August 25, 2021

Physical Transmission Rights

A physical transmission right (PTR) gives the holder the exclusive right to use a particular interconnection in one direction to transfer a predefined quantity of energy from one market hub to the other.

  • Market Hubs: Mid-Columbia (MIDC) and North of Path 15 (NP15)
  • Direction: North to South
  • Quantity: 1 MW (can rescaled for a different transmission capacity)

Who needs to understand the value of PTR:

  • Utilities in the PNW or generation owners that use the PNW-California path
  • Owners of PTRs (e.g. BPA) that need to price PTR contracts
  • Regulators considering building new transmission

Value from Owning Transmission

Opportunity for arbitrage between the market hubs.

Arbitrage can occur in different markets:

  • Long-term forward market (typically peak and off-peak prices)

  • Day-ahead market (hourly prices)

  • Real time market

    • 15-minute market
    • 5-minute market

Data:

  • Source: CAISO OASIS day ahead and 15-min market prices at MIDC (PGE share) and NP15
  • Period: August 1 2019 midnight - July 31 2021 11am.
  • Frequency: hourly for day ahead data, by 15 minutes for 15-min market data

Day-Ahead Prices at MIDC and NP-15, August 2019

Day Ahead Market Price Sread: Price at NP15 - Price at MIDC

15-Min Market Pices at MIDC and NP15, August 2019

15-Min Market Price Sread: Price at NP15 - Price at MIDC

DAM and FMM Prices and Spreads Between NP15 and MIDC, August 2019 - August 2021

Nonnegative DAM and FMM Price Spreads

Nonnegative price spreads between NP15 and MIDC represent the value of the option to transmit energy south between these hubs.

The value of 1 MW of PTR from MIDC to NP15 in a given hour = (nonnegative price spread per hour in $/MWh)*1 MW, adjusted for transmission losses.

I average 15-minute nonnegative spreads by hour to obtain hourly nonnegative price spreads in the FMM.

Nonnegative Price Spreads in DAM and FMM in August 2019

Seasonality of Nonnegative Spreads in the DAM and FMM

  • High hourly Seasonality in the DAM and FMM
    • Morning and evening peaks are sharper in California than in the Pacific Northwest.
  • No weekly seasonality
    • The day of the week does not appear to affect price spreads
  • Possible monthly seasonality
    • 15-min market spreads were highest in July

Nonnegative Price Spreads by Hour of the Day

Nonnegative Price Spreads by Day of the Week

Nonnegative Price Spreads by Month of the Year

Valuation Based on the NPV of Payoffs

Model assumptions and inputs:

  • Transmission can always be utilized at full capacity
  • Transmission losses = 5% (eia.gov)
  • Yearly discount rate = 10% (based on the company’s cost of capital)

\(NPV= \sum_{t=0}^{n}\frac{R_t}{(1+i)^t}\)

\(t\): hours

hourly payoffs: \(R_t =\) nonnegative hourly price spread * \(0.95\)

monthly discounting: \(i=10\%/12\)

The NPV (as of August 1 2019) of utilizing 1 MW of transmission from PNW to CA for 2 years in the DAM is $23,000.

The NPV of utilizing 1 MW of transmission for 2 years in the FMM is $177,000.

10 Year Valuation

PTR contracts may be long-term.

I create a “naive” forecast of nonnegative price spreads in the day ahead and real time markets for 2021 - 2029: price spreads for every 2 year forecast period until July 2029 = price spreads in 2019 - 2021

naive_forecast_until_aug1_2029 <-rep(fmmhourly$nonnegative_spread, times = 5)

The NPV (as of August 1 2019) of utilizing 1 MW of transmission from PNW to CA for 10 years in the DAM is $80,000.

The NPV of utilizing 1 MW of transmission for 10 years in the FMM is $609,000.

The 15-min market brings 7.6 times more arbitrage value from the difference in MIDC and Northern CA prices.

Quantifying Uncertainty

Can model 2 price series separately or model the spread directly.

  • If modeling 2 price series, need to preserve the correlation between the two price points

Price spreads exhibit characteristics similar to other energy price series:

  • Mean reverting (models like exponential smoothing)
  • Frequent spikes or jumps
  • High volatility, or fat tails

To quantify uncertainty

  • use the model to generate N (e.g. 1000) simulations of the series for the valuation period
  • calculate N NPVs
  • Obtain summary statistics from the distribution of NPVs: mean, standard errors, and percentiles.

Quantifying Uncertainty. A Bootstrap Approach.

Simulate nonnegative price spreads in a given hour of the day by sampling from historical data for this hour.

If N is the number of simulations needed, Y is the number of years of data to be simulated:

  • Generate a sample of hour 0 data:
    • Take a sample with replacement of size \(N*Y*\)(number of hours in a year) from hour 0 historical data.
sample(hour0, size = N*Y*8765, replace = TRUE)
  • Samples of hour 1 to hour 23 data are generated in the same way.
  • Transform the samples into N simulations of hourly data for Y years.
  • For each simulation, calculate the NPV.
  • Obtain summary statistics from the distribution of NPVs.

Discussion

Other Sources of Value from PTRs:

  • Sale of Renewable Energy Credits
  • Reduction of curtailment of wind and solar energy.
    • Increase the value of renewable energy projects and promote their development

Considerations:

  • Can the utilities always take full advantage of price spreads in the 15-minute market?
  • How does the participation in the 5-minute market affect the value of transmission?
    • I expect greater option value, but lower market volume and greater volatility.

Questions?

Loading the CAISO OASIS Data

CAISO OASIS website allows to download at most 1 month of price data

file_list <- paste(path, list.files(path), sep = "") 
#list of files with monthly prices

fmm <- data.frame()
for (i in 1:length(file_list)) {
  temp <-
    fread(file_list[i]) #read in files
  fmm <-
    rbindlist(list(fmm, temp), use.names = T) #for each iteration, 
  #bind the new data to the building dataset
}