Codebook BFAS-SF Project

Metadata

Description

Dataset name: SCORE dataset for BFAS short-form project

Select data from the SCORE dataset (Moin Syed) including Qualtrics and REP pool with complete BFAS. Excluded participant IDs and open-ended gender data.

Metadata for search engines

• Temporal Coverage: 2020

• Spatial Coverage: Online: Qualtrics and UMN REP pool

• Date published: 2021-03-30

• Creator:

name	value
1	Linh Nguyen

x age ethnic_cat engcomf_1 engcomf_2 engcomf_3 gender_f schooling socialclass politics covidstress_1 attcheck_01 attcheck_02 QC gc dataID narq_1 narq_2 narq_3 narq_4 narq_5 narq_6 narq_7 narq_8 narq_9 narq_10 narq_11 narq_12 narq_13 narq_14 narq_15 narq_16 narq_17 narq_18 rse_1 rse_2R rse_3 rse_4 rse_5R rse_6R rse_7 rse_8R rse_9R rse_10 bfas_1R bfas_2R bfas_3 bfas_4 bfas_5 bfas_6 bfas_7 bfas_8R bfas_9 bfas_10 bfas_11 bfas_12 bfas_13R bfas_14R bfas_15R bfas_16R bfas_17R bfas_18 bfas_19 bfas_20 bfas_21R bfas_22 bfas_23R bfas_24R bfas_25 bfas_26 bfas_27 bfas_28 bfas_29R bfas_30 bfas_31 bfas_32R bfas_33R bfas_34R bfas_35 bfas_36R bfas_37R bfas_38 bfas_39 bfas_40 bfas_41R bfas_42 bfas_43 bfas_44 bfas_45R bfas_46 bfas_47 bfas_48R bfas_49R bfas_50R bfas_51 bfas_52R bfas_53R bfas_54R bfas_55R bfas_56R bfas_57 bfas_58 bfas_59 bfas_60R bfas_61 bfas_62R bfas_63 bfas_64R bfas_65 bfas_66 bfas_67R bfas_68R bfas_69 bfas_70 bfas_71R bfas_72 bfas_73 bfas_74 bfas_75 bfas_76R bfas_77R bfas_78R bfas_79R bfas_80R bfas_81 bfas_82R bfas_83R bfas_84 bfas_85R bfas_86 bfas_87R bfas_88 bfas_89 bfas_90R bfas_91 bfas_92 bfas_93R bfas_94 bfas_95 bfas_96 bfas_97R bfas_98 bfas_99R bfas_100 dids_1 dids_2 dids_3 dids_4 dids_5 dids_6 dids_7 dids_8 dids_9 dids_10 dids_11 dids_12 dids_13 dids_14 dids_15 dids_16 dids_17 dids_18 dids_19 dids_20 dids_21 dids_22 dids_23 dids_24 dids_25 k10_1 k10_2 k10_3 k10_4 k10_5 k10_6 k10_7 k10_8 k10_9 k10_10 bfi2_1 bfi2_2 bfi2_3R bfi2_4R bfi2_5R bfi2_6 bfi2_7 bfi2_8R bfi2_9R bfi2_10 bfi2_11R bfi2_12R bfi2_13 bfi2_14 bfi2_15 bfi2_16R bfi2_17R bfi2_18 bfi2_19 bfi2_20 bfi2_21 bfi2_22R bfi2_23R bfi2_24R bfi2_25R bfi2_26R bfi2_27 bfi2_28R bfi2_29R bfi2_30R bfi2_31R bfi2_32 bfi2_33 bfi2_34 bfi2_35 bfi2_36R bfi2_37R bfi2_38 bfi2_39 bfi2_40 bfi2_41 bfi2_42R bfi2_43 bfi2_44R bfi2_45R bfi2_46 bfi2_47R bfi2_48R bfi2_49R bfi2_50R bfi2_51R bfi2_52 bfi2_53 bfi2_54 bfi2_55R bfi2_56 bfi2_57 bfi2_58R bfi2_59 bfi2_60 engcomf rse_selfesteem rse_positive rse_negative bfas_agreeableness bfas_conscientiousness bfas_extraversion bfas_neuroticism bfas_opennessdomain bfas_assertiveness bfas_compassion bfas_enthusiasm bfas_industriousness bfas_intellect bfas_opennessaspect bfas_orderliness bfas_politeness bfas_volatility bfas_withdrawal bfi_extraversion bfi_agreeableness bfi_conscientiousness bfi_negative bfi_openmindedness bfi_sociability bfi_compassion bfi_organization bfi_anxiety bfi_aesthetic bfi_assertiveness bfi_respectfulness bfi_productiveness bfi_depression bfi_intellect bfi_energy bfi_trust bfi_responsibility bfi_volatility bfi_imagination dids_commitmaking dids_commitid dids_explorebreadth dids_exploredepth dids_explorerum k10_distress narq_admiration narq_rivalry narq_grandiosity narq_uniqueness narq_aggressiveness narq_supremacy narq_charmingness narq_devaluation

Variables

age

Age

Distribution

Distribution of values for age

4 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist
age	Age	numeric	4	0.9982736	17	22	54	22.94509	3.98212	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>

ethnic_cat

Which of the following races/ethnicities do you most identify with? - Selected Choice

Distribution

Distribution of values for ethnic_cat

2 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
ethnic_cat	Which of the following races/ethnicities do you most identify with? - Selected Choice	haven_labelled	2	0.9991368	1	2	7	2.94946	2.41476	7	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
white	1
black	2
native american	3
asian	4
native hawaiian/pacific islander	5
other	6
latino	7

gender_f

Gender coded as factor

Distribution

Distribution of values for gender_f

275 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
gender_f	Gender coded as factor	haven_labelled	275	0.881312	1	1	3	1.283546	0.4792751	3	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
female	1
male	2
nonbinary	3

schooling

What is your level of schooling?

Distribution

Distribution of values for schooling

253 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
schooling	What is your level of schooling?	haven_labelled	253	0.8908071	1	4	7	3.801357	1.570226	7	<U+2581><U+2586><U+2582><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583><U+2581>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
did not complete high school	1
high school graduate	2
currently attending two-yr college	3
currently attending four-yr college	4
two-year college grad	5
4-yr college grad	6
grad/professional degree	7

socialclass

Which of the following best describes your social class background?

Distribution

Distribution of values for socialclass

253 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
socialclass	Which of the following best describes your social class background?	haven_labelled	253	0.8908071	1	3	5	2.712694	0.9989397	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
low-income/poor	1
working class/lower middle class	2
middle class	3
upper middle class	4
upper class	5

politics

Which of the following best describes how you would label your political views?

Distribution

Distribution of values for politics

258 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
politics	Which of the following best describes how you would label your political views?	haven_labelled	258	0.8886491	1	3	7	3.286061	1.599701	7	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
extremely liberal	1
liberal	2
slightly liberal	3
moderate, middle of the road	4
slightly conservative	5
conservative	6
extremely conservative	7

covidstress_1

How would you rate your current level of stress associated with the COVID-19/coronavirus pandemic? - 1

Distribution

Distribution of values for covidstress_1

258 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist
covidstress_1	How would you rate your current level of stress associated with the COVID-19/coronavirus pandemic? - 1	numeric	258	0.8886491	0	7	10	6.246236	2.662061	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2586><U+2587><U+2585>

attcheck_01

Please select “agree completely” in response to this question.

Distribution

Distribution of values for attcheck_01

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
attcheck_01	Please select “agree completely” in response to this question.	haven_labelled	0	1	0	1	1	0.9917997	0.0902027	2	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
Correct	1
Incorrect	0

attcheck_02

Please select “agree” in response to this question

Distribution

Distribution of values for attcheck_02

7 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
attcheck_02	Please select “agree” in response to this question	haven_labelled	7	0.9969789	0	1	1	0.9155844	0.2780703	2	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
Correct	1
Incorrect	0

QC

We care about the quality of our survey data and hope to receive the most accurate measures of your opinions, so it is important to us that you thoughtfully provide your best answer to each question in the survey. Do you commit to providing your thoughtful and honest answers to the questions in this survey?

Distribution

Distribution of values for QC

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
QC	We care about the quality of our survey data and hope to receive the most accurate measures of your opinions, so it is important to us that you thoughtfully provide your best answer to each question in the survey. Do you commit to providing your thoughtful and honest answers to the questions in this survey?	haven_labelled	0	1	1	1	5	1.008632	0.185655	3	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
I will provide my best answers	1
I can’t promise either way	4
I will not provide my best answers	5

gc

Good Complete

Distribution

Distribution of values for gc

61 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
gc	Good Complete	haven_labelled	61	0.9736729	1	1	4	1.445479	1.067	4	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
yes	1
screen out	2
over quota	3
failed check	4

dataID

Which dataset does this come from?

Distribution

Distribution of values for dataID

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
dataID	Which dataset does this come from?	haven_labelled	0	1	1	1	2	1.299094	0.4579598	2	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583>

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
qualtrics	1
REP	2

Scale: engcomf

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.96 [0.95;0.96].

Missing: 3.

Likert plot of scale engcomf items

Distribution of scale engcomf

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	engcomf_1, engcomf_2 & engcomf_3
Observations:	2314
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.90
Omega (hierarchical):	0.02
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.91
Coefficient H:	0.91
Coefficient Alpha:	0.90

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.9; 0.91]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.89; 0.91]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.96
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.96
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.96

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.95; 0.96]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.95; 0.96]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.503, 0.29 & 0.206

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
engcomf_1	0.829
engcomf_2	0.913
engcomf_3	0.859

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
engcomf_1	0.900
engcomf_2	0.929
engcomf_3	0.911

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
engcomf_1	3.7001	4	0.3311	0.5754	0	0.012	1	3	NA	4	-1.8044	2.2973	0.0908	2314	0	2314
engcomf_2	3.6629	4	0.3775	0.6144	1	0.0128	1	3	NA	4	-1.8705	3.2365	0.1052	2314	0	2314
engcomf_3	3.6232	4	0.4182	0.6467	1	0.0134	1	3	NA	4	-1.703	2.429	0.1117	2314	0	2314

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
engcomf_1	Please rate your comfort with speaking English	haven_labelled	1. beginning, 2. intermediate, 3. proficient, 4. advanced	2	0.9991368	1	4	4	3.699352	0.5763823	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587>
engcomf_2	Please rate your comfort with reading English	haven_labelled	1. beginning, 2. intermediate, 3. proficient, 4. advanced	3	0.9987052	1	4	4	3.662921	0.6143825	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587>
engcomf_3	Please rate your comfort with writing English	haven_labelled	1. beginning, 2. intermediate, 3. proficient, 4. advanced	2	0.9991368	1	4	4	3.622462	0.6474576	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587>

Scale: rse_selfesteem

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.88;0.89].

Missing: 5.

Likert plot of scale rse_selfesteem items

Distribution of scale rse_selfesteem

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	rse_1, rse_2R, rse_3, rse_4, rse_5R, rse_6R, rse_7, rse_8R, rse_9R & rse_10
Observations:	2312
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.86
Omega (hierarchical):	0.66
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.89
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.91
Coefficient H:	0.86
Coefficient Alpha:	0.85

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.85; 0.87]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.84; 0.86]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.88
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.87
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.88

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.88; 0.89]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.88; 0.89]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.337, 1.734, 0.697, 0.6, 0.575, 0.518, 0.43, 0.398, 0.374 & 0.337

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
rse_1	0.095	0.647
rse_2R	0.778	-0.010
rse_3	-0.045	0.766
rse_4	-0.073	0.716
rse_5R	0.671	0.045
rse_6R	0.815	-0.017
rse_7	-0.044	0.662
rse_8R	0.631	-0.073
rse_9R	0.673	0.096
rse_10	0.167	0.656

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
rse_1	0.110	0.707
rse_2R	0.810	0.007
rse_3	-0.033	0.819
rse_4	-0.081	0.797
rse_5R	0.749	0.041
rse_6R	0.829	0.010
rse_7	-0.060	0.761
rse_8R	0.756	-0.124
rse_9R	0.748	0.095
rse_10	0.198	0.694

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
rse_1	2.9606	3	0.6488	0.8055	0.5	0.0168	1	2	4	4	-0.565	0.003	0.125	2312	0	2312
rse_2R	2.3175	2	0.884	0.9402	1	0.0196	1	1	3	4	0.3055	-0.7741	0.1231	2312	0	2312
rse_3	3.2106	3	0.4969	0.7049	1	0.0147	1	2	4	4	-0.7372	0.712	0.1758	2312	0	2312
rse_4	3.1345	3	0.5284	0.7269	1	0.0151	1	2	4	4	-0.6307	0.375	0.1568	2312	0	2312
rse_5R	2.7115	3	0.8752	0.9355	1	0.0195	1	2	4	4	-0.2957	-0.7724	0.128	2312	0	2312
rse_6R	2.3382	2	0.9076	0.9527	1	0.0198	1	1	3	4	0.3176	-0.8057	0.1161	2312	0	2312
rse_7	3.0852	3	0.5678	0.7535	1	0.0157	1	2	4	4	-0.6396	0.3212	0.1473	2312	0	2312
rse_8R	2.1488	2	0.922	0.9602	2	0.02	1	1	3	4	0.4595	-0.7346	0.1427	2312	0	2312
rse_9R	2.833	3	0.9518	0.9756	2	0.0203	1	2	4	4	-0.4196	-0.8269	0.1445	2312	0	2312
rse_10	2.958	3	0.7057	0.8401	2	0.0175	1	2	4	4	-0.4774	-0.3627	0.1388	2312	0	2312

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
rse_1	On the whole, I am satisfied with myself.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	2.961572	0.8059122	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
rse_2R	At times, I think I am no good at all.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	2	4	2.316926	0.9399638	4	<U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
rse_3	I feel that I have a number of good qualities.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	4	3.210799	0.7046978	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_4	I am able to do things as well as most other people.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	3.135147	0.7267487	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_5R	I feel I do not have much to be proud of.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	4	2.711015	0.9351646	4	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_6R	I certainly feel useless at times.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	2	4	2.338947	0.9535490	4	<U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583>
rse_7	I feel that I’m a person of worth, at least on an equal plane with others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	3.084629	0.7543718	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_8R	I wish I could have more respect for myself.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	2	4	2.149395	0.9606309	4	<U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
rse_9R	All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a failure.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	2.831606	0.9758037	4	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
rse_10	I take a positive attitude toward myself.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	4	2.958081	0.8397120	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: rse_positive

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.87 [0.87;0.88].

Missing: 4.

Likert plot of scale rse_positive items

Distribution of scale rse_positive

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	rse_1, rse_3, rse_4, rse_7 & rse_10
Observations:	2313
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.83
Omega (hierarchical):	0.75
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.85
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.85
Coefficient H:	0.83
Coefficient Alpha:	0.83

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.82; 0.84]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.81; 0.84]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.87
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.87
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.87

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.87; 0.88]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.87; 0.88]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.951, 0.663, 0.572, 0.431 & 0.383

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
rse_1	0.709
rse_3	0.729
rse_4	0.668
rse_7	0.636
rse_10	0.749

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
rse_1	0.770
rse_3	0.794
rse_4	0.750
rse_7	0.726
rse_10	0.798

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
rse_1	2.9611	3	0.649	0.8056	1	0.0168	1	2	4	4	-0.5653	0.0025	0.1252	2313	0	2313
rse_3	3.2105	3	0.4967	0.7048	1	0.0147	1	2	4	4	-0.737	0.713	0.1757	2313	0	2313
rse_4	3.1345	3	0.5282	0.7268	1	0.0151	1	2	4	4	-0.6306	0.3761	0.1567	2313	0	2313
rse_7	3.0852	3	0.5676	0.7534	1	0.0157	1	2	4	4	-0.6396	0.3225	0.1472	2313	0	2313
rse_10	2.9581	3	0.7054	0.8399	2	0.0175	1	2	4	4	-0.4776	-0.3615	0.1388	2313	0	2313

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
rse_1	On the whole, I am satisfied with myself.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	2.961572	0.8059122	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
rse_3	I feel that I have a number of good qualities.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	4	3.210799	0.7046978	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_4	I am able to do things as well as most other people.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	3.135147	0.7267487	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_7	I feel that I’m a person of worth, at least on an equal plane with others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	3.084629	0.7543718	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_10	I take a positive attitude toward myself.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. agree, 4. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	4	2.958081	0.8397120	4	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: rse_negative

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.87;0.89].

Missing: 2.

Likert plot of scale rse_negative items

Distribution of scale rse_negative

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	rse_2R, rse_5R, rse_6R, rse_8R & rse_9R
Observations:	2315
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.84
Omega (hierarchical):	0.77
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.87
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.87
Coefficient H:	0.85
Coefficient Alpha:	0.84

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.83; 0.85]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.83; 0.85]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.88
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.88
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.88

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.87; 0.89]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.87; 0.89]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.069, 0.644, 0.542, 0.403 & 0.341

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
rse_2R	0.768
rse_5R	0.702
rse_6R	0.803
rse_8R	0.591
rse_9R	0.726

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
rse_2R	0.812
rse_5R	0.776
rse_6R	0.832
rse_8R	0.690
rse_9R	0.799

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
rse_2R	2.3171	2	0.8839	0.9401	1	0.0195	1	1	3	4	0.3054	-0.7739	0.1231	2315	0	2315
rse_5R	2.711	3	0.8745	0.9352	1	0.0194	1	2	4	4	-0.2944	-0.7722	0.1283	2315	0	2315
rse_6R	2.3391	2	0.9096	0.9537	1	0.0198	1	1	3	4	0.3169	-0.8096	0.116	2315	0	2315
rse_8R	2.1495	2	0.9232	0.9608	2	0.02	1	1	3	4	0.4585	-0.7375	0.1428	2315	0	2315
rse_9R	2.832	3	0.9523	0.9759	2	0.0203	1	2	4	4	-0.4185	-0.8284	0.1443	2315	0	2315

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
rse_2R	At times, I think I am no good at all.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	2	4	2.316926	0.9399638	4	<U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
rse_5R	I feel I do not have much to be proud of.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	4	2.711015	0.9351646	4	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
rse_6R	I certainly feel useless at times.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	2	4	2.338947	0.9535490	4	<U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583>
rse_8R	I wish I could have more respect for myself.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	2	4	2.149395	0.9606309	4	<U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
rse_9R	All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a failure.	haven_labelled	4. strongly disagree, 3. disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	4	2.831606	0.9758037	4	<U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfas_agreeableness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.87;0.89].

Missing: 32.

Likert plot of scale bfas_agreeableness items

Distribution of scale bfas_agreeableness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_7, bfas_2R, bfas_12, bfas_17R, bfas_22, bfas_27, bfas_32R, bfas_37R, bfas_42, bfas_47, bfas_52R, bfas_57, bfas_62R, bfas_67R, bfas_72, bfas_77R, bfas_82R, bfas_87R, bfas_92 & bfas_97R
Observations:	2285
Positive correlations:	182
Number of correlations:	190
Percentage positive correlations:	96

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.86
Omega (hierarchical):	0.71
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.89
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.86
Coefficient H:	0.90
Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.86; 0.87]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.88
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.82
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.89

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.87; 0.89]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.88; 0.89]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.877, 2.735, 1.373, 0.976, 0.791, 0.77, 0.705, 0.682, 0.662, 0.639, 0.565, 0.552, 0.525, 0.523, 0.479, 0.461, 0.448, 0.416, 0.414 & 0.406

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2	ML3
bfas_7	0.089	0.318	0.239
bfas_2R	0.341	0.233	-0.343
bfas_12	-0.052	0.656	0.014
bfas_17R	0.651	-0.047	-0.025
bfas_22	-0.026	0.727	0.013
bfas_27	0.085	0.369	0.332
bfas_32R	0.517	0.136	-0.318
bfas_37R	0.767	-0.032	0.043
bfas_42	0.054	0.721	0.044
bfas_47	-0.023	0.298	0.414
bfas_52R	0.507	0.121	-0.272
bfas_57	0.079	0.305	0.350
bfas_62R	0.597	0.121	-0.229
bfas_67R	0.721	-0.010	0.111
bfas_72	-0.067	0.661	-0.120
bfas_77R	0.770	-0.030	0.116
bfas_82R	0.632	0.080	-0.092
bfas_87R	0.676	-0.074	0.109
bfas_92	0.063	0.578	0.043
bfas_97R	0.504	-0.034	-0.067

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2	TC3
bfas_7	0.072	0.289	0.343
bfas_2R	0.404	0.353	-0.323
bfas_12	-0.061	0.718	0.071
bfas_17R	0.713	-0.068	0.010
bfas_22	-0.019	0.759	0.093
bfas_27	0.095	0.263	0.555
bfas_32R	0.585	0.224	-0.279
bfas_37R	0.791	-0.049	0.062
bfas_42	0.062	0.738	0.118
bfas_47	-0.012	0.135	0.672
bfas_52R	0.576	0.198	-0.247
bfas_57	0.100	0.168	0.603
bfas_62R	0.648	0.191	-0.206
bfas_67R	0.746	-0.047	0.123
bfas_72	-0.071	0.774	-0.072
bfas_77R	0.785	-0.065	0.117
bfas_82R	0.673	0.112	-0.081
bfas_87R	0.736	-0.149	0.170
bfas_92	0.057	0.634	0.119
bfas_97R	0.594	-0.063	-0.020

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_7	3.8604	4	0.9827	0.9913	2	0.0207	1	3	5	5	-0.757	0.2117	0.1438	2285	0	2285
bfas_2R	3.4376	4	1.4783	1.2158	1	0.0254	1	2	5	5	-0.4741	-0.7497	0.1033	2285	0	2285
bfas_12	3.9654	4	0.9423	0.9707	1	0.0203	1	3	5	5	-0.9829	0.7373	0.1591	2285	0	2285
bfas_17R	3.6617	4	1.4218	1.1924	2	0.0249	1	3	5	5	-0.5642	-0.6511	0.149	2285	0	2285
bfas_22	3.9396	4	0.9009	0.9492	2	0.0199	1	3	5	5	-0.9371	0.7968	0.1477	2285	0	2285
bfas_27	3.8149	4	1.0905	1.0443	2	0.0218	1	3	5	5	-0.7955	0.1173	0.1407	2285	0	2285
bfas_32R	3.5042	4	1.4051	1.1854	1	0.0248	1	3	5	5	-0.4859	-0.6345	0.1184	2285	0	2285
bfas_37R	3.8263	4	1.479	1.2161	2	0.0254	1	2	5	5	-0.8313	-0.3249	0.1488	2285	0	2285
bfas_42	3.9593	4	0.9681	0.9839	2	0.0206	1	3	5	5	-0.9425	0.5703	0.163	2285	0	2285
bfas_47	3.4862	4	1.0792	1.0388	1	0.0217	1	3	5	5	-0.464	-0.2683	0.147	2285	0	2285
bfas_52R	3.4578	4	1.3315	1.1539	1	0.0241	1	3	5	5	-0.4095	-0.6139	0.1361	2285	0	2285
bfas_57	3.54	4	1.0392	1.0194	1	0.0213	1	3	5	5	-0.4895	-0.2918	0.1315	2285	0	2285
bfas_62R	3.656	4	1.3186	1.1483	2	0.024	1	3	5	5	-0.7198	-0.2514	0.1254	2285	0	2285
bfas_67R	3.7597	4	1.4725	1.2134	2	0.0254	1	3	5	5	-0.7052	-0.5251	0.1446	2285	0	2285
bfas_72	3.7479	4	1.0468	1.0231	1	0.0214	1	3	5	5	-0.7772	0.1835	0.1164	2285	0	2285
bfas_77R	3.8254	4	1.4498	1.2041	2	0.0252	1	3	5	5	-0.7657	-0.4212	0.1346	2285	0	2285
bfas_82R	3.8136	4	1.3505	1.1621	2	0.0243	1	3	5	5	-0.8343	-0.1587	0.1694	2285	0	2285
bfas_87R	3.4	4	1.6884	1.2994	3	0.0272	1	2	5	5	-0.3132	-1.0499	0.1239	2285	0	2285
bfas_92	3.8796	4	0.9299	0.9643	2	0.0202	1	3	5	5	-0.7663	0.209	0.1396	2285	0	2285
bfas_97R	3.0963	3	1.3638	1.1678	2	0.0244	1	2	4	5	-0.0142	-0.8526	0.1206	2285	0	2285

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_7	Respect authority.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.866523	0.9903937	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_2R	Am not interested in other people’s problems.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.429620	1.2206871	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_12	Feel others’ emotions.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.966292	0.9724637	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_17R	Believe that I am better than others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.653713	1.1990417	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_22	Inquire about others’ well-being.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.936041	0.9570396	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_27	Hate to seem pushy.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.815824	1.0472284	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_32R	Can’t be bothered with other’s needs.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.490705	1.1910948	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_37R	Take advantage of others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	4	5	3.814446	1.2224281	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_42	Sympathize with others’ feelings.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	7	0.9969789	1	4	5	3.958009	0.9847092	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_47	Avoid imposing my will on others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.486358	1.0396849	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_52R	Am indifferent to the feelings of others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.447813	1.1583772	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_57	Rarely put people under pressure.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	4	5	3.537495	1.0221966	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_62R	Take no time for others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.645987	1.1534078	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_67R	Insult people.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	4	5	3.748591	1.2199880	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_72	Take an interest in other people’s lives.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.749241	1.0242420	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_77R	Seek conflict.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	4	5	3.817629	1.2083916	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_82R	Don’t have a soft side.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.800434	1.1707888	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_87R	Love a good fight.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	4	5	3.389926	1.3035816	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_92	Like to do things for others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.877604	0.9669943	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_97R	Am out for my own personal gain.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.089805	1.1700862	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfas_conscientiousness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.85 [0.84;0.86].

