Project Arctic is an educational tool: a real-life simulation of the geopolitics of the Arctic Region, in the context of climate change. As the acceleration of climate change produces increasing environmental impacts globally, the Arctic region, given its unique status both environmentally and geopolitically, is drawing rising attention from international stakeholders.
Russia is deploying an increasingly large number of military assets to the region, becoming a foremost actor to engage in a strategic build-up of military forces in the area. The People‘s Republic of China has dubbed itself a “near-Arctic state,” in anticipation of the upcoming “Polar Silk Road” project — a network of Arctic shipping routes. The United States has a plethora of interests in the Arctic, varying from the its territorial sea, navigation through international straits and upholding the freedom of the seas, to fishery conservation, pollution control, and resource development. The European Union has become more attentive to the region, since it is ‘’one of the world’s strongest proponents of greater international efforts to fight climate change, through the development of alternative energy sources, resource efficiency, and climate change research’’.
Project Arctic employs a simulation model as a pedagogical methodology to demonstrate how climate change, geopolitics and policy are inextricably intertwined in the Arctic Region. Via this simulation model, Project Arctic aims to enable participants to gain a greater understanding of the dynamics and potential outcomes of future policies in the region. Through combining critical and creative thinking, decision-making processes, negotiations, and analytical skills, participants will have the chance to engage in a dynamic modelling scenario in which the complexities of the climate change-conflict nexus are explored. Environmental policy meets security policy, with crisis-solving skills having to be adapted to the unprecedented situation facing the Arctic
The Arctic Region is experiencing the effects of rising global temperatures: the dramatic recession of Arctic Sea ice may trigger competition for extraction of the vast reservoirs of oil and natural gas that lie under the vanishing ice – up to a quarter of the world’s undiscovered fossil fuel reserves, by some estimates. Some radical predictions for the region envision a new Cold War-like scenario. This simulation explores the interaction between the eight Arctic Council states: Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Russia, and the U.S, and two permanent members: the Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of The North and Aleut International Association.
Additionally, the simulation places the People‘s Republic of China, and the European Union Taskforce for the Arctic as members of the Arctic Council, to offer a comprehensive representation of the geopolitical players. Annual crises, the consequences of policy-making, and cooperation or lack thereof are only a couple of challenges participants will face in their endeavours to develop Arctic policies.
The simulation explores the geopolitical dynamics of the Arctic Region over approximately one decade (2021-2030), over 4 rounds. As early as 2030, some researchers say, the Arctic Ocean could lose essentially all of its ice during the warmest months of the year — a radical transformation that would upend Arctic ecosystems and disrupt many northern communities.
Each round will explore the evolution of the Arctic Region over two, respectively three years- covering different Arctic Council Chairmanships. During each round, there will be limited events triggered by climate change-induced challenges. If not dealt with properly, these crises spill over in the region.
In this simulation, there will be a minimalistic representation of the Arctic. Based on the decisions and policy-making of the Arctic Council, the map will be updated each round. Participants will be able to visualize how their choices affected the Arctic, as well as picture the impact of climate events in the region.
Duration: approx. 90 minutes/round Phases: 5- Crisis Reveal, Strategy-Building, Drafting Resolutions, Arctic Council (AC) Meeting, Negotiations with other Stakeholders.
Crisis Reveal (5 minutes)
Each round has 5 phases. During the first phase, Crisis Reveal, the updated Arctic Map is revealed - the effects of the adopted resolutions, policies, and participant’s actions will take a toll on the outlook of the region. After that, a time-limited crisis event will be announced.
Strategy-Building (15-20 minutes)
Following the newly revealed Crisis and the updated map, participants will have 15-20 minutes to strategize before the Arctic Council Meeting. During this phase, participants must think of a strategy for the upcoming Arctic Council Meeting and must endeavour to gain insights into what other stakeholders plan to do. This phase requires a strategic gameplay since participants must gather information regarding the others’ positions as to the Crisis, their potential priorities and goals, and how they might vote in the upcoming Crisis. This phase can also be used to find potential allies and to offer trade-offs in exchange for positive votes at the upcoming Arctic Council Meeting. Given that only States’ representatives can propose a Resolution in the Arctic Council Meeting, interest groups (secondary roles) must endeavour to persuade State decision-makers to support their interests in proposed Resolutions.
