Here is an overview of the overall feedback on the course, 62% of participants rated the course a 7 or higher.
Below I compile participant feedback for all quantifiable questions for each facilitator on the left side of the tab, and qualitative feedback on the right side.
| All Responses for Adelfa Hegarty |
|---|
Discussions |
| All Responses for Alisha Powers |
|---|
Excellent |
Teachers sharing their thoughts and the presentation was helpful |
Many teachers agree we are unhappy with the holes in the curriculum, having to print |
| All Responses for Ashmeet Sahni |
|---|
We had a chance to really look at a lesson. |
| All Responses for Bethany Brown |
|---|
talking to peers about what works |
homework suggestions |
Great job! |
A lot of great discussions. |
Nothing |
Thank you for focusing on the math! |
Learned about effective questioning. |
More time in break out rooms. |
conversation with other grade level alike teachers, time to read through the IM curriculum |
I want more supports mentioned for Special Education in these Learnzillion PDs. |
Breakout rooms to talk with other schools |
Learnzillion site there seems to be so much clicking around to find the lesson, I wish |
I liked how we looked at our grade level lesson |
Nothing about facilitation skills. She was great. |
Well prepared; patient with slow feedback from audience/teacher; clear explanation of |
Nothing the facilitator did wrong. To me, this is such a dry subject and is not easy |
There is way too much focus on equity, and there is not nearly enough focus on the math. |
The internet only went down at Sessions, and at PBE it worked! |
Everything else. PLEASE focus on the math. |
informational |
thanks! |
focused and clear |
Jamboard |
information |
| All Responses for Callie Herring |
|---|
She was a great facilitator! |
Learning how to elicit student thinking and getting a chance to try on being a student |
I would not have changed anything |
At first I had no clue what I was going to learn today because I didn't participate in the |
the pacing and questioning using the activities were spot on to model the questions. |
nothing that I can think of |
Understanding how we can elicit student thinking. |
More time... |
| All Responses for Emily Griffin |
|---|
Good flow of the lesson |
| All Responses for Emily Howard |
|---|
Pace, assignment |
0 |
good job |
Structured well, pace was good. |
Looking at an actual lesson |
Everything |
Small Groups |
Was confused about the overall goal of the lesson or what the takeaway focus was, took me |
| All Responses for Gregory Leap |
|---|
This session was helpful because it was content specific. I liked the discussion on the |
Relevant material. |
Diving deeper into the Critical Concepts |
maybe a little faster pace |
Breakout rooms according to your preferred grade. I teach 3 grades and this was very |
Email follow up work with link. |
I'm okay, sometimes you all go pretty fast because you are veteran math teachers and you |
Knowing that I am not the only one re-learning what I forgot while learning what I don't |
I enjoyed the breakout sessions. I think they were timed well, not too long or too short |
Really enjoying these classes Thank you |
Critical concept map and focus questions |
nothing |
Looking at the math from the Student perspective |
Nothing |
It was a good lesson. I'm just tired at the end of the day. Also, I find students seem to |
I understood what was going on. |
Clearer instructions. |
Breakout rooms were either too short or too long. Directions were not always clear. And |
We started and ended on time. |
It would be nice if this were more relevant. I feel like what we are learning, I already |
I apologize but these trainings have been very repetitive. I have been a part of the SDEM |
working with my co-teacher regarding our classes |
nothing it went well |
It was a good introduction to the material |
Clear concise statements about directions - written or verbal |
none at this time |
It was quick and to the point |
not sure at this time |
I need more of the nuts and bolts of daily lesson facilitating rather that the reasoning |
Seeing good math discussion. |
nothing it was perfect |
He was nice. not boring. |
nothing. |
Examples given and the breakout rooms |
Time to work with other teachers. |
The timing was well done and I did like the breakout rooms. The questions were relevant |
Respectfully, I didn't feel like I learned anything new. |
Everything |
Nothing |
Great facilitator. Working as a student is always helpful |
nothing |
Breakout Rooms |
technology and dialogue was smooth |
the discourse that was promoted in breakouts. |
I was satisfied with the session. I would like to get to the meat of the classroom |
| All Responses for Hanady Elsayed |
|---|
Looking forward to an upcoming lesson and practicing with team mates. |
Collaboration and input on lessons and targeting student needs with thought provoking |
She was great, but didn't know the program Learn Zillion that we use. |
Breakout room with my grade level |
Knowing more about the LearnZillion platform that we have to use for IM |
Break out room conversation regarding preparing for a lesson |
Learning about platforms |
Hanady is very positive and knowledgeable. Love being in her sessions. |
People are exhausted and stretched thin but I think they were engaged. |
Continue to incorporate research cases that speak to the inequities in our math spaces. |
The act of going into lessons that we are actually going to teach was very valuable. It |
Additional time to process and discuss with whole group our thinking and to see the scope |
