.5 | 5495 | 38.0 | 94 |
This table uses much of the same info as before with the type of incident switched out for the time frame of said incident. With this representation, we can find similarly valuable realizations. For example, the the time frames with the most collisions are from 10am-5pm and from midnight to 6am. This data could be due to the wider tracked time frame but it could also indicate peek hours of reckless driving.
| time_frame | median_auto_year | median_claim_amount | median_age | Totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10a.m.-4:59p.m. | 2005 | 61490 | 38 | 293 |
| 10p.m.-midnight | 2006 | 62920 | 39 | 89 |
| 5p.m.-7:59p.m. | 2005 | 60190 | 40 | 135 |
| 6a.m.-9:59a.m. | 2005 | 40320 | 38 | 163 |
| 8p.m.-9:59p.m. | 2005 | 60205 | 39 | 76 |
| midnight-5:59a.m. | 2005 | 52590 | 36 | 244 |
This final table aggregates the previous two tables into one to allow for further info to be derived. This table may be slightly less legible due to the increased density of data but it allows for more specific insights to be made. One interesting realization that can be made in regards to this newly aggregated table is that no vehicle theft was reported between the hours of 10pm to midnight. This is fascinating as many would consider this to be a time where they and their belongings, such as a their vehicle, would be at higher risk for theft.
| time_frame | incident_type | median_auto_year | median_claim_amount | median_age | Totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10a.m.-4:59p.m. | Multi-vehicle Collision | 2007.0 | 60750 | 38.0 | 137 |
| 10a.m.-4:59p.m. | Parked Car | 2004.0 | 5900 | 40.0 | 7 |
| 10a.m.-4:59p.m. | Single Vehicle Collision | 2004.0 | 63700 | 39.0 | 138 |
| 10a.m.-4:59p.m. | Vehicle Theft | 2005.0 | 6820 | 40.0 | 11 |
| 10p.m.-midnight | Multi-vehicle Collision | 2008.0 | 64800 | 40.0 | 41 |
| 10p.m.-midnight | Parked Car | 2013.0 | 5700 | 41.0 | 3 |
| 10p.m.-midnight | Single Vehicle Collision | 2004.0 | 62640 | 37.0 | 45 |
| 5p.m.-7:59p.m. | Multi-vehicle Collision | 2005.0 | 61400 | 41.0 | 65 |
| 5p.m.-7:59p.m. | Parked Car | 2011.0 | 6490 | 37.0 | 5 |
| 5p.m.-7:59p.m. | Single Vehicle Collision | 2005.0 | 61110 | 41.0 | 62 |
| 5p.m.-7:59p.m. | Vehicle Theft | 2000.0 | 5100 | 28.0 | 3 |
| 6a.m.-9:59a.m. | Multi-vehicle Collision | 2004.0 | 64320 | 39.0 | 41 |
| 6a.m.-9:59a.m. | Parked Car | 2005.5 | 5830 | 39.0 | 34 |
| 6a.m.-9:59a.m. | Single Vehicle Collision | 2006.0 | 63685 | 37.5 | 46 |
| 6a.m.-9:59a.m. | Vehicle Theft | 2006.0 | 4975 | 38.0 | 42 |
| 8p.m.-9:59p.m. | Multi-vehicle Collision | 2005.0 | 61440 | 39.0 | 47 |
| 8p.m.-9:59p.m. | Parked Car | 2004.0 | 5005 | 32.0 | 2 |
| 8p.m.-9:59p.m. | Single Vehicle Collision | 2005.0 | 59355 | 38.0 | 22 |
| 8p.m.-9:59p.m. | Vehicle Theft | 2005.0 | 6500 | 35.0 | 5 |
| midnight-5:59a.m. | Multi-vehicle Collision | 2006.0 | 61625 | 36.5 | 88 |
| midnight-5:59a.m. | Parked Car | 2004.0 | 4900 | 34.0 | 33 |
| midnight-5:59a.m. | Single Vehicle Collision | 2005.0 | 60185 | 36.0 | 90 |
| midnight-5:59a.m. | Vehicle Theft | 2004.0 | 5220 | 39.0 | 33 |
The following chart is a great visual example of much of the information above. It allows for you to be able to quickly distinguish between which incident type is most common and when. One striking feature of the chart below is the fact that single car and multiple car collisions seem to alternate between being the most common at any given period. From a quick analysis it may be possible to deduce that single car collisions are more likely in the morning while multiple car collisions are more likely in the afternoon. Looking more into the number could easily help support this.
Finally, the graph below shows a series of box plots that aim to show any correlation between the incident types, their quantity, and the age of those who committed/experienced them. One interesting relationship that can be made noticed based on the plot below could be that collisions are more likely as you age while parking and vehicle theft remain consistent. This could be an anomaly based on the limited number of reports though so more data could either support or deny this.