Drafting Resolutions (10 minutes)
After learning (or attempting to learn) what other participants plan to do, each State will have 10 minutes to draft a Resolution for the round. The resolution should be a strategic priority proposed by the State, which can be aimed at achieving the individual hidden objective, at solving the crisis, or at a mixture of both. The word limit for each resolution is 50-100 words. Participants will submit their Resolutions, then proceed to the Auditorium where the AC meeting will begin.
AC Meeting (40-45 minutes)
The purpose of the AC Meeting is for decision-makers to adopt a Strategic Plan-a compilation of the most popular resolutions, to deal with the Arctic Council and, subsequently, with the ongoing crisis. Due to diverging interests, participants will have to vote on the proposed resolutions. The top 5 resolutions which garner the most voting points will comprise the Arctic Council‘s Arctic Council Strategic Plan for each respective round.
The Chairmanship will coordinate the discussion, and participants will have the chance to ask for clarifications regarding the others State’s resolutions.
The Chairmanship will open the voting session. Each AC member will have 2 voting options: - Agree (which generates a +1 value for the proposed Resolution) - Disagree (which generates a 0 value) A sum of the votes will be made each round and the hierarchy of the votes will be revealed, as shown below:
E.g.: Votes for Canada’s resolution: Canada commits to support new protection for the High Arctic and to create opportunities for Inuit peoples. The Government of Canada is proposing infrastructure investments to build multi-use buildings, food processing units, and harbours.
The voting procedure will repeat for each Resolution proposed by each State, and then the ranking of the resolutions will be calculated. If there is a tie for 5th place, both Resolutions in 5th place will be passed.
Attention! Secondary roles can use two VETOs, throughout the game, on 2 Resolutions of their choice. Needless to say, interest groups sometimes have powerful lobbying powers and can attract international support for their cause. Hence, the three interest groups represented in this simulation will have 2 instances, of their choice, to overturn a Resolution via VETO. If an interest group chooses to VETO a Resolution, it cannot be adopted in that round. It is up to the interest groups to individually cast their VETO, immediately following the reveal of the top 5 Resolutions for the round.
Negotiations with other Stakeholders (15-20 minutes)
After the Arctic Council Strategic Plan has been compiled, participants will get an additional 15-20 minutes to discuss and strategize with the other participants, in anticipation of the upcoming round. They can pursue their hidden objective or can form alliances for the upcoming AC Meeting.
The phases repeat for a total of 4 rounds.
There are no fixed conditions for winning the game. However, this exercise being a simulation of the realities of negotiations between stakeholders in the Arctic Region, there are conditions in which the interests of some stakeholders will be than others at the end of the decade.
The following is the list of guidelines which stakeholders must strive to achieve in order to establish dominance at the end of the simulation:
At the end of the simulation, participants will be presented with a video clip that will provide a hypothetical narrative of which stakeholders’ strategies ended up achieving dominance at the conclusion of the simulation. In this way, participants will be able to observe the outcome of their strategies and how they affected the Arctic after a decade.
The theme of Iceland’s Arctic Council Chairmanship program for 2019-2021, “Together towards a Sustainable Arctic”, reflects a commitment to the principle of sustainable development and refers to the necessity of close cooperation between the States and peoples of the region and beyond. The Icelandic Chairmanship highlighted four priorities: the Arctic Marine Environment, Climate and Green Energy Solutions, People and Communities of the Arctic, and a Stronger Arctic Council. The Chairmanship culminated in the historic creation of the first Arctic Council Strategic Plan.
