The following mathematical ecological model simulation, variable notations and definitions are adapted to the paper the Wickman, Diehl, and Brännström (2019) in order not to get any confusion for readers, except
The Assumptions of this mathematical ecological model have fours
Monotonic Properties for \(C_{(i,j)}\), if
\[\begin{align*} X &:= a_{(1,1)}R_{1}(t) \\ Y &:= a_{(1,2)}R_{2}(t) \end{align*}\]
Phase Portrait Plot
Because the symmetric property of \(G(X,Y) = G(Y,X)\) must occur at the equilibrium point, which implies that \[X(t \rightarrow \infty) = Y(t \rightarrow \infty)\]
\[\begin{align*} \therefore \frac{ X(t \rightarrow \infty)}{ Y(t \rightarrow \infty)} &= \left( \frac{a_{(1, 1)}}{a_{(1, 2)}}\right) = 1 \end{align*}\]
The above mathematical derivation shows that under a homogeneous 1-Consumer with 2-Resources ecological closed system if
the numbers of consumer is constant over time \(\frac{\mathrm{d} u_{1}(t)}{\mathrm{d} t} = 0\),
\(r = K =1\), and
the ratio of \(\left( \frac{a_{(1, 1)}}{a_{(1, 2)}}\right)= 1,\)
then the equilibrium resource point \((R^{*}_{1}(t), R^{*}_{2}(t))\) will reach at \((1,1)\)
This mathematical implication is inlined with the following Figure that published at the paper of Wickman, Diehl, and Brännström (2019) (Figure 6).
sourced from Wickman, Diehl, and Brännström (2019) (Figure 6)
Furthermore, the resource contribution function \(C_{(i, j)}\) is an endogenous control variable which is to govern the rate of reaching to the equilibrium resource point. All results in Figure 6 shown at Wickman, Diehl, and Brännström (2019) are subject to the curvature of function \(C_{(i, j)}\) with three scenario cases :
If the \(C_{(i, j)}\) is a hyperbolic/exponential function, this is the case of fast reaching to the ratio of \[\left( \frac{a_{(1, 1)}}{a_{(1, 2)}}\right) \rightarrow 1\], and then fast reaching to the equilibrium resource point \[(R_{1}(t\rightarrow \infty), R_{2}(t\rightarrow \infty))\rightarrow (1, 1).\]
Besides, the Phase Portrait Diagram is summarized the curvature of resource trade-off function between \(R_{1}(t)\) and \(R_{2}(t)\), where velocity arrows indicate both directions and managitudes that also inlined the arguments of Wickman, Diehl, and Brännström (2019) (Figure 6).
Finally, if \(r\) and \(K\) are not \(1\) but any other positive values (\(r\) and \(K \in(0,1]\)), all above mathematical implication mentioned for the small world dynamic Dim(1,2) are still valid; except it will reach to a new resource equilibrium \[(R_{1}(t\rightarrow \infty), R_{2}(t\rightarrow \infty))\rightarrow (K, K),\] where the renewal rate r is to govern the rate of exponentially decaying process in trading-off resources.