The following analysis looks at travel time to various locations in Glasgow and how these vary spatially and by socio-economic factors i.e., sex, age, ethnicity, and deprivation. It also looks at how accessibility to jobs in different industries varies.
By public transport we mean buses, the subway, and trains. Bus and subway data is taken from Traveline. It does not seem to cover services such as the airport bus. Rail data is taken from the Rail Delivery Group. Traveline and rail data refers to the first week of September 2020. Historic data does not seem to be available to allow us to see the situation pre-lockdown. It is probably available somewhere but not through the same channels. It will be relatively straightforward to rerun the analysis with updated timetable information. Journey times are likely less affected by disruptions due to the lockdown, however wait times may be longer due to reductions in the frequency of services.
I have assumed that journeys are taking place at noon on a Monday. Travel times will be vary depending on the time of the day and the day of week. We can perform calculations for whatever day and time is of interest. Calculations are based on timetables reported by the operators rather than actual performance.
Data from Traveline was supplied in TransXchange format while data from the RDG was supplied as ATOC CIF files. These formats do not work with standard tools. They were therefore converted to General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) using UK2GTFS R package. The GTFS data was them combines with OS Open Road data to form a network dataset. This was done using the Add GTFS to a Network Dataset add-on tool for ArcMap 10.6. The Network Analyst extension was then used to conduct the network analysis. Ideally this workflow will eventually be moved to an open platform such as Open Trip Planner
Travel times are measured based on population-weighted data zone centroids. The population weighting is based on the 2011 census. Some parameters of the analysis can/should be tweaked e.g., walking speed, time taken to board/alights. The default parameter choices should, however, give a reasonable indication.
Some caution should be exercised. The timetable data can be messy and the UK2GTFS package is still under development. Furthermore, the Add GTFS to a Network Dataset tool has been deprecated as its functionality has been incorporated into ArcGIS Pro. However, the results look mostly reasonable. We can check them against other sources to ensure robustness.
Below, we can see the travel time to different locations in Glasgow.
Below we can see how many people live in each of Glasgow’s data zones. There is not such a large amount of variation because data zone boundaries are drawn to have roughly equal populations.
For the analysis of how travel time varies by sex, we begin by looking at how the split between male and female varies across the city. The map below shows the percentage of the population who is male according to the 2011 census. The main pattern is that there is a higher proportion of males living in and around the city centre.
Next we compare the travel time to different locations in Glasgow for
males and females. This is done by taking a weighted-average of the
travel times from data zone centroids across the study area. Women tend
to have longer travel time to all destinations. This is driven by the
fact that there are quite a lot of males living in the well-connected
city centre compared to females.
# Travel time and deprivation
Next we move to look at deprivation, beginning by plotting deprivation quintiles. The first quntile is the most deprived. The quintiles are based on rankings within Scotland rather than only within Glasgow.