The Commitments adopted were:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Goal 1 – Arctic Climate monitor, assess, and highlight the impacts of climate change in the Arctic to encourage compliance with the Paris Agreement and support stronger global measures to reduce greenhouse gases and short-lived climate pollutants while strengthening circumpolar cooperation on climate science and observations; reduction of emissions; climate change mitigation, adaptation, and resilience; and exchange of knowledge and innovative technologies in support of these efforts;
Goal 2 – Healthy and Resilient Arctic Ecosystems promote pollution prevention, monitoring, assessment, conservation, and protection of Arctic biodiversity, ecosystems, and species habitats, based on the best available science, and respecting the importance of sustainable development for all current and future generations of Arctic inhabitants;
Goal 3 – Healthy Arctic Marine Environment promote conservation and sustainable use of the Arctic marine environment for the benefit of all current and future generations of Arctic inhabitants, encourage safety at sea, prevention of marine pollution and cooperate to improve knowledge of the Arctic marine environment, monitor and assess current and future impacts on Arctic marine ecosystems, work together to enhance cooperation on marine issues and promote respect for the rule of law and existing legal frameworks applicable to Arctic waters;
SUSTAINABLE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Goal 4 – Sustainable Social Development enhance work aimed at social and cultural inclusion and at improving health, safety, resilience, and well-being of all Arctic inhabitants with a particular focus on Indigenous Peoples;
Goal 5 – Sustainable Economic Development advance cooperation on sustainable and diverse economic development in the Arctic, promote economic cooperation, knowledge, and information sharing on innovative, sustainable, and low emission technologies, for the benefit and increased resilience of all Arctic inhabitants with a particular focus on Indigenous Peoples;
STRENGTHENING THE ARCTIC COUNCIL
Goal 6 – Knowledge and Communications generate, collect, analyse and communicate science, and traditional knowledge, and local knowledge, as appropriate, and enhance understanding of the Arctic within and beyond the region to inform policy shaping and decision making;
In this simulation there will be 11 members of the Arctic Council (Canada,People‘s Republic of China, The Russian Federation, The Kingdom of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, United States, European Union Taskforce, Aleut International Association) and 3 secondary roles: Rosoboronexport, COSCO and Greenpeace)
The Arctic and North Territory Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Yukon, and Northern parts of numerous provinces, including Manitoba, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Québec
Arctic and Northern Population Approximately 150,000
Permanent Participants with Canadian constituents Arctic Athabaskan Council, Inuit Circumpolar Council, and Gwich’in Council International
The Arctic is fundamental to Canada’s national identity. It is home to many Canadians, including indigenous peoples, across the Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, and the northern parts of many Canadian provinces. The Arctic also represents a potential for Canada’s future. Exercising sovereignty over Canada’s North, as over the rest of Canada, is Canada’s number one Arctic foreign policy priority. Canada’s Arctic and northern residents, especially Indigenous people, have not had access to the same services, opportunities, and standards of living as those enjoyed by other Canadians. There are longstanding inequalities in transportation, energy, communications, employment, community infrastructure, health, and education. While almost all past governments have put forward northern strategies, none closed these gaps for the people of the North or created a lasting legacy of sustainable economic development. Currently, Canada’s vision for the Arctic is a stable, rules-based region with clearly defined boundaries, dynamic economic growth and trade, vibrant Northern communities, and healthy and productive ecosystems. The Government of Canada has launched an ambitious Northern Strategy to respond to these opportunities and challenges. The Northern Strategy lays out four areas where Canada is taking action to advance its interests both domestically and internationally and to help unlock the North’s true potential: exercising sovereignty; promoting economic and social development; protecting our environmental heritage, and improving and devolving Northern governance. In pursuing each of these pillars in its Arctic foreign policy, Canada is committed to exercising the full extent of its sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction in the region. international efforts will focus on the following areas:
Role 1. Minister of Foreign Affairs
Role 2. Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs
Beijing’s interest in the Arctic has increased quickly in the last decade, with the polar regions included in China’s Twelfth Five-Year Plan (FYP) in 2011, the publication of China’s Arctic Policy in 2018, and the incorporation of the Polar Silk Road as part of President Xi Jinping’s signature One Belt, One Road (OBOR) program. China has declared itself a ‘near-Arctic’ state and outlined a ‘Polar Silk Road’(PSR) economic plan. The PSR is one of the most ambitious global infrastructure projects ever conceptualized. Through it, loans from Chinese state banks are funding the building of roads, railways, ports, pipelines, 5G telecommunications systems, and more, all around the world — and now, in the Arctic as well. The Polar Silk Road entails China investing in mining and energy, and setting up research stations and satellite data receiver stations. It is also working with Russia to link the Northern Sea Route through the Arctic Ocean with China’s Maritime Silk Road that starts in Asia and extends to Europe. That route can shave 10 days or more off a journey between China and Europe, compared to going through the Suez Canal.
