Hypothesis : E of the Product depends on Demand Loyalty than Price Competetiveness.

Null Hypothesis : E of the Product depends on Price Competetiveness than Demand Loyalty.

Alternate Hypothesis : E of the Product depends on Demand Loyalty than Price Competetiveness.


HIGH DL

Correlation Matrix with Equally distributed Observations.

## $HIGH
##                 PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA       1.0000000 -0.1499292
## Conversion -0.1499292  1.0000000
## 
## $LOW
##               PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA      1.000000   0.223528
## Conversion 0.223528   1.000000
## 
## HIGH  LOW 
##  220  219

## $HIGH
##                 PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA       1.0000000 -0.2118276
## Conversion -0.2118276  1.0000000
## 
## $LOW
##            PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA         NA         NA
## Conversion    NA         NA
## 
## $MID
##                PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA      1.0000000  0.1529794
## Conversion 0.1529794  1.0000000
## 
## HIGH  LOW  MID 
##  127   18  294

Below is the correlation matrix after collating “HIGH” & “MID” as one and “LOW” as other. HIGH>75% LOW Otherwise


## $HIGH
##                  PC_SA  Conversion
## PC_SA       1.00000000 -0.07685417
## Conversion -0.07685417  1.00000000
## 
## $LOW
##                 PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA       1.0000000 -0.6252245
## Conversion -0.6252245  1.0000000
## 
## HIGH  LOW 
##  421   18

Relationship between Conversion & Price Competetiveness : Cut-off : HIGH > 75%(default), LOW Otherwise

Change in Cut-off i.e; HIGH > 67%, LOW otherwise


HIGH DL : When Demand Loyalty is HIGH & PC is MID, Conversion is HIGH : Loyalty Cut-off 67%(Median)

## $HIGH
##                 PC_SA Conversion
## PC_SA       1.0000000 -0.3187486
## Conversion -0.3187486  1.0000000
## 
## $LOW
##                  PC_SA  Conversion
## PC_SA       1.00000000 -0.04890732
## Conversion -0.04890732  1.00000000
## 
## HIGH  LOW 
##   21  418

Relationship between Conversion & Price Competetiveness : Cut-off : HIGH > 60%, LOW Otherwise