## # A tibble: 384 × 5
## # Groups: symbol [2]
## symbol date price change text
## <chr> <date> <dbl> <dbl> <glue>
## 1 GDPC1 1947-01-01 2034. NA 1947.1,
## Growth: NA
## 2 GDPC1 1947-04-01 2029. -0.00267 1947.2,
## Growth: -0.3%
## 3 GDPC1 1947-07-01 2025. -0.00207 1947.3,
## Growth: -0.2%
## 4 GDPC1 1947-10-01 2057. 0.0156 1947.4,
## Growth: 1.6%
## 5 GDPC1 1948-01-01 2087. 0.0150 1948.1,
## Growth: 1.5%
## 6 GDPC1 1948-04-01 2122. 0.0165 1948.2,
## Growth: 1.7%
## 7 GDPC1 1948-07-01 2134. 0.00573 1948.3,
## Growth: 0.6%
## 8 GDPC1 1948-10-01 2136. 0.00112 1948.4,
## Growth: 0.1%
## 9 GDPC1 1949-01-01 2107. -0.0138 1949.1,
## Growth: -1.4%
## 10 GDPC1 1949-04-01 2100. -0.00341 1949.2,
## Growth: -0.3%
## # … with 374 more rows
Timing Have seemingly had more lows than highs when it comes to company growth, the company was largely impacted negatively everything since the recession in 2008.
Depth The chart showcases the growth to kind of plateau ever since 2007, the company hasn’t grown very much since then.
Duration The duration in sales matches up with the GDP for the most part, they share very similar results throughout the timeline of the companies lifespan.