| Culture | iHAP_Mean | iHAP_SD | iLAP_Mean | iLAP_SD | iHAN_Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European American | 3.476 | 0.7962 | 3.919 | 0.7551 | 1.404 |
| Taiwanese | 3.164 | 0.7805 | 3.805 | 0.7284 | 1.515 |
| iHAN_SD | iLAN_Mean | iLAN_SD |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5445 | 1.424 | 0.5216 |
| 0.5088 | 1.521 | 0.5597 |
| Culture | iHAPi_Mean | iHAPi_SD | iLAPi_Mean | iLAPi_SD | iHANi_Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European American | 0.7373 | 0.4179 | 1.051 | 0.4002 | -0.7287 |
| Taiwanese | 0.5947 | 0.4888 | 1.114 | 0.4443 | -0.6974 |
| iHANi_SD | iLANi_Mean | iLANi_SD |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2545 | -0.721 | 0.3042 |
| 0.2925 | -0.6823 | 0.3354 |
| Culture | aHAP_Mean | aHAP_SD | aLAP_Mean | aLAP_SD | aHAN_Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European American | 2.747 | 0.7897 | 2.816 | 0.7928 | 2.236 |
| Taiwanese | 2.553 | 0.7329 | 3.043 | 0.7266 | 2.072 |
| aHAN_SD | aLAN_Mean | aLAN_SD |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7055 | 2.708 | 0.8229 |
| 0.7083 | 2.764 | 0.8176 |
| Culture | aHAPi_Mean | aHAPi_SD | aLAPi_Mean | aLAPi_SD | aHANi_Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European American | 0.2379 | 0.653 | 0.3083 | 0.6774 | -0.2795 |
| Taiwanese | 0.1415 | 0.6873 | 0.6312 | 0.6786 | -0.3954 |
| aHANi_SD | aLANi_Mean | aLANi_SD |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5687 | 0.2108 | 0.7103 |
| 0.5626 | 0.316 | 0.6689 |
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## iHAP 1 131.6 131.58 280.320 <2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 0.9 0.95 2.018 0.1557
## iHAP:Culture 1 1.6 1.64 3.504 0.0615 .
## Residuals 1072 503.2 0.47
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## enthusiastic_i 1 102.1 102.12 151.527 <2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 2.8 2.79 4.133 0.0423 *
## enthusiastic_i:Culture 1 0.4 0.45 0.666 0.4145
## Residuals 1072 722.4 0.67
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## excited_i 1 146.3 146.27 218.688 < 2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 12.9 12.92 19.312 1.22e-05 ***
## excited_i:Culture 1 1.4 1.36 2.031 0.154
## Residuals 1072 717.0 0.67
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## elated_i 1 152.4 152.43 191.314 <2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 1.7 1.70 2.131 0.145
## elated_i:Culture 1 0.1 0.05 0.066 0.797
## Residuals 1072 854.1 0.80
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## iLAP 1 52.5 52.48 98.973 < 2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 18.2 18.24 34.408 5.95e-09 ***
## iLAP:Culture 1 0.2 0.21 0.389 0.533
## Residuals 1072 568.4 0.53
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## relaxed_i 1 24.8 24.785 30.357 4.5e-08 ***
## Culture 1 0.0 0.033 0.041 0.840
## relaxed_i:Culture 1 0.2 0.240 0.293 0.588
## Residuals 1072 875.2 0.816
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## calm_i 1 47.8 47.81 60.119 2.07e-14 ***
## Culture 1 4.6 4.65 5.844 0.0158 *
## calm_i:Culture 1 5.7 5.67 7.129 0.0077 **
## Residuals 1072 852.5 0.80
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## peaceful_i 1 45.5 45.51 51.282 1.48e-12 ***
## Culture 1 26.0 25.98 29.278 7.73e-08 ***
## peaceful_i:Culture 1 2.3 2.28 2.572 0.109
## Residuals 1072 951.3 0.89
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## serene_i 1 100.2 100.23 116.349 <2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 86.6 86.65 100.583 <2e-16 ***
## serene_i:Culture 1 0.3 0.34 0.393 0.531
## Residuals 1072 923.5 0.86
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## iHAN 1 58.6 58.56 133.820 < 2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 12.2 12.24 27.980 1.49e-07 ***
## iHAN:Culture 1 3.8 3.75 8.575 0.00348 **
## Residuals 1072 469.1 0.44
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## fearful_i 1 56.0 55.97 71.420 < 2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 16.8 16.77 21.397 4.19e-06 ***
## fearful_i:Culture 1 3.8 3.82 4.871 0.0275 *
## Residuals 1072 840.1 0.78
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## hostile_i 1 120.7 120.66 203.719 <2e-16 ***
## Culture 1 0.3 0.29 0.493 0.483
## hostile_i:Culture 1 1.0 0.98 1.659 0.198
## Residuals 1072 634.9 0.59
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## nervous_i 1 28.0 28.00 26.904 2.56e-07 ***
## Culture 1 36.7 36.73 35.291 3.83e-09 ***
## nervous_i:Culture 1 0.9 0.86 0.826 0.364
## Residuals 1072 1115.7 1.04
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## iLAN 1 23.9 23.932 36.877 1.74e-09 ***
## Culture 1 0.2 0.231 0.356 0.5509
## iLAN:Culture 1 4.0 3.988 6.145 0.0133 *
## Residuals 1072 695.7 0.649
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## dull_i 1 43.4 43.44 45.628 2.34e-11 ***
## Culture 1 40.7 40.69 42.741 9.65e-11 ***
## dull_i:Culture 1 0.1 0.07 0.077 0.781
## Residuals 1072 1020.7 0.95
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## sleepy_i 1 33.4 33.45 32.507 1.53e-08 ***
## Culture 1 0.1 0.12 0.114 0.736
## sleepy_i:Culture 1 1.2 1.17 1.142 0.286
## Residuals 1072 1103.0 1.03
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## sluggish_i 1 31.3 31.283 29.32 7.57e-08 ***