Everything |
More grade level practice. Looking more through IM |
I am new to the Teaching Lab and feel very supported here in these PD sessions. Thank you! |
Clarity in the approach to questioning so we focus on student understanding. |
Looking at upcoming lessons. |
Our breakout room in our grade level |
More grade level practice looking through IM-there are so many parts to look at, it's |
great session! |
discussion about questioning |
nothing |
More participants to share their thoughts. |
Too many questions that I had to answer without any background. I was waiting for some |
Opening |
Needs to be more engaging and give us some content. I am still not sure what the role of |
Good guidance by insructor. |
I don'y think you need the techers talking as much as you need the instructor giving us |
pacing |
demonstrations and collaboration |
I couldn't get to prework |
Great job |
Learning together |
0 |
Opportunities to work in small breakout rooms. Sharing out other groups' work. |
| All Responses for Kelsey Wasser |
|---|
The opportunities for grade level collaboration |
Thank you for giving us time to work on our grade-level content. |
Great training. |
Small groups |
nothing |
Emily Griffin has so much positive energy. She is a wonderful facilitator! |
Breakout rooms |
Nothing. |
Great working with grade team. |
Understanding building questions |
My preparedness |
This was the best session yet! Thank you... |
Break Out Room Discussions |
Getting paid... I hope the grant money is processed soon |
Strong connection to what the teachers are grappling with right now. |
It was great! |
Great pacing and loved the different ways you asked for participation |
Opportunities to work many times with grade level partners |
I liked that we were able to work on a lesson that we will actually be teaching soon, that |
Perhaps a little more time to collaborate in the breakout rooms. |
Breakout rooms |
I think more awareness of other grade level standards so we could understand what students |
safe learning environment |
The breakout sessions |
Maybe an example of quality questioning. |
Good session |
Time to work |
Nothing |
everything |
I liked that my breakout room was with teachers from my school. |
I feel it went a little fast for me because I am not good with computers but I hope next |
Pacing of presentation |
Session was fine. We understand internet issues, we've all had them at some point or |
I liked Activity 1 and low stress and the conversation around it. |
I stress myself out when asked to respond, thinking I don't have the academic language to |
Engagement |
I think engagement with the Jamboard went well. |
I think that doing the training after a day of teaching may have made it challenging for |
Awesome course |
Group participation and collaboration |
nothing |
Great leading and modeling of teacher methods. |
Seeing a lesson in action. |
Nothing :) |
It was a welcoming environment. |
My prior knowledge. |
The Jam Board breakouts. |
This is not a great time because it's hard to focus after a full day of teaching. |
Discussion |
| All Responses for Kimberly Robertson |
|---|
The break out rooms. |
Thanks for your time. You did great with little participation from the panel |
Kimberly was great. |
More time with lesson plans |
Everything |
breakout rooms with peers |
nothing |
Kimberly was great. |
more help with actual lessons |
Thank you |
Breakout rooms |
More time |
Teacher collaboration |
| All Responses for Kristen Taylor |
|---|
Demonstration of how to teach the warm up. |
Maybe pose discussion questions in a more informal way that makes people more comfortable |
It all went well. We ended up having a good open communication. |
Better understanding of the racial theory presented (more in depth knowledge), background |
we are already using a curriculum that addresses equity issues. It's aligned to the |
I think we were a little uncomfortable on the whole group share outs this first time, we |
Writing the purpose statement and discussing it with others. Thinking about the importance |
When we got to the "Equity based mathematics teaching practices", the bridge was not |
opportunity to share out |
more time in the breakout rooms |
The facilitator was encouraging and provided positive energy to the professional |
I was able to connect with other teachers. |
A list of contacts would have been useful. |
Nice to start to get to know everyone in the group. Looking foward to learning more. |
nothing |
The presenter was prepared with the materials needed to conduct the session. |
Less note - taking scrolling and searching and filling out. |
| All Responses for Mary Shaw-Lewis |
|---|
Mary is very positive. She makes the Zoom session more enjoyable. |
Teachers having an opportunity to share with each other |
More time for teachers to do that |
Everything: Organized, knowledgeable, courageous, and enlightening |
More time... |
Very Responsive. But trying to get too much content into the session. We had amazing |
Conversations, facilitator built a trusting space |
less content. The content is heavy and this session was at the end of the day. More space |
Mary was fantastic. She was engaging and kept us on-task even at the end of a long day. |
Everything. |
Maybe less material to get through. We got stuck on some conversations but they were great |
Positive interaction between participants |
Nothing, it was great! |
I enjoyed the conversations we had around the inquiry cycle and how |
Nothing, it was great! |
It was great |
Everything Mary was knowledgeable fun and engaging |
Nothing |
| All Responses for Sheena Lights |
|---|
Timing |