Lab Exercise 6.2

Young Americans, Part I. About 77% of young adults think they can achieve the American dream. Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.

  1. The distribution of sample proportions of young Americans who think they can achieve the American dream in samples of size 20 is left skewed.

True. The values of the success-failure criteria are 15.4 and 3.6 so the mean will be to the right and tail will be to the left.

  1. The distribution of sample proportions of young Americans who think they can achieve the American dream in random samples of size 40 is approximately normal since n >= 30

False. This is the criteria for sample means, not sample proportions.

  1. A random sample of 60 young Americans where 85% think they can achieve the American dream would be considered unusual.

Look at the Z score.

(.85-.77)/sqrt(.77*.23/60)
## [1] 1.472503

1.47. Less than 2 Standard Errors so not unusual.

  1. A random sample of 120 young Americans where 85% think they can achieve the American dream would be considered unusual.
(.85-.77)/sqrt(.77*.23/120)  
## [1] 2.082434

More than 2 Standard Errors, it looks unusual, so True.

Lab Exercise 6.6

2010 Healthcare Law. On June 28, 2012 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the much debated 2010 healthcare law, declaring it constitutional. A Gallup poll released the day after this decision indicates that 46% of 1,012 Americans agree with this decision. At a 95% confidence level, this sample has a 3% margin of error. Based on this information, determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.
(a) We are 95% confident that between 43% and 49% of Americans in this sample support the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the 2010 healthcare law.

False. A CI is about a population, not a sample.

  1. We are 95% confident that between 43% and 49% of Americans support the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the 2010 healthcare law.

True. This is our boilerplace for how to report a confidence interval.

  1. If we considered many random samples of 1,012 Americans, and we calculated the sample proportions of those who support the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, 95% of those sample proportions will be between 43% and 49%.

False. A CI is about the population proportion, not about a sample statistic.

  1. The margin of error at a 90% confidence level would be higher than 3%.

False. The CI will be narrower and the so the margin of error will be smaller.

Lab Exercise 6.14

The Civil War. A national survey conducted in 2011 among a simple random sample of 1,507 adults shows that 56% of Americans think the Civil War is still relevant to American politics and political life.

  1. Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if these data provide strong evidence that the majority of the Americans think the Civil War is still relevant.

\(H_0:p=.5\) \(H_A:p>.5\)

SF-Sample size is large, >10

Decision rule: reject null if p-value is less than 5%.

phat = 0.56
p0 = 0.5
n = 1507
z = (phat - p0)/sqrt(p0*(1-p0)/n)
1-pnorm(z,0,1)
## [1] 1.593292e-06

Z-score is 4.66. This is incredibly large.
p value is incredibly small. Less than %, reject the null.

Decision: The data provide convincing evidence that the majority of Americans still think the Civil War is relevant to politics.

  1. Interpret the p-value in this context.

The probabality of seeing 1,507 Americans or more thinking the Civil War is irrelevant in the distribution of the null is about zero.

  1. Calculate a 90% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who think the Civil War is still relevant. Interpret the interval in this context, and comment on whether or not the confidence interval agrees with the conclusion of the hypothesis test.
phat = 0.56
n = 1507
U = phat + 1.65*sqrt(phat*(1-phat)/n)
L = phat - 1.65*sqrt(phat*(1-phat)/n)
c(L,U)
## [1] 0.5389017 0.5810983

With 90% confidence, between 53.9% and 58.1% of Americans believe that the Civil War is still relevant to US politics. 50% is still not in our interval.

Lab Exercise 6.29

Offshore drilling, Part I. A 2010 survey asked 827 randomly sampled registered voters in California “Do you support? Or do you oppose? Drilling for oil and natural gas off the Coast of California? Or do you not know enough to say?” Below is the distribution of responses, separated based on whether or not the respondent graduated from college.

  1. What percent of college graduates and what percent of the non-college graduates in this sample do not know enough to have an opinion on drilling for oil and natural gas off the Coast of California?
pc = 104/438
pn = 131/389

pc = .237
pn = .3367

  1. Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if the data provide strong evidence that the proportion of college graduates who do not have an opinion on this issue is different than that of non-college graduates.

(i)State Hypotheses
\(H_0: p_c = p_n\) no difference between the 2 proportions

\(H_A: p_c \ne p_n\)

Large independent sample, S-F criteria is met.

  1. Decision rule: Reject null if p-value is less than 5%.

  2. Test Stat and the p-val:

Z = (0.237-0.337)/sqrt(0.254*0.716/438+0.284*0.716/389)
2*pnorm(Z,0,1)
## [1] 0.001093856
  1. Decision: reject the null since the p-value is less than 5%

  2. There appears to be a significant difference in the proportion of college graduates that do not know enough about the topic.

Homework

Homework Exercise 6.1

Vegetarian college students. Suppose that 8% of college students are vegetarians. Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.