Missing: 29.

Likert plot of scale bfas_conscientiousness items

Distribution of scale bfas_conscientiousness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_3, bfas_8R, bfas_13R, bfas_18, bfas_23R, bfas_28, bfas_33R, bfas_38, bfas_43, bfas_48R, bfas_53R, bfas_58, bfas_63, bfas_68R, bfas_73, bfas_78R, bfas_83R, bfas_88, bfas_93R & bfas_98
Observations:	2288
Positive correlations:	170
Number of correlations:	190
Percentage positive correlations:	89

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.82
Omega (hierarchical):	0.66
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.85
Coefficient H:	0.84
Coefficient Alpha:	0.82

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.81; 0.83]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.81; 0.83]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.85
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.84
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.85

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.84; 0.86]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.84; 0.86]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.705, 2.778, 1.825, 0.898, 0.855, 0.803, 0.752, 0.747, 0.705, 0.656, 0.623, 0.592, 0.572, 0.561, 0.526, 0.516, 0.505, 0.493, 0.454 & 0.433

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML2	ML1	ML3
bfas_3	0.501	0.188	-0.127
bfas_8R	0.070	0.457	0.302
bfas_13R	0.050	0.670	0.046
bfas_18	0.556	-0.124	0.209
bfas_23R	0.061	0.691	0.076
bfas_28	0.572	0.114	0.049
bfas_33R	0.027	0.631	0.072
bfas_38	0.607	0.097	-0.021
bfas_43	0.569	0.234	-0.155
bfas_48R	-0.030	0.193	0.545
bfas_53R	0.010	0.448	0.314
bfas_58	0.552	-0.258	0.200
bfas_63	0.492	0.162	-0.232
bfas_68R	0.052	0.152	0.563
bfas_73	0.397	0.189	-0.402
bfas_78R	0.133	0.206	0.473
bfas_83R	-0.059	0.590	-0.074
bfas_88	0.490	-0.107	-0.056
bfas_93R	-0.053	0.641	-0.037
bfas_98	0.590	-0.182	0.122

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC2	TC1	TC3
bfas_3	0.539	0.240	-0.163
bfas_8R	0.075	0.489	0.376
bfas_13R	0.052	0.711	0.082
bfas_18	0.628	-0.143	0.241
bfas_23R	0.065	0.722	0.118
bfas_28	0.614	0.150	0.042
bfas_33R	0.023	0.685	0.107
bfas_38	0.647	0.134	-0.038
bfas_43	0.592	0.287	-0.180
bfas_48R	-0.021	0.175	0.663
bfas_53R	0.014	0.471	0.402
bfas_58	0.635	-0.305	0.228
bfas_63	0.528	0.215	-0.293
bfas_68R	0.073	0.128	0.678
bfas_73	0.416	0.260	-0.495
bfas_78R	0.158	0.193	0.591
bfas_83R	-0.089	0.678	-0.075
bfas_88	0.574	-0.122	-0.086
bfas_93R	-0.071	0.712	-0.024
bfas_98	0.672	-0.211	0.133

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_3	3.7574	4	0.8467	0.9202	1	0.0192	1	3	5	5	-0.7557	0.5052	0.1086	2288	0	2288
bfas_8R	3.2168	3	1.5131	1.2301	2	0.0257	1	2	4	5	-0.1994	-1.0189	0.113	2288	0	2288
bfas_13R	2.9865	3	1.4423	1.201	2	0.0251	1	2	4	5	0.073	-0.9785	0.1233	2288	0	2288
bfas_18	3.7535	4	0.944	0.9716	1	0.0203	1	3	5	5	-0.6905	0.2151	0.1167	2288	0	2288
bfas_23R	2.9969	3	1.4783	1.2159	2	0.0254	1	2	4	5	-0.0117	-0.9971	0.1263	2288	0	2288
bfas_28	3.6394	4	1.1585	1.0763	1	0.0225	1	3	5	5	-0.5158	-0.4386	0.1204	2288	0	2288
bfas_33R	3.052	3	1.3978	1.1823	2	0.0247	1	2	4	5	-0.0053	-0.912	0.1254	2288	0	2288
bfas_38	3.6241	4	1.1582	1.0762	1	0.0225	1	3	5	5	-0.6537	-0.1939	0.106	2288	0	2288
bfas_43	3.7946	4	0.995	0.9975	2	0.0209	1	3	5	5	-0.7126	0.082	0.1267	2288	0	2288
bfas_48R	3.1901	3	1.5034	1.2261	2	0.0256	1	2	4	5	-0.2108	-0.9736	0.1141	2288	0	2288
bfas_53R	3.3575	4	1.2591	1.1221	1	0.0235	1	3	5	5	-0.4049	-0.5916	0.1307	2288	0	2288
bfas_58	3.882	4	0.9384	0.9687	2	0.0203	1	3	5	5	-0.707	0.0175	0.1447	2288	0	2288
bfas_63	3.4812	4	1.0517	1.0255	1	0.0214	1	3	5	5	-0.3839	-0.4847	0.1353	2288	0	2288
bfas_68R	3.1779	3	1.4677	1.2115	2	0.0253	1	2	4	5	-0.1992	-0.9368	0.1217	2288	0	2288
bfas_73	3.1346	3	1.2622	1.1235	2	0.0235	1	2	4	5	-0.0442	-0.8765	0.1355	2288	0	2288
bfas_78R	3.5682	4	1.4392	1.1997	2	0.0251	1	3	5	5	-0.5389	-0.6231	0.1294	2288	0	2288
bfas_83R	2.7684	3	1.3604	1.1664	2	0.0244	1	2	4	5	0.2644	-0.8137	0.1283	2288	0	2288
bfas_88	3.5087	4	0.9505	0.9749	1	0.0204	1	3	5	5	-0.4567	-0.0669	0.1604	2288	0	2288
bfas_93R	2.6385	2	1.429	1.1954	2	0.025	1	1	4	5	0.3286	-0.8757	0.108	2288	0	2288
bfas_98	3.7137	4	0.9888	0.9944	1	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.5808	-0.0954	0.1248	2288	0	2288

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_3	Carry out my plans.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.759067	0.9200337	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_8R	Leave my belongings around.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	3.210458	1.2319614	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_13R	Waste my time.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	5	2.980130	1.2059142	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_18	Like order.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.749460	0.9774216	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_23R	Find it difficult to get down to work.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	5	2.992228	1.2161370	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_28	Keep things tidy.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.641037	1.0783285	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_33R	Mess things up.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.045415	1.1848297	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_38	Follow a schedule.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	4	5	3.623270	1.0798633	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_43	Finish what I start.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.791613	1.0003367	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_48R	Am not bothered by messy people.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	6	0.9974104	1	3	5	3.179576	1.2288868	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_53R	Don’t put my mind on the task at hand.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.352967	1.1219668	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_58	Want everything to be “just right.”	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	4	5	3.879549	0.9704151	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_63	Get things done quickly.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	4	5	3.482236	1.0267914	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_68R	Am not bothered by disorder.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.174403	1.2104668	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_73	Always know what I am doing.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.135358	1.1234110	5	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_78R	Dislike routine.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.559219	1.2026025	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_83R	Postpone decisions.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	3	5	2.765421	1.1661843	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_88	See that rules are observed.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	4	5	3.510638	0.9752563	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_93R	Am easily distracted.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	2	5	2.634549	1.1949179	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_98	Want every detail taken care of.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.716269	0.9957461	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfas_extraversion

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.85 [0.84;0.85].

Missing: 30.

Likert plot of scale bfas_extraversion items

Distribution of scale bfas_extraversion

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_4, bfas_9, bfas_14R, bfas_19, bfas_24R, bfas_29R, bfas_34R, bfas_39, bfas_44, bfas_49R, bfas_54R, bfas_59, bfas_64R, bfas_69, bfas_74, bfas_79R, bfas_84, bfas_89, bfas_94 & bfas_99R
Observations:	2287
Positive correlations:	177
Number of correlations:	190
Percentage positive correlations:	93

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.82
Omega (hierarchical):	0.47
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.88
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.88
Coefficient H:	0.86
Coefficient Alpha:	0.84

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.81; 0.83]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.83; 0.85]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.85
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.77
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.84; 0.85]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.023, 2.893, 1.773, 1.138, 0.836, 0.752, 0.697, 0.69, 0.635, 0.601, 0.587, 0.567, 0.536, 0.519, 0.501, 0.486, 0.478, 0.462, 0.432 & 0.396

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2	ML3	ML4
bfas_4	0.455	0.297	0.191	-0.176
bfas_9	0.732	-0.070	-0.002	0.146
bfas_14R	-0.018	0.710	0.010	0.009
bfas_19	0.558	-0.092	0.124	0.107
bfas_24R	-0.051	0.638	0.029	0.132
bfas_29R	0.152	0.198	0.065	0.458
bfas_34R	-0.087	0.666	-0.077	0.063
bfas_39	0.600	-0.004	0.109	-0.049
bfas_44	0.381	0.352	0.164	-0.326
bfas_49R	0.307	0.149	-0.126	0.552
bfas_54R	-0.283	0.129	0.336	0.420
bfas_59	0.671	0.022	0.069	0.081
bfas_64R	-0.141	0.221	0.339	0.406
bfas_69	0.475	-0.052	0.104	-0.049
bfas_74	0.138	0.052	0.540	-0.071
bfas_79R	0.118	0.141	-0.027	0.466
bfas_84	0.154	-0.006	0.648	-0.004
bfas_89	0.647	-0.044	0.014	0.012
bfas_94	0.026	-0.056	0.704	-0.016
bfas_99R	0.223	0.074	-0.086	0.518

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC4	TC2	TC3
bfas_4	0.507	-0.184	0.357	0.203
bfas_9	0.749	0.199	-0.081	0.015
bfas_14R	-0.026	0.025	0.791	0.015
bfas_19	0.619	0.172	-0.132	0.139
bfas_24R	-0.062	0.154	0.717	0.030
bfas_29R	0.155	0.564	0.196	0.072
bfas_34R	-0.098	0.068	0.782	-0.105
bfas_39	0.674	-0.017	-0.007	0.110
bfas_44	0.430	-0.369	0.438	0.179
bfas_49R	0.296	0.639	0.157	-0.144
bfas_54R	-0.357	0.494	0.083	0.459
bfas_59	0.709	0.124	0.024	0.076
bfas_64R	-0.181	0.456	0.218	0.425
bfas_69	0.568	-0.026	-0.072	0.099
bfas_74	0.148	-0.105	0.042	0.667
bfas_79R	0.118	0.613	0.115	-0.045
bfas_84	0.194	-0.029	0.001	0.708
bfas_89	0.712	0.047	-0.048	-0.001
bfas_94	0.058	-0.049	-0.069	0.792
bfas_99R	0.230	0.663	0.037	-0.109

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_4	3.4307	4	1.3897	1.1788	1	0.0247	1	3	5	5	-0.4496	-0.6753	0.1154	2287	0	2287
bfas_9	3.4272	4	1.1468	1.0709	1	0.0224	1	3	5	5	-0.4061	-0.4552	0.1419	2287	0	2287
bfas_14R	2.8881	3	1.5063	1.2273	2	0.0257	1	2	4	5	0.0889	-1.0189	0.1198	2287	0	2287
bfas_19	3.6248	4	1.2083	1.0992	1	0.023	1	3	5	5	-0.4722	-0.5536	0.124	2287	0	2287
bfas_24R	2.7258	3	1.2874	1.1347	2	0.0237	1	2	4	5	0.228	-0.8148	0.1286	2287	0	2287
bfas_29R	3.15	3	1.3358	1.1558	2	0.0242	1	2	4	5	-0.1567	-0.7948	0.1419	2287	0	2287
bfas_34R	2.7149	3	1.3439	1.1593	2	0.0242	1	2	4	5	0.2598	-0.8554	0.1183	2287	0	2287
bfas_39	3.2903	3	1.1519	1.0733	1	0.0224	1	2	4	5	-0.2229	-0.6236	0.155	2287	0	2287
bfas_44	3.4066	4	1.258	1.1216	1	0.0235	1	3	5	5	-0.3637	-0.6658	0.127	2287	0	2287
bfas_49R	2.9764	3	1.2943	1.1377	2	0.0238	1	2	4	5	0.0231	-0.8189	0.1303	2287	0	2287
bfas_54R	3.247	3	1.2526	1.1192	2	0.0234	1	2	4	5	-0.3116	-0.7185	0.1301	2287	0	2287
bfas_59	3.5763	4	1.1568	1.0755	1	0.0225	1	3	5	5	-0.5559	-0.302	0.1231	2287	0	2287
bfas_64R	3.2794	3	1.4359	1.1983	2	0.0251	1	2	4	5	-0.3105	-0.8602	0.1152	2287	0	2287
bfas_69	3.3568	3	1.0922	1.0451	1	0.0219	1	2	4	5	-0.416	-0.3776	0.1502	2287	0	2287
bfas_74	3.8688	4	0.9355	0.9672	2	0.0202	1	3	5	5	-0.8386	0.4553	0.134	2287	0	2287
bfas_79R	2.972	3	1.4489	1.2037	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	0.0372	-0.9651	0.1277	2287	0	2287
bfas_84	3.7363	4	1.0201	1.01	1	0.0211	1	3	5	5	-0.6096	-0.1286	0.12	2287	0	2287
bfas_89	3.2016	3	1.112	1.0545	2	0.0221	1	2	4	5	-0.1266	-0.6443	0.1517	2287	0	2287
bfas_94	3.8601	4	1.0355	1.0176	2	0.0213	1	3	5	5	-0.772	0.1083	0.1493	2287	0	2287
bfas_99R	2.9672	3	1.3047	1.1422	2	0.0239	1	2	4	5	-0.0116	-0.7972	0.1233	2287	0	2287

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_4	Make friends easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.435665	1.1789028	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_9	Take charge.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.426782	1.0750449	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_14R	Am hard to get to know.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	2.885430	1.2297915	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_19	Have a strong personality.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.626350	1.0995781	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_24R	Keep others at a distance.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	2.718669	1.1376992	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_29R	Lack the talent for influencing people.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	3.143537	1.1595000	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_34R	Reveal little about myself.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	2.709468	1.1599507	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_39	Know how to captivate people.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.294983	1.0758394	5	<U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_44	Warm up quickly to others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	4	5	3.410900	1.1232266	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_49R	Wait for others to lead the way.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	7	0.9969789	1	3	5	2.968398	1.1399842	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_54R	Rarely get caught up in the excitement.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	3.244579	1.1220637	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_59	See myself as a good leader.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.574708	1.0776529	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_64R	Am not a very enthusiastic person.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	3	5	3.274697	1.1999571	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_69	Can talk others into doing things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	3	5	3.357607	1.0466098	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_74	Show my feelings when I’m happy.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.866319	0.9695374	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_79R	Hold back my opinions.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	2.966175	1.2043597	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_84	Have a lot of fun.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	4	5	3.736751	1.0102626	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_89	Am the first to act.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.204338	1.0550714	5	<U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_94	Laugh a lot.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	4	5	3.861425	1.0176185	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_99R	Do not have an assertive personality.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	2.962240	1.1435626	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2582>

Scale: bfas_neuroticism

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.88;0.9].

Missing: 29.

Likert plot of scale bfas_neuroticism items

Distribution of scale bfas_neuroticism

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_6, bfas_1R, bfas_11, bfas_16R, bfas_21R, bfas_26, bfas_31, bfas_36R, bfas_41R, bfas_46, bfas_51, bfas_56R, bfas_61, bfas_66, bfas_71R, bfas_76R, bfas_81, bfas_86, bfas_91 & bfas_96
Observations:	2288
Positive correlations:	181
Number of correlations:	190
Percentage positive correlations:	95

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.87
Omega (hierarchical):	0.54
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.92
Coefficient H:	0.90
Coefficient Alpha:	0.87

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.86; 0.88]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.87; 0.88]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.89
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.84
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.89

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.88; 0.9]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.88; 0.9]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

6.263, 2.431, 1.521, 0.932, 0.926, 0.792, 0.713, 0.678, 0.633, 0.594, 0.565, 0.532, 0.507, 0.482, 0.451, 0.448, 0.44, 0.419, 0.347 & 0.326

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2	ML3
bfas_6	0.765	0.063	-0.028
bfas_1R	-0.274	0.358	0.063
bfas_11	0.077	0.035	0.630
bfas_16R	0.155	0.665	-0.152
bfas_21R	-0.115	0.433	0.344
bfas_26	0.655	0.079	0.161
bfas_31	0.384	-0.112	0.414
bfas_36R	0.175	0.516	0.064
bfas_41R	-0.216	0.582	0.290
bfas_46	0.472	0.014	0.295
bfas_51	0.022	0.101	0.530
bfas_56R	0.197	0.535	-0.127
bfas_61	0.239	-0.026	0.587
bfas_66	0.449	0.076	0.353
bfas_71R	-0.234	0.489	0.252
bfas_76R	0.225	0.645	-0.097
bfas_81	0.120	0.022	0.564
bfas_86	0.645	0.087	0.112
bfas_91	0.200	-0.071	0.512
bfas_96	0.587	0.041	0.098

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2	TC3
bfas_6	0.783	0.090	-0.024
bfas_1R	-0.370	0.444	0.114
bfas_11	0.115	0.005	0.696
bfas_16R	0.160	0.724	-0.156
bfas_21R	-0.136	0.480	0.403
bfas_26	0.682	0.106	0.173
bfas_31	0.456	-0.120	0.422
bfas_36R	0.216	0.610	0.028
bfas_41R	-0.228	0.622	0.333
bfas_46	0.563	0.018	0.275
bfas_51	0.013	0.060	0.654
bfas_56R	0.255	0.647	-0.213
bfas_61	0.304	-0.033	0.605
bfas_66	0.532	0.086	0.340
bfas_71R	-0.297	0.530	0.348
bfas_76R	0.227	0.696	-0.084
bfas_81	0.160	-0.011	0.635
bfas_86	0.709	0.108	0.096
bfas_91	0.251	-0.101	0.572
bfas_96	0.679	0.060	0.062

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_6	2.8492	3	1.5334	1.2383	2	0.0259	1	2	4	5	0.0763	-1.0659	0.1254	2288	0	2288
bfas_1R	3.1097	3	1.4558	1.2066	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	-0.0558	-0.9639	0.1294	2288	0	2288
bfas_11	3.5494	4	1.3758	1.1729	1	0.0245	1	2	5	5	-0.6168	-0.4774	0.1097	2288	0	2288
bfas_16R	3.1591	3	1.4202	1.1917	2	0.0249	1	2	4	5	-0.2579	-0.9379	0.1086	2288	0	2288
bfas_21R	2.3733	2	1.2852	1.1337	1	0.0237	1	1	3	5	0.6271	-0.3753	0.1206	2288	0	2288
bfas_26	3.0192	3	1.5195	1.2327	2	0.0258	1	2	4	5	-0.0324	-1.0606	0.1296	2288	0	2288
bfas_31	2.8518	3	1.4573	1.2072	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	0.1084	-1.0078	0.123	2288	0	2288
bfas_36R	2.5376	2	1.285	1.1336	1	0.0237	1	1	3	5	0.4287	-0.6217	0.1213	2288	0	2288
bfas_41R	3.2225	3	1.6685	1.2917	2	0.027	1	2	4	5	-0.2239	-1.0644	0.1082	2288	0	2288
bfas_46	3.2784	3	1.3265	1.1517	2	0.0241	1	2	4	5	-0.2739	-0.8016	0.1254	2288	0	2288
bfas_51	3.8724	4	1.1293	1.0627	2	0.0222	1	3	5	5	-0.906	0.2572	0.1567	2288	0	2288
bfas_56R	2.6198	2	1.217	1.1032	1	0.0231	1	1	3	5	0.3562	-0.6673	0.1243	2288	0	2288
bfas_61	3.0118	3	1.4135	1.1889	2	0.0249	1	2	4	5	-0.0275	-1.0065	0.1359	2288	0	2288
bfas_66	3.2662	3	1.4547	1.2061	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	-0.2177	-0.9396	0.1184	2288	0	2288
bfas_71R	3.2338	3	1.623	1.274	2	0.0266	1	2	4	5	-0.2218	-1.05	0.1066	2288	0	2288
bfas_76R	3.066	3	1.439	1.1996	2	0.0251	1	2	4	5	-0.1119	-1.0284	0.1278	2288	0	2288
bfas_81	3.3855	4	1.3564	1.1646	1	0.0243	1	2	5	5	-0.3669	-0.7497	0.1189	2288	0	2288
bfas_86	2.9948	3	1.4272	1.1946	2	0.025	1	2	4	5	-0.0161	-0.9819	0.1309	2288	0	2288
bfas_91	3.0555	3	1.4735	1.2139	2	0.0254	1	2	4	5	-0.0388	-1.0095	0.1274	2288	0	2288
bfas_96	3.0555	3	1.3485	1.1612	2	0.0243	1	2	4	5	-0.0796	-0.935	0.1278	2288	0	2288

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_6	Get angry easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	5	2.853627	1.239623	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_1R	Seldom feel blue.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	0	1.0000000	1	3	5	3.106172	1.206968	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_11	Am filled with doubts about things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.547732	1.173658	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_16R	Rarely get irritated.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	5	3.160691	1.191337	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_21R	Feel comfortable with myself.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	2	5	2.374082	1.133684	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>
bfas_26	Get upset easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	3.025065	1.232670	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_31	Feel threatened easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	2.852204	1.208031	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_36R	Keep my emotions under control.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	2	5	2.539991	1.133126	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581>
bfas_41R	Rarely feel depressed.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.215398	1.291508	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_46	Change my mood a lot.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.279412	1.150602	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_51	Worry about things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	4	5	3.870017	1.064664	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_56R	Rarely lose my composure.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	2	5	2.620451	1.102764	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581>
bfas_61	Am easily discouraged.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	3.016912	1.189313	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_66	Am a person whose moods go up and down easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	3.265828	1.205563	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_71R	Am not embarrassed easily.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	3.231337	1.273617	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_76R	Am not easily annoyed.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	3	5	3.063423	1.199511	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_81	Become overwhelmed by events.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.384549	1.163434	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_86	Get easily agitated.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	2.995662	1.194598	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_91	Am afraid of many things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.058568	1.212116	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_96	Can be stirred up easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	3.056424	1.160701	5	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfas_opennessdomain

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.83;0.85].