The People’s Republic of China became an observer nation on the Arctic Council in 2013. Its interest in the Arctic region is clear: access to Arctic natural resources and use of the Northern Route, which work together to enhance its image as a major power. China enjoys the freedom or rights of scientific research, navigation, overflight, fishing, laying of submarine cables and pipelines, and resource exploration and exploitation in the high seas, the Area, and other relevant sea areas, and certain special areas in the Arctic Ocean, as stipulated in treaties such as the UNCLOS and the Spitsbergen Treaty, and general international law.
China’s increasing focus on commercial opportunities in the Arctic has grown in tandem with its efforts to contribute to the shaping of norms and rules in the region through multilateral forums. As indicated in its official Arctic policy, China states that it wants to play, “a constructive part in the making, interpretation, application, and development of international rules regarding the Arctic”. While China has contributed to other multilateral forums, the Arctic Council is the principal outlet for these efforts, where countries’ scientific and academic capacities in the Arctic play an important part. The Chinese government has emphasized the importance of the Arctic region for the country’s “environment, economy, society, and consequently, the trajectory of its sustainable development”, whereas China’s strategists have stressed the possibility for the Arctic region to become both a theatre of militarized competition over the control of the sea routes and resources and a ground for military power projection over three continents.
Five key policy areas are highlighted in People Republic‘s of China Arctic Policy:
Role 1: Foreign Minister of the People‘s Republic of China
Role 2: Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs
Arctic Territory Murmansk, Nenets, Yamal-Nenets, Chukotka Autonomous Okrugs and northern municipalities of Arkhangelsk, Komi Republic, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
Arctic Population 2.5 million
Arctic Indigenous Peoples 40 Indigenous Peoples live in Russia. The largest include: Dolgan, Nganasan, Nenets, Saami, Khanty, Chukchi, Evenk, Even, Enets, Eskimo (Yupik), and Yukagir
Russia is one of the main stakeholders in the Arctic. Russia’s involvement in the Arctic and interest in the Northern Sea Route (NSR) is tied to its interests: due to its geopositioning, Russia is interested in developing alternative shipping routes, as well as exploiting the region’s oil and natural gas. Some 70 percent of Russia’s reserves are on the continental shelf off its coast (primarily in the Arctic) and its status as the world’s largest supplier of oil and natural gas makes it a likely player in exploiting further reserves in international waters. Lately, Russia has been amassing military presence in the Arctic and has been testing its weapons.
Russia’s military presence in the Arctic seeks to achieve three objectives:
Russia’s military capabilities in the Arctic embody aerial and maritime early warning and defense, highlighted by the reopening of 50 previously closed Soviet-era military posts. This includes the refurbishment of 13 air bases, 10 radar stations, 20 border outposts, and 10 integrated emergency rescue stations. Russian special forces units are also part of an Arctic Brigade and have deployed to the region for exercises and training. Complementing the Russian Northern Fleet is the world’s largest nuclear and non-nuclear icebreaker fleet, numbering more than 40 ships.
Russia has adopted a development strategy for the Arctic for the period from October 2020 to 2035. The key ambitions highlighted are:
Role 1. Minister of Foreign Affairs
Role 2. Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs
Population: Greenland: 55,992 (January 2019) The Faroe Islands: 52,124 (January 2020) Denmark: 5,822,763 (January 2020) Arctic Indigenous Peoples: Inuit
The Kingdom of Denmark is centrally located in the Arctic. The three parts of the Realm – Denmark, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands – share several values and interests and all have a responsibility in and for the Arctic region. The Arctic makes up an essential part of the common cultural heritage and is home to part of the Kingdom’s population. The Kingdom is a vigorous and important actor in the strategically vital international cooperation on the future of the Arctic and in that connection attaches great importance to creating transparency in and understanding for cooperation.
