The four programs being evaluated in this report are:
Bridges to Success is a course designed to help preparing new students at the Colin Powell School to turn their college experience into personal and professional success. This course’s goal is to help students in:
In this report, data collected from students who completed this course in Fall 2021 and Spring 2022 were analyzed, aiming to investigate whether students’ success in college and future career would be beneficial from the materials and lectures discussed in the course.
Originally, there were 99 students enrolled in Fall 2021 and 71 enrolled in Spring 2022
| Semester | Student Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Fall 2021 | 99 | 58 |
| Spring 2022 | 71 | 42 |
About 69% of the enrolled students were born in the US, with 29.8% of these students were first generation attending college. Among 31% of the students born outside of the US, 35.7% were first generation in their family to attend college.
70% of the enrolled students were Freshman students, and 11% were New Transfer Students. Most students were from New York City.
In Fall 2021, 88 out of 99 students successfully completed/passed the course. In Spring 2022, 64 out of 71 successfully completed/passed the course. The data in the table below did record students who dropped the course early.
##
## A B C D P F INC WU
## Fall 2021 39 44 5 0 0 0 3 6
## Spring 2022 32 26 4 1 1 2 4 0
Fall 2021 students appeared to do better in term of performance compared to those who took the class in Spring 2022.
To evaluate the success of the Bridges to Success Course, we assessed students’ level of confidence BEFORE/AFTER completing the course across six (6) different domains:
When comparing students’ confidence level in each domain, a score of 3 was considered as the satisfactory level as the students were rating on a 5-point scale. Any measurement above this satisfactory level was considered as higher confidence level, whereas any measurement lying below this was considered as lower confidence.
##
## Paired t-test
##
## data: After and Before
## t = 4.4858, df = 89, p-value = 1.081e-05
## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is greater than 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 2.531843 Inf
## sample estimates:
## mean difference
## 4.022222
## [1] "standard deviation"
## [1] 5.181162
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: bsc_predict_df$post_score and bsc_predict_df$S22_gpa
## t = 0.46487, df = 35, p-value = 0.6449
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.2520810 0.3923955
## sample estimates:
## cor
## 0.07833647
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = S22_gpa ~ post_score, data = bsc_predict_df)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.93567 -0.34465 0.09811 0.51157 0.81331
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 3.128741 0.280033 11.173 4.31e-13 ***
## post_score 0.007244 0.015583 0.465 0.645
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 0.6598 on 35 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.006137, Adjusted R-squared: -0.02226
## F-statistic: 0.2161 on 1 and 35 DF, p-value: 0.6449
Number of survey submitted:
## [1] 60
However, a few students completed the survey more than once, such as:
| Name | Counts | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allegra Durante | 2 |
| 3 | Christanya Symplice | 2 |
| 5 | Esmirna Mateo | 2 |
Therefore, all of the rating scores items for these students will be the average score.
Since there is one question asked twice in the survey and the students’ rating were not consistent, the average rate was used in this analysis.
| Time Tracking Method | Student Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Company Hour Tracking System | 11 | 18 |
| CPS Time Sheet | 12 | 20 |
| Google Sheets/Excel | 13 | 22 |
| Other | 8 | 13 |
| Paper Notes | 16 | 27 |
There were 8 supervisors would liked to be contacted by CPS team to discuss more about the interns’ experience at their program.
All supervisors reported 100% of the participated students attended the program and met the objective requirements.
