## # A tibble: 384 × 5
## # Groups:   symbol [2]
##    symbol date       price   change text                
##    <chr>  <date>     <dbl>    <dbl> <glue>              
##  1 GDPC1  1947-01-01 2034. NA       1947.1,
## Growth: NA   
##  2 GDPC1  1947-04-01 2029. -0.00267 1947.2,
## Growth: -0.3%
##  3 GDPC1  1947-07-01 2025. -0.00207 1947.3,
## Growth: -0.2%
##  4 GDPC1  1947-10-01 2057.  0.0156  1947.4,
## Growth: 1.6% 
##  5 GDPC1  1948-01-01 2087.  0.0150  1948.1,
## Growth: 1.5% 
##  6 GDPC1  1948-04-01 2122.  0.0165  1948.2,
## Growth: 1.7% 
##  7 GDPC1  1948-07-01 2134.  0.00573 1948.3,
## Growth: 0.6% 
##  8 GDPC1  1948-10-01 2136.  0.00112 1948.4,
## Growth: 0.1% 
##  9 GDPC1  1949-01-01 2107. -0.0138  1949.1,
## Growth: -1.4%
## 10 GDPC1  1949-04-01 2100. -0.00341 1949.2,
## Growth: -0.3%
## # … with 374 more rows

Timing Have seemingly had more lows than highs when it comes to company growth, the company was largely impacted negatively everything since the recession in 2008.

Depth The chart showcases the growth to kind of plateau ever since 2007, the company hasn’t grown very much since then.

Duration The duration in sales matches up with the GDP for the most part, they share very similar results throughout the timeline of the companies lifespan.