Denmark has currently one aircraft, four helicopters, and four ships in Greenland, using them for monitoring the Arctic, fisheries control, and search and rescue operations. However, early this year the government allocated an extended budget and enhanced capabilities, potentially using long-range drones and radars. The Kingdom is trying to enhance its defence capabilities, in light of the increase in foreign activities in the Arctic. A cooperative framework between Denmark, the Faroe Islands, and Greenland, which claim to have a special responsibility for defence and security in the Arctic, has been put in place. The framework will significantly strengthen the Danish Defence’s capabilities to track and monitor the steadily increasing activities in the region, through investments in high-tech unmanned systems and capabilities. The efforts take place in dialogue and cooperation with the United States and other Arctic allies, while founded in NATO. Political support from the Faroe Islands and Greenland to the radars and construction work is of key importance.
While Denmark’s strategy for the Arctic for the period 2021-2030 has not been released yet, the highlights and key priorities of the 2011-2020 strategy were:
1.A peaceful, secure, and safe Arctic- with an emphasis on the UN’s Convention on the Law of the Sea, enhanced maritime safety, and exercising of sovereignty and surveillance;
2.A self-sustaining growth and development
3.Development with respect for the Arctic’s vulnerable climate, environment, and nature
4.Close cooperation with International Partners:
Role 1: Minister for Foreign Affairs
Role 2: Chief Consultant of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Arctic Territory Northern Ostrobothnia, Kainuu, and Lapland
Arctic Population 180,000 (Lapland), 5,500,000 (Finland)
Arctic Indigenous Peoples Saami
Finnish Lapland has been upheld as an example of how ecosystem services can help prevent ecological problems caused by human action, as well as a way to resolve land-use questions in an economically and environmentally sustainable way. Finland has attempted to position itself as a leader in sustainable development in the Arctic region. Moreover, Finland is often rated among the world’s top countries in terms of environmental protection standards.
With over 70% of the country covered, Finland is Europe’s most forested country. Of these forests, about 17,000 km2 of it are strictly protected. Finland’s forest resources are increasing as the natural growth of forests more than compensates for the amounts of timber logged. Finland’s contributions to global greenhouse gas emissions are small in global terms, but very high when measured per capita. Renewable energy sources account for about a quarter of all the energy used in Finland. A large part of this renewable energy is produced from residuals generated in the pulp and paper industry, including bio-sludge and wood chips. Almost half of the wood used in Finland is burnt to produce energy.
The Regional Council of Lapland has developed a climate change strategy for 2030. The strategy lists goals for Lapland to better mitigate climate change in the region. Lapland’s carbon dioxide emissions in 2009 were about 2.8 million tons, which is more than the Finnish average in proportion to population density. The province of Lapland sees climate change as bringing both economic opportunities for development, but also as a threat to traditional livelihoods.
Finland’s 2021 Arctic policy strategy sets out Finland’s key objectives in the Arctic region. All activities in the Arctic region must be based on ecological carrying capacity, climate protection, principles of sustainable development, and respect for the rights of indigenous peoples. The objectives arising from Finland’s economic interests can also be examined from this perspective. The strategy extends to the year 2030. Finland stresses the need to strengthen Arctic cooperation
The priorities of the new strategy are as follows:
Role 1: Minister for Foreign Affairs
Role 2: Secretary to the Minister
Arctic Territory: All of Iceland
Arctic Population: 365,000 Despite only having a population of slightly more than 337,000, in 2017 more than two million people visited the Iceland. While bringing a significant boom to the Icelandic economy after the 2008 Icelandic financial crisis, this tourism has brought environmental concerns with it. The government of Iceland, the tourism industry, and a growing body of academic researchers have dedicated much time, thought, and energy to ensure that nature conservation efforts are not jeopardized by such a large increase in annual visitors. Building tourist infrastructure in an already saturated housing market, developing wilderness areas as tourist resorts, damaging moss-covered geographies, and the breaking of recent volcanic features are just a few examples of how tourism is changing the Icelandic landscapes and having an impact on its environment.
