This current ODA profile is based on the DAC database managed by the OECD, updated on April 24th 2021. Categorization of spendings are based on the analytical work done in the Ceres2030 project.
All amounts are indicated in constant Canada-2019.
Spendings done by multilateral organizations are not included in Canada’s spendings, except if reported directly by the donor to the OECD.
In this section, we describe the overall evolution of Canada ODA in terms of total flows, for both Food Security and non-Food Security focused spendings.
We group spendings into 9 categories: Not related to Food Security & Nutrition, Emergency Food Assistance*, Ceres2030 portfolio, Fisheries related projects, Other Nutrition, Other projects related to Agriculture, Other Food Security measures, Others with impacts on Agri-Food Systems, Environment related projects. The category “Others with impacts on Agri-Food Systems” gathers spendings that can are relevant, but loosely linked to Food Security and Nutrition outcomes, especially in terms of improved utilities such as water sanitation, or improved, and sustainable, energy production.
Evolution of Total ODA
Evolution of ODA Grants
In this section, and the following ones, we will focus on spendings with direct impacts on Food Security and Nutrition, namely Emergency Food Assistance*, Ceres2030 portfolio, Fisheries related projects, Other Nutrition, Other projects related to Agriculture, Other Food Security measures.
Evolution of FNS ODA Grants for FNS topics
As shown on the figure above, the Ceres2030 portfolio captures most of the core FNS development spendings, as soon as we exclude Emergency Food Assistance spendings.
Evolution of FNS ODA Grants by Ceres2030 category
The following figure shows the evolution of Ceres2030 relevant spendings by region.
Evolution of Ceres2030 ODA Grants by Region
In this section, we focus on the recent period and look at the last 3 years. Amounts are expressed as an annual average.
In the recent years, the FNS-relevant ODA spendings, as defined in the previous section, for both for grants and loans, average 487.7 million, of which 474.8 million are grants only. Ceres2030 interventions, supported by grants, represent 227.6 million. The main difference between our FNS-relevant ODA spendings and Ceres2030 spendings are due to Emergency Food Assistance* (68 million).
Specific Ceres2030 interventions, such as Vocational Training and Women’s rights, include spendings that may be related to non-farm, or non rural-oriented projects, and therefore overestimate their active contributions to FSN goals.
Overall portfolio Grants - Treemap
Structure of spendings in the Ceres2030 portfolio
[…]
Structure of spendings in the Ceres2030 portfolio by region
Relevant FNS ODA by financing mechanisms and regions
[…]
Relevant FNS ODA by financing mechanisms and Channels
Ceres2030 categories by financing mechanisms and channels, excluding emergency spendings
The following graph restricts the analysis to Grants only.
ODA Grants only:Ceres2030 categories by regions and channels
In this section, we provide a quick comparison of Canada spendings with other donors, namely: G7 excluding Canada, Multilateral Donors, EU Institutions.
[…]
[…]
Evolution over time of FNS-relevant grants for selected donors. Index 100 for 2004-2006 average
[…]
Evolution over time of FNS-relevant grants for selected donors. Index 100 for 2004-2006 average
Evolution over time of FNS-relevant grants for selected donors. Index 100 for 2004-2006 average
The following figures compare the structure of ODA grants. Level of spendings are displayed through mouse Over.
The following graph shows spendings by broad category of FNS relevant spendings, including emergency food aid.
FNS ODA Grants by category
ODA Grants by Ceres2030 category
Regional structure of spendings could also be compared. We exclude emergency food aid from the analysis.
FNS ODA Grants by Regions