1 To-Date Endline Report

## [1] "Today's date is: 2022-08-22"

1.1 Summary Tables: Total Surveys, Recontact Rates, Duration

1.1.1 Recontact Rates for Forms and Surveys

The tables show only recontact rates for attrition forms and surveys.

Surveys and Forms Completed 8-17 to 8-22
Municipality Total Surveys and Forms Recontact
Kampong Cham 107 73%
Siem Reap 616 69%
Stung Saen 150 98%
Surveys and Forms Completed to Date
Municipality Total Surveys and Forms Recontact
Kampong Cham 343 62%
Siem Reap 1474 71%
Stung Saen 381 96%

1.1.2 Survey Only Durations for Each Municipality

The tables below show the average survey duration by municipality.

Average Survey Duration by Municipality 8-17 to 8-22
Municipality Average Duration
Kampong Cham 36 mins
Siem Reap 37 mins
Stung Saen 30 mins
Average Survey Duration by Municipality To Date
Municipality Average Duration
Kampong Cham 37 mins
Siem Reap 39 mins
Stung Saen 32 mins

1.2 Recontact Rates to Date

The graphs below plot the recontact rates of baseline households up to today. This rate indicates the percentage of completed surveys which were administered to houses in the baseline.

1.3 Recontact Errors

1.3.1 Missing Attrition Forms

These are hhs whose atrition form and replacement survey IDs do not match. The column replace shows hhs with a replacement survey ID but no matching attrition form ID. The column attrition_form shows hhs with an attrition form ID but no matching replacement survey ID.

Replacement and Attritted Households w/o Matching IDs 8-17 to 8-22
ENUMERATOR_NAME BLOCK uniqueID replace attrition_form
Ret Doun 1 1-14-76-1-1 1
Kheat Phun 5 1-14-76-5-7 1
Sang Phally 4 1-14-84-4-8 1
Sang Phally 3 1-14-84-3-4 1
Sang Phally 3 1-14-84-3-3 1
Huom sayan 2 1-18-114-2-1 1
Ret Doun 4 1-14-82-4-2 1
Em Sambath 2 2-1-4-2-2 1
Sang Phally 11 1-13-75-11-7 1
Un Chhuy 2 1-18-112-2-1 1
Ret Doun 1 1-1-76-1-1 1
Kheat Phun 5 1-14-76-5-6 1
Huom sayan 1 1-18-114-2-1 1
Ret Doun 4 1-14-83-4-2 1
Em Sambath 2 2-1-4-1-2 1
Sang Phally 11 1-13-75-11-8 1

1.3.2 Incorrect UniqueIDs

The form shows any IDs entered that do not match a unique ID from baseline. This likely means there was a typo.