Increased energy production from hydroelectric and geothermal sources has also put pressure on Iceland’s natural landscape, demanding more dams to be built across streams, rivers, and estuaries, and wilderness areas to be reclaimed for geothermal plants. The health of the ocean is of great importance to Iceland as an island nation. Therefore, Iceland imbues great importance in maintaining a healthy ocean environment and ensuring sustainable utilization of the ocean as one of the core sectors of Iceland’s economy. Iceland’s policies for ocean management and conservation are based on the UN Law of the Sea, which the country ratified in 1985; the concept of sustainable development, and the view that responsibility for the conservation and utilization of marine ecosystems is best placed in the hands of those states directly affected by the decisions taken and with the greatest interests at stake. Perhaps the largest environmental marine issue for Iceland is the sustainable harvesting of fish and other living marine resources. The alleged overfishing of mackerel in large part led to Iceland withdrawing its European Union application.
The theme of the Arctic Council Chairmanship program for 2019-2021 reflects Iceland’s commitment to the principle of sustainable development and refers to the necessity of close cooperation between the States and peoples of the region and beyond. With sustainable development as an overarching theme, Iceland had four priorities:
Role 1: Minister of Foreign Affairs
Role 2: Permanent Secretary of State
Arctic Territory Nordland, Troms and Finnmark, Svalbard and Jan Mayen
Arctic Maritime Area 1,500,000 square kilometers
Arctic Population 490,000
Arctic Indigenous Peoples Saami
North Norway accounts for 35 % of Norway’s mainland territory, and 9 % of Norway’s population lives north of the Arctic Circle. Responsible economic growth and future-oriented jobs in the north are therefore a matter of national interest. Considering Norway’s geopolitical location, this also has strategic significance beyond its demographics. Further developing North Norway as a strong, dynamic and highly competent region is the best way to safeguard Norwegian interests in the Arctic. Norway supports cooperation with non-Arctic states based on respect for international law and within the framework of existing cooperation structures.
Norway’s Arctic policy focuses on the international picture, relations with neighbouring countries in the Barents region, the northernmost regions of Finland, Norway, and Sweden (known in Nordic countries as the North Calotte), and the development of North Norway. The main features of Norway’s Arctic policy in the years ahead are:
Role 1: Minister of Foreign Affairs
Role 2: State Secretary
Arctic Territory Västerbotten County and Norrbotten County
Area approx. 153 400 km²
Arctic Population approx. 520 000
Arctic Indigenous Peoples Sámi
Sweden is an Arctic country. Sweden, therefore, has a particular interest in and responsibility for promoting peaceful, stable, and sustainable development and contributing to constructive international cooperation in the Arctic. As one of the eight Arctic countries, Sweden is a member of the Arctic Council. The Arctic is facing both new opportunities and severe challenges. This applies especially to the dramatic climate and environmental changes. Global warming has hit the Arctic particularly hard, reducing the extent of ice and permafrost cover and affecting biodiversity and the living conditions of the region’s population. The indigenous peoples are particularly vulnerable. Climate change has also played a part in increasing the economic importance of the Arctic. The smaller ice cover creates new conditions for the use of natural resources and sea transport, for instance. The region’s geostrategic importance has increased for both Arctic and non-Arctic states. Increased military presence and activity in the region have security policy consequences.
In Sweden’s Strategy for the Arctic, there are six primordial thematic areas:
Role 1: Minister for Foreign Affairs
Role 2: State Secretary for Foreign Affairs
Arctic Territory All United States territory north and west of the boundary formed by the Porcupine, Yukon, and Kuskokwim Rivers; all contiguous seas, including the Arctic Ocean and the Beaufort, Bering and Chukchi Seas; and the Aleutian chain.