Missing: 28.

Likert plot of scale bfas_opennessdomain items

Distribution of scale bfas_opennessdomain

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_5, bfas_10, bfas_15R, bfas_20, bfas_25, bfas_30, bfas_35, bfas_40, bfas_45R, bfas_50R, bfas_55R, bfas_60R, bfas_65, bfas_70, bfas_75, bfas_80R, bfas_85R, bfas_90R, bfas_95 & bfas_100
Observations:	2289
Positive correlations:	172
Number of correlations:	190
Percentage positive correlations:	91

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.78
Omega (hierarchical):	0.40
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.85
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.88
Coefficient H:	0.84
Coefficient Alpha:	0.81

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.77; 0.8]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.79; 0.82]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.84
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.78
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.85

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.83; 0.85]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.84; 0.85]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.566, 2.758, 1.758, 1.06, 0.894, 0.842, 0.761, 0.73, 0.672, 0.647, 0.615, 0.592, 0.577, 0.567, 0.549, 0.519, 0.506, 0.494, 0.448 & 0.446

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML3	ML4	ML2
bfas_5	0.632	0.020	0.103	-0.042
bfas_10	0.153	0.480	0.070	-0.001
bfas_15R	0.168	-0.050	0.580	0.097
bfas_20	0.041	0.673	0.050	-0.004
bfas_25	0.623	0.097	-0.005	0.009
bfas_30	0.245	0.444	-0.013	0.025
bfas_35	0.481	0.172	0.024	-0.017
bfas_40	0.076	0.564	0.010	0.017
bfas_45R	-0.020	0.050	0.537	0.108
bfas_50R	-0.233	0.353	0.513	0.011
bfas_55R	0.057	-0.003	0.632	-0.023
bfas_60R	-0.194	0.113	0.371	0.254
bfas_65	0.380	0.182	0.059	0.020
bfas_70	0.040	0.538	-0.154	0.076
bfas_75	0.631	0.048	-0.047	0.018
bfas_80R	-0.011	-0.004	0.082	0.624
bfas_85R	0.325	-0.261	0.442	0.090
bfas_90R	-0.002	0.004	-0.038	0.838
bfas_95	0.565	0.109	0.003	-0.062
bfas_100	0.130	0.572	0.042	-0.034

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC3	TC2	TC4
bfas_5	0.693	0.015	0.127	-0.064
bfas_10	0.143	0.557	0.131	-0.053
bfas_15R	0.182	-0.053	0.651	0.124
bfas_20	0.057	0.723	0.076	-0.006
bfas_25	0.694	0.100	-0.008	0.007
bfas_30	0.269	0.521	-0.002	0.007
bfas_35	0.573	0.182	0.007	-0.001
bfas_40	0.075	0.649	0.033	0.004
bfas_45R	-0.029	0.057	0.635	0.129
bfas_50R	-0.262	0.391	0.608	-0.003
bfas_55R	0.062	-0.008	0.744	-0.046
bfas_60R	-0.222	0.131	0.409	0.365
bfas_65	0.488	0.189	0.014	0.088
bfas_70	0.059	0.643	-0.252	0.177
bfas_75	0.718	0.043	-0.067	0.027
bfas_80R	0.019	-0.010	0.006	0.845
bfas_85R	0.380	-0.327	0.510	0.121
bfas_90R	-0.021	0.001	0.002	0.859
bfas_95	0.650	0.106	0.005	-0.083
bfas_100	0.127	0.650	0.093	-0.087

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_5	3.8523	4	0.8969	0.947	1	0.0198	1	3	5	5	-0.7929	0.3687	0.1249	2289	0	2289
bfas_10	4.2036	4	0.8292	0.9106	1	0.019	1	3	5	5	-1.1564	1.0789	0.1798	2289	0	2289
bfas_15R	3.3718	4	1.2643	1.1244	1	0.0235	1	3	5	5	-0.3351	-0.6786	0.1319	2289	0	2289
bfas_20	3.8742	4	1.0821	1.0402	2	0.0217	1	3	5	5	-0.7823	0.0827	0.161	2289	0	2289
bfas_25	3.7711	4	0.9956	0.9978	1	0.0209	1	3	5	5	-0.7001	0.0265	0.1199	2289	0	2289
bfas_30	3.8637	4	0.9613	0.9805	2	0.0205	1	3	5	5	-0.7355	0.1447	0.142	2289	0	2289
bfas_35	3.5522	4	1.1556	1.075	1	0.0225	1	3	5	5	-0.4957	-0.414	0.1245	2289	0	2289
bfas_40	3.9384	4	1.1898	1.0908	2	0.0228	1	3	5	5	-0.8445	-0.0807	0.1564	2289	0	2289
bfas_45R	3.284	3	1.4595	1.2081	2	0.0253	1	2	4	5	-0.2196	-0.8796	0.1359	2289	0	2289
bfas_50R	3.256	3	1.6206	1.273	2	0.0266	1	2	4	5	-0.2333	-1.0437	0.1068	2289	0	2289
bfas_55R	3.1883	3	1.5935	1.2623	2	0.0264	1	2	4	5	-0.1539	-1.0818	0.1153	2289	0	2289
bfas_60R	3.0795	3	1.429	1.1954	2	0.025	1	2	4	5	-0.075	-0.9024	0.1293	2289	0	2289
bfas_65	3.4093	3	1.2017	1.0962	1	0.0229	1	2	4	5	-0.2984	-0.6261	0.1466	2289	0	2289
bfas_70	3.6234	4	1.1728	1.083	1	0.0226	1	3	5	5	-0.556	-0.3472	0.1206	2289	0	2289
bfas_75	3.7143	4	0.9008	0.9491	1	0.0198	1	3	5	5	-0.5607	-0.1362	0.1145	2289	0	2289
bfas_80R	3.1953	3	1.5191	1.2325	2	0.0258	1	2	4	5	-0.1692	-0.9838	0.1208	2289	0	2289
bfas_85R	3.1284	3	1.4048	1.1853	2	0.0248	1	2	4	5	-0.1816	-0.8962	0.1284	2289	0	2289
bfas_90R	3.2023	3	1.6186	1.2722	2	0.0266	1	2	4	5	-0.2059	-1.0395	0.1116	2289	0	2289
bfas_95	3.5972	4	0.9714	0.9856	1	0.0206	1	3	5	5	-0.48	-0.2301	0.135	2289	0	2289
bfas_100	3.9096	4	0.9923	0.9961	2	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.7902	0.1666	0.1584	2289	0	2289

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_5	Am quick to understand things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.856526	0.9460973	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_10	Enjoy the beauty of nature.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	4.200519	0.9136897	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_15R	Have difficulty understanding abstract ideas.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.366897	1.1303892	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_20	Believe in the importance of art.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.873379	1.0416946	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_25	Can handle a lot of information.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.773552	0.9983431	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_30	Love to reflect on things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.863440	0.9829605	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_35	Like to solve complex problems.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.552961	1.0757958	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_40	Get deeply immersed in music.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	6	0.9974104	1	4	5	3.938988	1.0911683	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_45R	Avoid philosophical discussions.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	3.275400	1.2104594	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_50R	Do not like poetry.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	3	5	3.248592	1.2759113	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_55R	Avoid difficult reading material.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	3	5	3.183629	1.2630842	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_60R	Seldom notice the emotional aspects of paintings and pictures.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	3	5	3.075390	1.1954404	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_65	Have a rich vocabulary.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	3	5	3.410923	1.0968782	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_70	Need a creative outlet.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	4	5	3.627060	1.0837533	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_75	Think quickly.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	4	5	3.715958	0.9492440	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_80R	Seldom get lost in thought.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	3.187934	1.2337743	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_85R	Learn things slowly.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	3	5	3.126357	1.1860451	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_90R	Seldom daydream.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	3	5	3.200174	1.2733859	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_95	Formulate ideas clearly.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.595486	0.9868860	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_100	See the beauty in things that others might not notice.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	4	5	3.909840	0.9967960	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfas_assertiveness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.81 [0.8;0.82].

Missing: 16.

Likert plot of scale bfas_assertiveness items

Distribution of scale bfas_assertiveness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_9, bfas_19, bfas_29R, bfas_39, bfas_49R, bfas_59, bfas_69, bfas_79R, bfas_89 & bfas_99R
Observations:	2301
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.78
Omega (hierarchical):	0.66
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.84
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.82
Coefficient H:	0.83
Coefficient Alpha:	0.79

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.77; 0.79]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.77; 0.8]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.81
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.78
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.81

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.8; 0.82]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.8; 0.83]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.542, 1.691, 0.83, 0.722, 0.656, 0.619, 0.536, 0.525, 0.463 & 0.417

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_9	0.708	0.077
bfas_19	0.582	0.053
bfas_29R	0.018	0.574
bfas_39	0.680	-0.090
bfas_49R	0.043	0.690
bfas_59	0.661	0.098
bfas_69	0.559	-0.110
bfas_79R	-0.065	0.588
bfas_89	0.669	-0.037
bfas_99R	0.017	0.581

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_9	0.742	0.100
bfas_19	0.655	0.076
bfas_29R	0.028	0.696
bfas_39	0.757	-0.085
bfas_49R	0.067	0.747
bfas_59	0.709	0.121
bfas_69	0.669	-0.140
bfas_79R	-0.084	0.740
bfas_89	0.737	-0.039
bfas_99R	0.020	0.706

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_9	3.4289	4	1.1503	1.0725	1	0.0224	1	3	5	5	-0.4046	-0.4583	0.1421	2301	0	2301
bfas_19	3.628	4	1.2068	1.0985	1	0.0229	1	3	5	5	-0.474	-0.5504	0.1241	2301	0	2301
bfas_29R	3.1439	3	1.3432	1.159	2	0.0242	1	2	4	5	-0.158	-0.7991	0.1417	2301	0	2301
bfas_39	3.2938	3	1.1554	1.0749	1	0.0224	1	2	4	5	-0.2216	-0.6299	0.1545	2301	0	2301
bfas_49R	2.97	3	1.3013	1.1407	2	0.0238	1	2	4	5	0.0253	-0.8226	0.1302	2301	0	2301
bfas_59	3.5758	4	1.1583	1.0762	1	0.0224	1	3	5	5	-0.5538	-0.3044	0.1236	2301	0	2301
bfas_69	3.3577	3	1.0933	1.0456	1	0.0218	1	2	4	5	-0.4159	-0.3767	0.1504	2301	0	2301
bfas_79R	2.967	3	1.452	1.205	2	0.0251	1	2	4	5	0.041	-0.9655	0.1278	2301	0	2301
bfas_89	3.2043	3	1.1139	1.0554	2	0.022	1	2	4	5	-0.1279	-0.642	0.1515	2301	0	2301
bfas_99R	2.9622	3	1.3086	1.1439	2	0.0238	1	2	4	5	-0.008	-0.7996	0.1226	2301	0	2301

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_9	Take charge.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.426782	1.075045	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_19	Have a strong personality.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.626350	1.099578	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_29R	Lack the talent for influencing people.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	3.143537	1.159500	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_39	Know how to captivate people.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.294983	1.075839	5	<U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_49R	Wait for others to lead the way.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	7	0.9969789	1	3	5	2.968398	1.139984	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_59	See myself as a good leader.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.574708	1.077653	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_69	Can talk others into doing things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	3	5	3.357607	1.046610	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_79R	Hold back my opinions.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	2.966175	1.204360	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_89	Am the first to act.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.204338	1.055071	5	<U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_99R	Do not have an assertive personality.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	2.962240	1.143563	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2582>

Scale: bfas_compassion

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.87 [0.86;0.87].

Missing: 25.

Likert plot of scale bfas_compassion items

Distribution of scale bfas_compassion

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_12, bfas_2R, bfas_22, bfas_32R, bfas_42, bfas_52R, bfas_62R, bfas_72, bfas_82R & bfas_92
Observations:	2292
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.83
Omega (hierarchical):	0.56
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.87
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.88
Coefficient H:	0.83
Coefficient Alpha:	0.83

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.82; 0.84]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.82; 0.84]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.87
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.87
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.87

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.86; 0.87]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.86; 0.87]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.913, 1.738, 0.719, 0.686, 0.548, 0.531, 0.525, 0.469, 0.449 & 0.423

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_12	-0.050	0.665
bfas_2R	0.583	0.086
bfas_22	-0.025	0.730
bfas_32R	0.719	-0.008
bfas_42	0.027	0.732
bfas_52R	0.690	-0.015
bfas_62R	0.734	-0.004
bfas_72	0.033	0.617
bfas_82R	0.673	-0.016
bfas_92	0.047	0.565

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_12	-0.063	0.754
bfas_2R	0.674	0.085
bfas_22	-0.019	0.789
bfas_32R	0.787	-0.008
bfas_42	0.046	0.773
bfas_52R	0.769	-0.022
bfas_62R	0.787	0.005
bfas_72	0.026	0.716
bfas_82R	0.756	-0.026
bfas_92	0.026	0.677

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_12	3.966	4	0.9417	0.9704	1	0.0203	1	3	5	5	-0.9818	0.7358	0.1592	2292	0	2292
bfas_2R	3.4346	4	1.4837	1.2181	1	0.0254	1	2	5	5	-0.4727	-0.7547	0.1032	2292	0	2292
bfas_22	3.9389	4	0.9077	0.9527	2	0.0199	1	3	5	5	-0.945	0.8083	0.1481	2292	0	2292
bfas_32R	3.5009	4	1.4094	1.1872	1	0.0248	1	3	5	5	-0.483	-0.641	0.1185	2292	0	2292
bfas_42	3.9603	4	0.9679	0.9838	2	0.0205	1	3	5	5	-0.9418	0.5681	0.1634	2292	0	2292
bfas_52R	3.4516	4	1.3416	1.1583	1	0.0242	1	3	5	5	-0.4093	-0.6204	0.1359	2292	0	2292
bfas_62R	3.6527	4	1.3241	1.1507	2	0.024	1	3	5	5	-0.7172	-0.2616	0.1252	2292	0	2292
bfas_72	3.75	4	1.0466	1.023	1	0.0214	1	3	5	5	-0.7781	0.1852	0.1169	2292	0	2292
bfas_82R	3.8076	4	1.3619	1.167	2	0.0244	1	3	5	5	-0.8322	-0.1701	0.1688	2292	0	2292
bfas_92	3.88	4	0.9332	0.966	2	0.0202	1	3	5	5	-0.7702	0.2157	0.1401	2292	0	2292

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_12	Feel others’ emotions.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.966292	0.9724637	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_2R	Am not interested in other people’s problems.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.429620	1.2206871	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_22	Inquire about others’ well-being.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.936041	0.9570396	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_32R	Can’t be bothered with other’s needs.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.490705	1.1910948	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_42	Sympathize with others’ feelings.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	7	0.9969789	1	4	5	3.958009	0.9847092	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_52R	Am indifferent to the feelings of others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.447813	1.1583772	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_62R	Take no time for others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.645987	1.1534078	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_72	Take an interest in other people’s lives.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.749241	1.0242420	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_82R	Don’t have a soft side.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.800434	1.1707888	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_92	Like to do things for others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.877604	0.9669943	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfas_enthusiasm

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.78;0.8].

Missing: 27.

Likert plot of scale bfas_enthusiasm items

Distribution of scale bfas_enthusiasm

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_4, bfas_14R, bfas_24R, bfas_34R, bfas_44, bfas_54R, bfas_64R, bfas_74, bfas_84 & bfas_94
Observations:	2290
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.76
Omega (hierarchical):	0.56
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.81
Coefficient H:	0.77
Coefficient Alpha:	0.77

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.75; 0.78]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.78]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.79
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.76
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.80

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.78; 0.8]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.78; 0.81]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.249, 1.772, 1.088, 0.68, 0.619, 0.589, 0.529, 0.521, 0.489 & 0.464

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2	ML3
bfas_4	0.434	0.178	0.351
bfas_14R	0.009	0.702	0.075
bfas_24R	0.003	0.697	-0.036
bfas_34R	-0.123	0.704	0.009
bfas_44	0.382	0.175	0.419
bfas_54R	0.168	0.343	-0.432
bfas_64R	0.243	0.410	-0.309
bfas_74	0.612	0.009	0.028
bfas_84	0.736	-0.032	-0.005
bfas_94	0.714	-0.074	-0.071

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2	TC3
bfas_4	0.513	0.282	-0.423
bfas_14R	0.008	0.795	-0.022
bfas_24R	-0.009	0.768	0.112
bfas_34R	-0.164	0.818	0.039
bfas_44	0.464	0.293	-0.511
bfas_54R	0.185	0.254	0.706
bfas_64R	0.274	0.367	0.524
bfas_74	0.744	-0.035	0.021
bfas_84	0.808	-0.052	0.041
bfas_94	0.811	-0.135	0.129

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_4	3.431	4	1.39	1.179	1	0.0246	1	3	5	5	-0.4494	-0.6765	0.1153	2290	0	2290
bfas_14R	2.8891	3	1.5054	1.2269	2	0.0256	1	2	4	5	0.0871	-1.0188	0.1201	2290	0	2290
bfas_24R	2.7262	3	1.2867	1.1343	2	0.0237	1	2	4	5	0.2275	-0.8148	0.1286	2290	0	2290
bfas_34R	2.7148	3	1.3433	1.159	2	0.0242	1	2	4	5	0.2602	-0.8555	0.1181	2290	0	2290
bfas_44	3.4074	4	1.2577	1.1215	1	0.0234	1	3	5	5	-0.3641	-0.6649	0.1271	2290	0	2290
bfas_54R	3.2467	3	1.2536	1.1197	2	0.0234	1	2	4	5	-0.3132	-0.7184	0.1299	2290	0	2290
bfas_64R	3.2803	3	1.4373	1.1989	2	0.0251	1	2	4	5	-0.31	-0.862	0.1151	2290	0	2290
bfas_74	3.8694	4	0.9349	0.9669	2	0.0202	1	3	5	5	-0.8396	0.4585	0.1341	2290	0	2290
bfas_84	3.7367	4	1.0215	1.0107	1	0.0211	1	3	5	5	-0.6091	-0.1333	0.1203	2290	0	2290
bfas_94	3.8616	4	1.0359	1.0178	2	0.0213	1	3	5	5	-0.7732	0.1087	0.1498	2290	0	2290

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_4	Make friends easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.435665	1.1789028	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_14R	Am hard to get to know.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	2.885430	1.2297915	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_24R	Keep others at a distance.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	2.718669	1.1376992	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_34R	Reveal little about myself.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	2.709468	1.1599507	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_44	Warm up quickly to others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	4	5	3.410900	1.1232266	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_54R	Rarely get caught up in the excitement.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	3.244579	1.1220637	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_64R	Am not a very enthusiastic person.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	3	5	3.274697	1.1999571	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_74	Show my feelings when I’m happy.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.866319	0.9695374	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_84	Have a lot of fun.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	4	5	3.736751	1.0102626	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_94	Laugh a lot.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	4	5	3.861425	1.0176185	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfas_industriousness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.81 [0.8;0.82].

Missing: 20.

Likert plot of scale bfas_industriousness items

Distribution of scale bfas_industriousness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_3, bfas_13R, bfas_23R, bfas_33R, bfas_43, bfas_53R, bfas_63, bfas_73, bfas_83R & bfas_93R
Observations:	2297
Positive correlations:	44
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	98

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.79
Omega (hierarchical):	0.47
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.84
Coefficient H:	0.82
Coefficient Alpha:	0.79

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.78; 0.81]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.77; 0.8]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.81
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.79
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.81

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.8; 0.82]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.8; 0.83]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.487, 1.584, 0.897, 0.714, 0.637, 0.599, 0.588, 0.537, 0.514 & 0.443

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_3	0.028	0.582
bfas_13R	0.693	0.021
bfas_23R	0.713	0.037
bfas_33R	0.641	0.023
bfas_43	0.035	0.682
bfas_53R	0.568	-0.109
bfas_63	-0.029	0.591
bfas_73	-0.044	0.544
bfas_83R	0.539	0.006
bfas_93R	0.619	-0.018

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_3	0.056	0.677
bfas_13R	0.736	0.051
bfas_23R	0.753	0.064
bfas_33R	0.712	0.038
bfas_43	0.091	0.726
bfas_53R	0.684	-0.175
bfas_63	-0.035	0.734
bfas_73	-0.070	0.718
bfas_83R	0.626	0.017
bfas_93R	0.695	-0.003

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_3	3.7579	4	0.8456	0.9195	1	0.0192	1	3	5	5	-0.7544	0.5059	0.1088	2297	0	2297
bfas_13R	2.9826	3	1.4466	1.2027	2	0.0251	1	2	4	5	0.0755	-0.9803	0.123	2297	0	2297
bfas_23R	2.993	3	1.4817	1.2172	2	0.0254	1	2	4	5	-0.0099	-1.0005	0.1265	2297	0	2297
bfas_33R	3.0488	3	1.4027	1.1843	2	0.0247	1	2	4	5	-0.0046	-0.9151	0.1254	2297	0	2297
bfas_43	3.7954	4	0.9956	0.9978	2	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.7114	0.077	0.1271	2297	0	2297
bfas_53R	3.3557	4	1.258	1.1216	1	0.0234	1	3	5	5	-0.3999	-0.5947	0.1313	2297	0	2297
bfas_63	3.4832	4	1.0512	1.0253	1	0.0214	1	3	5	5	-0.3868	-0.483	0.1347	2297	0	2297
bfas_73	3.1345	3	1.2611	1.123	2	0.0234	1	2	4	5	-0.0428	-0.8762	0.1356	2297	0	2297
bfas_83R	2.7649	3	1.3593	1.1659	2	0.0243	1	2	4	5	0.2687	-0.8107	0.128	2297	0	2297
bfas_93R	2.6356	2	1.4294	1.1956	2	0.0249	1	1	4	5	0.3305	-0.8752	0.1077	2297	0	2297

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_3	Carry out my plans.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.759067	0.9200337	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_13R	Waste my time.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	5	2.980130	1.2059142	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_23R	Find it difficult to get down to work.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	5	2.992228	1.2161370	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_33R	Mess things up.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.045415	1.1848297	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_43	Finish what I start.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.791613	1.0003367	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_53R	Don’t put my mind on the task at hand.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.352967	1.1219668	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_63	Get things done quickly.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	4	5	3.482236	1.0267914	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_73	Always know what I am doing.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.135358	1.1234110	5	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_83R	Postpone decisions.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	3	5	2.765421	1.1661843	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_93R	Am easily distracted.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	2	5	2.634549	1.1949179	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>

Scale: bfas_intellect

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.78;0.8].

