1 Survey Diagnostics this Week

1.1 Overview by Province

Surveys Completed from August 24-30, 2022
Municipality Total Surveys Recontact Rate Avg Duration N Enumerators
Kampong Cham 185 57% 33.93 8
Siem Reap 387 73% 35.61 14
Stung Saen 176 88% 29.19 7
Total 748 73% 33.68 25

1.2 Overview by Enumerator

Enumerator Summary: Surveys Completed on August 24-30, 2022
Enumerator Municipality N Surveys Recontact Rate Avg Duration Under 30 min
Hoeung Soram Stung Saen 19 95% 24.92 17
Ret Doun Siem Reap 3 0% 25.14 3
In Seyha Siem Reap 21 43% 26.49 17
Yiem Nim Stung Saen 23 96% 27.83 18
Voeuk Khoeun Stung Saen 26 100% 28.07 20
Seng Bunthay Stung Saen 30 73% 28.68 18
Kheng SreyToch Stung Saen 26 81% 29.76 16
Ret Doun Kampong Cham 25 44% 30.57 10
Sales Mouseu Kampong Cham 25 80% 31.1 11
Yorn Khnhey Stung Saen 26 100% 31.27 11
Ren Borath Siem Reap 42 64% 32.2 14
Khut Sambo Stung Saen 26 77% 32.57 8
Pek Kea Siem Reap 31 81% 32.86 13
Sreang Kimheng Siem Reap 4 25% 32.89 2
Un Chhuy Siem Reap 36 81% 33.65 8
Huom sayan Siem Reap 37 76% 33.77 9
Chay Thona Kampong Cham 35 66% 33.99 7
Chhon Soda Kampong Cham 14 64% 34.08 3
Sreang Kimheng Kampong Cham 26 50% 34.16 4
Ly Hengtry Siem Reap 34 85% 34.25 9
Em Sambath Kampong Cham 17 47% 34.77 2
Suon Savoeun Siem Reap 3 0% 34.94 0
Hieng Samnang Kampong Cham 18 33% 36.63 1
Kheat Phun Siem Reap 39 67% 36.64 0
Suon Savoeun Kampong Cham 25 64% 37.21 0
Hieng Samnang Siem Reap 5 40% 37.26 0
Sang Phally Siem Reap 39 62% 38.45 3
Tong Vanndy Siem Reap 51 100% 40.83 4
Pay Danech Siem Reap 42 74% 40.93 0
Enumerators listed in order of shortest average duration.

1.3 List Experiment

List Experiment Diagnostics by Enumerator: August 24-30, 2022
Enumerator Municipality N Surveys N Zero Responses Avg Time (Min) Shortest Time (Min)
In Seyha Siem Reap 21 13 0.81 0.58
Tong Vanndy Siem Reap 51 27 0.83 0.05
Yiem Nim Stung Saen 23 18 0.83 0.6
Hoeung Soram Stung Saen 19 14 0.85 0.65
Kheng SreyToch Stung Saen 26 24 0.86 0.02
Ret Doun Siem Reap 3 2 0.88 0.83
Kheat Phun Siem Reap 39 23 0.89 0.47
Sang Phally Siem Reap 39 19 0.9 0.55
Ren Borath Siem Reap 42 30 0.97 0.72
Pay Danech Siem Reap 42 32 0.98 0.75
Sreang Kimheng Siem Reap 4 2 0.99 0.87
Chay Thona Kampong Cham 35 24 1.05 0.42
Khut Sambo Stung Saen 26 20 1.05 0.63
Pek Kea Siem Reap 31 9 1.05 0.53
Ret Doun Kampong Cham 25 18 1.11 0.73
Chhon Soda Kampong Cham 14 9 1.14 0.58
Hieng Samnang Siem Reap 5 4 1.14 1.08
Seng Bunthay Stung Saen 30 19 1.18 0.65
Hieng Samnang Kampong Cham 18 15 1.19 0.97
Sreang Kimheng Kampong Cham 26 14 1.23 0.73
Un Chhuy Siem Reap 36 17 1.23 -0.02
Ly Hengtry Siem Reap 34 20 1.26 0.75
Huom sayan Siem Reap 37 26 1.35 0.97
Yorn Khnhey Stung Saen 26 22 1.4 0.88
Voeuk Khoeun Stung Saen 26 12 1.41 0.78
Sales Mouseu Kampong Cham 25 13 1.44 0.93
Suon Savoeun Kampong Cham 25 18 1.73 1.03
Em Sambath Kampong Cham 17 7 1.8 1.3
Suon Savoeun Siem Reap 3 1 1.83 1.48
Enumerators listed in order of shortest average list experiment duration.

