Heights of adults. (7.7, p. 260) Researchers studying anthropometry collected body girth measurements and skeletal diameter measurements, as well as age, weight, height and gender, for 507 physically active individuals. The histogram below shows the sample distribution of heights in centimeters.
Ans. Point Estimate Mean is 171.1 and Median is 170.3.
summary(bdims$hgt)
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 147.2 163.8 170.3 171.1 177.8 198.1
IQR= 3rd Qrt-1st Quartile
sd(bdims$hgt)
## [1] 9.407205
177.8 - 163.8
## [1] 14
180CM is within .94 SD away from the mean, which means its not unusually tall. The 155 cm is 1.7 sd away from the mean which is unusually short as its almost over 90th percintile.
(180-171.1)/9.4
## [1] 0.9468085
(155-171.1)/9.4
## [1] -1.712766
The mean and SD should be the similar as the sample size is large enough.
We would usestandard error which is the measure of variability of all variables estimates. SE= SD/Sqrt(n)
9.4/sqrt(507)
## [1] 0.4174687
Thanksgiving spending, Part I. The 2009 holiday retail season, which kicked off on November 27, 2009 (the day after Thanksgiving), had been marked by somewhat lower self-reported consumer spending than was seen during the comparable period in 2008. To get an estimate of consumer spending, 436 randomly sampled American adults were surveyed. Daily consumer spending for the six-day period after Thanksgiving, spanning the Black Friday weekend and Cyber Monday, averaged $84.71. A 95% confidence interval based on this sample is ($80.31, $89.11). Determine whether the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.
False- Sample mean always fall within CI.
True- The distribution is slightly skewed so the CI should not be valid.
True, Sample mean should be with in CI of the orignal sample.
True, The sample is large enough to make this assumption.
True, the larger the sample or the lower the CI then the narower the CI.
False. We need a sample size 9 times bigger.
True. (89.11-80.31)/2 =4.4
Gifted children, Part I. Researchers investigating characteristics of gifted children col- lected data from schools in a large city on a random sample of thirty-six children who were identified as gifted children soon after they reached the age of four. The following histogram shows the dis- tribution of the ages (in months) at which these children first counted to 10 successfully. Also provided are some sample statistics.
Yes, Sample is large enough and random. The population distribution is not strongly skewed so is normal. and the sample are independent.
n=36; x=30.69; sd=4.31
se=sd/sqrt(n)
zscore=(x-32)/se
p=pnorm((zscore))
p
## [1] 0.0341013
We reject the null hypothesis as p< .10
z=1.645
a=x-z*se
b=x+z*se
a
## [1] 29.50834
b
## [1] 31.87166
Yes, our results agreee as tge 32 months is outside our CI.
Gifted children, Part II. Exercise above describes a study on gifted children. In this study, along with variables on the children, the researchers also collected data on the mother’s and father’s IQ of the 36 randomly sampled gifted children. The histogram below shows the distribution of mother’s IQ. Also provided are some sample statistics.
H0: Average IQ of mothers of Gifted children = 100 H1: Average IQ of mother of Gifted children != 100
P value of 0< .1, we reject the null hypotheses. There is Significant evidence that the avergae IQ of mothers of gifted chikdreb is different fom the rest of population.
x=118.2; sd=6.5; n=36
zscore=(x-100)/sd*sqrt(n)
se=sd/sqrt(n)
se
## [1] 1.083333
zscore
## [1] 16.8
1-pnorm((zscore),2)
## [1] 0
x-1.64*se
## [1] 116.4233
x+1.64*se
## [1] 119.9767
Yes agree, averageIQ if 100 is not in the CI of 116.4 and 119.98
CLT. Define the term “sampling distribution” of the mean, and describe how the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of the mean change as sample size increases.
Samling distribution means that we aare taking a sample from a distribution which maybe or maybe not normal. However as the size od the sample that we take from the distribution increase the samle mean approaches the true population mea and the shape of it become a normal distribution with the spread becoming leaner and leaner as sample size increase.
CFLBs. A manufacturer of compact fluorescent light bulbs advertises that the distribution of the lifespans of these light bulbs is nearly normal with a mean of 9,000 hours and a standard deviation of 1,000 hours.
Probablity = 6.68%
x=9000
sd=1000
z=(10500-x)/sd
p=1-pnorm(z)
p
## [1] 0.0668072
Distribution is normal with N(9000,258.2)
se=sd/sqrt(15)
se
## [1] 258.1989
0% as the z score is 5.80 away from the mean. There in no chance that 15 randomly choses lights will last more than 10500.
z= (10500-x)/se
z
## [1] 5.809475
x <- seq(5000, 13000,length=sd)
plot(x,dnorm(x,mean=9000,sd=sd),type = "l",lty=1,lwd=3,col="blue", ylim = c(0,.0015))
x <- seq(8000,10000,length=200)
curve(dnorm(x,9000, 258.2),add=TRUE,lty=2,col="red")
(e) Could you estimate the probabilities from parts (a) and (c) if the lifespans of light bulbs had a skewed distribution?
No we couldnot estimate with a skewed distribution becasue sample size is not large enough. Normallt for CLT, we would like minumum n>30.
Same observation, different sample size. Suppose you conduct a hypothesis test based on a sample where the sample size is n = 50, and arrive at a p-value of 0.08. You then refer back to your notes and discover that you made a careless mistake, the sample size should have been n = 500. Will your p-value increase, decrease, or stay the same? Explain.
The z score will decrease and the p value will decrease as the sample szie increase thus you might have a different result.