Missing: 19.

Likert plot of scale bfas_intellect items

Distribution of scale bfas_intellect

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_5, bfas_15R, bfas_25, bfas_35, bfas_45R, bfas_55R, bfas_65, bfas_75, bfas_85R & bfas_95
Observations:	2298
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.73
Omega (hierarchical):	0.63
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.81
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.83
Coefficient H:	0.79
Coefficient Alpha:	0.75

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.72; 0.75]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.74; 0.77]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.79
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.75
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.80

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.78; 0.8]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.79; 0.81]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.219, 1.702, 0.862, 0.736, 0.673, 0.622, 0.575, 0.553, 0.543 & 0.515

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_5	0.627	0.073
bfas_15R	0.037	0.669
bfas_25	0.650	0.003
bfas_35	0.542	0.033
bfas_45R	-0.094	0.622
bfas_55R	0.005	0.607
bfas_65	0.469	0.051
bfas_75	0.660	-0.051
bfas_85R	0.140	0.471
bfas_95	0.639	-0.043

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_5	0.688	0.092
bfas_15R	0.046	0.756
bfas_25	0.720	0.005
bfas_35	0.639	0.029
bfas_45R	-0.112	0.755
bfas_55R	0.006	0.732
bfas_65	0.573	0.050
bfas_75	0.736	-0.059
bfas_85R	0.141	0.605
bfas_95	0.722	-0.054

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_5	3.8529	4	0.8952	0.9462	1	0.0197	1	3	5	5	-0.7929	0.3725	0.1249	2298	0	2298
bfas_15R	3.3695	4	1.2701	1.127	1	0.0235	1	3	5	5	-0.3356	-0.6811	0.1319	2298	0	2298
bfas_25	3.7728	4	0.995	0.9975	1	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.7006	0.0281	0.1203	2298	0	2298
bfas_35	3.5535	4	1.1554	1.0749	1	0.0224	1	3	5	5	-0.4957	-0.4144	0.1245	2298	0	2298
bfas_45R	3.2824	3	1.46	1.2083	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	-0.2179	-0.8814	0.1358	2298	0	2298
bfas_55R	3.1876	3	1.5943	1.2627	2	0.0263	1	2	4	5	-0.1521	-1.083	0.1155	2298	0	2298
bfas_65	3.4099	3	1.2006	1.0957	1	0.0229	1	2	4	5	-0.2974	-0.6255	0.1469	2298	0	2298
bfas_75	3.7132	4	0.9003	0.9488	1	0.0198	1	3	5	5	-0.5578	-0.1399	0.1149	2298	0	2298
bfas_85R	3.1271	3	1.4066	1.186	2	0.0247	1	2	4	5	-0.1808	-0.8978	0.1284	2298	0	2298
bfas_95	3.5962	4	0.9722	0.986	1	0.0206	1	3	5	5	-0.4814	-0.2246	0.1353	2298	0	2298

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_5	Am quick to understand things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.856526	0.9460973	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_15R	Have difficulty understanding abstract ideas.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.366897	1.1303892	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_25	Can handle a lot of information.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.773552	0.9983431	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_35	Like to solve complex problems.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.552961	1.0757958	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_45R	Avoid philosophical discussions.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	3	5	3.275400	1.2104594	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_55R	Avoid difficult reading material.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	3	5	3.183629	1.2630842	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_65	Have a rich vocabulary.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	3	5	3.410923	1.0968782	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_75	Think quickly.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	4	5	3.715958	0.9492440	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_85R	Learn things slowly.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	3	5	3.126357	1.1860451	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_95	Formulate ideas clearly.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.595486	0.9868860	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfas_opennessaspect

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.76 [0.74;0.77].

Missing: 21.

Likert plot of scale bfas_opennessaspect items

Distribution of scale bfas_opennessaspect

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_10, bfas_20, bfas_30, bfas_40, bfas_50R, bfas_60R, bfas_70, bfas_80R, bfas_90R & bfas_100
Observations:	2296
Positive correlations:	44
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	98

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.68
Omega (hierarchical):	0.24
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.79
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.81
Coefficient H:	0.78
Coefficient Alpha:	0.71

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.65; 0.7]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.69; 0.73]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.76
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.70
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.77

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.74; 0.77]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.78]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.976, 1.877, 0.853, 0.822, 0.698, 0.648, 0.632, 0.567, 0.475 & 0.452

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_10	0.587	0.003
bfas_20	0.699	0.018
bfas_30	0.532	-0.029
bfas_40	0.594	-0.004
bfas_50R	0.339	0.307
bfas_60R	0.106	0.469
bfas_70	0.491	-0.011
bfas_80R	-0.016	0.700
bfas_90R	-0.031	0.758
bfas_100	0.652	-0.041

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_10	0.664	0.004
bfas_20	0.748	0.049
bfas_30	0.636	-0.063
bfas_40	0.678	-0.007
bfas_50R	0.361	0.469
bfas_60R	0.073	0.677
bfas_70	0.585	-0.027
bfas_80R	-0.050	0.787
bfas_90R	-0.061	0.808
bfas_100	0.729	-0.041

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_10	4.2025	4	0.8309	0.9115	1	0.019	1	3	5	5	-1.1532	1.0629	0.1794	2296	0	2296
bfas_20	3.8737	4	1.0847	1.0415	2	0.0217	1	3	5	5	-0.7837	0.0845	0.1611	2296	0	2296
bfas_30	3.8654	4	0.961	0.9803	2	0.0205	1	3	5	5	-0.7365	0.1459	0.1424	2296	0	2296
bfas_40	3.9403	4	1.189	1.0904	2	0.0228	1	3	5	5	-0.8463	-0.0776	0.1561	2296	0	2296
bfas_50R	3.2522	3	1.624	1.2743	2	0.0266	1	2	4	5	-0.2308	-1.0468	0.1067	2296	0	2296
bfas_60R	3.0758	3	1.4313	1.1964	2	0.025	1	2	4	5	-0.0728	-0.9039	0.1289	2296	0	2296
bfas_70	3.6254	4	1.1721	1.0826	1	0.0226	1	3	5	5	-0.5577	-0.3443	0.1204	2296	0	2296
bfas_80R	3.1916	3	1.5214	1.2335	2	0.0257	1	2	4	5	-0.1672	-0.9846	0.1211	2296	0	2296
bfas_90R	3.2012	3	1.6214	1.2733	2	0.0266	1	2	4	5	-0.2047	-1.0413	0.1117	2296	0	2296
bfas_100	3.9081	4	0.995	0.9975	2	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.7907	0.1684	0.1583	2296	0	2296

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_10	Enjoy the beauty of nature.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	4.200519	0.9136897	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_20	Believe in the importance of art.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.873379	1.0416946	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_30	Love to reflect on things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	4	5	3.863440	0.9829605	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_40	Get deeply immersed in music.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	6	0.9974104	1	4	5	3.938988	1.0911683	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_50R	Do not like poetry.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	3	5	3.248592	1.2759113	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_60R	Seldom notice the emotional aspects of paintings and pictures.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	3	5	3.075390	1.1954404	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_70	Need a creative outlet.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	4	5	3.627060	1.0837533	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_80R	Seldom get lost in thought.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	3.187934	1.2337743	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_90R	Seldom daydream.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	3	5	3.200174	1.2733859	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_100	See the beauty in things that others might not notice.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	4	5	3.909840	0.9967960	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfas_orderliness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.75 [0.73;0.76].

Missing: 22.

Likert plot of scale bfas_orderliness items

Distribution of scale bfas_orderliness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_18, bfas_8R, bfas_28, bfas_38, bfas_48R, bfas_58, bfas_68R, bfas_78R, bfas_88 & bfas_98
Observations:	2295
Positive correlations:	42
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	93

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.69
Omega (hierarchical):	0.50
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.77
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.81
Coefficient H:	0.74
Coefficient Alpha:	0.70

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.67; 0.71]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.68; 0.72]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.75
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.72
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.75

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.73; 0.76]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.74; 0.77]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.81, 1.751, 1.009, 0.787, 0.753, 0.715, 0.626, 0.561, 0.514 & 0.475

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML2	ML3	ML1
bfas_18	0.068	0.330	0.302
bfas_8R	0.389	-0.171	0.356
bfas_28	0.000	0.007	0.735
bfas_38	-0.043	0.159	0.534
bfas_48R	0.640	-0.034	-0.006
bfas_58	0.069	0.646	-0.025
bfas_68R	0.684	0.078	-0.058
bfas_78R	0.461	0.089	0.084
bfas_88	-0.145	0.338	0.209
bfas_98	0.001	0.668	0.048

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC2	TC1	TC3
bfas_18	0.073	0.410	0.416
bfas_8R	0.469	0.508	-0.297
bfas_28	-0.007	0.811	0.021
bfas_38	-0.088	0.729	0.141
bfas_48R	0.771	-0.047	-0.002
bfas_58	0.122	-0.044	0.797
bfas_68R	0.789	-0.085	0.131
bfas_78R	0.609	0.140	0.090
bfas_88	-0.226	0.311	0.454
bfas_98	0.032	0.088	0.759

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_18	3.7508	4	0.9483	0.9738	1	0.0203	1	3	5	5	-0.6897	0.207	0.1168	2295	0	2295
bfas_8R	3.2148	3	1.5149	1.2308	2	0.0257	1	2	4	5	-0.1978	-1.0193	0.1129	2295	0	2295
bfas_28	3.6405	4	1.1571	1.0757	1	0.0225	1	3	5	5	-0.5166	-0.4358	0.1205	2295	0	2295
bfas_38	3.6227	4	1.1627	1.0783	1	0.0225	1	3	5	5	-0.6547	-0.1947	0.1061	2295	0	2295
bfas_48R	3.1843	3	1.5105	1.229	2	0.0257	1	2	4	5	-0.2076	-0.98	0.1137	2295	0	2295
bfas_58	3.881	4	0.9392	0.9691	2	0.0202	1	3	5	5	-0.7067	0.0136	0.1444	2295	0	2295
bfas_68R	3.1743	3	1.4683	1.2117	2	0.0253	1	2	4	5	-0.1941	-0.9406	0.1216	2295	0	2295
bfas_78R	3.5638	4	1.4457	1.2024	2	0.0251	1	3	5	5	-0.5374	-0.6298	0.129	2295	0	2295
bfas_88	3.5107	4	0.951	0.9752	1	0.0204	1	3	5	5	-0.4562	-0.0677	0.1603	2295	0	2295
bfas_98	3.7137	4	0.9899	0.995	1	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.5807	-0.1006	0.1244	2295	0	2295

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_18	Like order.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.749460	0.9774216	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_8R	Leave my belongings around.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	3.210458	1.2319614	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_28	Keep things tidy.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.641037	1.0783285	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_38	Follow a schedule.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	4	5	3.623270	1.0798633	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_48R	Am not bothered by messy people.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	6	0.9974104	1	3	5	3.179576	1.2288868	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_58	Want everything to be “just right.”	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	4	5	3.879549	0.9704151	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_68R	Am not bothered by disorder.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.174403	1.2104668	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_78R	Dislike routine.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.559219	1.2026025	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_88	See that rules are observed.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	4	5	3.510638	0.9752563	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_98	Want every detail taken care of.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	4	5	3.716269	0.9957461	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfas_politeness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.76;0.78].

Missing: 22.

Likert plot of scale bfas_politeness items

Distribution of scale bfas_politeness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_7, bfas_17R, bfas_27, bfas_37R, bfas_47, bfas_57, bfas_67R, bfas_77R, bfas_87R & bfas_97R
Observations:	2295
Positive correlations:	42
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	93

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.76
Omega (hierarchical):	0.19
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.79
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.77
Coefficient H:	0.84
Coefficient Alpha:	0.74

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.74; 0.77]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.72; 0.76]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.77
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.72
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.76

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.76; 0.78]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.78]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.272, 1.606, 0.936, 0.759, 0.746, 0.67, 0.635, 0.503, 0.446 & 0.426

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_7	0.126	0.258
bfas_17R	0.643	-0.052
bfas_27	0.058	0.512
bfas_37R	0.745	-0.008
bfas_47	-0.081	0.556
bfas_57	0.038	0.516
bfas_67R	0.705	0.022
bfas_77R	0.743	0.014
bfas_87R	0.623	0.046
bfas_97R	0.504	-0.050

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_7	0.133	0.431
bfas_17R	0.723	-0.063
bfas_27	0.054	0.686
bfas_37R	0.787	0.002
bfas_47	-0.097	0.714
bfas_57	0.030	0.685
bfas_67R	0.756	0.042
bfas_77R	0.785	0.020
bfas_87R	0.700	0.048
bfas_97R	0.609	-0.089

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_7	3.8619	4	0.9822	0.9911	2	0.0207	1	3	5	5	-0.7562	0.2099	0.1442	2295	0	2295
bfas_17R	3.661	4	1.4221	1.1925	2	0.0249	1	3	5	5	-0.5647	-0.6495	0.1492	2295	0	2295
bfas_27	3.8144	4	1.0919	1.045	2	0.0218	1	3	5	5	-0.7963	0.1196	0.1407	2295	0	2295
bfas_37R	3.8222	4	1.4828	1.2177	2	0.0254	1	2	5	5	-0.8242	-0.3407	0.1481	2295	0	2295
bfas_47	3.4876	4	1.0773	1.0379	1	0.0217	1	3	5	5	-0.4643	-0.2644	0.1473	2295	0	2295
bfas_57	3.539	4	1.0393	1.0195	1	0.0213	1	3	5	5	-0.4874	-0.2974	0.1314	2295	0	2295
bfas_67R	3.7556	4	1.4777	1.2156	2	0.0254	1	2.5	5	5	-0.7018	-0.5336	0.1447	2295	0	2295
bfas_77R	3.8187	4	1.4588	1.2078	2	0.0252	1	3	5	5	-0.7603	-0.4349	0.1344	2295	0	2295
bfas_87R	3.3952	4	1.6942	1.3016	3	0.0272	1	2	5	5	-0.3103	-1.0539	0.1235	2295	0	2295
bfas_97R	3.0932	3	1.3662	1.1688	2	0.0244	1	2	4	5	-0.0127	-0.8525	0.12	2295	0	2295

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_7	Respect authority.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.866523	0.9903937	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_17R	Believe that I am better than others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	4	5	3.653713	1.1990417	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_27	Hate to seem pushy.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	4	5	3.815824	1.0472284	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_37R	Take advantage of others.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	4	5	3.814446	1.2224281	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_47	Avoid imposing my will on others.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	8	0.9965473	1	4	5	3.486358	1.0396849	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_57	Rarely put people under pressure.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	4	5	3.537495	1.0221966	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_67R	Insult people.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	10	0.9956841	1	4	5	3.748591	1.2199880	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_77R	Seek conflict.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	4	5	3.817629	1.2083916	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_87R	Love a good fight.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	14	0.9939577	1	4	5	3.389926	1.3035816	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfas_97R	Am out for my own personal gain.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.089805	1.1700862	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfas_volatility

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.85;0.87].

Missing: 22.

Likert plot of scale bfas_volatility items

Distribution of scale bfas_volatility

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_6, bfas_16R, bfas_26, bfas_36R, bfas_46, bfas_56R, bfas_66, bfas_76R, bfas_86 & bfas_96
Observations:	2295
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.84
Omega (hierarchical):	0.71
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.88
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.90
Coefficient H:	0.87
Coefficient Alpha:	0.84

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.83; 0.85]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.83; 0.85]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.86
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.83
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.85; 0.87]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.184, 1.534, 0.788, 0.72, 0.603, 0.545, 0.486, 0.439, 0.368 & 0.333

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_6	0.704	0.039
bfas_16R	-0.072	0.719
bfas_26	0.754	0.013
bfas_36R	0.138	0.507
bfas_46	0.711	-0.072
bfas_56R	0.003	0.587
bfas_66	0.724	-0.027
bfas_76R	0.051	0.668
bfas_86	0.689	0.055
bfas_96	0.631	0.020

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_6	0.748	0.044
bfas_16R	-0.066	0.795
bfas_26	0.782	0.033
bfas_36R	0.114	0.657
bfas_46	0.780	-0.083
bfas_56R	-0.041	0.757
bfas_66	0.785	-0.028
bfas_76R	0.068	0.732
bfas_86	0.749	0.053
bfas_96	0.709	0.009

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_6	2.8532	3	1.536	1.2393	2	0.0259	1	2	4	5	0.0739	-1.0666	0.1255	2295	0	2295
bfas_16R	3.1577	3	1.4189	1.1912	2	0.0249	1	2	4	5	-0.2569	-0.9362	0.1092	2295	0	2295
bfas_26	3.0231	3	1.5213	1.2334	2	0.0257	1	2	4	5	-0.0355	-1.0613	0.1292	2295	0	2295
bfas_36R	2.5377	2	1.2853	1.1337	1	0.0237	1	1	3	5	0.4267	-0.6249	0.1214	2295	0	2295
bfas_46	3.2789	3	1.3241	1.1507	2	0.024	1	2	4	5	-0.2735	-0.7978	0.1261	2295	0	2295
bfas_56R	2.62	2	1.2183	1.1037	1	0.023	1	1	3	5	0.3535	-0.6724	0.1242	2295	0	2295
bfas_66	3.2662	3	1.4544	1.206	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	-0.2187	-0.9375	0.1187	2295	0	2295
bfas_76R	3.0645	3	1.4387	1.1995	2	0.025	1	2	4	5	-0.1105	-1.0292	0.1281	2295	0	2295
bfas_86	2.9943	3	1.4276	1.1948	2	0.0249	1	2	4	5	-0.0182	-0.9819	0.1305	2295	0	2295
bfas_96	3.0566	3	1.349	1.1615	2	0.0242	1	2	4	5	-0.082	-0.9344	0.1275	2295	0	2295

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_6	Get angry easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	1	0.9995684	1	3	5	2.853627	1.239623	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_16R	Rarely get irritated.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	3	5	3.160691	1.191337	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_26	Get upset easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	3.025065	1.232670	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_36R	Keep my emotions under control.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	4	0.9982736	1	2	5	2.539991	1.133126	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581>
bfas_46	Change my mood a lot.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.279412	1.150602	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_56R	Rarely lose my composure.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	2	5	2.620451	1.102764	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2581>
bfas_66	Am a person whose moods go up and down easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	3.265828	1.205563	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_76R	Am not easily annoyed.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	15	0.9935261	1	3	5	3.063423	1.199511	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_86	Get easily agitated.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	2.995662	1.194598	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_96	Can be stirred up easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	3.056424	1.160701	5	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfas_withdrawal

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.79;0.81].

Missing: 19.

Likert plot of scale bfas_withdrawal items

Distribution of scale bfas_withdrawal

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfas_11, bfas_1R, bfas_21R, bfas_31, bfas_41R, bfas_51, bfas_61, bfas_71R, bfas_81 & bfas_91
Observations:	2298
Positive correlations:	41
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	91

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.76
Omega (hierarchical):	0.52
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.82
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.84
Coefficient H:	0.82
Coefficient Alpha:	0.76

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.75; 0.78]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.78]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.80
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.77
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.80

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.79; 0.81]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.78; 0.81]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.428, 1.569, 0.823, 0.806, 0.75, 0.596, 0.577, 0.514, 0.487 & 0.451

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfas_11	0.610	0.149
bfas_1R	-0.193	0.415
bfas_21R	0.189	0.500
bfas_31	0.700	-0.159
bfas_41R	-0.008	0.739
bfas_51	0.465	0.191
bfas_61	0.714	0.028
bfas_71R	0.089	0.431
bfas_81	0.595	0.094
bfas_91	0.635	-0.048

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfas_11	0.689	0.146
bfas_1R	-0.282	0.648
bfas_21R	0.223	0.610
bfas_31	0.752	-0.174
bfas_41R	0.056	0.764
bfas_51	0.559	0.207
bfas_61	0.759	0.034
bfas_71R	0.087	0.623
bfas_81	0.686	0.081
bfas_91	0.714	-0.056

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfas_11	3.5474	4	1.3754	1.1728	1	0.0245	1	2	5	5	-0.6141	-0.479	0.1094	2298	0	2298
bfas_1R	3.1092	3	1.4565	1.2069	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	-0.0571	-0.9633	0.1295	2298	0	2298
bfas_21R	2.3747	2	1.2853	1.1337	1	0.0237	1	1	3	5	0.6266	-0.375	0.1203	2298	0	2298
bfas_31	2.8516	3	1.4595	1.2081	2	0.0252	1	2	4	5	0.1099	-1.0082	0.1227	2298	0	2298
bfas_41R	3.218	3	1.6699	1.2922	2	0.027	1	2	4	5	-0.22	-1.0667	0.1084	2298	0	2298
bfas_51	3.8712	4	1.1319	1.0639	2	0.0222	1	3	5	5	-0.9055	0.2537	0.1567	2298	0	2298
bfas_61	3.0131	3	1.413	1.1887	2	0.0248	1	2	4	5	-0.0299	-1.0055	0.1356	2298	0	2298
bfas_71R	3.2332	3	1.6217	1.2734	2	0.0266	1	2	4	5	-0.2215	-1.0489	0.1068	2298	0	2298
bfas_81	3.3864	4	1.3534	1.1634	1	0.0243	1	2	5	5	-0.3666	-0.7453	0.1197	2298	0	2298
bfas_91	3.0561	3	1.4696	1.2123	2	0.0253	1	2	4	5	-0.0401	-1.0064	0.1273	2298	0	2298

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfas_11	Am filled with doubts about things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	4	5	3.547732	1.173658	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_1R	Seldom feel blue.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	0	1.0000000	1	3	5	3.106172	1.206968	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_21R	Feel comfortable with myself.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	2	0.9991368	1	2	5	2.374082	1.133684	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581>
bfas_31	Feel threatened easily.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	3	0.9987052	1	3	5	2.852204	1.208031	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2582>
bfas_41R	Rarely feel depressed.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	5	0.9978420	1	3	5	3.215398	1.291508	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_51	Worry about things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	9	0.9961157	1	4	5	3.870017	1.064664	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfas_61	Am easily discouraged.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	11	0.9952525	1	3	5	3.016912	1.189313	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfas_71R	Am not embarrassed easily.	haven_labelled	5. strongly disagree, 4. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 2. agree, 1. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	3	5	3.231337	1.273617	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_81	Become overwhelmed by events.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	13	0.9943893	1	4	5	3.384549	1.163434	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfas_91	Am afraid of many things.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	12	0.9948209	1	3	5	3.058568	1.212116	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfi_extraversion

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.83 [0.82;0.84].

Missing: 131.

