10/14/2021
| purposes |
| 1. Explain how to connect political life from daily life, 2. Confirm the relevance of heterogeneous components to participation in politics, 3. Explore the impact of technology and civil society. |
| This is an R Markdown presentation of the article. Markdown is a simple formatting syntax for authoring HTML, PDF, and MS Word documents. For more details on reading the article,see see<https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=19956584-202012-202102200001-202102200001-1-43\>. |
Social structure, political cognitive attitudes and cultural values are the main constructs to explain political participation. (Norris, 2002)
H1. The more positive the awareness of civic norms, the more inclined to engagement.
H2. The greater the scope of daily contact, the more inclined to engagement.
H3. The opinion network is heterogeneous and more likely to engagement
H4. Social media is intermediary
2014 Taiwan Social Change Survey, citizenship (1) and (2) data, Specific questions for Taiwan (political communication) ISSP, International Social Survey Program Common questionnaire Executed by the Academia Sinica, A total of 1875 interviews were successfully completed.
# The dependent variable obeys the Poisson distribution, # which is a count model of positive integers. # Usually refers to the number of occurrences, # from 0 to positive integer infinity, # such as the frequency of bills being rejected, # the number of articles published or the frequency of coups, # also known as "discrete variables" (Long, Ch8, 1997), # It is mainly due to the internal process and # structure of data generation, # so the analysis method of connecting variables # is not suitable.
# There are 1,021 users and 854 non-users of social media, # with a total observation value of 1,875. It does not mean # that different groups do not come into contact with each # other. Instead, use social media interaction, field, or # technology. This article continues by analyzing and # comparing the relationship between media use to # politics or life through a cross-tabulation, and examining # whether there are differences in the use of new media.
# "Daily Contact" Questions: # How many people do you interact with from morning to night # in a typical day? (Including nodding, greeting, speaking, # making phone calls, writing letters, and through computer # networks, whether the other party knows or does not know it is # counted.) # (1) 0-4 people (2) 5-9 people (3) 10-19 people # (4) 20-49 people (5) 50-99 people (6) more than 100 people ### Classification # (1) High degree of contact, # (2) Medium degree of contact, # (3) Low degree of contact
The dependent variable “active political participation” is a positive integer accumulation, so the Poisson regression model is used for analysis and the total marginal effect (AME) is used as the report.
“Social media usage” is divided into two groups and modeled separately.
“Daily Contact” and “Opinion Network” are divided into four different types of social interaction scenarios,
(Models 1 to 3) are for non-users of social media,
(Models 4 to 6) are social media users
People have the need to connect with others in society. As the social circle expands, they are more likely to come into contact with strange or heterogeneous others. However, occasional or inadvertent daily contact may have opportunities to change stereotypes
| > In a democratic society, under the value norms of mutual respect and understanding, although homogeneous interaction may have natural potential incentives, heterogeneous situations should and may be more conducive to learning and tolerance. |