The ToothGrowth(Datasets) describes the response of the length of odontoblasts (teeth) in each of 10 guinea pigs at each of three dose levels of Vitamin C (0.5, 1, and 2 mg) with each of two delivery methods (orange juice or ascorbic acid). The data contain 60 observations on 3 variables,
In this project, we will use the hypothesis tests to compare tooth growth by supplement and dose.
First, we need to simply visualize the data to get the properties of the parameters. The following code plots the data with ggplot2 package.
library(datasets)
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(data=ToothGrowth, aes(x=as.factor(dose), y=len, fill=supp)) +
geom_boxplot() +
facet_grid(. ~ supp) +
xlab("Dose in miligrams") +
ylab("Tooth length") +
guides(fill=guide_legend(title="Supplement type"))
The boxplot shows that the tooth lenght has positive correlation with the dosage of both supplements(VC/OJ). The summary table is shown as followed.
library(dplyr)
ToothGrowth %>%
group_by(supp,dose) %>%
summarise(Q25th_len = quantile(len,0.25),
Q50th_len = quantile(len,0.5),
Q75th_len = quantile(len,0.75),
avg_len = mean(len),
sd_len = sd(len)) -> data
data
## Source: local data frame [6 x 7]
## Groups: supp
##
## supp dose Q25th_len Q50th_len Q75th_len avg_len sd_len
## 1 OJ 0.5 9.700 12.25 16.175 13.23 4.459709
## 2 OJ 1.0 20.300 23.45 25.650 22.70 3.910953
## 3 OJ 2.0 24.575 25.95 27.075 26.06 2.655058
## 4 VC 0.5 5.950 7.15 10.900 7.98 2.746634
## 5 VC 1.0 15.275 16.50 17.300 16.77 2.515309
## 6 VC 2.0 23.375 25.95 28.800 26.14 4.797731
We can study the relations between len and supp and dose by using t hypothesis test. The following table shows the t-test results combined with p-value and confidence intervals.
tests = list()
dose = c(0.5,1,2)
for (d in dose) {
ojd = ToothGrowth$len[ToothGrowth$dose == d & ToothGrowth$supp == "OJ"]
vcd = ToothGrowth$len[ToothGrowth$dose == d & ToothGrowth$supp == "VC"]
t <- t.test(ojd, vcd)
id <- paste0("OJ","-", "VC",",",d)
tests <- rbind(tests, list(id=id, p.value=t$p.value, conf.lo=t$conf.int[1], conf.hi=t$conf.int[2]))
}
tests
## id p.value conf.lo conf.hi
## [1,] "OJ-VC,0.5" 0.006358607 1.719057 8.780943
## [2,] "OJ-VC,1" 0.001038376 2.802148 9.057852
## [3,] "OJ-VC,2" 0.9638516 -3.79807 3.63807
From the t-test results, we need to reject the following hypotheses:
We cannot distinguish the difference between OJ and VC in dose 2. Therefore, we can conclude that in dose 0.5 and dose 1, the tooth length with OJ supplement is longer than that with VC. However, in dose 2, the tooth length with OJ and VC supplements does not have significant difference.