Likert plot of scale bfi_extraversion items

Distribution of scale bfi_extraversion

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_1, bfi2_6, bfi2_11R, bfi2_16R, bfi2_21, bfi2_26R, bfi2_31R, bfi2_36R, bfi2_41, bfi2_46, bfi2_51R & bfi2_56
Observations:	2186
Positive correlations:	64
Number of correlations:	66
Percentage positive correlations:	97

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.80
Omega (hierarchical):	0.52
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.86
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.88
Coefficient H:	0.83
Coefficient Alpha:	0.81

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.79; 0.82]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.8; 0.82]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.83
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.80
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.84

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.82; 0.84]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.82; 0.85]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.959, 1.798, 1.214, 1.002, 0.697, 0.587, 0.563, 0.535, 0.446, 0.41, 0.399 & 0.391

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2	ML3	ML4
bfi2_1	0.453	0.269	0.244	-0.050
bfi2_6	0.096	0.057	0.636	-0.017
bfi2_11R	0.278	0.112	-0.378	0.433
bfi2_16R	-0.047	0.840	-0.049	0.029
bfi2_21	0.136	0.007	0.722	0.108
bfi2_26R	0.153	0.062	-0.072	0.535
bfi2_31R	-0.026	0.591	0.094	0.144
bfi2_36R	0.038	0.113	0.029	0.553
bfi2_41	0.699	-0.061	0.111	0.015
bfi2_46	0.398	0.397	0.151	-0.191
bfi2_51R	-0.124	0.081	0.313	0.594
bfi2_56	0.766	-0.034	0.000	0.056

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC3	TC4	TC2	TC1
bfi2_1	0.523	0.349	-0.057	0.247
bfi2_6	0.150	0.049	0.053	0.761
bfi2_11R	0.334	0.117	0.484	-0.548
bfi2_16R	-0.065	0.891	0.049	-0.078
bfi2_21	0.227	0.037	0.163	0.735
bfi2_26R	0.168	0.027	0.688	-0.113
bfi2_31R	-0.096	0.775	0.138	0.074
bfi2_36R	0.017	0.108	0.706	0.016
bfi2_41	0.810	-0.094	0.033	0.130
bfi2_46	0.472	0.531	-0.261	0.107
bfi2_51R	-0.155	0.098	0.715	0.357
bfi2_56	0.847	-0.044	0.056	0.000

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_1	3.4904	4	1.5773	1.2559	2	0.0269	1	2	5	5	-0.5	-0.8425	0.1219	2186	0	2186
bfi2_6	3.2434	3	1.5105	1.229	2	0.0263	1	2	4	5	-0.2994	-0.8708	0.1258	2186	0	2186
bfi2_11R	3.3586	4	1.6059	1.2672	2	0.0271	1	2	5	5	-0.3692	-0.9856	0.1034	2186	0	2186
bfi2_16R	2.387	2	1.5362	1.2394	2	0.0265	1	1	4	5	0.5693	-0.7538	0.1468	2186	0	2186
bfi2_21	3.312	4	1.5365	1.2396	2	0.0265	1	2	5	5	-0.3465	-0.8879	0.1123	2186	0	2186
bfi2_26R	2.9922	3	1.7093	1.3074	2	0.028	1	2	4	5	0.1054	-1.1712	0.1064	2186	0	2186
bfi2_31R	2.1857	2	1.3943	1.1808	2	0.0253	1	1	4	5	0.9205	-0.0084	0.1674	2186	0	2186
bfi2_36R	3.0329	3	1.3673	1.1693	2	0.025	1	2	4	5	-0.0777	-0.8523	0.1324	2186	0	2186
bfi2_41	3.3728	3	1.4083	1.1867	2	0.0254	1	2	4	5	-0.2757	-0.8594	0.1267	2186	0	2186
bfi2_46	3.4117	4	1.5622	1.2499	2	0.0267	1	2	5	5	-0.4013	-0.8817	0.1118	2186	0	2186
bfi2_51R	2.8861	3	1.4291	1.1955	2	0.0256	1	2	4	5	0.1768	-0.8677	0.1395	2186	0	2186
bfi2_56	3.6308	4	1.1685	1.081	1	0.0231	1	3	5	5	-0.5482	-0.3692	0.1199	2186	0	2186

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_1	Is outgoing, sociable.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.489517	1.255768	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_6	Has an assertive personality.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	3.241112	1.230308	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_11R	Rarely feels excited or eager.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	125	0.9460509	1	4	5	3.358120	1.267124	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_16R	Tends to be quiet.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.389219	1.240390	5	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_21	Is dominant, acts as a leader.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.312329	1.238998	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_26R	Is less active than other people.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.990863	1.307379	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_31R	Is sometimes shy, introverted.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.185473	1.180412	5	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_36R	Finds it hard to influence people.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.032435	1.169520	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_41	Is full of energy.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.373230	1.186085	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_46	Is talkative.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.411792	1.250144	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_51R	Prefers to have others take charge.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.886706	1.195647	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_56	Shows a lot of enthusiasm.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.628310	1.082154	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfi_agreeableness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.82 [0.81;0.83].

Missing: 134.

Likert plot of scale bfi_agreeableness items

Distribution of scale bfi_agreeableness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_2, bfi2_7, bfi2_12R, bfi2_17R, bfi2_22R, bfi2_27, bfi2_32, bfi2_37R, bfi2_42R, bfi2_47R, bfi2_52 & bfi2_57
Observations:	2183
Positive correlations:	61
Number of correlations:	66
Percentage positive correlations:	92

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.75
Omega (hierarchical):	0.46
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.86
Coefficient H:	0.82
Coefficient Alpha:	0.77

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.74; 0.77]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.78]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.82
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.77
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.82

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.81; 0.83]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.81; 0.83]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.696, 1.847, 1.169, 0.852, 0.694, 0.639, 0.607, 0.564, 0.543, 0.487, 0.47 & 0.432

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML2	ML1	ML3
bfi2_2	0.054	0.576	0.167
bfi2_7	0.121	0.665	0.021
bfi2_12R	0.604	-0.021	0.054
bfi2_17R	0.367	0.047	-0.178
bfi2_22R	0.684	0.146	-0.169
bfi2_27	0.002	0.315	0.424
bfi2_32	-0.026	0.567	0.102
bfi2_37R	0.671	0.035	0.017
bfi2_42R	0.404	-0.383	0.308
bfi2_47R	0.635	0.030	0.104
bfi2_52	0.075	0.685	0.023
bfi2_57	-0.014	0.156	0.660

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC2	TC1	TC3
bfi2_2	0.102	0.671	0.167
bfi2_7	0.181	0.710	0.037
bfi2_12R	0.681	-0.012	0.091
bfi2_17R	0.541	0.079	-0.425
bfi2_22R	0.750	0.162	-0.183
bfi2_27	-0.020	0.421	0.550
bfi2_32	-0.013	0.690	0.104
bfi2_37R	0.725	0.068	0.035
bfi2_42R	0.445	-0.481	0.514
bfi2_47R	0.703	0.068	0.127
bfi2_52	0.132	0.739	0.024
bfi2_57	-0.029	0.258	0.746

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_2	4.2891	4	0.7436	0.8623	1	0.0185	1	3	5	5	-1.2195	1.2802	0.1695	2183	0	2183
bfi2_7	4.377	5	0.6841	0.8271	1	0.0177	1	4	NA	5	-1.3703	1.6963	0.1553	2183	0	2183
bfi2_12R	3.1498	3	1.4941	1.2223	2	0.0262	1	2	4	5	-0.1099	-1.0057	0.1186	2183	0	2183
bfi2_17R	3.2217	3	2.2175	1.4891	3	0.0319	1	2	5	5	-0.1956	-1.4073	0.0999	2183	0	2183
bfi2_22R	3.5708	4	1.6915	1.3006	2	0.0278	1	2	5	5	-0.4871	-0.9481	0.1255	2183	0	2183
bfi2_27	3.869	4	1.1826	1.0875	2	0.0233	1	3	5	5	-0.8278	-0.017	0.1681	2183	0	2183
bfi2_32	3.9936	4	0.9422	0.9707	1	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.9472	0.6128	0.1718	2183	0	2183
bfi2_37R	3.2973	3	1.6306	1.277	2	0.0273	1	2	4	5	-0.1326	-1.1924	0.1281	2183	0	2183
bfi2_42R	2.453	2	1.4551	1.2063	1	0.0258	1	1	4	5	0.5532	-0.6605	0.1216	2183	0	2183
bfi2_47R	3.3509	4	1.7732	1.3316	3	0.0285	1	2	5	5	-0.2458	-1.1839	0.12	2183	0	2183
bfi2_52	4.2194	4	0.7681	0.8764	1	0.0188	1	3	5	5	-1.1607	1.2983	0.1892	2183	0	2183
bfi2_57	3.5923	4	1.314	1.1463	1	0.0245	1	3	5	5	-0.534	-0.5621	0.1212	2183	0	2183

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_2	Is compassionate, has a soft heart.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	4.283045	0.8698290	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_7	Is respectful, treats others with respect.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	5	5	4.369694	0.8370823	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_12R	Tends to find fault with others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	3	5	3.150616	1.2212533	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_17R	Feels little sympathy for others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	3	5	3.221360	1.4884088	5	<U+2585><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_22R	Starts arguments with others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.568036	1.3006943	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_27	Has a forgiving nature.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.867916	1.0867342	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_32	Is helpful and unselfish with others.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.993604	0.9698165	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_37R	Is sometimes rude to others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.298310	1.2763142	5	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_42R	Is suspicious of others’ intentions.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.454546	1.2053217	5	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_47R	Can be cold and uncaring.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.350091	1.3312449	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_52	Is polite, courteous to others.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	4.217550	0.8765726	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_57	Assumes the best about people.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.591408	1.1460990	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfi_conscientiousness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.85;0.87].

Missing: 134.

Likert plot of scale bfi_conscientiousness items

Distribution of scale bfi_conscientiousness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_13, bfi2_3R, bfi2_8R, bfi2_18, bfi2_23R, bfi2_28R, bfi2_33, bfi2_38, bfi2_43, bfi2_48R, bfi2_53 & bfi2_58R
Observations:	2183
Positive correlations:	66
Number of correlations:	66
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.83
Omega (hierarchical):	0.52
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.87
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.89
Coefficient H:	0.84
Coefficient Alpha:	0.83

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.82; 0.84]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.82; 0.84]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.86
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.86
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.85; 0.87]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.217, 1.82, 0.997, 0.776, 0.676, 0.617, 0.578, 0.488, 0.478, 0.471, 0.461 & 0.423

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfi2_13	-0.050	0.613
bfi2_3R	0.685	0.048
bfi2_8R	0.652	0.015
bfi2_18	0.128	0.510
bfi2_23R	0.573	0.057
bfi2_28R	0.691	-0.091
bfi2_33	0.231	0.454
bfi2_38	-0.005	0.714
bfi2_43	-0.046	0.683
bfi2_48R	0.566	0.102
bfi2_53	0.006	0.648
bfi2_58R	0.611	-0.057

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_13	-0.075	0.709
bfi2_3R	0.717	0.088
bfi2_8R	0.715	0.023
bfi2_18	0.106	0.618
bfi2_23R	0.662	0.047
bfi2_28R	0.771	-0.100
bfi2_33	0.223	0.552
bfi2_38	0.003	0.762
bfi2_43	-0.055	0.756
bfi2_48R	0.627	0.125
bfi2_53	0.005	0.715
bfi2_58R	0.714	-0.082

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_13	3.929	4	0.9606	0.9801	2	0.021	1	3	5	5	-0.8106	0.2167	0.1583	2183	0	2183
bfi2_3R	3.0985	3	1.8285	1.3522	2	0.0289	1	2	4	5	-0.0367	-1.2667	0.1193	2183	0	2183
bfi2_8R	2.9047	3	1.6408	1.2809	2	0.0274	1	2	4	5	0.1653	-1.1118	0.1086	2183	0	2183
bfi2_18	3.8021	4	1.0791	1.0388	2	0.0222	1	3	5	5	-0.7052	-0.1043	0.1402	2183	0	2183
bfi2_23R	2.8983	3	1.6853	1.2982	2	0.0278	1	2	4	5	0.1602	-1.1321	0.1063	2183	0	2183
bfi2_28R	2.8846	3	1.5898	1.2609	2	0.027	1	2	4	5	0.218	-1.0862	0.1088	2183	0	2183
bfi2_33	3.6587	4	1.2762	1.1297	2	0.0242	1	3	5	5	-0.5603	-0.5485	0.1322	2183	0	2183
bfi2_38	3.9171	4	0.9505	0.9749	2	0.0209	1	3	5	5	-0.7543	0.0407	0.1548	2183	0	2183
bfi2_43	4.027	4	0.9456	0.9724	2	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.8651	0.19	0.1858	2183	0	2183
bfi2_48R	3.7229	4	1.5982	1.2642	2	0.0271	1	2	5	5	-0.6959	-0.6521	0.1436	2183	0	2183
bfi2_53	3.912	4	1.0848	1.0416	2	0.0223	1	3	5	5	-0.8103	-0.024	0.1697	2183	0	2183
bfi2_58R	2.9409	3	1.5854	1.2591	2	0.0269	1	2	4	5	0.2162	-1.0967	0.1047	2183	0	2183

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_13	Is dependable, steady.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.927887	0.9807755	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_3R	Tends to be disorganized.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	3.098906	1.3531705	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_8R	Tends to be lazy.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	124	0.9464825	1	3	5	2.906065	1.2820080	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_18	Is systematic, likes to keep things in order.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.802740	1.0389367	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_23R	Has difficulty getting started on tasks.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	3	5	2.897260	1.2979732	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_28R	Can be somewhat careless.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.883052	1.2615212	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_33	Keeps things neat and tidy.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.661335	1.1298925	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_38	Is efficient, gets things done.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.919561	0.9751936	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_43	Is reliable, can always be counted on.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	130	0.9438930	1	4	5	4.027892	0.9720002	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_48R	Leaves a mess, doesn’t clean up.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.721664	1.2646025	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_53	Is persistent, works until the task is finished.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.911832	1.0425113	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_58R	Sometimes behaves irresponsibly.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	3	5	2.941552	1.2587780	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfi_negative

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.88;0.89].

Missing: 130.

Likert plot of scale bfi_negative items

Distribution of scale bfi_negative

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_14, bfi2_4R, bfi2_9R, bfi2_19, bfi2_24R, bfi2_29R, bfi2_34, bfi2_39, bfi2_44R, bfi2_49R, bfi2_54 & bfi2_59
Observations:	2187
Positive correlations:	66
Number of correlations:	66
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.86
Omega (hierarchical):	0.61
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.89
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.90
Coefficient H:	0.87
Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.85; 0.87]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.88
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.87
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.88

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.88; 0.89]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.88; 0.89]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.803, 1.666, 0.904, 0.862, 0.701, 0.59, 0.492, 0.476, 0.44, 0.428, 0.391 & 0.246

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML2	ML1
bfi2_14	0.082	0.591
bfi2_4R	0.768	-0.026
bfi2_9R	0.602	-0.022
bfi2_19	0.029	0.438
bfi2_24R	0.569	0.089
bfi2_29R	0.708	0.061
bfi2_34	0.160	0.520
bfi2_39	-0.018	0.859
bfi2_44R	0.666	0.002
bfi2_49R	0.578	-0.068
bfi2_54	-0.053	0.876
bfi2_59	0.135	0.503

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_14	0.776	-0.027
bfi2_4R	0.034	0.774
bfi2_9R	-0.079	0.731
bfi2_19	0.669	-0.121
bfi2_24R	-0.003	0.724
bfi2_29R	0.123	0.710
bfi2_34	0.644	0.114
bfi2_39	0.783	0.058
bfi2_44R	0.077	0.671
bfi2_49R	-0.106	0.692
bfi2_54	0.800	0.022
bfi2_59	0.732	-0.011

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_14	3.3288	4	1.5986	1.2644	2	0.027	1	2	5	5	-0.3759	-0.9002	0.11	2187	0	2187
bfi2_4R	2.8555	3	1.6626	1.2894	2	0.0276	1	2	4	5	0.1217	-1.1399	0.1184	2187	0	2187
bfi2_9R	2.545	2	1.3807	1.1751	1	0.0251	1	1	4	5	0.3862	-0.7935	0.1104	2187	0	2187
bfi2_19	3.6411	4	1.2403	1.1137	1	0.0238	1	3	5	5	-0.7407	-0.1435	0.1107	2187	0	2187
bfi2_24R	2.5039	2	1.4569	1.207	1	0.0258	1	1	4	5	0.4775	-0.7463	0.1152	2187	0	2187
bfi2_29R	2.8381	3	1.6865	1.2987	2	0.0278	1	2	4	5	0.1354	-1.1433	0.1148	2187	0	2187
bfi2_34	3.7769	4	1.4872	1.2195	2	0.0261	1	2	5	5	-0.8112	-0.3448	0.1632	2187	0	2187
bfi2_39	3.3027	4	1.6787	1.2956	2	0.0277	1	2	5	5	-0.3084	-1.0436	0.1045	2187	0	2187
bfi2_44R	2.4856	2	1.3652	1.1684	1	0.025	1	1	4	5	0.4593	-0.7043	0.1118	2187	0	2187
bfi2_49R	3.4797	4	1.7017	1.3045	3	0.0279	1	2	5	5	-0.4808	-0.9206	0.1347	2187	0	2187
bfi2_54	3.1811	3	1.8144	1.347	2	0.0288	1	2	4	5	-0.197	-1.1837	0.0999	2187	0	2187
bfi2_59	3.203	3	1.6578	1.2875	2	0.0275	1	2	4	5	-0.2419	-1.0776	0.1011	2187	0	2187

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_14	Is moody, has up and down mood swings.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.327248	1.264616	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_4R	Is relaxed, handles stress well.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	2.855971	1.290550	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_9R	Stays optimistic after experiencing a setback.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	124	0.9464825	1	2	5	2.549476	1.177434	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_19	Can be tense.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.639726	1.114452	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_24R	Feels secure, comfortable with self.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.503883	1.206551	5	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_29R	Is emotionally stable, not easily upset.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.838739	1.298303	5	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_34	Worries a lot.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.777981	1.219528	5	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_39	Often feels sad.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.302421	1.295082	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_44R	Keeps their emotions under control.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.485610	1.167976	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_49R	Rarely feels anxious or afraid.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.479671	1.303971	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_54	Tends to feel depressed, blue.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	130	0.9438930	1	3	5	3.181070	1.347000	5	<U+2585><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_59	Is temperamental, gets emotional easily.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	3	5	3.201734	1.286891	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfi_openmindedness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.81 [0.8;0.83].

Missing: 131.

Likert plot of scale bfi_openmindedness items

Distribution of scale bfi_openmindedness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_10, bfi2_5R, bfi2_15, bfi2_20, bfi2_25R, bfi2_30R, bfi2_35, bfi2_40, bfi2_45R, bfi2_50R, bfi2_55R & bfi2_60
Observations:	2186
Positive correlations:	64
Number of correlations:	66
Percentage positive correlations:	97

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.76
Omega (hierarchical):	0.48
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.84
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.85
Coefficient H:	0.80
Coefficient Alpha:	0.78

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.75; 0.78]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.76; 0.79]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.81
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.77
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.82

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.8; 0.83]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.81; 0.83]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.591, 2.066, 1.02, 0.852, 0.73, 0.653, 0.61, 0.575, 0.55, 0.494, 0.469 & 0.389

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML2	ML1	ML3
bfi2_10	0.082	0.285	0.316
bfi2_5R	0.484	-0.112	-0.050
bfi2_15	-0.017	-0.005	0.737
bfi2_20	-0.024	0.753	0.043
bfi2_25R	0.573	0.061	-0.010
bfi2_30R	0.653	-0.092	0.071
bfi2_35	-0.008	0.757	0.050
bfi2_40	0.078	0.255	0.354
bfi2_45R	0.623	-0.060	0.093
bfi2_50R	0.476	0.367	-0.140
bfi2_55R	0.665	0.034	-0.020
bfi2_60	0.046	0.055	0.650

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC2	TC1	TC3
bfi2_10	0.056	0.382	0.414
bfi2_5R	0.653	-0.238	0.016
bfi2_15	0.010	0.006	0.827
bfi2_20	-0.062	0.801	0.104
bfi2_25R	0.603	0.215	-0.071
bfi2_30R	0.767	-0.134	0.134
bfi2_35	-0.046	0.794	0.122
bfi2_40	0.053	0.344	0.462
bfi2_45R	0.696	-0.012	0.111
bfi2_50R	0.457	0.563	-0.236
bfi2_55R	0.699	0.138	-0.053
bfi2_60	0.069	0.055	0.776

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_10	4.2219	4	0.7604	0.872	1	0.0187	1	3	5	5	-1.1004	0.9953	0.1864	2186	0	2186
bfi2_5R	2.8463	3	1.764	1.3282	2	0.0284	1	2	4	5	0.1989	-1.1565	0.099	2186	0	2186
bfi2_15	3.6908	4	1.075	1.0368	1	0.0222	1	3	5	5	-0.5565	-0.3423	0.1167	2186	0	2186
bfi2_20	3.9382	4	1.3001	1.1402	2	0.0244	1	3	5	5	-0.9135	-0.0615	0.1516	2186	0	2186
bfi2_25R	3.3957	4	1.669	1.2919	3	0.0276	1	2	5	5	-0.3288	-1.0101	0.1263	2186	0	2186
bfi2_30R	3.1921	3	1.7663	1.329	2	0.0284	1	2	4	5	-0.1702	-1.1953	0.113	2186	0	2186
bfi2_35	3.9744	4	1.0849	1.0416	2	0.0223	1	3	5	5	-0.8706	0.091	0.1699	2186	0	2186
bfi2_40	4.0073	4	0.9693	0.9845	2	0.0211	1	3	5	5	-0.8614	0.1777	0.1846	2186	0	2186
bfi2_45R	3.5384	4	1.5676	1.2521	2	0.0268	1	2	5	5	-0.4871	-0.8393	0.1372	2186	0	2186
bfi2_50R	3.328	3	1.8333	1.354	3	0.029	1	2	5	5	-0.2572	-1.1818	0.1173	2186	0	2186
bfi2_55R	3.2685	3	1.5613	1.2495	2	0.0267	1	2	4	5	-0.2356	-0.9679	0.1215	2186	0	2186
bfi2_60	3.6711	4	1.0986	1.0482	1	0.0224	1	3	5	5	-0.5062	-0.384	0.1272	2186	0	2186

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_10	Is curious about many different things.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	125	0.9460509	1	4	5	4.219434	0.8755130	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_5R	Has few artistic interests.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	2.846855	1.3292019	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_15	Is inventive, finds clever ways to do things.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.690552	1.0381302	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_20	Is fascinated by art, music, or literature.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.938813	1.1397949	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_25R	Avoids intellectual, philosophical discussions.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.393151	1.2927915	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_30R	Has little creativity.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	3	5	3.191499	1.3293428	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_35	Values art and beauty.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.975331	1.0413454	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_40	Is complex, a deep thinker.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	4.007766	0.9840752	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_45R	Has difficulty imagining things.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.537477	1.2526929	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_50R	Thinks poetry and plays are boring.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.325263	1.3552007	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_55R	Has little interest in abstract ideas.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	3	5	3.267368	1.2495248	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_60	Is original, comes up with new ideas.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.671839	1.0479492	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfi_sociability

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.76;0.79].

Missing: 131.

Likert plot of scale bfi_sociability items

Distribution of scale bfi_sociability

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_1, bfi2_16R, bfi2_31R & bfi2_46
Observations:	2186
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.73
Omega (hierarchical):	0.63
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.82
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.82
Coefficient H:	0.74
Coefficient Alpha:	0.73

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.71; 0.75]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.72; 0.75]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.78
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.77
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.78

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.76; 0.79]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.77; 0.8]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.224, 0.872, 0.501 & 0.403

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
bfi2_1	0.590
bfi2_16R	0.703
bfi2_31R	0.664
bfi2_46	0.592

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
bfi2_1	0.740
bfi2_16R	0.766
bfi2_31R	0.738
bfi2_46	0.738

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_1	3.4904	4	1.5773	1.2559	2	0.0269	1	2	5	5	-0.5	-0.8425	0.1219	2186	0	2186
bfi2_16R	2.387	2	1.5362	1.2394	2	0.0265	1	1	4	5	0.5693	-0.7538	0.1468	2186	0	2186
bfi2_31R	2.1857	2	1.3943	1.1808	2	0.0253	1	1	4	5	0.9205	-0.0084	0.1674	2186	0	2186
bfi2_46	3.4117	4	1.5622	1.2499	2	0.0267	1	2	5	5	-0.4013	-0.8817	0.1118	2186	0	2186

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_1	Is outgoing, sociable.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.489517	1.255768	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_16R	Tends to be quiet.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.389219	1.240390	5	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_31R	Is sometimes shy, introverted.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.185473	1.180412	5	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_46	Is talkative.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.411792	1.250144	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfi_compassion

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.61 [0.59;0.64].