1.4 Conjoint

Conjoint Diagnostics by Enumerator: August 24-30, 2022
Enumerator Municipality Conjoint 1 Conjoint 2 Conjoint 3 Total
In Seyha Siem Reap 0.78 0.33 0.35 1.46
Sang Phally Siem Reap 0.59 0.41 0.47 1.47
Kheng SreyToch Stung Saen 0.67 0.48 0.49 1.64
Hoeung Soram Stung Saen 0.77 0.53 0.55 1.85
Yiem Nim Stung Saen 0.77 0.57 0.6 1.94
Seng Bunthay Stung Saen 0.96 0.59 0.44 1.99
Hieng Samnang Siem Reap 0.88 0.55 0.56 1.99
Ly Hengtry Siem Reap 0.92 0.55 0.52 1.99
Em Sambath Kampong Cham 0.89 0.67 0.48 2.04
Kheat Phun Siem Reap 0.91 0.6 0.54 2.05
Chay Thona Kampong Cham 0.78 0.65 0.62 2.05
Ren Borath Siem Reap 1.04 0.55 0.47 2.06
Sales Mouseu Kampong Cham 0.95 0.55 0.58 2.08
Pek Kea Siem Reap 0.95 0.59 0.57 2.11
Pay Danech Siem Reap 1.01 0.58 0.56 2.15
Tong Vanndy Siem Reap 1.03 0.53 0.6 2.16
Ret Doun Kampong Cham 1 0.67 0.52 2.19
Hieng Samnang Kampong Cham 1.03 0.56 0.62 2.21
Ret Doun Siem Reap 0.92 0.62 0.72 2.26
Un Chhuy Siem Reap 1.01 0.54 0.78 2.33
Voeuk Khoeun Stung Saen 1.16 0.61 0.6 2.37
Sreang Kimheng Kampong Cham 1.24 0.55 0.6 2.39
Sreang Kimheng Siem Reap 1.21 0.68 0.5 2.39
Yorn Khnhey Stung Saen 0.92 0.74 0.82 2.48
Khut Sambo Stung Saen 1.09 0.71 0.73 2.53
Suon Savoeun Siem Reap 1.08 0.8 0.69 2.57
Suon Savoeun Kampong Cham 1.21 0.75 0.62 2.58
Huom sayan Siem Reap 1.16 0.79 0.71 2.66
Chhon Soda Kampong Cham 1.46 0.79 0.81 3.06
Enumerators listed in order of shortest average total conjoint duration.

1.5 Agreement Questions

This table shows the average HHI, by enumerator, of the responses to 13 agreement-style questions in the survey. The HHI is a metric that indicates the ‘diversification’ in responses to the agreement questions. An average HHI of 1 indicates that the enumerator records the same answer for all 13 agreement questions on every survey they enumerated. As the average HHI approaches 0, it indicates that the enumerator tends to record the same number of responses at each level of agreement for each survey.

We consider average HHIs above 0.8 and below 0.3 (the smallest possible HHI in this case is 0.17) as potentially suspicious. Note that an HHI of 0.86 corresponds to 12 out of 13 answers being the same.

Variation in Response to Agreement Questions by Enumerator: August 24-30, 2022
Enumerator N Surveys Avg HHI
Huom sayan 37 0.836
Voeuk Khoeun 26 0.826
Ret Doun 28 0.787
Suon Savoeun 28 0.78
Hoeung Soram 19 0.765
Yiem Nim 23 0.753
Seng Bunthay 30 0.721
Tong Vanndy 51 0.72
Un Chhuy 36 0.704
Yorn Khnhey 26 0.697
Khut Sambo 26 0.657
Kheng SreyToch 26 0.622
In Seyha 21 0.578
Ly Hengtry 34 0.574
Hieng Samnang 23 0.573
Kheat Phun 39 0.56
Pay Danech 42 0.557
Sang Phally 39 0.532
Pek Kea 31 0.521
Chay Thona 35 0.506
Sales Mouseu 25 0.506
Chhon Soda 14 0.495
Ren Borath 42 0.488
Em Sambath 17 0.481
Sreang Kimheng 30 0.457
Enumerators listed in order of highest to lowest Average HHI.

1.6 Summary of Most Problematic Enumerators This Week

This table shows the basic summary stats for the most problematic enumerators this week. Note that this table only includes an enumerator’s diagnostic if they were among the worst 5 enumerators this week in terms of average duration, recontact rate, average list experiment duration, or average total conjoint time, or had an average HHI on the agreement questions of above 0.8 or below 0.3.

The column “Total number of issues” indicates how many of these five categories (duration, recontact, list experiment, conjoint, agreement questions) the enumerator was among the worst in.

Worst Performing Enumerators: August 24-30, 2022
Enumerator Municipality N Surveys Avg Duration Under 30 min Recontact Rate (%) N Zeros on LE Avg Time on LE Avg Total Time Conjoint Avg HHI agreement Total # of Issues
Hoeung Soram Stung Saen 19 24.92 17 14 0.85 1.85 3
In Seyha Siem Reap 21 26.49 17 13 0.81 1.46 3
Yiem Nim Stung Saen 23 27.83 18 18 0.83 1.94 3
Ret Doun Siem Reap 3 25.14 3 0 2
Voeuk Khoeun Stung Saen 26 28.07 20 0.826 2
Kheng SreyToch Stung Saen 26 24 0.86 1.64 2
Enumerators listed from worst to better performers on August 24-30, 2022