| Attendance | Performance | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Yes | 100 |
The supervisors who need to be contacted were:
| Supervisor Name | Supervisor Email | Internship Site | Intern Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alice Mills Mai | info@centeringwholeness.com | Centering Wholeness Counseling | Katherine Vargas |
| Alice Mills Mai | info@centeringwholeness.com | Centering Wholeness Counseling | Khalil Gallop |
| Laura Liberman MD | libermal@mskcc.org | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY | Alexis Dickerson |
| Jennifer Taveras | Jtaveras@ccny.cuny.edu | Stem Institute | Alexander Pichol |
| Maureen Ramirez | mramirez@nycers.org | NYCERS | Jay Garcia |
| Dr Ousmane Aly PAME | redes.ecovillages@gmail.com | Le Réseau pour l’Emergence & le Développement des Ecovillages au Sahel (REDES) | Ondrea Kanwhen |
| Nathalie Lebron | nathalie.lebron@cuny.islg.edu | CUNY Institute for State and Local Governance | Sultonmirzo Ravshanbekov |
| Sarah Hayes | sarah@glimmer.org | A Glimmer of Hope | Monica Scotti |
| Meeting Goal? | Student Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Not sure | 5 | 8 |
| Yes | 55 | 92 |
The students who were unsure if they meet their goal are:
| Student | The internship helps gaining confidence in professional setting | Supervisor rating | The internship helps with professional networking | The internship helps gaining more career knowledge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christanya Symplice | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.0 |
| Christine Bascombe | 2 | 5.0 | 2 | 5.0 |
| Tara Snover | 4 | 4.0 | 5 | 1.0 |
| Vanessa Crowe | 4 | 5.0 | 3 | 4.5 |
| Yi Wendy Ng Liang | 4 | 5.0 | 4 | 4.0 |
When checking data from the intern organization we noticed that only
two (2) of these students had their supervisors completed the
survey.
Both students got high rating from their supervisor across the
board.
| Student | Supervisor | Site | Attendance? | Meet objectives? | Willing to improve? | Intern Rating | Quality of Work | Time management skill |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christanya Symplice | Sarah Martin | New York City Department of Education - Office of Policy & Evaluation | Yes | Yes | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Yi Wendy Ng Liang | Cindy-Ann Pascall | Brooklyn TCAC | Yes | Yes | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Christanya Symplice were also one of the three students who completed this survey more than once. So it’ll be more reliable to check her raw data to see if her responses were consistent. And they were not.
Here is the inconsistency in her responses
| Meet Goal? | Opinion about the Internship | The internship helps gaining more career knowledge | The internship helps gaining confidence in professional setting | Supervisor rating | The internship helps with professional networking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | Learn how data is able to create a voice for change. | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Not sure | no highlight | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Christanya Symplice’s supervisor at the New York City Department of Education - Office of Policy & Evaluation - Ms. Sarah Martin’s opinion about Christanya Symplice was:
| I would say overall, the highlight of having Christanya on our team so far has been her great questions! She challenges us to name why we do what we do - and every team needs someone who does that! She has brought her past experience as a parent coordinator into our work - and that experience and first-hand knowledge is invaluable to us! |
Students’ rating score were relatively above the average line across
all measures:
1. How beneficial the internship was in building students’
confidence.
2. How helpful their supervisors were during the internship.
3. How beneficial the internship was for students to gain professional
connection.
4. How much info about student’s career path they learned through the
internship.
Supervisors’ rating score were relatively above the average line
across all measures:
1. The intern’s willingness to take challenge and improvement.
2. The intern’s evaluation in general.
3. The intern’s quality of work.
4. The intern’s time management skill.
Colin Powell School Fellowships are programs provided annually for both undergraduate and graduate students, aiming to create a platform to help student gain experience in their field of study.
In this report, we focused on four (4) fellowship programs:
Each program was design to connect students with different organization specialized in the students’ field study, and help them building specific skill sets neccessary for their future career.
There are a total of 136 students applied to Colin Powell Fellowship Programs this 2022, in which we received 67 applications for Climate Policy Fellows Program, 23 applications for Colin Powell Fellowship in Leadership and Public Service, 21 for NBCU Academy Fellows Program, and 25 for Racial Justice Fellows Program.
| Program | Counts |
|---|---|
| Climate Policy Fellows Program | 67 |
| Colin Powell Fellowship in Leadership and Public Service | 23 |
| NBCU Academy Fellows Program | 21 |
| Racial Justice Fellows Program | 25 |
A large portion of the applicants is Asian (n = 41) followed by Black/African American (n = 33) and Latinx (n = 30)
Most applicants reported that they learned about these fellowship programs from Emails (n = 75), Faculty (n = 50) and Peers (n = 34).