Arctic Population Approximately 50,000
Arctic Indigenous Peoples Aleut, Alutiiq, Yup’ik, Iñupiaq (Northwest Alaskan Inuit), Athabaskan, Tlingit, and Haida
The United States, by virtue of Alaska, is an Arctic state and has substantial political, economic, energy, environmental, and other interests in the region. The USA has developed the “Regaining Arctic Dominance” strategy, outlining how it will pursue the Defence Department’s goal of defending US interests in that increasingly accessible region. The U.S. feels left behind, with its competitors already making strong moves in the region: ‘The Army plans to use its forces in the region “to project power from, within, and into the Arctic to conduct and sustain extended operations in competition, crisis, and conflict from a position of advantage,” according to the strategy. The U.S. wants to establish a Multidomain Task Force (MDTF) unit in Alaska, including a division headquarters with “specially trained and equipped combat brigades to recapture cold-weather dominance.”
As the environment changes in the Arctic, new routes for transportation have opened up and new resources are being discovered.As long-time Arctic occupants increase their activity there, and newcomers begin staking claims as well, the Department of the Air Force has developed, as part of its Arctic strategy, four strategic priorities to guide its involvement in ensuring the United States is equally and fairly represented in the region.
Role 1: U.S Secretary of State
Role 2: Deputy Secretary of State of the United States
Three of the eight Arctic states—Denmark, Finland, and Sweden—are members of the European Union (EU), and two other Arctic states—Iceland and Norway—have close ties to the EU as members of the European Economic Area. The EU is showing an increased interest in the Arctic, and the European Parliament (EP) supports an active EU role in the Arctic. The EU is considered an “observer in principle” to the Arctic Council. The EU’s current Arctic policy, set out in a Joint Communication from 2016, is based on three pillars: fighting climate change and protecting the environment, promoting sustainable development, and strengthening international cooperation.
In July 2020, the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) launched a public consultation to update its policy. The consultation process involved a wide range of Arctic stakeholders, public and private alike, governmental and non-governmental, regional and local. The overwhelming majority of responses to the consultation confirmed the continued relevance of the current Arctic priorities. What is clear from the consultation is that the EU has an important role to play in making the Arctic safe, stable, sustainable, and prosperous, including through enhanced international cooperation. According to feedback provided by contributors in this public consultation, the EU should take a long-term view and discourage environmentally unsustainable practices that undermine Arctic ecosystems, inhabitants and species. Furthermore, contributors assessed a need for the EU to make a stronger link between its climate policy, the European Green Deal, and the updated EU Arctic policy in order to achieve sustainable development of the Arctic and to maintain science and research at the heart of EU policies and actions in the Arctic. With all of this as background, the European Commission and the EEAS will aim to re-examine the role of the EU in Arctic affairs and to update the 2016 Joint Communication on an integrated European Union policy for the Arctic by the end of 2021.
The EU, and particularly the Taskforce commissioned to overseeing the Arctic affairs have 4 key priorities:
Climate Change and the Arctic Environment: Understanding the science of climate change, helping to develop strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and safeguarding the Arctic environment are part of the EU’s wider efforts in relation to the Arctic.
International Cooperation on Arctic Matters: The EU engages in multilateral, regional, and sub-regional cooperation on Arctic matters. Many Arctic matters relate to the Arctic as well as to lower latitudes.
Sustainable Development in the Arctic: A safe, stable, sustainable, and prosperous Arctic is important not just for the region itself, but for the EU and the rest of the world. The EU is committed to contributing to sustainable development in a balanced and integrated manner.
Arctic Funding: The EU offers a wide range of funding opportunities in the Arctic regions for businesses, entrepreneurs, researchers, local and regional authorities, young people, and Indigenous peoples’ groups.
Role 1: President of the EU Taskforce
Role 2: Deputy President of the EU Taskforce
Territory Alaska (United States), Russian Federation, Pribilof Islands (United States), and Commander Islands (Russian Federation)
Indigenous Peoples Russian and American Aleut (Unangan)
Indigenous Population Approximately 15,000 Aleuts in the United States and 350 Aleuts in the Russian Federation
Languages English, Russian, Unangam Tunuu (Eastern Dialect of the Aleut Language), Niigugim Tunuu (Atkan Dialect of the Aleut Language)
The Aleut International Association (AIA) is a not-for-profit corporation that represents the Indigenous peoples of Aleut descent in the United States and the Russian Federation. It was created by the Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association (APIA) and the Association of the Indigenous peoples of the North of the Aleut District of the Kamchatka Region of the Russian Federation (ANSARKO). AIA is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of four Alaskan and four Russian Aleuts under the leadership of a president.
