Primary outcome
- All-cause mortality
Nuestra búsqueda de literatura fue diseñada por el equipo que mantiene la plataforma L · OVE (https://app.iloveevidence.com), utilizando el siguiente enfoque:
Identificación de términos relevantes para la población y componentes de intervención de la estrategia de búsqueda, utilizando tecnología Word2vec [Github repository [Internet] [Accessed 2020 May 24 Available from: https://github.com/dperezrada/keywords2vec] al corpus de documentos disponibles en la Base de Datos Epistemonikos.
Discusión de términos con expertos en contenido y métodos para identificar términos relevantes, irrelevantes y faltantes.
Creación de una estrategia booleana sensible que abarque todos los términos relevantes.
Análisis iterativo de artículos omitidos por la estrategia booleana y refinamiento de la estrategia en consecuencia.
Nuestra principal fuente de búsqueda fue la base de datos Epistemonikos (https://www.epistemonikos.org), una base de datos completa de revisiones sistemáticas y otros tipos de evidencia [Epistemonikos Database Methods [Internet] Santiago: Epistemonikos Foundation [Accessed 2021 May 14] Available from: https://www.epistemonikos.org/en/about_us/methods ] que la hemos complementado con información proveniente de 33 fuentes relevantes para COVID-19. La lista de fuentes que se han agregado a la base de datos de Epistemonikos se amplía continuamente. Esta lista de fuentes que Epistemonikos analiza periódicamente para detectar COVID-19 se actualiza periódicamente en nuestro sitio web [Methods for the special L·OVE of Coronavirus infection [Internet] Santiago: Epistemonikos Foundation [Accessed 2020 May 24] Available from: https://app.iloveevidence.com/covid-19]
Los criterios de eligibilidad fueron desarrollados por la colaboración BESSI, quienes utilizando la base de datos L · OVE (https://app.iloveevidence.com) identificaron los estudios relevantes bajo los siguientes criterios:
Tipos de estudios
Ensayos aleatorios que informan el efecto de las intervenciones BESS sobre la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2 o los comportamientos que pueden afectar la adquisición o propagación del SARS-CoV-2 fueron incluidos.
Tipos de participantes Tipos de intervenciones Tipos de desenlaces
X X X X X
Two trials (n=250) evaluated lopinavir/ritonavir in addition to standard care versus standard care alone in adult inpatients from China [31],[32]. Both trials included patients with radiologically confirmed pneumonia. One trial had additional criteria of severity [31] and the other only required the presence of symptoms [32]. Table 1 presents the inclusion criteria. Table 2 presents the characteristics of the intervention. Table 3 presents the baseline characteristics of the participants.
| Authors | Age | Confirmation method | Clinical or severity parameters | Radiological findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henning Bundgaard | Adultos y jovenes | RT-PCR | SaO2 < 94% or PaFi <300 | Pneumonia confirmed by chest imaging |
| Gyula Seres | prueba de inclusión | RT-PCR | Participants with mild (no signs of pneumonia on imaging) or moderate clinical status (pneumonia on imaging plus specific symptoms and/or laboratory findings) | Not an inclusion criteria |
| Authors | Intervention | Dose | Duration | Standard care |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henning Bundgaard | Lopinavir/ritonavir | 400mg/100mg bid | 14 days | Supplemental oxygen, noninvasive and invasive ventilation, antibiotic agents, vasopressor support, renal-replacement therapy, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. |
| Gyula Seres | Lopinavir/ritonavir | 200mg/50m bid | 7-14 days | Supportive care and effective oxygen therapy, without antiviral therapy. Corticosteroids (same regime in both groups). Gamma globulin (same regime in both groups) |
| Authors | Number randomised | Geographic location and Setting | Mean age (years) | Females in study, % | Time from onset to treatment, days | Pneumonia,% | Amount of supplemental oxygen (%) | Receiving mechanical ventilation (%) | Underlying chronic diseases (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henning Bundgaard | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Gyula Seres | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Summary plots
Traffic light plots
| …1 | Author | Public Title | Reported data? | Population | Intervention | Comparison | Outcome | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henning Bundgaard | Face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 - Rationale and design of the randomised controlled trial DANMASK-19 | Yes | Adults in Denmark | Instructions to wear mask and masks provided | No mask recommendation | SARS-CoV 2 infection | 6,000 person RCT of masks in Denmark |
| 2 | Gyula Seres | Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: Evidence from pubic waiting lines | Yes | People behind experimenters in shop que | Experimenter with mask | Experimenter without mask | Distance to person behind them in the cue | . |
| 3 | . | Locally Produced Cloth Face Mask and COVID-19 Like Illness Prevention | No | 10 years of age | Cloth face mask | Advice on how to prevent COVID based on government policy | Reported COVID like illness | 66,000 person cluster randomized trial in Guinea-Bissau |
| 4 | . | Medical Masks vs N95 Respirators for COVID-19 | No | Nurses working in medical, emergency, pediatric units. | Medical mask worn when providing care to person with febrile respiratory illness. | N95 mask worn when providing care to person with febrile respiratory illness. | Confirmed COVID infection | NA |
| 5 | . | Face Masks to Reduce COVID-19 in Bangladesh | No | Villages in Bangladesh and workers in market; I-face mask. | Face mask. | Face mask awareness. | Symptomatic SARS CoV2 infection. | Enroll 600 communities and create matched pairs based on population size; half of which will be randomized to receive the intervention. |
| 6 | . | A trial to evaluate the effect of cotton face-masks and other behavioral factors on COVID-19 risk in rural Telangana | No | Healthy human volunteers in villages in rural Telangana. | Cloth masks. | No intervention. | Village level incidence of COVID-19 | . |
| 7 | . | Effectiveness of a novel respirator with chitosan nanoparticles | No | Healthcare professionals working in hospitals. | Novel individual protection semi-facial respirator. | Conventional N95 respirator. | Incidence rate of infection. | . |
| 8 | . | Effectiveness and adherence to closed face shields to prevent COVID-19 transmission | No | Adults without COVID present or past. | Surgical face mask + shield. | Surgical face mask. | COVID-19 incidence. | . |
| 9 | . | Efficacy of Nano-Ivermectin impregnated masks in prevention of COVID-19 among healthy contacts and medical staff | No | Healthcare personnel and family contacts of confirmed cases. | Ivermectin impregnated mask. | Ordinary mask. | suspected symptoms’ fever, myalgia, cough, sore throat etc, secondary outcome is COVID-19 diagnosis | . |
| 10 | . | Clinical efficiency of surgical masks and filtering face-piece 2 masks | No | Nursing home staff. | Surgical mask. | FFP2 masks. | COVID-19 attack rate. | . |
¿Cuál es el objetivo de BESSI? En la página principal de su página web, la colaboración BESSI, en un video de 5 minutos lo explica: Clic al video https://www.bessi-collab.net/
.