Missing: 129.

Likert plot of scale bfi_compassion items

Distribution of scale bfi_compassion

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_2, bfi2_17R, bfi2_32 & bfi2_47R
Observations:	2188
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.45
Omega (hierarchical):	0.40
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.60
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.59
Coefficient H:	0.65
Coefficient Alpha:	0.48

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.42; 0.49]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.45; 0.51]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.61
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.60
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.59

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.59; 0.64]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.56; 0.62]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.664, 1.048, 0.703 & 0.586

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfi2_2	0.622	0.113
bfi2_17R	-0.085	0.529
bfi2_32	0.641	-0.089
bfi2_47R	0.195	0.459

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_2	0.785	0.136
bfi2_17R	-0.112	0.883
bfi2_32	0.849	-0.133
bfi2_47R	0.348	0.630

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_2	4.2875	4	0.7472	0.8644	1	0.0185	1	3	5	5	-1.2275	1.3168	0.1698	2188	0	2188
bfi2_17R	3.2212	3	2.2162	1.4887	3	0.0318	1	2	5	5	-0.1959	-1.4068	0.1003	2188	0	2188
bfi2_32	3.9941	4	0.9405	0.9698	1	0.0207	1	3	5	5	-0.9485	0.6198	0.1716	2188	0	2188
bfi2_47R	3.3501	4	1.7722	1.3312	3	0.0285	1	2	5	5	-0.2461	-1.182	0.1202	2188	0	2188

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_2	Is compassionate, has a soft heart.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	4.283045	0.8698290	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_17R	Feels little sympathy for others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	3	5	3.221360	1.4884088	5	<U+2585><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_32	Is helpful and unselfish with others.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.993604	0.9698165	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_47R	Can be cold and uncaring.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.350091	1.3312449	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>

Scale: bfi_organization

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.75;0.79].

Missing: 131.

Likert plot of scale bfi_organization items

Distribution of scale bfi_organization

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_18, bfi2_3R, bfi2_33 & bfi2_48R
Observations:	2186
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.72
Omega (hierarchical):	0.62
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.77
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.77
Coefficient H:	0.73
Coefficient Alpha:	0.71

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.7; 0.74]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.69; 0.73]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.77
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.77
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.77

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.75; 0.79]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.78]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.167, 0.854, 0.5 & 0.478

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
bfi2_18	0.594
bfi2_3R	0.650
bfi2_33	0.704
bfi2_48R	0.549

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
bfi2_18	0.702
bfi2_3R	0.768
bfi2_33	0.780
bfi2_48R	0.690

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_18	3.8033	4	1.0789	1.0387	2	0.0222	1	3	5	5	-0.7064	-0.1026	0.1404	2186	0	2186
bfi2_3R	3.0993	3	1.8286	1.3523	2	0.0289	1	2	4	5	-0.0372	-1.267	0.1194	2186	0	2186
bfi2_33	3.6606	4	1.277	1.13	2	0.0242	1	3	5	5	-0.5617	-0.5483	0.1327	2186	0	2186
bfi2_48R	3.7223	4	1.6002	1.265	2	0.0271	1	2	5	5	-0.6964	-0.652	0.1436	2186	0	2186

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_18	Is systematic, likes to keep things in order.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.802740	1.038937	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_3R	Tends to be disorganized.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	3.098906	1.353171	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_33	Keeps things neat and tidy.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.661335	1.129892	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_48R	Leaves a mess, doesn’t clean up.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.721664	1.264603	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>

Scale: bfi_anxiety

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.71 [0.69;0.73].

Missing: 128.

Likert plot of scale bfi_anxiety items

Distribution of scale bfi_anxiety

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_19, bfi2_4R, bfi2_34 & bfi2_49R
Observations:	2189
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.66
Omega (hierarchical):	0.56
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.71
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.71
Coefficient H:	0.68
Coefficient Alpha:	0.65

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.64; 0.69]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.63; 0.68]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.71
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.71
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.70

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.69; 0.73]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.68; 0.72]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.964, 0.915, 0.574 & 0.547

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
bfi2_19	0.403
bfi2_4R	0.665
bfi2_34	0.613
bfi2_49R	0.584

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
bfi2_19	0.579
bfi2_4R	0.754
bfi2_34	0.758
bfi2_49R	0.697

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_19	3.64	4	1.2424	1.1146	1	0.0238	1	3	5	5	-0.7414	-0.1442	0.1106	2189	0	2189
bfi2_4R	2.8543	3	1.6629	1.2896	2	0.0276	1	2	4	5	0.123	-1.14	0.1183	2189	0	2189
bfi2_34	3.778	4	1.4872	1.2195	2	0.0261	1	2	5	5	-0.8123	-0.3433	0.1631	2189	0	2189
bfi2_49R	3.4797	4	1.7003	1.304	3	0.0279	1	2	5	5	-0.481	-0.9192	0.1345	2189	0	2189

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_19	Can be tense.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.639726	1.114452	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_4R	Is relaxed, handles stress well.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	2.855971	1.290550	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_34	Worries a lot.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.777981	1.219528	5	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_49R	Rarely feels anxious or afraid.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.479671	1.303971	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>

Scale: bfi_aesthetic

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.67 [0.64;0.69].

Missing: 128.

Likert plot of scale bfi_aesthetic items

Distribution of scale bfi_aesthetic

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_20, bfi2_5R, bfi2_35 & bfi2_50R
Observations:	2189
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.57
Omega (hierarchical):	0.65
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.64
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.67
Coefficient H:	0.77
Coefficient Alpha:	0.55

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.54; 0.59]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.52; 0.58]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.67
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.64
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.62

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.64; 0.69]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.59; 0.65]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.878, 1.075, 0.651 & 0.395

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfi2_20	0.741	0.025
bfi2_5R	-0.128	0.516
bfi2_35	0.816	-0.028
bfi2_50R	0.309	0.427

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_20	0.866	-0.044
bfi2_5R	-0.076	0.930
bfi2_35	0.873	-0.073
bfi2_50R	0.552	0.495

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_20	3.9392	4	1.2993	1.1399	2	0.0244	1	3	5	5	-0.915	-0.0582	0.1517	2189	0	2189
bfi2_5R	2.8442	3	1.765	1.3285	2	0.0284	1	2	4	5	0.2006	-1.1564	0.0989	2189	0	2189
bfi2_35	3.9753	4	1.0844	1.0413	2	0.0223	1	3	5	5	-0.8719	0.0938	0.1699	2189	0	2189
bfi2_50R	3.3253	3	1.8366	1.3552	3	0.029	1	2	5	5	-0.2552	-1.1844	0.1172	2189	0	2189

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_20	Is fascinated by art, music, or literature.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.938813	1.139795	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_5R	Has few artistic interests.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	2.846855	1.329202	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_35	Values art and beauty.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.975331	1.041345	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_50R	Thinks poetry and plays are boring.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.325263	1.355201	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>

Scale: bfi_assertiveness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.67 [0.65;0.69].

Missing: 128.

Likert plot of scale bfi_assertiveness items

Distribution of scale bfi_assertiveness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_6, bfi2_21, bfi2_36R & bfi2_51R
Observations:	2189
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.65
Omega (hierarchical):	0.43
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.74
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.74
Coefficient H:	0.77
Coefficient Alpha:	0.64

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.63; 0.67]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.61; 0.66]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.67
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.64
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.67

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.65; 0.69]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.65; 0.69]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.931, 1.063, 0.58 & 0.425

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfi2_6	0.700	-0.051
bfi2_21	0.815	0.037
bfi2_36R	-0.072	0.573
bfi2_51R	0.042	0.726

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_6	0.902	-0.075
bfi2_21	0.848	0.099
bfi2_36R	-0.105	0.894
bfi2_51R	0.202	0.748

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_6	3.2439	3	1.5099	1.2288	2	0.0263	1	2	4	5	-0.2992	-0.8696	0.1261	2189	0	2189
bfi2_21	3.3125	4	1.5358	1.2393	2	0.0265	1	2	5	5	-0.3463	-0.8867	0.1126	2189	0	2189
bfi2_36R	3.0324	3	1.3678	1.1695	2	0.025	1	2	4	5	-0.0784	-0.8524	0.1325	2189	0	2189
bfi2_51R	2.8867	3	1.4296	1.1956	2	0.0256	1	2	4	5	0.1773	-0.8677	0.1396	2189	0	2189

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_6	Has an assertive personality.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	3.241112	1.230308	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_21	Is dominant, acts as a leader.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.312329	1.238998	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_36R	Finds it hard to influence people.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.032435	1.169520	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_51R	Prefers to have others take charge.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.886706	1.195647	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfi_respectfulness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.74 [0.73;0.76].

Missing: 130.

Likert plot of scale bfi_respectfulness items

Distribution of scale bfi_respectfulness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_7, bfi2_22R, bfi2_37R & bfi2_52
Observations:	2187
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.64
Omega (hierarchical):	0.58
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.77
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.77
Coefficient H:	0.71
Coefficient Alpha:	0.66

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.61; 0.66]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.64; 0.69]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.74
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.72
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.75

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.73; 0.76]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.73; 0.77]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.046, 0.969, 0.52 & 0.465

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
bfi2_7	0.697
bfi2_22R	0.508
bfi2_37R	0.451
bfi2_52	0.679

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
bfi2_7	0.738
bfi2_22R	0.722
bfi2_37R	0.674
bfi2_52	0.725

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_7	4.3745	5	0.6891	0.8301	1	0.0178	1	4	NA	5	-1.3673	1.6691	0.155	2187	0	2187
bfi2_22R	3.5688	4	1.6928	1.3011	2	0.0278	1	2	5	5	-0.4854	-0.9499	0.1255	2187	0	2187
bfi2_37R	3.2986	3	1.6295	1.2765	2	0.0273	1	2	4	5	-0.1343	-1.191	0.1283	2187	0	2187
bfi2_52	4.2176	4	0.7687	0.8768	1	0.0187	1	3	5	5	-1.1548	1.2788	0.1891	2187	0	2187

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_7	Is respectful, treats others with respect.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	5	5	4.369694	0.8370823	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_22R	Starts arguments with others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.568036	1.3006943	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_37R	Is sometimes rude to others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.298310	1.2763142	5	<U+2582><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_52	Is polite, courteous to others.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	4.217550	0.8765726	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>

Scale: bfi_productiveness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.69 [0.67;0.71].

Missing: 129.

Likert plot of scale bfi_productiveness items

Distribution of scale bfi_productiveness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_38, bfi2_8R, bfi2_23R & bfi2_53
Observations:	2188
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.62
Omega (hierarchical):	0.49
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.74
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.74
Coefficient H:	0.68
Coefficient Alpha:	0.64

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.6; 0.65]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.62; 0.67]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.69
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.67
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.70

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.67; 0.71]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.68; 0.72]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.958, 0.985, 0.561 & 0.496

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
bfi2_38	0.689
bfi2_8R	0.431
bfi2_23R	0.457
bfi2_53	0.654

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
bfi2_38	0.731
bfi2_8R	0.667
bfi2_23R	0.689
bfi2_53	0.710

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_38	3.9196	4	0.951	0.9752	2	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.7565	0.0417	0.1556	2188	0	2188
bfi2_8R	2.9036	3	1.6418	1.2813	2	0.0274	1	2	4	5	0.1649	-1.1129	0.1088	2188	0	2188
bfi2_23R	2.8963	3	1.6842	1.2978	2	0.0277	1	2	4	5	0.1629	-1.1305	0.106	2188	0	2188
bfi2_53	3.9118	4	1.0873	1.0427	2	0.0223	1	3	5	5	-0.8139	-0.0162	0.1698	2188	0	2188

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_38	Is efficient, gets things done.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.919561	0.9751936	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_8R	Tends to be lazy.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	124	0.9464825	1	3	5	2.906065	1.2820080	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_23R	Has difficulty getting started on tasks.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	3	5	2.897260	1.2979732	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_53	Is persistent, works until the task is finished.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.911832	1.0425113	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>

Scale: bfi_depression

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.75;0.78].

Missing: 130.

Likert plot of scale bfi_depression items

Distribution of scale bfi_depression

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_39, bfi2_9R, bfi2_24R & bfi2_54
Observations:	2187
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.76
Omega (hierarchical):	0.67
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.83
Coefficient H:	0.86
Coefficient Alpha:	0.74

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.74; 0.77]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.72; 0.76]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.77
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.72
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.77

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.75; 0.78]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.79]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.246, 0.975, 0.528 & 0.251

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
bfi2_39	0.865
bfi2_9R	0.332
bfi2_24R	0.439
bfi2_54	0.858

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
bfi2_39	0.832
bfi2_9R	0.607
bfi2_24R	0.706
bfi2_54	0.828

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_39	3.3027	4	1.6787	1.2956	2	0.0277	1	2	5	5	-0.3084	-1.0436	0.1045	2187	0	2187
bfi2_9R	2.545	2	1.3807	1.1751	1	0.0251	1	1	4	5	0.3862	-0.7935	0.1104	2187	0	2187
bfi2_24R	2.5039	2	1.4569	1.207	1	0.0258	1	1	4	5	0.4775	-0.7463	0.1152	2187	0	2187
bfi2_54	3.1811	3	1.8144	1.347	2	0.0288	1	2	4	5	-0.197	-1.1837	0.0999	2187	0	2187

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_39	Often feels sad.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	3.302421	1.295082	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_9R	Stays optimistic after experiencing a setback.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	124	0.9464825	1	2	5	2.549476	1.177434	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_24R	Feels secure, comfortable with self.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.503883	1.206551	5	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_54	Tends to feel depressed, blue.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	130	0.9438930	1	3	5	3.181070	1.347000	5	<U+2585><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfi_intellect

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.64 [0.62;0.67].

Missing: 130.

Likert plot of scale bfi_intellect items

Distribution of scale bfi_intellect

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_10, bfi2_25R, bfi2_40 & bfi2_55R
Observations:	2187
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.60
Omega (hierarchical):	0.45
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.66
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.66
Coefficient H:	0.62
Coefficient Alpha:	0.57

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.57; 0.62]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.54; 0.6]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.64
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.63
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.65

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.62; 0.67]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.62; 0.67]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.751, 1.044, 0.637 & 0.569

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfi2_10	0.027	0.532
bfi2_25R	0.644	0.059
bfi2_40	-0.010	0.673
bfi2_55R	0.659	-0.051

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_10	-0.018	0.832
bfi2_25R	0.808	0.090
bfi2_40	0.023	0.815
bfi2_55R	0.874	-0.067

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_10	4.2213	4	0.7607	0.8722	1	0.0187	1	3	5	5	-1.0985	0.9889	0.1863	2187	0	2187
bfi2_25R	3.3955	4	1.6683	1.2916	3	0.0276	1	2	5	5	-0.3284	-1.0096	0.1262	2187	0	2187
bfi2_40	4.0073	4	0.9688	0.9843	2	0.021	1	3	5	5	-0.8616	0.1792	0.1845	2187	0	2187
bfi2_55R	3.2679	3	1.5613	1.2495	2	0.0267	1	2	4	5	-0.2346	-0.9688	0.1214	2187	0	2187

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_10	Is curious about many different things.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	125	0.9460509	1	4	5	4.219434	0.8755130	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_25R	Avoids intellectual, philosophical discussions.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.393151	1.2927915	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_40	Is complex, a deep thinker.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	4	5	4.007766	0.9840752	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_55R	Has little interest in abstract ideas.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	3	5	3.267368	1.2495248	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfi_energy

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.65 [0.63;0.67].

Missing: 128.

Likert plot of scale bfi_energy items

Distribution of scale bfi_energy

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_41, bfi2_11R, bfi2_26R & bfi2_56
Observations:	2189
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.58
Omega (hierarchical):	0.43
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.74
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.74
Coefficient H:	0.75
Coefficient Alpha:	0.59

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.55; 0.61]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.57; 0.62]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.65
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.61
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.64

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.63; 0.67]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.62; 0.67]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.84, 1.06, 0.691 & 0.408

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML2	ML1
bfi2_41	0.964	-0.032
bfi2_11R	-0.005	0.998
bfi2_26R	0.184	0.304
bfi2_56	0.571	0.154

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_41	0.905	-0.050
bfi2_11R	-0.030	0.838
bfi2_26R	0.039	0.789
bfi2_56	0.861	0.060

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_41	3.3732	3	1.4068	1.1861	2	0.0254	1	2	4	5	-0.2767	-0.8573	0.1268	2189	0	2189
bfi2_11R	3.3572	4	1.6063	1.2674	2	0.0271	1	2	5	5	-0.3682	-0.9856	0.1032	2189	0	2189
bfi2_26R	2.9909	3	1.7092	1.3074	2	0.0279	1	2	4	5	0.1066	-1.1705	0.1062	2189	0	2189
bfi2_56	3.6286	4	1.1714	1.0823	1	0.0231	1	3	5	5	-0.5474	-0.3722	0.1199	2189	0	2189

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_41	Is full of energy.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	3.373230	1.186085	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_11R	Rarely feels excited or eager.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	125	0.9460509	1	4	5	3.358120	1.267124	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_26R	Is less active than other people.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.990863	1.307379	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_56	Shows a lot of enthusiasm.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	4	5	3.628310	1.082154	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfi_trust

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.52;0.58].

Missing: 131.

Likert plot of scale bfi_trust items

Distribution of scale bfi_trust

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_27, bfi2_12R, bfi2_42R & bfi2_57
Observations:	2186
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.50
Omega (hierarchical):	0.32
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.61
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.61
Coefficient H:	0.65
Coefficient Alpha:	0.49

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.46; 0.53]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.45; 0.52]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.55
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.53
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.53

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.52; 0.58]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.49; 0.56]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.609, 1.048, 0.785 & 0.558

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfi2_27	0.778	-0.050
bfi2_12R	0.172	0.285
bfi2_42R	-0.012	0.715
bfi2_57	0.531	0.160

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_27	0.873	-0.085
bfi2_12R	0.127	0.706
bfi2_42R	-0.071	0.836
bfi2_57	0.799	0.116

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_27	3.8687	4	1.1814	1.0869	2	0.0232	1	3	5	5	-0.8274	-0.0153	0.1679	2186	0	2186
bfi2_12R	3.15	3	1.4924	1.2216	2	0.0261	1	2	4	5	-0.1104	-1.0037	0.1189	2186	0	2186
bfi2_42R	2.4538	2	1.4544	1.206	1	0.0258	1	1	4	5	0.552	-0.6617	0.1215	2186	0	2186
bfi2_57	3.5919	4	1.3144	1.1465	1	0.0245	1	3	5	5	-0.5325	-0.5649	0.1212	2186	0	2186

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_27	Has a forgiving nature.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.867916	1.086734	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_12R	Tends to find fault with others.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	3	5	3.150616	1.221253	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_42R	Is suspicious of others’ intentions.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.454546	1.205322	5	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_57	Assumes the best about people.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.591408	1.146099	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: bfi_responsibility

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.61 [0.59;0.64].

Missing: 130.

Likert plot of scale bfi_responsibility items

Distribution of scale bfi_responsibility

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_13, bfi2_28R, bfi2_43 & bfi2_58R
Observations:	2187
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.53
Omega (hierarchical):	0.47
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.73
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.73
Coefficient H:	0.67
Coefficient Alpha:	0.59

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.5; 0.56]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.56; 0.62]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.61
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.56
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.64

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.59; 0.64]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.61; 0.66]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.804, 1.194, 0.51 & 0.492

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
bfi2_13	-0.022	0.791
bfi2_28R	0.833	-0.020
bfi2_43	0.048	0.625
bfi2_58R	0.588	0.061

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_13	0.871	-0.015
bfi2_28R	-0.010	0.869
bfi2_43	0.861	0.016
bfi2_58R	0.010	0.862

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_13	3.9296	4	0.9594	0.9795	2	0.0209	1	3	5	5	-0.8119	0.2217	0.1582	2187	0	2187
bfi2_28R	2.8825	3	1.5905	1.2611	2	0.027	1	2	4	5	0.2192	-1.0853	0.1086	2187	0	2187
bfi2_43	4.0279	4	0.9448	0.972	2	0.0208	1	3	5	5	-0.8665	0.194	0.1859	2187	0	2187
bfi2_58R	2.941	3	1.5853	1.2591	2	0.0269	1	2	4	5	0.2144	-1.0968	0.1049	2187	0	2187

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_13	Is dependable, steady.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.927887	0.9807755	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_28R	Can be somewhat careless.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.883052	1.2615212	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_43	Is reliable, can always be counted on.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	130	0.9438930	1	4	5	4.027892	0.9720002	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_58R	Sometimes behaves irresponsibly.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	127	0.9451877	1	3	5	2.941552	1.2587780	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583>

Scale: bfi_volatility

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.76;0.79].

Missing: 128.

Likert plot of scale bfi_volatility items

Distribution of scale bfi_volatility

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_14, bfi2_29R, bfi2_44R & bfi2_59
Observations:	2189
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.74
Omega (hierarchical):	0.66
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.80
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.80
Coefficient H:	0.74
Coefficient Alpha:	0.74

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.73; 0.76]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.72; 0.76]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.78
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.78
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.78

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.76; 0.79]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.76; 0.79]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.26, 0.819, 0.466 & 0.455

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
bfi2_14	0.626
bfi2_29R	0.652
bfi2_44R	0.650
bfi2_59	0.664

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
bfi2_14	0.737
bfi2_29R	0.753
bfi2_44R	0.752
bfi2_59	0.765

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_14	3.3289	4	1.5974	1.2639	2	0.027	1	2	5	5	-0.3763	-0.8988	0.1101	2189	0	2189
bfi2_29R	2.8387	3	1.6856	1.2983	2	0.0277	1	2	4	5	0.1343	-1.1429	0.1149	2189	0	2189
bfi2_44R	2.4856	2	1.3642	1.168	1	0.025	1	1	4	5	0.4594	-0.7029	0.1117	2189	0	2189
bfi2_59	3.2024	3	1.6569	1.2872	2	0.0275	1	2	4	5	-0.2407	-1.0776	0.1012	2189	0	2189

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_14	Is moody, has up and down mood swings.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.327248	1.264616	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_29R	Is emotionally stable, not easily upset.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	3	5	2.838739	1.298303	5	<U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
bfi2_44R	Keeps their emotions under control.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	128	0.9447562	1	2	5	2.485610	1.167976	5	<U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
bfi2_59	Is temperamental, gets emotional easily.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	3	5	3.201734	1.286891	5	<U+2583><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: bfi_imagination

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.59 [0.56;0.62].

Missing: 130.

