Question No: 1
Aspirin_A <- c(15,26,13,28,17,20,07,36,12,18)
Aspirin_B <- c(13,20,10,21,17,22,05,30,07,11)
Answer to the question 1.a)
here, for Null Hypothesis, Ho: u1=u2: u1-u2=0
So The mean of Aspirin A is equal to mean of Aspirin B
alternative Hypothesis: H1: u1=!u2: u1-u2=!0
So the mean of AspirinA is not equal to mean of AspirinB.
t.test(Aspirin_A,Aspirin_B,paired=TRUE)
##
## Paired t-test
##
## data: Aspirin_A and Aspirin_B
## t = 3.6742, df = 9, p-value = 0.005121
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 1.383548 5.816452
## sample estimates:
## mean of the differences
## 3.6
Answer to Question 1.b)
Here from the summary We see P value =0.005121 which is less than 0.05, So We reject null hypothesis
t.test(Aspirin_A,Aspirin_B,alternative = "two.sided",paired = FALSE)
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: Aspirin_A and Aspirin_B
## t = 0.9802, df = 17.811, p-value = 0.3401
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -4.12199 11.32199
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 19.2 15.6
Answer to the question 1.c)
The P value of tested hypothesis using two sample t-test is 0.3401
Question :2
Active_exercise <- c(9.50,10.00,9.75,9.75,9.00,13.0)
No_Exercise <- c(11.50,12.00,13.25,11.50,13.00,9.00)
Answer to the question 2.a)
here, for Null Hypothesis, Ho: u1=u2: u1-u2=0
So The mean of active exercise is equal to mean of no exercise
alternative Hypothesis: H1: u1=!u2: u1-u2=!0
So the mean of active exercise is not equal to mean of no exercise.
qqnorm(Active_exercise,main = "Active Exercise")
qqline(Active_exercise)
qqnorm(No_Exercise,main="No Exercise")
qqline(No_Exercise)
boxplot(Active_exercise,No_Exercise,names=c("Active Exercise","No Exercise"))
Answer to the question 2.b)
there is not enough data points to claim the normality and constant variarnce.
So we have to analysis data using non- parametric method.
wilcox.test(Active_exercise,No_Exercise, alternative = "less")
## Warning in wilcox.test.default(Active_exercise, No_Exercise, alternative =
## "less"): cannot compute exact p-value with ties
##
## Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
##
## data: Active_exercise and No_Exercise
## W = 9, p-value = 0.08523
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is less than 0
Answer to the question 2.c)
From the wilcox test summary we see the P-value is 0.08523 which is greater than alpha(0.05)
So we accept null hypothesis thats means, mean of Active Exercise is equal to mean of No Exercise.
Conclusion: There is not enough evidence to conclude that two groups differ in the typical time required to first walking.