Worked with others in the community to achieve a common goal (for example, fundraising for the local library)

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

## X-squared 
##  4.303703
## [1] 0.03802949
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(chi_1$`Native Hawaiian Status`, chi_1$`Worked with Others in Community`)
## X-squared = 4.3037, df = 1, p-value = 0.03803

The results of the chi-square test are significant with a p-value of .038, suggesting there is a significant difference in responding for this item. 44% of Native Hawaiians reported they had worked with others in the community to achieve a common goal, compared with only 38% of non-Hawaiians. Overall, a majority of both Native and non-Hawaiians did not work with others in the community to achieve a common goal.

\[X^2 = 4.304, df = 1, p = .038\]

Participated in an event to address a community issue

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

## X-squared 
##   3.18008
## [1] 0.07454107
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(svy2022$q2_are_you_native_hawaiian_are_any_of_your_ancestors_native_hawaiian,     svy2022$q9_in_the_last_12_months_have_you_participated_in_an_event_to_address_a_community_issue_virtually_or_in_person)
## X-squared = 3.1801, df = 1, p-value = 0.07454

The results of the chi-square test are not significant with a p-value of .075, suggesting there is not a significant difference in responding for this item (although it is borderline to the significance threshold). 40% of Native Hawaiians reported they had participated in an event to address a community issue, compared with only 35% of non-Hawaiians. Overall, a majority of both Native and non-Hawaiians did not participate in an event to address a community issue.

\[X^2 = 3.18, df = 1, p = .074\]

Organized an event to address a community issue

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

## X-squared 
##  6.357647
## [1] 0.01168764
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(svy2022$q2_are_you_native_hawaiian_are_any_of_your_ancestors_native_hawaiian,     svy2022$q9_in_the_last_12_months_have_you_organized_an_event_to_address_a_community_issue_virtually_or_in_person)
## X-squared = 6.3576, df = 1, p-value = 0.01169

The results of the chi-square test are significant with a p-value of .012, suggesting there is a significant difference in responding for this item. 17% of Native Hawaiians reported they had organized an event to address a community issue, compared with only 12% of non-Hawaiians. Overall, a large majority of both Native and non-Hawaiians did not organize an event to address a community issue.

\[X^2 = 6.36, df = 1, p = .012\]

Provided testimony or written a letter about an issue that is important to you

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

## X-squared 
## 0.5370155
## [1] 0.4636722
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(svy2022$q2_are_you_native_hawaiian_are_any_of_your_ancestors_native_hawaiian,     svy2022$q9_in_the_last_12_months_have_you_provided_testimony_or_written_a_letter_about_an_issue_that_is_important_to_you_virtually_or_in_person)
## X-squared = 0.53702, df = 1, p-value = 0.4637

The results of the chi-square test are not significant with a p-value of .464, suggesting there is not a significant difference in responding for this item. 30% of Native Hawaiians reported they had provided testimony or written a letter about an issue that is important, compared with 28% of non-Hawaiians. Overall, a majority of both Native and non-Hawaiians did not provide testimony or written a letter about an issue that is important.

\[X^2 = 0.537, df = 1, p = .464\]

Met with a local official about an issue that is important to you

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

## X-squared 
##  1.106477
## [1] 0.2928491
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(svy2022$q2_are_you_native_hawaiian_are_any_of_your_ancestors_native_hawaiian,     svy2022$q9_in_the_last_12_months_have_you_met_with_a_local_official_about_an_issue_that_is_important_to_you_virtually_or_in_person)
## X-squared = 1.1065, df = 1, p-value = 0.2928

The results of the chi-square test are not significant with a p-value of .293, suggesting there is not a significant difference in responding for this item. 16% of Native Hawaiians reported they had met with a local official about an issue important to them, compared with 14% of non-Hawaiians. Overall, a majority of both Native and non-Hawaiians did not meet with local officials about important issues.

\[X^2 = 1.107, df = 1, p = .293\]

Ran for political office

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

##    X-squared 
## 8.646035e-30
## [1] 1
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(svy2022$q2_are_you_native_hawaiian_are_any_of_your_ancestors_native_hawaiian,     svy2022$q9_in_the_last_12_months_have_you_ran_for_political_office_virtually_or_in_person)
## X-squared = 8.646e-30, df = 1, p-value = 1

The results of the chi-square test are not significant with a p-value of 1.0, suggesting there is not a significant difference in responding for this item. Less than 1% of both Native Hawaiians and non-Hawaiians reported they had run for political office. Overall, nearly 100% of Native and non-Hawaiians did not run for political office.

\[X^2 = <.001, df = 1, p = 1.0\]

Served on a government board, committee, commission, or taskforce

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

##    X-squared 
## 0.0006866881
## [1] 0.979094
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(svy2022$q2_are_you_native_hawaiian_are_any_of_your_ancestors_native_hawaiian,     svy2022$q9_in_the_last_12_months_have_you_served_on_a_government_board_committee_commission_or_taskforce_virtually_or_in_person)
## X-squared = 0.00068669, df = 1, p-value = 0.9791

The results of the chi-square test are not significant with a p-value of .979, suggesting there is not a significant difference in responding for this item. 7% of both Native and non-Hawaiians reported they served on a government board, committee, commission, or taskforce. Overall, a majority did not serve (93% for both Native and non-Hawaiians).

\[X^2 = 0.0006, df = 1, p = .979\]

Made donations to benefit the community

Summary Tables

Chi-Square Analysis

## X-squared 
##  8.200654
## [1] 0.00418753
## 
##  Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction
## 
## data:  table(svy2022$q2_are_you_native_hawaiian_are_any_of_your_ancestors_native_hawaiian,     svy2022$q9_in_the_last_12_months_have_you_made_donations_to_benefit_the_community_virtually_or_in_person)
## X-squared = 8.2007, df = 1, p-value = 0.004188

The results of the chi-square test are significant with a p-value of .004, suggesting there is a significant difference in responding for this item. 58% of Native Hawaiians made donations to benefit the community compared to 66% of non-Hawaiians. This is the only response item of this question where a majority of respondents of both Native and non-Hawaiians responded they did do the target activity.

\[X^2 = 8.2007, df = 1, p = .004\]

Overall Summary

Comparisons with significant Chi-Square results:

  • Worked with others in the community to achieve a common goal (for example, fundraising for the local library)
  • Participated in an event to address a community issue (borderline significant)
  • Organized an event to address a community issue
  • Made donations to benefit the community

For the significant (or nearly) significant comparisons, some interesting findings to drive further discussion: * The percentage of Native Hawaiians who worked with others, participated in events, or organized events was greater than the percentage of non-Hawaiians * For these three responses, an overall majority of respondents did not report doing the target activity * Making donations to benefit the community was the only response item where an overall majority of respondents stated they did they target behavior and also the only response item where the percentage of non-Hawaiians who responded completing the target behavior was greater than the percentage of Native Hawaiians.