Hypothesis : E of the Product depends on Demand Loyalty than Price Competetiveness.
Null Hypothesis : E of the Product depends on Price Competetiveness than Demand Loyalty.
Alternate Hypothesis : E of the Product depends on Demand Loyalty than Price Competetiveness.
HIGH DL
Correlation Matrix with Equally distributed Observations.
## $HIGH
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.0000000 -0.1499292
## Conversion -0.1499292 1.0000000
##
## $LOW
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.000000 0.223528
## Conversion 0.223528 1.000000
##
## HIGH LOW
## 220 219
## $HIGH
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.0000000 -0.2118276
## Conversion -0.2118276 1.0000000
##
## $LOW
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA NA NA
## Conversion NA NA
##
## $MID
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.0000000 0.1529794
## Conversion 0.1529794 1.0000000
##
## HIGH LOW MID
## 127 18 294
Below is the correlation matrix after collating “HIGH” & “MID” as one and “LOW” as other. HIGH>75% LOW Otherwise
## $HIGH
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.00000000 -0.07685417
## Conversion -0.07685417 1.00000000
##
## $LOW
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.0000000 -0.6252245
## Conversion -0.6252245 1.0000000
##
## HIGH LOW
## 421 18
Relationship between Conversion & Price Competetiveness : Cut-off : HIGH > 75%(default), LOW Otherwise
Change in Cut-off i.e; HIGH > 67%, LOW otherwise
HIGH DL : When Demand Loyalty is HIGH & PC is MID, Conversion is HIGH : Loyalty Cut-off 67%(Median)
## $HIGH
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.0000000 -0.3187486
## Conversion -0.3187486 1.0000000
##
## $LOW
## PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA 1.00000000 -0.04890732
## Conversion -0.04890732 1.00000000
##
## HIGH LOW
## 21 418
Relationship between Conversion & Price Competetiveness : Cut-off : HIGH > 60%, LOW Otherwise