Highest Innovation Share Micropolitan Counties

highest_inno_share_micropolitans <- moodys_employ_share_2020 %>%
  dplyr::filter(metropolitan_designation == "Micro") %>%
  dplyr::arrange(desc(employment_co_share)) %>%
  head(10)

knitr::kable(highest_inno_share_micropolitans)
geoid_co employment_co employment_co_share metropolitan_designation rural_cbsa_flag
35028 3.9881 0.0010123 Micro 1
26005 2.5217 0.0006401 Micro 1
33009 1.9553 0.0004963 Micro 1
31141 1.9250 0.0004886 Micro 1
37195 1.8731 0.0004754 Micro 1
27169 1.7226 0.0004372 Micro 1
53025 1.6332 0.0004145 Micro 1
37105 1.5234 0.0003867 Micro 1
48057 1.4763 0.0003747 Micro 1
09005 1.3677 0.0003472 Micro 1

Highest Innovation Employment Micropolitan Counties

highest_inno_employment_micropolitans <- moodys_employ_share_2020 %>%
  dplyr::filter(metropolitan_designation == "Micro") %>%
  dplyr::arrange(desc(employment_co)) %>%
  head(10)

knitr::kable(highest_inno_employment_micropolitans)
geoid_co employment_co employment_co_share metropolitan_designation rural_cbsa_flag
35028 3.9881 0.0010123 Micro 1
26005 2.5217 0.0006401 Micro 1
33009 1.9553 0.0004963 Micro 1
31141 1.9250 0.0004886 Micro 1
37195 1.8731 0.0004754 Micro 1
27169 1.7226 0.0004372 Micro 1
53025 1.6332 0.0004145 Micro 1
37105 1.5234 0.0003867 Micro 1
48057 1.4763 0.0003747 Micro 1
09005 1.3677 0.0003472 Micro 1
  1. Los Alamos, NM
  2. Allegan, MI
  3. Grafton, NH
  4. Platte, NE
  5. Wilson, NC
  6. Winona, MN
  7. Grant, WA
  8. Lee, NC
  9. Calhoun, TX
  10. Litchfield, CT