Likert plot of scale bfi_imagination items

Distribution of scale bfi_imagination

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	bfi2_15, bfi2_30R, bfi2_45R & bfi2_60
Observations:	2187
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.49
Omega (hierarchical):	0.40
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.69
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.69
Coefficient H:	0.70
Coefficient Alpha:	0.54

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.45; 0.52]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.51; 0.57]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.59
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.54
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.60

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.56; 0.62]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.57; 0.63]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.701, 1.223, 0.592 & 0.485

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML2	ML1
bfi2_15	0.771	-0.036
bfi2_30R	-0.011	0.858
bfi2_45R	0.075	0.468
bfi2_60	0.659	0.059

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
bfi2_15	0.879	-0.042
bfi2_30R	-0.006	0.842
bfi2_45R	0.007	0.837
bfi2_60	0.858	0.046

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
bfi2_15	3.6914	4	1.0753	1.037	1	0.0222	1	3	5	5	-0.5569	-0.3425	0.1168	2187	0	2187
bfi2_30R	3.1925	3	1.7658	1.3288	2	0.0284	1	2	4	5	-0.1709	-1.1948	0.1129	2187	0	2187
bfi2_45R	3.5386	4	1.567	1.2518	2	0.0268	1	2	5	5	-0.4876	-0.8383	0.1372	2187	0	2187
bfi2_60	3.6712	4	1.0982	1.0479	1	0.0224	1	3	5	5	-0.5067	-0.3828	0.1271	2187	0	2187

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
bfi2_15	Is inventive, finds clever ways to do things.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.690552	1.038130	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
bfi2_30R	Has little creativity.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	3	5	3.191499	1.329343	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
bfi2_45R	Has difficulty imagining things.	haven_labelled	5. disagree strongly, 4. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 2. agree a little, 1. agree strongly	129	0.9443246	1	4	5	3.537477	1.252693	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587>
bfi2_60	Is original, comes up with new ideas.	haven_labelled	1. disagree strongly, 2. disagree a little, 3. neutral; no opinion, 4. agree a little, 5. agree strongly	126	0.9456193	1	4	5	3.671839	1.047949	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: dids_commitmaking

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.88;0.89].

Missing: 125.

Likert plot of scale dids_commitmaking items

Distribution of scale dids_commitmaking

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	dids_1, dids_2, dids_3, dids_4 & dids_5
Observations:	2192
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.87
Omega (hierarchical):	0.02
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.87
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.86
Coefficient H:	0.88
Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.86; 0.87]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.89
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.89
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.88

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.88; 0.89]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.87; 0.89]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.179, 0.738, 0.41, 0.349 & 0.323

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
dids_1	0.810
dids_2	0.821
dids_3	0.788
dids_4	0.475
dids_5	0.776

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
dids_1	0.852
dids_2	0.851
dids_3	0.834
dids_4	0.588
dids_5	0.830

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
dids_1	3.4662	4	1.3425	1.1587	1	0.0247	1	3	5	5	-0.4606	-0.6419	0.1138	2192	0	2192
dids_2	3.4891	4	1.3892	1.1786	1	0.0252	1	3	5	5	-0.4626	-0.6786	0.1131	2192	0	2192
dids_3	3.2984	3	1.4509	1.2045	2	0.0257	1	2	4	5	-0.2712	-0.8715	0.1245	2192	0	2192
dids_4	3.7468	4	0.976	0.9879	1	0.0211	1	3	5	5	-0.7756	0.3019	0.1077	2192	0	2192
dids_5	3.6656	4	1.2304	1.1093	2	0.0237	1	3	5	5	-0.612	-0.3587	0.1264	2192	0	2192

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
dids_1	I have decided on the direction I want to follow in life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.467639	1.159076	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_2	I know what I want to do with my future.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	3.489284	1.178425	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_3	I have a clear view on my future.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	3	5	3.299134	1.204797	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_4	I have made a choice concerning some of my plans for the future.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.747949	0.988215	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
dids_5	I know what I want to achieve in my life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.665907	1.109202	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: dids_commitid

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.85;0.87].

Missing: 126.

Likert plot of scale dids_commitid items

Distribution of scale dids_commitid

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	dids_6, dids_7, dids_8, dids_9 & dids_10
Observations:	2191
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.82
Omega (hierarchical):	0.71
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.85
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.86
Coefficient H:	0.83
Coefficient Alpha:	0.82

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.81; 0.84]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.81; 0.83]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.86
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.86
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.85; 0.87]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.939, 0.627, 0.579, 0.472 & 0.383

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
dids_6	0.701
dids_7	0.764
dids_8	0.675
dids_9	0.673
dids_10	0.667

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
dids_6	0.763
dids_7	0.807
dids_8	0.754
dids_9	0.760
dids_10	0.748

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
dids_6	3.7157	4	1.1269	1.0615	2	0.0227	1	3	5	5	-0.6547	-0.1741	0.1251	2191	0	2191
dids_7	3.7275	4	1.1335	1.0647	2	0.0227	1	3	5	5	-0.6543	-0.2057	0.1289	2191	0	2191
dids_8	3.2757	3	1.3413	1.1582	2	0.0247	1	2	4	5	-0.1904	-0.8191	0.1408	2191	0	2191
dids_9	3.7248	4	0.995	0.9975	1	0.0213	1	3	5	5	-0.6135	0.0296	0.1303	2191	0	2191
dids_10	3.9562	4	0.9278	0.9632	2	0.0206	1	3	5	5	-0.8606	0.4821	0.1616	2191	0	2191

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
dids_6	Plans for the future offer me a sense of security.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.716499	1.0612055	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_7	Future plans give me self-confidence.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	125	0.9460509	1	4	5	3.728102	1.0647561	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
dids_8	Because of the path of life I have mapped out, I feel certain about myself.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	3	5	3.275878	1.1577441	5	<U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_9	I sense that the direction I want to take in life will really suit me.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.725160	0.9968649	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_10	I value my plans for the future very much.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.956244	0.9630188	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: dids_explorebreadth

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.85 [0.84;0.86].

Missing: 125.

Likert plot of scale dids_explorebreadth items

Distribution of scale dids_explorebreadth

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	dids_11, dids_12, dids_13, dids_14 & dids_15
Observations:	2192
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.79
Omega (hierarchical):	0.74
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.82
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.82
Coefficient H:	0.80
Coefficient Alpha:	0.79

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.78; 0.81]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.78; 0.81]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.85
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.85
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.85

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.84; 0.86]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.84; 0.86]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.759, 0.765, 0.53, 0.476 & 0.47

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
dids_11	0.691
dids_12	0.673
dids_13	0.606
dids_14	0.688
dids_15	0.655

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
dids_11	0.757
dids_12	0.746
dids_13	0.707
dids_14	0.758
dids_15	0.746

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
dids_11	4.0251	4	0.7812	0.8839	1	0.0189	1	3	5	5	-1.0532	1.4462	0.1537	2192	0	2192
dids_12	4.0082	4	0.8918	0.9443	1	0.0202	1	3	5	5	-0.9993	0.8481	0.1661	2192	0	2192
dids_13	3.6943	4	1.0567	1.028	1	0.022	1	3	5	5	-0.6899	-0.0082	0.1081	2192	0	2192
dids_14	4.0525	4	0.8202	0.9056	1	0.0193	1	3	5	5	-1.0813	1.2702	0.1674	2192	0	2192
dids_15	3.8175	4	0.9416	0.9704	1	0.0207	1	3	5	5	-0.8466	0.5048	0.1191	2192	0	2192

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
dids_11	I think about the direction I want to take in my life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	4.025536	0.8839015	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_12	I think a lot about how I see my future.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	4.008664	0.9443540	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
dids_13	I try to figure out regularly which lifestyle would suit me.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.695078	1.0278846	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
dids_14	I think about what to do with my life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	4.051528	0.9064795	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
dids_15	I try to find out which lifestyle would be good for me.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	3.817601	0.9701382	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: dids_exploredepth

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.76;0.79].

Missing: 125.

Likert plot of scale dids_exploredepth items

Distribution of scale dids_exploredepth

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	dids_16, dids_17, dids_18, dids_19 & dids_20
Observations:	2192
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.69
Omega (hierarchical):	0.67
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.77
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.77
Coefficient H:	0.78
Coefficient Alpha:	0.70

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.67; 0.71]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.68; 0.72]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.77
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.76
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.77

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.76; 0.79]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.75; 0.78]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.386, 0.999, 0.608, 0.574 & 0.432

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
dids_16	0.758
dids_17	0.517
dids_18	0.611
dids_19	0.275
dids_20	0.721

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
dids_16	0.787
dids_17	0.682
dids_18	0.717
dids_19	0.437
dids_20	0.772

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
dids_16	3.9498	4	0.8884	0.9425	1	0.0201	1	3	5	5	-1.0097	0.9918	0.1448	2192	0	2192
dids_17	3.3987	4	1.4265	1.1944	1.5	0.0255	1	2	5	5	-0.4015	-0.7898	0.1079	2192	0	2192
dids_18	3.7669	4	0.8808	0.9385	1	0.02	1	3	5	5	-0.6518	0.2741	0.1243	2192	0	2192
dids_19	3.1036	3	1.5114	1.2294	2	0.0263	1	2	4	5	-0.1387	-0.9903	0.1211	2192	0	2192
dids_20	3.9599	4	0.9276	0.9631	1.5	0.0206	1	3	5	5	-0.9383	0.6686	0.1578	2192	0	2192

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
dids_16	I think about the future plans I have made.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.950319	0.9423861	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_17	I talk regularly with other people about the plans for the future I have made.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.399271	1.1943473	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_18	I work out for myself if the goals I put forward in life really suit me.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	3.767442	0.9386751	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
dids_19	I try to find out regularly what other people think about the specific direction I want to take in my life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	3	5	3.103511	1.2291144	5	<U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
dids_20	I think a lot about the future plans I strive for.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.960802	0.9632151	5	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>

Scale: dids_explorerum

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.78;0.81].

Missing: 127.

Likert plot of scale dids_explorerum items

Distribution of scale dids_explorerum

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	dids_21, dids_22, dids_23, dids_24 & dids_25
Observations:	2190
Positive correlations:	10
Number of correlations:	10
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.76
Omega (hierarchical):	0.67
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.79
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.79
Coefficient H:	0.78
Coefficient Alpha:	0.75

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.74; 0.77]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.73; 0.77]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.79
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.79
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.79

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.78; 0.81]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.78; 0.8]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.519, 0.829, 0.692, 0.499 & 0.461

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
dids_21	0.563
dids_22	0.636
dids_23	0.706
dids_24	0.717
dids_25	0.448

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
dids_21	0.683
dids_22	0.712
dids_23	0.779
dids_24	0.777
dids_25	0.578

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
dids_21	3.711	4	1.122	1.0592	1	0.0226	1	3	5	5	-0.7289	-0.0019	0.1185	2190	0	2190
dids_22	3.0863	3	1.5362	1.2394	2	0.0265	1	2	4	5	-0.0934	-1.0585	0.1219	2190	0	2190
dids_23	3.6338	4	1.2665	1.1254	1	0.024	1	3	5	5	-0.6508	-0.3355	0.118	2190	0	2190
dids_24	3.558	4	1.4519	1.2049	2	0.0257	1	2	5	5	-0.5119	-0.7418	0.1272	2190	0	2190
dids_25	3.6146	4	1.2274	1.1079	1	0.0237	1	3	5	5	-0.5085	-0.555	0.1183	2190	0	2190

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
dids_21	I keep looking for the direction I want to take in my life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	4	5	3.710574	1.059389	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_22	I am doubtful about what I really want to achieve in life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	123	0.9469141	1	3	5	3.087967	1.239644	5	<U+2583><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2583>
dids_23	I keep wondering which direction my life has to take.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	3.632011	1.125767	5	<U+2581><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>
dids_24	I worry about what I want to do with my future.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	124	0.9464825	1	4	5	3.557683	1.205022	5	<U+2582><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586>
dids_25	It is hard to stop thinking about the direction I want to follow in life.	haven_labelled	1. strongly disagree, 2. disagree, 3. neither agree nor disagree, 4. agree, 5. strongly agree	125	0.9460509	1	4	5	3.614051	1.109168	5	<U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585>

Scale: k10_distress

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.94 [0.94;0.94].

Missing: 132.

Likert plot of scale k10_distress items

Distribution of scale k10_distress

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	k10_1, k10_2, k10_3, k10_4, k10_5, k10_6, k10_7, k10_8, k10_9 & k10_10
Observations:	2185
Positive correlations:	45
Number of correlations:	45
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.93
Omega (hierarchical):	0.81
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.94
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.95
Coefficient H:	0.93
Coefficient Alpha:	0.92

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.92; 0.93]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.92; 0.93]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.94
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.93
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.94

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.94; 0.94]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.94; 0.94]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.967, 0.841, 0.67, 0.571, 0.472, 0.388, 0.305, 0.291, 0.27 & 0.225

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
k10_1	0.656
k10_2	0.648
k10_3	0.739
k10_4	0.835
k10_5	0.671
k10_6	0.671
k10_7	0.830
k10_8	0.674
k10_9	0.826
k10_10	0.832

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
k10_1	0.709
k10_2	0.711
k10_3	0.785
k10_4	0.835
k10_5	0.736
k10_6	0.729
k10_7	0.831
k10_8	0.719
k10_9	0.826
k10_10	0.826

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
k10_1	3.2073	3	1.3293	1.1529	2	0.0247	1	2	4	5	-0.1501	-0.7193	0.1277	2185	0	2185
k10_2	3.0737	3	1.2972	1.139	2	0.0244	1	2	4	5	-0.0962	-0.6893	0.1229	2185	0	2185
k10_3	2.3478	2	1.4595	1.2081	2	0.0258	1	1	3	5	0.5489	-0.6497	0.1332	2185	0	2185
k10_4	2.5927	3	1.66	1.2884	3	0.0276	1	1	4	5	0.3274	-0.9727	0.1243	2185	0	2185
k10_5	2.8252	3	1.4905	1.2209	2	0.0261	1	2	4	5	0.0768	-0.9191	0.1117	2185	0	2185
k10_6	2.3465	2	1.5278	1.236	2	0.0264	1	1	3	5	0.5271	-0.7636	0.1201	2185	0	2185
k10_7	2.7217	3	1.7046	1.3056	2	0.0279	1	1	4	5	0.218	-1.0523	0.1144	2185	0	2185
k10_8	3.0096	3	1.5846	1.2588	2	0.0269	1	2	4	5	-0.0471	-0.9769	0.1126	2185	0	2185
k10_9	2.384	2	1.5874	1.2599	2	0.027	1	1	3	5	0.4999	-0.8417	0.1195	2185	0	2185
k10_10	2.4297	2	1.7882	1.3372	2	0.0286	1	1	4	5	0.5018	-0.9587	0.1089	2185	0	2185

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
k10_1	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel tired out for no good reason?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	3	5	3.207685	1.152792	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
k10_2	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel nervous?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	3	5	3.073650	1.138698	5	<U+2582><U+2585><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2582>
k10_3	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel so nervous that nothing could calm you down?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	2	5	2.348124	1.207922	5	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
k10_4	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel hopeless?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	3	5	2.593321	1.288474	5	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583>
k10_5	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel restless or fidgety?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	3	5	2.825709	1.220833	5	<U+2585><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2582>
k10_6	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel so restless you could not sit still?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	2	5	2.346295	1.235785	5	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
k10_7	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel depressed?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	132	0.9430298	1	3	5	2.721739	1.305598	5	<U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
k10_8	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel that everything was an effort?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	3	5	3.010064	1.258705	5	<U+2585><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583>
k10_9	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel so sad that nothing could cheer you up?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	2	5	2.384263	1.259694	5	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>
k10_10	During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel worthless?	haven_labelled	1. none of the time, 2. a little of the time, 3. some of the time, 4. most of the time, 5. all of the time	131	0.9434614	1	2	5	2.430009	1.336992	5	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582>

Scale: narq_admiration

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.88;0.9].

Missing: 2.

Likert plot of scale narq_admiration items

Distribution of scale narq_admiration

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_1, narq_2, narq_3, narq_5, narq_7, narq_8, narq_15, narq_16 & narq_18
Observations:	2315
Positive correlations:	36
Number of correlations:	36
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.87
Omega (hierarchical):	0.69
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.88
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.87
Coefficient H:	0.87
Coefficient Alpha:	0.86

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.86; 0.87]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.85; 0.87]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.89
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.89
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.89

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.88; 0.9]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.88; 0.9]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

4.312, 0.894, 0.818, 0.641, 0.584, 0.514, 0.477, 0.402 & 0.359

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_1	0.647
narq_2	0.652
narq_3	0.759
narq_5	0.521
narq_7	0.647
narq_8	0.684
narq_15	0.701
narq_16	0.699
narq_18	0.444

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_1	0.701
narq_2	0.691
narq_3	0.786
narq_5	0.588
narq_7	0.697
narq_8	0.731
narq_15	0.742
narq_16	0.738
narq_18	0.515

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_1	4.5533	5	1.7866	1.3366	2	0.0278	1	4	6	6	-0.6876	-0.1374	0.1324	2315	0	2315
narq_2	2.9676	3	3.1895	1.7859	3	0.0371	1	1	5	6	0.4315	-1.1585	0.0849	2315	0	2315
narq_3	3.8134	4	2.4889	1.5776	2	0.0328	1	2	6	6	-0.1746	-0.9446	0.1041	2315	0	2315
narq_5	4.7305	5	1.643	1.2818	2	0.0266	1	4	6	6	-0.9601	0.5185	0.1233	2315	0	2315
narq_7	3.4268	3	2.689	1.6398	3	0.0341	1	2	5	6	0.0941	-1.099	0.0985	2315	0	2315
narq_8	4.1218	4	2.3896	1.5458	3	0.0321	1	3	6	6	-0.4514	-0.7248	0.1281	2315	0	2315
narq_15	3.8302	4	2.676	1.6359	2	0.034	1	2	6	6	-0.2146	-1.0441	0.1112	2315	0	2315
narq_16	2.8536	3	2.7093	1.646	3	0.0342	1	1	5	6	0.5242	-0.8506	0.0965	2315	0	2315
narq_18	4.0955	4	2.1132	1.4537	2	0.0302	1	3	6	6	-0.4274	-0.5885	0.1048	2315	0	2315

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_1	I am great.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	5	6	4.554596	1.336731	2	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>
narq_2	I will someday be famous.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	3	6	2.969357	1.786394	2	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583>
narq_3	I show others how special I am.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	4	6	3.814335	1.577948	2	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>
narq_5	I enjoy my successes very much.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	5	6	4.730255	1.282001	2	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587>
narq_7	Most of the time I am able to draw people’s attention to myself in conversations.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	3	6	3.428140	1.640023	2	<U+2586><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2586>
narq_8	I deserve to be seen as a great personality.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	4	6	4.123004	1.545781	2	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>
narq_15	Being a very special person gives me a lot of strength.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	4	6	3.831174	1.636119	2	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>
narq_16	I manage to be the center of attention with my outstanding contributions.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	3	6	2.856280	1.647883	2	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583>
narq_18	Mostly, I am very adept at dealing with other people.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	4	6	4.097108	1.454127	2	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2586>

Scale: narq_rivalry

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.93 [0.93;0.93].

Missing: 7.

Likert plot of scale narq_rivalry items

Distribution of scale narq_rivalry

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_4, narq_6, narq_9, narq_10, narq_11, narq_12, narq_13, narq_14 & narq_17
Observations:	2310
Positive correlations:	36
Number of correlations:	36
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.90
Omega (hierarchical):	0.80
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.92
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.93
Coefficient H:	0.92
Coefficient Alpha:	0.90

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.9; 0.91]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.9; 0.91]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.93
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.93
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.93

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.93; 0.93]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.92; 0.93]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

5.133, 0.91, 0.666, 0.57, 0.46, 0.382, 0.326, 0.283 & 0.271

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_4	0.655
narq_6	0.696
narq_9	0.796
narq_10	0.757
narq_11	0.449
narq_12	0.789
narq_13	0.734
narq_14	0.758
narq_17	0.789

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_4	0.711
narq_6	0.742
narq_9	0.821
narq_10	0.790
narq_11	0.514
narq_12	0.821
narq_13	0.765
narq_14	0.777
narq_17	0.807

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_4	2.6455	2	2.727	1.6514	3	0.0344	1	1	4	6	0.7213	-0.6737	0.105	2310	0	2310
narq_6	2.8117	3	2.8597	1.6911	3	0.0352	1	1	5	6	0.5065	-0.9966	0.0872	2310	0	2310
narq_9	2.4061	2	2.6319	1.6223	2	0.0338	1	1	4	6	0.964	-0.2745	0.1045	2310	0	2310
narq_10	2.4584	2	2.6009	1.6127	3	0.0336	1	1	4	6	0.8655	-0.4216	0.0957	2310	0	2310
narq_11	3.6338	4	2.6055	1.6142	3	0.0336	1	2	6	6	-0.114	-1.0596	0.0879	2310	0	2310
narq_12	2.1996	2	2.4249	1.5572	2	0.0324	1	1	4	6	1.1854	0.2479	0.0965	2310	0	2310
narq_13	2.3887	2	2.747	1.6574	3	0.0345	1	1	4	6	0.93	-0.42	0.0812	2310	0	2310
narq_14	1.839	1	2.3482	1.5324	1	0.0319	1	NA	4	6	1.6957	1.4959	0.0374	2310	0	2310
narq_17	2.026	1	2.448	1.5646	2	0.0326	1	NA	3	6	1.4005	0.6985	0.0636	2310	0	2310

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_4	I react annoyed if another person steals the show from me.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	2	6	2.649827	1.654239	2	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582>
narq_6	I secretly take pleasure in the failure of my rivals.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	3	6	2.816573	1.692083	2	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582>
narq_9	I want my rivals to fail.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	2	0.9991368	1	2	6	2.411663	1.626100	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>
narq_10	I enjoy it when another person is inferior to me.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	2	6	2.466321	1.618518	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>
narq_11	I often get annoyed when I am criticized.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	4	6	3.637738	1.615136	2	<U+2585><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2586>
narq_12	I can barely stand it if another person is at the center of events.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	2	6	2.206733	1.563008	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>
narq_13	Most people won’t achieve anything.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	2	6	2.394044	1.660165	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>
narq_14	Other people are worth nothing.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	2	0.9991368	1	1	6	1.842765	1.535909	2	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>
narq_17	Most people are somehow losers.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	1	6	2.031938	1.568752	2	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>

Scale: narq_grandiosity

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.75 [0.74;0.77].

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale narq_grandiosity items

Distribution of scale narq_grandiosity

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_1, narq_2 & narq_8
Observations:	2317
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.69
Omega (hierarchical):	0.02
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.70
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.68
Coefficient H:	0.70
Coefficient Alpha:	0.69

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.67; 0.71]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.67; 0.71]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.75
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.75
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.75

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.74; 0.77]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.74; 0.77]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.865, 0.575 & 0.56

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_1	0.668
narq_2	0.647
narq_8	0.657

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_1	0.792
narq_2	0.784
narq_8	0.788

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_1	4.5546	5	1.7868	1.3367	2	0.0278	1	4	6	6	-0.6885	-0.137	0.1323	2317	0	2317
narq_2	2.9694	3	3.1912	1.7864	3	0.0371	1	1	5	6	0.43	-1.1601	0.0848	2317	0	2317
narq_8	4.123	4	2.3894	1.5458	3	0.0321	1	3	6	6	-0.4525	-0.724	0.128	2317	0	2317

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_1	I am great.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1	1	5	6	4.554596	1.336731	2	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2583><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>
narq_2	I will someday be famous.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1	1	3	6	2.969357	1.786394	2	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583>
narq_8	I deserve to be seen as a great personality.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1	1	4	6	4.123004	1.545781	2	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>

Scale: narq_uniqueness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.75 [0.74;0.77].

Missing: 2.