## Culture 1 21.6 21.594 20.24 7.58e-06 ***
## sluggish_i:Culture 1 30.8 30.840 28.91 9.32e-08 ***
## Residuals 1072 1143.7 1.067
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal HAP was 0.48, p = 2.204638310^{-34}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal HAP was 0.4, p = 4.549314510^{-20}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal enthusiasm was 0.35, p = 3.365236310^{-18}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal enthusiasm was 0.34, p = 9.345263610^{-15}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal excited was 0.39, p = 3.479300110^{-22}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal excited was 0.34, p = 9.592668410^{-15}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal elated was 0.41, p = 1.668006210^{-25}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal elated was 0.36, p = 1.384746910^{-16}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal LAP was 0.28, p = 6.413937510^{-12}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal LAP was 0.33, p = 3.905521510^{-14}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal relaxed was 0.17, p = 2.233835610^{-5}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal relaxed was 0.15, p = 5.80616610^{-4}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal calm was 0.16, p = 9.167528210^{-5}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal calm was 0.33, p = 1.007538710^{-13}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal peaceful was 0.18, p = 1.512973210^{-5}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal peaceful was 0.29, p = 3.820278710^{-11}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal serene was 0.3, p = 1.850186710^{-13}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal serene was 0.3, p = 1.246567610^{-11}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal HAN was 0.28, p = 4.560788910^{-12}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal HAN was 0.42, p = 5.650377910^{-23}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal fearful was 0.18, p = 1.513713110^{-5}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal fearful was 0.33, p = 2.47035410^{-14}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal hostile was 0.38, p = 4.451790610^{-21}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal hostile was 0.42, p = 1.123107510^{-22}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal nervous was 0.16, p = 1.463742610^{-4}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal nervous was 0.23, p = 3.499605110^{-7}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal LAN was 0.1, p = 0.0132712.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal LAN was 0.27, p = 2.156158910^{-9}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal dull was 0.17, p = 4.578016110^{-5}.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal dull was 0.19, p = 1.765782410^{-5}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal sleepy was 0.14, p = 0.0010291.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal sleepy was 0.21, p = 1.583670310^{-6}.
For US participants, correlation between actual and ideal sluggish was 0.02, p = 0.6038007.
For Taiwanese participants, correlation between actual and ideal sluggish was 0.34, p = 7.146749510^{-15}.
Positive (13 items): enthusiastic, excited, strong, euphoric, rested, calm, peaceful, relaxed, elated, content, happy, satisfied, serene
Negative (9 items): dull, sleepy, sluggish, fearful, hostile, nervous, lonely, sad, unhappy
##
## Error: ID
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 0.006015 0.006015
##
## Error: ID:Valence
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 1.931e-05 1.931e-05
##
## Error: Within
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## Culture 1 0.67 0.6686 7.087 0.00782 **
## Valence 1 1.86 1.8579 19.695 9.55e-06 ***
## Culture:Valence 1 0.61 0.6141 6.510 0.01080 *
## Residuals 2108 198.86 0.0943
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Valence = Positive:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## European American - Taiwanese 0.0018 0.0194 2108 0.093 0.9260
##
## Valence = Negative:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## European American - Taiwanese 0.0719 0.0194 2108 3.697 0.0002
## Culture = European American:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## Positive - Negative -0.138 0.0278 2108 -4.962 <.0001
##
## Culture = Taiwanese:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## Positive - Negative -0.068 0.0334 2108 -2.037 0.0418
There was a main effect of culture (European American > Taiwanese) and a main effect of valence (negative > positive) but they were qualified by an interaction between Culture x Valence: Between cultures, European Americans had a greater profile correlation than Taiwanese for Negative states, while there was no cultural difference in the profile correlation of positive states. Further, within cultures, European Americans had a greater profile correlation for negative than positive states, whereas Taiwanese had a greater profile correlation for positive than negative states.
