This are the baseline demographics of the entire group. There are 1499 respondents, with the following distributions. This will be used to contrast with the Chulha users.
##
## 8 Gen NT OBC SC ST Sum
## Buddhist 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
## Hindu 0 13 57 737 2 192 1001
## Muslim 1 118 0 1 1 0 121
## Other 0 0 0 0 367 1 368
## Sikh 0 5 0 1 1 1 8
## Sum 1 136 57 739 371 195 1499
These are the baseine health effects for the entire group. Here, Cataract and Arthritis are the major health issues, with Nausea being the third most prevalant and minor effect.
The respondents overwhelmingly use both the Chulha and LPG, as we can see that almost all the respondents (<1400) have/use LPG.
Here we split the dataset into Chulha and non-chulha users, to see how the two population are distinct.
The Chulha user population demographics look like the tabe below.
##
## 8 Gen NT OBC SC ST Sum
## Hindu 0 4 39 309 1 74 427
## Muslim 1 48 0 1 1 0 51
## Other 0 0 0 0 168 1 169
## Sikh 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
## Sum 1 52 39 311 170 75 648
The family size distributions are nearly identical.
The income distributions are also very similar, suggesting that chulha users and non-users will have similar budget constraints.
Here we see a difference - Chulha users report far more Nausea and eye irritation.
As we can see, Almost all the chulha users do in fact have LPG connections, at the very least. This begs the followig question:
One explanation is the preference this group has for the taste imparted by the Chulha - suggesting cultural reasons.