Incorrect IDs: 8-17 to 8-22
uniqueID Enumerator Date.and.Start.Time Name Municipality Village Block GPS.Location
1-188-114-5-3 Hieng Samnang Aug 18, 2022 4:17:40 AM កែវ រតនា Siem Reap Spean Chreav 5 13.3225413 103.8514988 -5.699999809265137 4.502
2-24-29-1-2 Yorn Dara Aug 18, 2022 3:45:11 AM ជឹម សារៈទីន្នី Kampong Cham Phum Buon 1 11.9879624 105.4594854 8.077423095703125 4.931
3-5-4-32-3 Kheng SreyToch Aug 19, 2022 2:02:17 AM កឹមពុម្ព Stung Saen Balang Khang Kaeut 4 12.6843954 104.9068443 2.299999952316284 6.273
1-18-144-6-5 Pay Danech Aug 19, 2022 10:35:34 AM ឃឹម សូរីយ៉ា Siem Reap Spean Chreav 6 13.3264691 103.8544065 29.72662353515625 4.716
2-3-222-2-6 Chay Thona Aug 22, 2022 9:15:06 AM នួន ផល្លៃ Kampong Cham Preaek Derm Chan 2 11.9731248 105.4424126 -30.04052734375 4.716
Incorrect UniqueIDs to Date
uniqueID Enumerator Date.and.Start.Time Name Municipality Village Block GPS.Location
2-4-21-1-2 Chay Thona Aug 8, 2022 2:26:58 AM ស្រីលាភ Kampong Cham Phum Prammuoy 1 11.9953666 105.4527413 12.899999618530273 16.8
1-28-115-3-5 Hieng Samnang Aug 12, 2022 2:50:13 AM វឿន សុខ Siem Reap aranh 3 13.3052981 103.8466904 -16.22760009765625 4.288
2-4-29-8-1 Chhon Soda Aug 12, 2022 2:41:12 AM Kampong Cham Phum Buon 2 11.9897399 105.4628065 10.899999618530273 6.833
3-10-5-5-9 Seng Bunthay Aug 12, 2022 9:24:03 AM កាំឃី ហ៊ុន Stung Saen Stueng Saen 5 12.7177082 104.8871573 2.3841858265427618E-8 10.362
2-10-53-2-6 Seng Bunthay Aug 12, 2022 2:32:35 AM ឃុយ អ៊ីម Stung Saen Kampong Krabau 2 12.7153976 104.8830157 1.600000023841858 32.084
3-10-5-1-5 Kheng SreyToch Aug 14, 2022 1:52:49 AM ឃាន ណាវី Stung Saen Kampong Krabau 1 12.7133487 104.8950285 -1.265655517578125 3.216
3-10-68-4-4 Seng Bunthay Aug 15, 2022 9:04:59 AM ជួន សារ៉ុម Stung Saen Sla Kaet 4 12.7297664 104.883591 -1.1999999284744263 2200.0
1-188-114-5-3 Hieng Samnang Aug 18, 2022 4:17:40 AM កែវ រតនា Siem Reap Spean Chreav 5 13.3225413 103.8514988 -5.699999809265137 4.502
2-24-29-1-2 Yorn Dara Aug 18, 2022 3:45:11 AM ជឹម សារៈទីន្នី Kampong Cham Phum Buon 1 11.9879624 105.4594854 8.077423095703125 4.931
3-5-4-32-3 Kheng SreyToch Aug 19, 2022 2:02:17 AM កឹមពុម្ព Stung Saen Balang Khang Kaeut 4 12.6843954 104.9068443 2.299999952316284 6.273
1-18-144-6-5 Pay Danech Aug 19, 2022 10:35:34 AM ឃឹម សូរីយ៉ា Siem Reap Spean Chreav 6 13.3264691 103.8544065 29.72662353515625 4.716
2-3-222-2-6 Chay Thona Aug 22, 2022 9:15:06 AM នួន ផល្លៃ Kampong Cham Preaek Derm Chan 2 11.9731248 105.4424126 -30.04052734375 4.716

1.4 Survey Duration

The plots below show average survey duration by enumerator today and since the beginning of the endline. The plot at the end of the section shows average duration over time.

1.4.1 Number of Surveys by Enumerator

The table below shows the number of surveys conducted by each enumerator today and to-date.

Number of Surveys by Enumerator
Enumerator Name Surveys To-Date Surveys 8-17 to 8-22
Ren Borath 90 40
Un Chhuy 89 39
Sang Phally 86 38
In Seyha 84 42
Huom sayan 82 33
Pek Kea 82 33
Hieng Samnang 80 29
Sreang Kimheng 79 36
Kheat Phun 75 34
Pay Danech 75 38
Tong Vanndy 72 24
Ret Doun 69 32
Seng Bunthay 68 24
Suon Savoeun 65 28
Ly Hengtry 63 29
Voeuk Khoeun 60 22
Kheng SreyToch 54 25
Chay Thona 51 17
Yiem Nim 51 20
Yorn Khnhey 50 19
Hoeung Soram 49 20
Sales Mouseu 46 28
Run Makara 40 NA
Khut Sambo 38 17
Em Sambath 31 24
Chhon Soda 23 NA
Yorn Dara 23 15
Thy Ritha 18 NA
Oem Sophal 17 NA
Sales Mary 13 NA
Pen Sophors 11 NA
Sam Socheat 10 NA
Sim Chankanha 5 NA
Sem Sokcheat 3 NA
Sin Sreynich 3 NA
Sok Mara 2 NA

1.4.2 Over 60 mins and under 30 mins

The table below shows the number of surveys lasting longer than 60 minutes and shorter than 30 minutes by enumerator from 8-17 to 8-22.

Number of Surveys Completed in Over 60 and Under 30 Mins
Enumerator Name Under 30 Over 60
Chay Thona 7 0
Em Sambath 3 1
Hieng Samnang 1 0
Hoeung Soram 12 0
Huom sayan 5 0
In Seyha 15 0
Kheat Phun 3 0
Kheng SreyToch 17 0
Khut Sambo 8 0
Ly Hengtry 4 0
Pay Danech 2 0
Pek Kea 4 0
Ren Borath 3 0
Ret Doun 7 0
Sales Mouseu 9 0
Sang Phally 0 0
Seng Bunthay 16 0
Sreang Kimheng 14 0
Suon Savoeun 0 0
Tong Vanndy 2 1
Un Chhuy 5 0
Voeuk Khoeun 12 0
Yiem Nim 10 0
Yorn Dara 1 1
Yorn Khnhey 5 0

1.4.3 Don’t Knows

Average rate of “don’t know” responses by enumerators to date.