About 55% of the applicants were born in the US (n = 73)
| US Born? | Student Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| No | 57 | 43 |
| Prefer not to state | 3 | 2 |
| Yes | 73 | 55 |
Among these US Born Applicants, only 21% having US Born parents.
| Parents were US Born? | Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| No | 44 | 33 |
| Prefer not to state | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 28 | 21 |
49% applicants reported having at least one parents graduated from college.
| At least 1 Parent with College Degree? | Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| No | 62 | 47 |
| Prefer not to state | 6 | 5 |
| Yes | 65 | 49 |
The majority of applicants considered themselves as females (She/Her/Hers, n = 77) while 49 applicants considered themselves as males (He/Him/His). There were also other types of gender identity being reported (n = 8 or 6%).
| Pronouns | Student Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| He/Him/His | 49 | 37 |
| He/Him/They/Them | 3 | 2 |
| Name | 1 | 1 |
| She/He/They | 1 | 1 |
| She/Her/Hers | 77 | 57 |
| She/Her/They/Them | 2 | 1 |
| They/Them/Theirs | 1 | 1 |
The overall acceptance rate was 52%, with 71 applications being accepted and 65 being rejected.
| Decision | Student Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted | 71 | 52 |
| Rejected | 65 | 48 |
1. Were applicants who were US Born more likely to be accepted?
By comparing Final Decision (Accepted or Rejected) between US-born and non-US-born applicants, there was not much of a difference in acceptance rate between US Born applicant () and Non-US Born applicants.
2. Were applicants whose parent was with a college degree more likely to be accepted?
Similarly, there is no difference in acceptance rate among applicants whose parents with or without a college degree.
3. Were applicants who had participated previously in another fellowship more likely to be accepted?
There is no difference in acceptance rate between applicants with or without previous fellowship experience.
4. Do being a full Time status and having more Current Credits affect acceptance rate?“
The majority of the applicants (96%) has been taken classes full-time and will continue their next semester as full-time students. Therefore, students’ status does not really affect applicants’ chance to be accepted to a fellowship program.
While comparing differences in number of current credit among applicants to see if this attributes would affect students’ chance to be accepted in a fellowship program, we noticed that accepted applicants tend to have slightly more number of credits.
However, an independent t-test indicated NO SIGNIFICANT difference in number of current credits between Accepted (M = 72 credits) and Rejected Applicants (M = 69 credits), t(131) = 0.3841, p = 0.7015.
##
## Two Sample t-test
##
## data: response$credit by response$Final.Decision
## t = 0.38414, df = 131, p-value = 0.7015
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group Accepted and group Rejected is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -10.35064 15.33922
## sample estimates:
## mean in group Accepted mean in group Rejected
## 71.63714 69.14286
Cummulative GPA is also an important attribute to assess students’ college performance. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate if applicants’ GPA affect acceptance rate.
In this analysis, we consider GPA = 3.0 as the GPA satisfied level, with GPA > 3.0 as higher level of college performance and GPA < 3.0 as lower level of college performance.
Based on the boxplot and mean bar visualization, Accepted Applicants appeared to have slightly higher mean GPA all though the majority of the applicants (both Accepted and Rejected) had GPA > 3.0 (higher level of college performance)
##
## Two Sample t-test
##
## data: response$Cumulative.GPA by response$Final.Decision
## t = 0.92771, df = 134, p-value = 0.3552
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group Accepted and group Rejected is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.1687849 0.4670072
## sample estimates:
## mean in group Accepted mean in group Rejected
## 3.316296 3.167185
However, an independent t-test indicated NO SIGNIFICANT difference in Cumulative GPA between Accepted (M = 3.3163) and Rejected Applicants (M = 3.1672), t(134) = 0.9277, p = 0.3552.
Since there was NO SIGNIFICANT difference in Cummulative GPA between Accepted and Rejected Applicants, there might be a chance that different fellowship program weighting the GPA attribute differently.