AIA was formed to address environmental and cultural concerns of the extended Aleut family whose wellbeing has been connected to the rich resources of the Bering Sea for millennia. Its mission is to promote continuity of culture and protect the resources needed to sustain it. The need to understand global processes, such as transboundary contaminants transport, the impacts of climate change, and the effects of commercial fisheries on the ecosystem of the Bering Sea, to name a few, was an impetus in joining in the work of international fora where AIA is actively pursuing collaboration with governments, scientists and other organizations to improve the wellbeing of the Aleut peoples and their environment.
Role: President of the Aleut International Association (AIA)
Secondary roles are different interest groups. They militate for their agenda and have the special power of mobilising international support for their cause, which allows them to overturn two resolutions, through their ‘VETO power’.
Rosoboronexport is Russia’s only state-controlled intermediary in the area of exports and imports of the entire range of military and double-purpose products, technologies, and services. The company is actively involved in pursuing the national policy of the Russian Federation in the area of military-technical cooperation with foreign countries. The company offers to foreign customers weaponry and military vehicles, machinery and equipment for the army, air force and navy, air defence facilities, special purpose supplies, as well as spare parts, materiel, tools, auxiliary and training equipment.
COSCO Specialized Carriers Company, a subsidiary of COSCO Shipping Group, the world’s third-largest shipping company, began sending ships along Russia’s Northern Sea Route in 2013. The Yong Sheng became the first Chinese vessel to transit along the route. In the following years, the company increased its activity, conducting two transits in 2015, six in 2016, five in 2017, and eight in 2018.
Greenpeace is a non-governmental environmental organisation with offices in over 55 countries. It doesn’t accept any funding from governments, corporations, or political parties. In its main campaign in the region, Save the Arctic, the organisation advocates to create a global sanctuary and establish bans on offshore oil drilling and industrial fishing in the Arctic.
Aleut International Association
https://arctic-council.org/about/permanent-participants/aia/
Finland
Greenpeace
https://news.mongabay.com/2012/05/greenpeace-activists-occupy-icebreaker-set-for-arctic-drilling/
Iceland
https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/countries/iceland/ https://arcticiceland.is/en/selected-material/arctic-policies https://www.arctic-office.de/en/news/news-archive/icelands-chairmanship-of-the-arctic-council-2019-2021/
Norway
https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/arctic_policy/id2830120/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1911043 https://hir.harvard.edu/managing-the-arctic-a-norwegian-perspective/
People‘s Republic of China https://www.icsin.org/uploads/2019/03/18/2659130d6b316472ca6abedd7afb1381.pdf https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/FP_20210412_china_arctic.pdf
Russian Association Of Indigenous Peoples Of The North
https://arctic-council.org/about/permanent-participants/raipon/ http://www.ecologyandculture.ru/eng/index.php?id=22
Russian Federation
https://www.sipri.org/commentary/essay/2020/russias-new-arctic-policy-document-signals-continuity-rather-change https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/laruelle_russia_arctic_policy_2020.pdf https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2020C57/ https://www.csis.org/features/ice-curtain-russias-arctic-military-presence
State of Affairs
Sweden
https://arcticgenderequality.network/gea-times/2021/2/23/swedens-strategy-for-the-arctic-region
The EU Taskforce for the Arctic
https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/20956/EU%20Arctic%20policy https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R41153.pdf
The Kingdom of Denmark
https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/the-arctic/ https://naalakkersuisut.gl/~/media/Nanoq/Images/Udenrigsdirektoratet/100295_Arktis_Rapport_UK_210x270_Final_Web.pdf https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/denmark-interests-arctic-greenland-connection/ https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2016/Scholarly_Papers/13.Rahbek.pdf https://polarjournal.ch/en/2021/02/16/denmark-increases-budget-for-the-arctic/ https://fmn.dk/en/news/2021/new-political-agreement-on-arctic-capabilities-for-1.5-billion-dkk/
The United States of America
https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R41153.pdf https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/FP_20210520_arctic_defense.pdf