Top ‘I Don’t Knows’
Question Rate Number
B.26a) What is the name of the waste service provider in your community? (dump) 52.630 10
B.7) Is the waste service provider in your community a …? (hh) 38.050 366
B.6) What is the name of the waste service provider in your community? (hh) 37.530 361
B.27) Is the waste service provider in your community a …? (dump) 36.840 7
B.33) Please estimate what share of those in your village pay their waste collection fee? (dump) 26.320 5
B.35a) In your opinion, who is most responsible for the quality of the waste service provision that your village receives? (dump) 26.320 5
25.160 442
B.18a) In your opinion, who is most responsible for the quality of the waste service provision that your village receives? (hh) 20.060 193
D.3) Think of the oft_interact individuals in this village with whom you interact often. How many of these are active in community development activities? 17.490 251
B.45) Do any households in your village receive waste collection services? 16.810 133

1.5 Sampling

1.5.1 Total Surveys of Women:

[1] 488

1.5.2 Total Surveys of Men:

[1] 218

1.6 Experiments

1.6.1 List Experiments

1.6.1.1 Share of Zero Responses by Enumerator Today

Share of List Experiment Zeros by Enumerator
Enumerator Name N of Zeros N of Surveys Share of Zeros
Kheng SreyToch 21 25 84%
In Seyha 35 42 83%
Voeuk Khoeun 18 22 82%
Hoeung Soram 15 20 75%
Yiem Nim 15 20 75%
Sang Phally 28 38 74%
Yorn Khnhey 14 19 74%
Pay Danech 27 38 71%
Em Sambath 16 24 67%
Huom sayan 22 33 67%
Yorn Dara 10 15 67%
Hieng Samnang 19 29 66%
Ret Doun 21 32 66%
Khut Sambo 11 17 65%
Pek Kea 20 33 61%
Ren Borath 23 40 57%
Kheat Phun 19 34 56%
Seng Bunthay 13 24 54%
Suon Savoeun 14 28 50%
Chay Thona 8 17 47%
Ly Hengtry 13 29 45%
Un Chhuy 17 39 44%
Tong Vanndy 10 24 42%
Sales Mouseu 10 28 36%
Sreang Kimheng 13 36 36%

1.6.1.2 Distribution of Responses For Treatment and Control from 8-17 to 8-22

1.6.1.3 Difference in means estimates for the list experiment (all data)

Difference in Means Estimates
estimate treatment control statistic p.value parameter conf.low conf.high method alternative
0.092 0.548 0.456 c(t = 2.505) 0.012 c(df = 1735.379) 0.02 0.164 Welch Two Sample t-test two.sided

1.6.1.4 Average amount of time taken to complete the list experiment by enumerator (in minutes)

Time Taken to List Experiments Today
Enumerator Name Time in Minutes
Chay Thona 1.38
Em Sambath 1.59
Hieng Samnang 1.3
Hoeung Soram 0.81
Huom sayan 1.41
In Seyha 1.05
Kheat Phun 1.22
Kheng SreyToch 0.83
Khut Sambo 0.88
Ly Hengtry 1.35
Pay Danech 0.95
Pek Kea 1.09
Ren Borath 1.03
Ret Doun 1.1
Sales Mouseu 1.63
Sang Phally 0.86
Seng Bunthay 1.3
Sreang Kimheng 1.01
Suon Savoeun 1.87
Tong Vanndy 0.71
Un Chhuy 1.47
Voeuk Khoeun 1.14
Yiem Nim 0.87
Yorn Dara 1.43
Yorn Khnhey 1.27

1.6.2 Conjoint Experiments

1.6.2.1 AMCE (all data)

Results for Conjoint Tasks 1,2,3: Choice between two imaginary leaders

1.6.2.2 Back-to-Back Surveys Repeat Patterns in Conjoint Responses, by Enumerator

This test shows how often enumerators have the same three responses in the same order on two surveys in a row. For example, if on the first survey an enumerator conducts in a day, the conjoint responses are ‘2’,‘2’, and ‘1’, and then on the second survey the enumerator conducts that day, the responses are again ‘2’,‘2’, ‘1’, this is coded as a duplicate.

From 8-17 to 8-22, we find that In Seyha, Ly Hengtry, Em Sambath, and Sreang Kimheng have the same three responses as on the previous survey in over one-sixth of their surveys.

