本报告的主要内容将从收入程度,能源消耗,碳排放三个部分入手,分析并对比日本跟澳大利亚两个国家的差异,我们将顺着以下两个问题来解决。
二氧化碳排放量与能源使用量的关系如何?
日本和澳洲谁在减少碳排放方面做得更好?
The main content of this report will start from the income level, energy consumption, carbon emissions, analysis and comparison of the differences between Japan and Australia.
the following questions will be detailed explained.
| IncomeGroup | Country | min | max |
|---|---|---|---|
| High income | Austria | 4.373319 | 9.020170 |
| High income | Japan | 2.516538 | 9.909204 |
通过该表格可以得出日本的人均碳排放波动程度最大,且日本的人均碳排放量均值大于澳大利亚
A table overview of per capita emissions in Japan and Austria.
Compared with Australia,The table shows that Japan’s per capita carbon emissions fluctuate the most, and that the mean of Japan’s per capita carbon emissions are larger. ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
下面我们具体来分析一下两个国家之间的碳排放数据
Let’s look specifically at the carbon emissions data between the two countries.
通过图形我们可以得知,1960年的时候日本的碳排放是远低于澳大利亚的,但从1970年开始,日本人均碳排放量的水平增长速度逐渐超过澳大利亚 我们对于散点图的趋势进行拟合,可以看到二者都在2005年左右达到峰值随后降低,趋势线路中澳大利亚的人均碳排放峰值大约在8.2吨左右,而日本的人均碳排放峰值大约在9.7吨
In 1960, Japan’s carbon emissions were much lower than Australia’s, but since 1970, Japan’s per capita emissions have been growing faster than Australia’s.The data in both countries were on the rise until 2005.
We fitted the trend of the scatter plot to see that the data in tow country also peaked the highest around 2005, and then declined. On the trend line, Australia’s per capita peak is about 8.2 tons, while that in Japan’s is about 9.7 tons. ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
现在我们来看一下澳大利亚跟日本的人均能源消耗量
lets look at the per capita energy consumption of Australia and Japan 从1970年左右开始,可以发现两个国家的趋势大致一致都在波动上升,峰值都在8.3吨左右。但日本从2000年左右开始就有个下降趋势,而澳大利亚维持着这个水平。
与以往的碳排放量相比,特别是对于日本来说,能源消费与碳排放量的关系更为密切,趋势基本相同。
相差不大的人均能源消耗,日本的人均碳排放量却更高,这说明澳大利亚更注意低碳排放,日本需要重视选取低碳排放的产品,或更加重视碳排放政策、规定。
Starting around 1970, the trends in both countries have been roughly in line, they also peaks around 8.3 tons. But Japan has had a downward trend since around 2000, while Australia has maintained it.
Compared with the carbon emissions, energy consumption and carbon emissions are more closely related, the trend is basically the same,especially for Japan.
The relatively small difference in per capita energy consumption, while Japan’s per capita carbon emissions are higher, which means Australia pays more attention to low carbon emissions, Japan needs to pay more attention to select low carbon products, or pay more attention to carbon emissions policies and regulations. ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
为了分析日本和澳洲谁在减少碳排放方面做得更好,我们现在来看一下澳大利亚人口跟日本人口的差距
To further analyze who is doing a good job of reducing carbon emissions, we now look at the gap between the population of Australia and that of Japan.
可以看到澳大利亚人口基本维持在550 ten thousand左右,而日本的人口则一直在波动,从600ten thousand增长到了11660 ten thousand左右。
We can see that the population of Australia has basically stayed at around 550 ten thousand, while the population of Japan has been fluctuating, from 600 ten thousand to around 116600 ten thousand. ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
现在我们再来看一下两个国家的总碳排放量数据,单位是million
Let’s take another look at the total carbon emissions for both countries, unit: million.
将总碳排放量的数据进行对比,也可以看到两国的差异非常之大,从1960年到2020年,澳大利亚的总碳排放量在25百万吨维持不动,而日本则呈现高速上升趋势,从大约一百百万吨上升到了1130百万吨
A comparison of total carbon emissions shows that the two countries are very different. From 1960 to 2020, Australia’s total emissions stood at 25million Ton, while Japan’s showed a rapid rise, from about 100 million Ton to 1130 million Ton.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
总的来说,在节能减排方面,澳大利亚做的远远比日本好.
在能源消耗差不多的前提下,因为日本人均碳排放量高于澳大利亚和日本人口远大于澳大利亚人口,所以日本的总碳排放量远大于了澳大利亚。 日本应该重视碳排放量的问题,不能继续放任总碳排放量继续升高了。
On the premise that energy consumption is about the same, because Japan’s per capita carbon emissions are higher than Australia’s and Japan’s population is much larger than Australia’s, Japan’s total carbon emissions are much larger than Australia’s.
Japan should pay attention to the issue of carbon emissions, can not continue to allow total carbon emissions continue to rise.