  1. The distribution of the sample proportions of vegetarians in random samples of size 60 is approximately normal since n >= 30

False. This is the criteria for sample means, not sample proportions.

  1. The distribution of the sample proportions of vegetarian college students in random samples of size 50 is right skewed.

True. The SF criteria are 4 & 1 so the mean will be to the left and the tail will be to the right.

  1. A random sample of 125 college students where 12% are vegetarians would be considered unusual.

Z Score

(.12-.08)/sqrt(.08*.02/125)
## [1] 11.18034

11.18

Yes it would be very extremely highly unusual.

  1. A random sample of 250 college students where 12% are vegetarians would be considered unusual.
(.12-.08)/sqrt(.08*.02/250)
## [1] 15.81139

15.81

It would be even more ridiculously unusual.

  1. The standard error would be reduced by one-half if we increased the sample size from 125 to 250.

?

Homework Exercise 6.3

Orange tabbies. Suppose that 90% of orange tabby cats are male. Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.

  1. The distribution of sample proportions of random samples of size 30 is left skewed.

This is not the type of data that is really skewed.

  1. Using a sample size that is 4 times as large will reduce the standard error of the sample proportion by one-half.

  2. The distribution of sample proportions of random samples of size 140 is approximately normal.

  3. The distribution of sample proportions of random samples of size 280 is approximately normal.

Homework Exercise 6.4

Young Americans, Part II. About 25% of young Americans have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump. Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.

  1. The distribution of sample proportions of young Americans who have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump in random samples of size 12 is right skewed.

  2. In order for the the distribution of sample proportions of young Americans who have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump to be approximately normal, we need random samples where the sample size is at least 40.

  3. A random sample of 50 young Americans where 20% have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump would be considered unusual.

  4. A random sample of 150 young Americans where 20% have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump would be considered unusual.

  5. Tripling the sample size will reduce the standard error of the sample proportion by one-third.

Homework Excercise 6.8

Elderly drivers. In January 2011, The Marist Poll published a report stating that 66% of adults nationally think licensed drivers should be required to retake their road test once they reach 65 years of age. It was also reported that interviews were conducted on 1,018 American adults, and that the margin of error was 3% using a 95% confidence level.

  1. Verify the margin of error reported by The Marist Poll.
1.96*sqrt((.66*.44)/1018)
## [1] 0.033104

Yes it’s correct.

  1. Based on a 95% confidence interval, does the poll provide convincing evidence that more than 70% of the population think that licensed drivers should be required to retake their road test once they turn 65?

No, it provides convincing evidence tha 66% think so.

Homework Exercise 6.12

Legalization of marijuana, Part I. The 2010 General Social Survey asked 1,259 US residents: “Do you think the use of marijuana should be made legal, or not?” 48% of the respondents said it should be made legal.

  1. Is 48% a sample statistic or a population parameter? Explain.

48% is a sample statistic because no work has been done to apply this number to the population.

  1. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of US residents who think marijuana should be made legal, and interpret it in the context of the data.
phat = .48
n = 1259

U = phat + 1.96*sqrt(phat*(1-phat)/n)

L = phat - 1.96*sqrt(phat*(1-phat)/n)
c(L,U)
## [1] 0.4524028 0.5075972

We are 95% confident that between 45% and 50.7% of Americans think that Marijuana should be made legal.

  1. A critic points out that this 95% confidence interval is only accurate if the statistic follows a normal distribution, or if the normal model is a good approximation. Is this true for these data? Explain.

If the sample were repeated multiple times, it would eventually follow normal distribution.

  1. A news piece on this survey’s findings states, “Majority of Americans think marijuana should be legalized.” Based on your confidence interval, is this news piece’s statement justified?

No, on the upper end it is only just over half. I would say “almost half of Americans” to be more precise.

Homework Exercise 6.26

The Daily Show. A 2010 Pew Research foundation poll indicates that among 1,099 college graduates, 33% watch The Daily Show. Meanwhile, 22% of the 1,110 people with a high school degree but no college degree in the poll watch The Daily Show. A 95% confidence interval for (pcollege grad - pHSorless) where p is the proportion of those who watch The Daily Show, is (0.07, 0.15). Based on this information, determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning if you identify the statement as false.

  1. At the 5% significance level, the data provide convincing evidence of a difference between the proportions of college graduates and those with a high school degree or less who watch The Daily Show.

  2. We are 95% confident that 7% less to 15% more college graduates watch The Daily Show than those with a high school degree or less.

  3. 95% of random samples of 1,099 college graduates and 1,110 people with a high school degree or less will yield differences in sample proportions between 7% and 15%.

  4. A 90% confidence interval for pcollegegrad - pHSorless would be wider.

  5. A 95% confidence interval for pcollegegrad - pHSorless is (-0.15,-0.07).

I need an office hour, or Math Lab, or some kind of help before I can do these!