% of surveys where conjoint answers are the same as previous survey
Enumerator # surveys % back-to-back surv dupes
In Seyha 42 19.05
Ly Hengtry 29 17.24
Em Sambath 24 16.67
Sreang Kimheng 36 16.67
Pek Kea 33 15.15
Pay Danech 38 13.16
Un Chhuy 39 12.82
Ren Borath 40 12.5
Huom sayan 33 12.12
Khut Sambo 17 11.76
Sang Phally 37 10.81
Ret Doun 32 9.38
Voeuk Khoeun 22 9.09
Tong Vanndy 23 8.7
Kheng SreyToch 25 8
Suon Savoeun 28 7.14
Hieng Samnang 29 6.9
Yorn Dara 15 6.67
Chay Thona 17 5.88
Kheat Phun 34 5.88
Yorn Khnhey 19 5.26
Yiem Nim 20 5
Seng Bunthay 24 4.17
Sales Mouseu 28 3.57
Hoeung Soram 20 0

1.6.2.3 Three Repeated Conjoint Responses, by Enumerator

This test shows how often an enumerator records the same three choices for the three consecutive conjoint questions. For simplicity, we take the baseline probability of a respondent selecting the same answer three times in a row as 25% (2 * (0.5 ^ 3), ignoring the potential to select “I don’t know”).

For the period between 8-17 and 8-22, we find six enumerators that record the same response on all three conjoint questions over 36% of the time - significantly more than the baseline probability. These are: Khut Sambo, Sreang Kimheng, Yorn Khney, Huom Sayan, Pek Kea, and Kheng SreyToch.

% of surveys w same 3 responses, by enumerator
Enumerator % survey w same 3 responses
Khut Sambo 47.06
Sreang Kimheng 38.89
Yorn Khnhey 36.84
Huom sayan 36.36
Pek Kea 36.36
Kheng SreyToch 36
In Seyha 35.71
Ret Doun 34.38
Suon Savoeun 32.14
Sang Phally 31.58
Un Chhuy 30.77
Kheat Phun 29.41
Seng Bunthay 29.17
Sales Mouseu 28.57
Ren Borath 27.5
Yorn Dara 26.67
Yiem Nim 25
Pay Danech 23.68
Chay Thona 23.53
Tong Vanndy 20.83
Hieng Samnang 20.69
Ly Hengtry 20.69
Voeuk Khoeun 18.18
Em Sambath 12.5
Hoeung Soram 5

1.6.2.4 Average amount of time taken to complete conjoints by enumerator

The first set of tables shows the average amount of time taken to complete each conjoint task by enumerator. The fourth column gives the sum of the first three columns.

From 8-17 to 8-22, the enumerators spending the shortest amount of time on the conjoint are Sang Phally, Kheat Phun, Yiem Nim, Seng Bunthay, In Seyha, and Kheng SreyToch.

Time Taken to Complete Conjoints in Minutes
Enumerator Name Conjoint 1 Conjoint 2 Conjoint 3 TotTime
Sang Phally 0.66 0.43 0.41 1.5
Kheat Phun 0.61 0.54 0.48 1.63
Yiem Nim 0.63 0.48 0.58 1.69
Seng Bunthay 0.82 0.49 0.48 1.79
In Seyha 0.95 0.59 0.37 1.91
Kheng SreyToch 0.75 0.61 0.55 1.91
Hoeung Soram 0.86 0.58 0.56 2
Ren Borath 0.92 0.62 0.51 2.05
Sales Mouseu 0.88 0.67 0.53 2.08
Pay Danech 1.15 0.56 0.48 2.19
Tong Vanndy 1.2 0.46 0.53 2.19
Hieng Samnang 1.04 0.62 0.55 2.21
Sreang Kimheng 1.25 0.58 0.47 2.3
Ly Hengtry 0.94 0.68 0.72 2.34
Chay Thona 0.9 0.69 0.77 2.36
Khut Sambo 1 0.68 0.7 2.38
Voeuk Khoeun 1.15 0.62 0.61 2.38
Pek Kea 1.12 0.74 0.7 2.56
Un Chhuy 1.16 0.66 0.8 2.62
Yorn Khnhey 1.01 0.84 0.8 2.65
Em Sambath 0.97 0.95 0.74 2.66
Ret Doun 1.19 0.74 0.73 2.66
Yorn Dara 1 0.8 0.91 2.71
Suon Savoeun 1.33 0.79 0.74 2.86
Huom sayan 1.45 0.98 0.83 3.26

1.7 Agreement (table_E4E11)