Positive (9 items): enthusiastic, excited, calm, peaceful, relaxed, elated, content, happy, satisfied
Negative (9 items): dull, sleepy, sluggish, fearful, hostile, nervous, lonely, sad, unhappy
##
## Error: ID
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 0.007486 0.007486
##
## Error: ID:Valence
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 2.669 2.669
##
## Error: Within
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## Culture 1 2.06 2.059 17.727 2.66e-05 ***
## Valence 1 4.42 4.425 38.086 8.10e-10 ***
## Culture:Valence 1 0.03 0.025 0.219 0.64
## Residuals 2094 243.26 0.116
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## European American - Taiwanese 0.0647 0.0153 2094 4.232 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Valence
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## Positive - Negative -0.181 0.0306 2094 -5.904 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Culture
Unlike the version above with unequal number of states for positive vs. negative affect, there was no longer a Culture x Valence interaction. However, there was still a main effect of culture (European American > Taiwanese) and a main effect of valence (negative > positive).
HAP (3 items): enthusiastic, excited, elated
LAP (3 items): calm, relaxed, serene
HAN (3 items): fearful, hostile, nervous
LAN (3 items): dull, sleepy, sluggish
##
## Error: ID
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 1.23 1.23
##
## Error: ID:Quadrant
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 45.12 45.12
## Quadrant 2 16.00 8.00
##
## Error: Within
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## Culture 1 20.7 20.731 61.79 5.11e-15 ***
## Quadrant 3 19.5 6.493 19.35 1.94e-12 ***
## Culture:Quadrant 3 24.1 8.049 23.99 2.35e-15 ***
## Residuals 3327 1116.2 0.335
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## Quadrant = HAP:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## European American - Taiwanese 0.1330 0.0439 3327 3.030 0.0025
##
## Quadrant = LAP:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## European American - Taiwanese 0.4640 0.0418 3327 11.110 <.0001
##
## Quadrant = HAN:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## European American - Taiwanese 0.0217 0.0399 3327 0.545 0.5858
##
## Quadrant = LAN:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## European American - Taiwanese 0.0566 0.0402 3327 1.408 0.1593
## Culture = European American:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## HAP - LAP -0.0993 0.0609 3327 -1.631 0.3612
## HAP - HAN -0.3070 0.0594 3327 -5.168 <.0001
## HAP - LAN -0.2600 0.0595 3327 -4.368 0.0001
## LAP - HAN -0.2078 0.0583 3327 -3.564 0.0021
## LAP - LAN -0.1607 0.0584 3327 -2.751 0.0304
## HAN - LAN 0.0470 0.0569 3327 0.827 0.8419
##
## Culture = Taiwanese:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## HAP - LAP 0.2318 0.0746 3327 3.107 0.0103
## HAP - HAN -0.4183 0.0730 3327 -5.729 <.0001
## HAP - LAN -0.3363 0.0731 3327 -4.599 <.0001
## LAP - HAN -0.6500 0.0703 3327 -9.241 <.0001
## LAP - LAN -0.5681 0.0705 3327 -8.060 <.0001
## HAN - LAN 0.0819 0.0688 3327 1.191 0.6328
##
## P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 4 estimates
There was a main effect of culture (European American > Taiwanese) and a main effect of quadrant (HAN & LAN > HAP & LAP) but they were qualified by an interaction between Culture x Quadrant: Between cultures, European Americans had a greater profile correlation than Taiwanese for HAP and LAP states (i.e., positive states), while there was no cultural difference in the profile correlation of HAN and LAN (i.e., negative states). Further, within cultures, European Americans had a greater profile correlation for HAN and LAN states (no diff between the two) than HAP and LAP states (no diff between the two), whereas Taiwanese had a greater profile correlation for HAN & LAN (no difference between the two) than HAP, which in turn had a greater profile correlation than LAP.
High Arousal (10 items): enthusiastic, excited, elated, euphoric, fearful, hostile, nervous, aroused, astonished, surprised
Low Arousal (13 items): rested, calm, peaceful, relaxed, serene, dull, sleepy, sluggish, idle, quiet, still, passive, inactive
##
## Error: ID
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 0.2577 0.2577
##
## Error: ID:Arousal
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 12.89 12.89
##
## Error: Within
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## Culture 1 3.7 3.701 16.38 5.37e-05 ***
## Arousal 1 3.2 3.163 14.00 0.000187 ***
## Culture:Arousal 1 0.1 0.145 0.64 0.423722
## Residuals 2125 480.1 0.226
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
There was a main effect of culture (Taiwanese > European Americans) and a main effect of arousal (high arousal > low arousal) but no interaction between Culture x Arousal.
High Arousal (10 items): enthusiastic, excited, elated, euphoric, fearful, hostile, nervous, aroused, astonished, surprised
Low Arousal (10 items): calm, peaceful, relaxed, serene, dull, sleepy, sluggish, quiet, passive, inactive
##
## Error: ID
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 0.3336 0.3336
##
## Error: ID:Arousal
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq
## Culture 1 10.79 10.79
##
## Error: Within
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## Culture 1 4.4 4.393 17.954 2.36e-05 ***
## Arousal 1 2.3 2.312 9.450 0.00214 **
## Culture:Arousal 1 0.3 0.307 1.254 0.26285
## Residuals 2121 519.0 0.245
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Same as above version with unequal number of states for low vs. high arousal: There was a main effect of culture (Taiwanese > European Americans) and a main effect of arousal (high arousal > low arousal) but no interaction between Culture x Arousal.