By visualizing GPA difference across programs with boxplot and mean error bar, we noticed that:
Still, all of the error overlaps, there were NO SIGNIFICANT difference in Accepted Applicant GPA across programs.
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## program 3 0.16 0.05341 0.214 0.886
## Residuals 63 15.71 0.24939
A One Way ANOVA test also confirmed such result: NO SIGNIFICANT difference in Cumulative was found across program, F(3, 63) = 0.214, p = 0.886.
However, there were 5 applicants who got accepted but latter declined the offer, leaving only 66 students actually participated in the fellowship program after being accepted.
| Decision | Student Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted | 69 | 51 |
| Accepted but Declined | 5 | 4 |
| Rejected | 62 | 46 |
The five later declined applicants were 2 from Racial Justice Fellows Program and 1 in each of the other three programs: NBCU Academy Fellows Program (1), Climate Policy Fellows Program (1), and Colin Powell Fellowship in Leadership and Public Service (1), leaving the actual participated students in this year fellowship being distributed as:
| Program | Application Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Climate Policy Fellows Program | 26 | 38 |
| Colin Powell Fellowship in Leadership and Public Service | 14 | 20 |
| NBCU Academy Fellows Program | 14 | 20 |
| Racial Justice Fellows Program | 15 | 22 |
Colin Powell Fellowship in Leadership and Public Service is the program that has been in service the longest time out of the four program.
According to our data, there has been a decline of 34.29% in number of total applications from 35 applicants in 2020 to 23 applications in 2022.
However, the program’s acceptance rate has been increasing consistently from 31.43% in 2020, to 51.85% in 2021, and currently peaks at 65.22% in 2022.
| Year | Acceptance Rate |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 43.75 |
| 2019 | 35.29 |
| 2020 | 31.43 |
| 2021 | 51.85 |
| 2022 | 65.22 |
Racial Justice Fellows Program has been in service since 2020, but has been consistently receiving less and less applications over the past three years, decreasing 63.24% from the total of 68 applications in 2020 to 25 applications in 2022.
| Year | Acceptance Rate |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 19.12 |
| 2021 | 39.22 |
| 2022 | 60.00 |
Similar to Racial Justice Fellow Program, Climate Policy Fellows Program has been in service since 2020. Like other programs, the total number application applied to Climate Policy Program was decreasing 21.18% from 85 applications in 2021 to 67 applications in 2022.
| Year | Acceptance Rate |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 35.62 |
| 2021 | 35.29 |
| 2022 | 40.30 |
NBCU Academy Fellows Program started to provide connections and support for students since 2021. Still, like others, the total number of application declining from 26 to 21 applications in 2022.
| Year | Acceptance Rate |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 57.69 |
| 2022 | 71.43 |
The data collected for the Internship Program at Colin Powell in 2022 divided the student body into two different categories:
There were a total of 555 participated in the program with 219 senior students and 336 Freshman/Sophomore/Junior students.
| Student Categories | Counts | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Not yet a senior | 336 | 60.54 |
| Senior | 219 | 39.46 |
Among Freshman/Sophomore/Junior, the majority student participated in the internship programs were from Psychology major (n = 149, 44.48%), following by Administration and Management (n = 45) and Economics (n = 36)
Among Seniors and Graduate Students, the majority student participated in the internship programs were also from Psychology major (n = 87, 43.07%), following by Political Science (n = 26) and Economics (n = 26)
As being reported, the majority of students at all college level hope to find job in Public/Government sector:
As being reported, the majority of students at all college level hope to find job in Counseling and Human resoucse.
In both group, the majority of students in both group hope to change in mental health issue and racial justice.
Comparing between the two group, senior students were more aware of CPDI service as a resource whereas both CPDI service and LinkIned Page were popular among Freshman/Sophomore/Junior students. Nonetheless, both group were not aware much of Colin Powell Career Handbook.
A large number of students in both group have never participated in any Colin Powell events.