Likert plot of scale narq_uniqueness items

Distribution of scale narq_uniqueness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_3, narq_5 & narq_15
Observations:	2315
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.71
Omega (hierarchical):	0.11
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.71
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.71
Coefficient H:	0.72
Coefficient Alpha:	0.70

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.69; 0.73]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.67; 0.72]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.75
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.75
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.75

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.74; 0.77]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.73; 0.77]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.871, 0.639 & 0.49

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_3	0.730
narq_5	0.556
narq_15	0.698

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_3	0.818
narq_5	0.741
narq_15	0.808

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_3	3.8134	4	2.4889	1.5776	2	0.0328	1	2	6	6	-0.1746	-0.9446	0.1041	2315	0	2315
narq_5	4.7305	5	1.643	1.2818	2	0.0266	1	4	6	6	-0.9601	0.5185	0.1233	2315	0	2315
narq_15	3.8302	4	2.676	1.6359	2	0.034	1	2	6	6	-0.2146	-1.0441	0.1112	2315	0	2315

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_3	I show others how special I am.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	4	6	3.814335	1.577948	2	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>
narq_5	I enjoy my successes very much.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	5	6	4.730255	1.282001	2	<U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582><U+2586><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587>
narq_15	Being a very special person gives me a lot of strength.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	4	6	3.831174	1.636119	2	<U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2587>

Scale: narq_aggressiveness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.78;0.81].

Missing: 2.

Likert plot of scale narq_aggressiveness items

Distribution of scale narq_aggressiveness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_4, narq_11 & narq_12
Observations:	2315
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.74
Omega (hierarchical):	0.07
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.75
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.77
Coefficient H:	0.78
Coefficient Alpha:	0.73

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.72; 0.76]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.71; 0.75]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.80
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.80
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.79

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.78; 0.81]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.77; 0.8]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.958, 0.656 & 0.386

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_4	0.754
narq_11	0.520
narq_12	0.812

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_4	0.841
narq_11	0.721
narq_12	0.855

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_4	2.6484	2	2.7328	1.6531	3	0.0344	1	1	4	6	0.7191	-0.6784	0.1048	2315	0	2315
narq_11	3.6367	4	2.6074	1.6147	3	0.0336	1	2	6	6	-0.1151	-1.0598	0.0879	2315	0	2315
narq_12	2.2035	2	2.4327	1.5597	2	0.0324	1	1	4	6	1.1796	0.2297	0.0963	2315	0	2315

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_4	I react annoyed if another person steals the show from me.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	2	6	2.649827	1.654239	2	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582>
narq_11	I often get annoyed when I am criticized.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	4	6	3.637738	1.615136	2	<U+2585><U+2585><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2586>
narq_12	I can barely stand it if another person is at the center of events.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	2	6	2.206733	1.563008	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>

Scale: narq_supremacy

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.87;0.89].

Missing: 3.

Likert plot of scale narq_supremacy items

Distribution of scale narq_supremacy

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_6, narq_9 & narq_10
Observations:	2314
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.84
Omega (hierarchical):	0.83
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.84
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.86
Coefficient H:	0.86
Coefficient Alpha:	0.83

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.83; 0.85]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.82; 0.85]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.88
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.88
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.88

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.87; 0.89]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.87; 0.88]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.255, 0.45 & 0.295

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_6	0.774
narq_9	0.888
narq_10	0.717

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_6	0.863
narq_9	0.899
narq_10	0.838

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_6	2.8146	3	2.8636	1.6922	3	0.0352	1	1	5	6	0.5052	-0.9981	0.0871	2314	0	2314
narq_9	2.4114	2	2.6452	1.6264	2	0.0338	1	1	4	6	0.9597	-0.2878	0.1044	2314	0	2314
narq_10	2.4641	2	2.6154	1.6172	3	0.0336	1	1	4	6	0.8615	-0.4343	0.0955	2314	0	2314

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_6	I secretly take pleasure in the failure of my rivals.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	3	6	2.816573	1.692083	2	<U+2587><U+2585><U+2581><U+2583><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582>
narq_9	I want my rivals to fail.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	2	0.9991368	1	2	6	2.411663	1.626100	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>
narq_10	I enjoy it when another person is inferior to me.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	1	0.9995684	1	2	6	2.466321	1.618518	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2583><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>

Scale: narq_charmingness

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.73 [0.71;0.75].

Missing: 0.

Likert plot of scale narq_charmingness items

Distribution of scale narq_charmingness

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_7, narq_16 & narq_18
Observations:	2317
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.70
Omega (hierarchical):	0.08
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.69
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.71
Coefficient H:	0.73
Coefficient Alpha:	0.67

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.68; 0.72]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.65; 0.7]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.73
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.73
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.72

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.71; 0.75]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.7; 0.74]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

1.818, 0.736 & 0.446

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_7	0.755
narq_16	0.733
narq_18	0.441

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_7	0.831
narq_16	0.826
narq_18	0.666

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_7	3.4281	3	2.6897	1.64	3	0.0341	1	2	5	6	0.0932	-1.0993	0.0984	2317	0	2317
narq_16	2.8563	3	2.7155	1.6479	3	0.0342	1	1	5	6	0.523	-0.8542	0.0965	2317	0	2317
narq_18	4.0971	4	2.1145	1.4541	2	0.0302	1	3	6	6	-0.4281	-0.5891	0.1051	2317	0	2317

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_7	Most of the time I am able to draw people’s attention to myself in conversations.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1	1	3	6	3.428140	1.640023	2	<U+2586><U+2586><U+2581><U+2587><U+2587><U+2581><U+2585><U+2586>
narq_16	I manage to be the center of attention with my outstanding contributions.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1	1	3	6	2.856280	1.647883	2	<U+2587><U+2586><U+2581><U+2585><U+2585><U+2581><U+2582><U+2583>
narq_18	Mostly, I am very adept at dealing with other people.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1	1	4	6	4.097108	1.454127	2	<U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2586><U+2587><U+2581><U+2586><U+2586>

Scale: narq_devaluation

Overview

Reliability: ω_ordinal [95% CI] = 0.91 [0.91;0.92].

Missing: 2.

Likert plot of scale narq_devaluation items

Distribution of scale narq_devaluation

Reliability details

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	narq_13, narq_14 & narq_17
Observations:	2315
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.85
Omega (hierarchical):	0.02
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.86
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.87
Coefficient H:	0.87
Coefficient Alpha:	0.85

Confidence intervals

Omega (total):	[0.84; 0.86]
Coefficient Alpha:	[0.84; 0.86]

Estimates assuming ordinal level

Ordinal Omega (total):	0.91
Ordinal Omega (hierarch.):	0.91
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	0.91

Confidence intervals

Ordinal Omega (total):	[0.91; 0.92]
Ordinal Coefficient Alpha:	[0.91; 0.92]

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.316, 0.399 & 0.284

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
narq_13	0.754
narq_14	0.803
narq_17	0.878

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
narq_13	0.857
narq_14	0.877
narq_17	0.901

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
narq_13	2.3922	2	2.7527	1.6591	3	0.0345	1	1	4	6	0.9255	-0.4307	0.081	2315	0	2315
narq_14	1.8428	1	2.359	1.5359	1	0.0319	1	NA	4	6	1.6903	1.4753	0.0376	2315	0	2315
narq_17	2.0298	1	2.4559	1.5671	2	0.0326	1	NA	3	6	1.3943	0.6778	0.0635	2315	0	2315

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
narq_13	Most people won’t achieve anything.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	2	6	2.394044	1.660165	2	<U+2587><U+2583><U+2581><U+2582><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2582>
narq_14	Other people are worth nothing.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	2	0.9991368	1	1	6	1.842765	1.535909	2	<U+2587><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>
narq_17	Most people are somehow losers.	haven_labelled	1. not agree at all, 6. agree completely	0	1.0000000	1	1	6	2.031938	1.568752	2	<U+2587><U+2582><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581><U+2581>

Missingness report

Codebook table

JSON-LD metadata

The following JSON-LD can be found by search engines, if you share this codebook publicly on the web.

{
  "name": "SCORE dataset for BFAS short-form project",
  "description": "Select data from the SCORE dataset (Moin Syed) including Qualtrics and REP pool with complete BFAS. Excluded participant IDs and open-ended gender data.\n\n\n## Table of variables\nThis table contains variable names, labels, and number of missing values.\nSee the complete codebook for more.\n\n[truncated]\n\n### Note\nThis dataset was automatically described using the [codebook R package](https://rubenarslan.github.io/codebook/) (version 0.9.4).",
  "creator": "Linh Nguyen",
  "temporalCoverage": "2020",
  "spatialCoverage": "Online: Qualtrics and UMN REP pool",
  "datePublished": "2021-03-30",
  "keywords": ["age", "ethnic_cat", "engcomf_1", "engcomf_2", "engcomf_3", "gender_f", "schooling", "socialclass", "politics", "covidstress_1", "attcheck_01", "attcheck_02", "QC", "gc", "dataID", "narq_1", "narq_2", "narq_3", "narq_4", "narq_5", "narq_6", "narq_7", "narq_8", "narq_9", "narq_10", "narq_11", "narq_12", "narq_13", "narq_14", "narq_15", "narq_16", "narq_17", "narq_18", "rse_1", "rse_2R", "rse_3", "rse_4", "rse_5R", "rse_6R", "rse_7", "rse_8R", "rse_9R", "rse_10", "bfas_1R", "bfas_2R", "bfas_3", "bfas_4", "bfas_5", "bfas_6", "bfas_7", "bfas_8R", "bfas_9", "bfas_10", "bfas_11", "bfas_12", "bfas_13R", "bfas_14R", "bfas_15R", "bfas_16R", "bfas_17R", "bfas_18", "bfas_19", "bfas_20", "bfas_21R", "bfas_22", "bfas_23R", "bfas_24R", "bfas_25", "bfas_26", "bfas_27", "bfas_28", "bfas_29R", "bfas_30", "bfas_31", "bfas_32R", "bfas_33R", "bfas_34R", "bfas_35", "bfas_36R", "bfas_37R", "bfas_38", "bfas_39", "bfas_40", "bfas_41R", "bfas_42", "bfas_43", "bfas_44", "bfas_45R", "bfas_46", "bfas_47", "bfas_48R", "bfas_49R", "bfas_50R", "bfas_51", "bfas_52R", "bfas_53R", "bfas_54R", "bfas_55R", "bfas_56R", "bfas_57", "bfas_58", "bfas_59", "bfas_60R", "bfas_61", "bfas_62R", "bfas_63", "bfas_64R", "bfas_65", "bfas_66", "bfas_67R", "bfas_68R", "bfas_69", "bfas_70", "bfas_71R", "bfas_72", "bfas_73", "bfas_74", "bfas_75", "bfas_76R", "bfas_77R", "bfas_78R", "bfas_79R", "bfas_80R", "bfas_81", "bfas_82R", "bfas_83R", "bfas_84", "bfas_85R", "bfas_86", "bfas_87R", "bfas_88", "bfas_89", "bfas_90R", "bfas_91", "bfas_92", "bfas_93R", "bfas_94", "bfas_95", "bfas_96", "bfas_97R", "bfas_98", "bfas_99R", "bfas_100", "dids_1", "dids_2", "dids_3", "dids_4", "dids_5", "dids_6", "dids_7", "dids_8", "dids_9", "dids_10", "dids_11", "dids_12", "dids_13", "dids_14", "dids_15", "dids_16", "dids_17", "dids_18", "dids_19", "dids_20", "dids_21", "dids_22", "dids_23", "dids_24", "dids_25", "k10_1", "k10_2", "k10_3", "k10_4", "k10_5", "k10_6", "k10_7", "k10_8", "k10_9", "k10_10", "bfi2_1", "bfi2_2", "bfi2_3R", "bfi2_4R", "bfi2_5R", "bfi2_6", "bfi2_7", "bfi2_8R", "bfi2_9R", "bfi2_10", "bfi2_11R", "bfi2_12R", "bfi2_13", "bfi2_14", "bfi2_15", "bfi2_16R", "bfi2_17R", "bfi2_18", "bfi2_19", "bfi2_20", "bfi2_21", "bfi2_22R", "bfi2_23R", "bfi2_24R", "bfi2_25R", "bfi2_26R", "bfi2_27", "bfi2_28R", "bfi2_29R", "bfi2_30R", "bfi2_31R", "bfi2_32", "bfi2_33", "bfi2_34", "bfi2_35", "bfi2_36R", "bfi2_37R", "bfi2_38", "bfi2_39", "bfi2_40", "bfi2_41", "bfi2_42R", "bfi2_43", "bfi2_44R", "bfi2_45R", "bfi2_46", "bfi2_47R", "bfi2_48R", "bfi2_49R", "bfi2_50R", "bfi2_51R", "bfi2_52", "bfi2_53", "bfi2_54", "bfi2_55R", "bfi2_56", "bfi2_57", "bfi2_58R", "bfi2_59", "bfi2_60", "engcomf", "rse_selfesteem", "rse_positive", "rse_negative", "bfas_agreeableness", "bfas_conscientiousness", "bfas_extraversion", "bfas_neuroticism", "bfas_opennessdomain", "bfas_assertiveness", "bfas_compassion", "bfas_enthusiasm", "bfas_industriousness", "bfas_intellect", "bfas_opennessaspect", "bfas_orderliness", "bfas_politeness", "bfas_volatility", "bfas_withdrawal", "bfi_extraversion", "bfi_agreeableness", "bfi_conscientiousness", "bfi_negative", "bfi_openmindedness", "bfi_sociability", "bfi_compassion", "bfi_organization", "bfi_anxiety", "bfi_aesthetic", "bfi_assertiveness", "bfi_respectfulness", "bfi_productiveness", "bfi_depression", "bfi_intellect", "bfi_energy", "bfi_trust", "bfi_responsibility", "bfi_volatility", "bfi_imagination", "dids_commitmaking", "dids_commitid", "dids_explorebreadth", "dids_exploredepth", "dids_explorerum", "k10_distress", "narq_admiration", "narq_rivalry", "narq_grandiosity", "narq_uniqueness", "narq_aggressiveness", "narq_supremacy", "narq_charmingness", "narq_devaluation"],
  "@context": "http://schema.org/",
  "@type": "Dataset",
  "variableMeasured": [
    {
      "name": "age",
      "description": "Age",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "ethnic_cat",
      "description": "Which of the following races/ethnicities do you most identify with? - Selected Choice",
      "value": "1. white,\n2. black,\n3. native american,\n4. asian,\n5. native hawaiian/pacific islander,\n6. other,\n7. latino",
      "maxValue": 7,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "engcomf_1",
      "description": "Please rate your comfort with speaking English",
      "value": "1. beginning,\n2. intermediate,\n3. proficient,\n4. advanced",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "engcomf_2",
      "description": "Please rate your comfort with reading English",
      "value": "1. beginning,\n2. intermediate,\n3. proficient,\n4. advanced",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "engcomf_3",
      "description": "Please rate your comfort with writing English",
      "value": "1. beginning,\n2. intermediate,\n3. proficient,\n4. advanced",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "gender_f",
      "description": "Gender coded as factor",
      "value": "1. female,\n2. male,\n3. nonbinary",
      "maxValue": 3,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "schooling",
      "description": "What is your level of schooling?",
      "value": "1. did not complete high school,\n2. high school graduate,\n3. currently attending two-yr college,\n4. currently attending four-yr college,\n5. two-year college grad,\n6. 4-yr college grad,\n7. grad/professional degree",
      "maxValue": 7,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "socialclass",
      "description": "Which of the following best describes your social class background?",
      "value": "1. low-income/poor,\n2. working class/lower middle class,\n3. middle class,\n4. upper middle class,\n5. upper class",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "politics",
      "description": "Which of the following best describes how you would label your political views?",
      "value": "1. extremely liberal,\n2. liberal,\n3. slightly liberal,\n4. moderate, middle of the road,\n5. slightly conservative,\n6. conservative,\n7. extremely conservative",
      "maxValue": 7,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "covidstress_1",
      "description": "How would you rate your current level of stress associated with the COVID-19/coronavirus pandemic? - 1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "attcheck_01",
      "description": "Please select \"agree completely\" in response to this question.",
      "value": "1. Correct,\n0. Incorrect",
      "maxValue": 1,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "attcheck_02",
      "description": "Please select \"agree\" in response to this question",
      "value": "1. Correct,\n0. Incorrect",
      "maxValue": 1,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "QC",
      "description": "We care about the quality of our survey data and hope to receive the most accurate measures of your opinions, so it is important to us that you thoughtfully provide your best answer to each question in the survey. \nDo you commit to providing your thoughtful and honest answers to the questions in this survey?",
      "value": "1. I will provide my best answers,\n4. I can't promise either way,\n5. I will not provide my best answers",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "gc",
      "description": "Good Complete",
      "value": "1. yes,\n2. screen out,\n3. over quota,\n4. failed check",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dataID",
      "description": "Which dataset does this come from?",
      "value": "1. qualtrics,\n2. REP",
      "maxValue": 2,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_1",
      "description": "I am great.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_2",
      "description": "I will someday be famous.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_3",
      "description": "I show others how special I am.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_4",
      "description": "I react annoyed if another person steals the show from me.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_5",
      "description": "I enjoy my successes very much.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_6",
      "description": "I secretly take pleasure in the failure of my rivals.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_7",
      "description": "Most of the time I am able to draw people’s attention to myself in conversations.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_8",
      "description": "I deserve to be seen as a great personality.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_9",
      "description": "I want my rivals to fail.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_10",
      "description": "I enjoy it when another person is inferior to me.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_11",
      "description": "I often get annoyed when I am criticized.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_12",
      "description": "I can barely stand it if another person is at the center of events.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_13",
      "description": "Most people won’t achieve anything.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_14",
      "description": "Other people are worth nothing.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_15",
      "description": "Being a very special person gives me a lot of strength.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_16",
      "description": "I manage to be the center of attention with my outstanding contributions.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_17",
      "description": "Most people are somehow losers.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_18",
      "description": "Mostly, I am very adept at dealing with other people.",
      "value": "1. not agree at all,\n6. agree completely",
      "maxValue": 6,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_1",
      "description": "On the whole, I am satisfied with myself.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. agree,\n4. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_2R",
      "description": "At times, I think I am no good at all.",
      "value": "4. strongly disagree,\n3. disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_3",
      "description": "I feel that I have a number of good qualities.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. agree,\n4. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_4",
      "description": "I am able to do things as well as most other people.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. agree,\n4. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_5R",
      "description": "I feel I do not have much to be proud of.",
      "value": "4. strongly disagree,\n3. disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_6R",
      "description": "I certainly feel useless at times.",
      "value": "4. strongly disagree,\n3. disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_7",
      "description": "I feel that I’m a person of worth, at least on an equal plane with others.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. agree,\n4. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_8R",
      "description": "I wish I could have more respect for myself.",
      "value": "4. strongly disagree,\n3. disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_9R",
      "description": "All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a failure.",
      "value": "4. strongly disagree,\n3. disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_10",
      "description": "I take a positive attitude toward myself.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. agree,\n4. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 4,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_1R",
      "description": "Seldom feel blue.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_2R",
      "description": "Am not interested in other people's problems.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_3",
      "description": "Carry out my plans.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_4",
      "description": "Make friends easily.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_5",
      "description": "Am quick to understand things.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_6",
      "description": "Get angry easily.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_7",
      "description": "Respect authority.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_8R",
      "description": "Leave my belongings around.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_9",
      "description": "Take charge.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_10",
      "description": "Enjoy the beauty of nature.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_11",
      "description": "Am filled with doubts about things.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_12",
      "description": "Feel others' emotions.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_13R",
      "description": "Waste my time.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_14R",
      "description": "Am hard to get to know.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_15R",
      "description": "Have difficulty understanding abstract ideas.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_16R",
      "description": "Rarely get irritated.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_17R",
      "description": "Believe that I am better than others.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_18",
      "description": "Like order.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_19",
      "description": "Have a strong personality.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_20",
      "description": "Believe in the importance of art.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_21R",
      "description": "Feel comfortable with myself.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_22",
      "description": "Inquire about others' well-being.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_23R",
      "description": "Find it difficult to get down to work.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_24R",
      "description": "Keep others at a distance.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_25",
      "description": "Can handle a lot of information.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_26",
      "description": "Get upset easily.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_27",
      "description": "Hate to seem pushy.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_28",
      "description": "Keep things tidy.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_29R",
      "description": "Lack the talent for influencing people.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_30",
      "description": "Love to reflect on things.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_31",
      "description": "Feel threatened easily.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_32R",
      "description": "Can't be bothered with other's needs.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_33R",
      "description": "Mess things up.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_34R",
      "description": "Reveal little about myself.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_35",
      "description": "Like to solve complex problems.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_36R",
      "description": "Keep my emotions under control.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_37R",
      "description": "Take advantage of others.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_38",
      "description": "Follow a schedule.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_39",
      "description": "Know how to captivate people.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_40",
      "description": "Get deeply immersed in music.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_41R",
      "description": "Rarely feel depressed.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_42",
      "description": "Sympathize with others' feelings.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_43",
      "description": "Finish what I start.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_44",
      "description": "Warm up quickly to others.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_45R",
      "description": "Avoid philosophical discussions.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_46",
      "description": "Change my mood a lot.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_47",
      "description": "Avoid imposing my will on others.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_48R",
      "description": "Am not bothered by messy people.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_49R",
      "description": "Wait for others to lead the way.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_50R",
      "description": "Do not like poetry.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_51",
      "description": "Worry about things.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_52R",
      "description": "Am indifferent to the feelings of others.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_53R",
      "description": "Don't put my mind on the task at hand.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_54R",
      "description": "Rarely get caught up in the excitement.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_55R",
      "description": "Avoid difficult reading material.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_56R",
      "description": "Rarely lose my composure.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_57",
      "description": "Rarely put people under pressure.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_58",
      "description": "Want everything to be “just right.”",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_59",
      "description": "See myself as a good leader.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_60R",
      "description": "Seldom notice the emotional aspects of paintings and pictures.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_61",
      "description": "Am easily discouraged.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_62R",
      "description": "Take no time for others.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_63",
      "description": "Get things done quickly.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_64R",
      "description": "Am not a very enthusiastic person.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_65",
      "description": "Have a rich vocabulary.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_66",
      "description": "Am a person whose moods go up and down easily.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_67R",
      "description": "Insult people.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_68R",
      "description": "Am not bothered by disorder.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_69",
      "description": "Can talk others into doing things.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_70",
      "description": "Need a creative outlet.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_71R",
      "description": "Am not embarrassed easily.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_72",
      "description": "Take an interest in other people's lives.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_73",
      "description": "Always know what I am doing.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_74",
      "description": "Show my feelings when I'm happy.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_75",
      "description": "Think quickly.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_76R",
      "description": "Am not easily annoyed.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_77R",
      "description": "Seek conflict.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_78R",
      "description": "Dislike routine.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_79R",
      "description": "Hold back my opinions.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_80R",
      "description": "Seldom get lost in thought.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_81",
      "description": "Become overwhelmed by events.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_82R",
      "description": "Don't have a soft side.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_83R",
      "description": "Postpone decisions.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_84",
      "description": "Have a lot of fun.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_85R",
      "description": "Learn things slowly.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_86",
      "description": "Get easily agitated.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_87R",
      "description": "Love a good fight.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_88",
      "description": "See that rules are observed.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_89",
      "description": "Am the first to act.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_90R",
      "description": "Seldom daydream.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_91",
      "description": "Am afraid of many things.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_92",
      "description": "Like to do things for others.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_93R",
      "description": "Am easily distracted.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_94",
      "description": "Laugh a lot.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_95",
      "description": "Formulate ideas clearly.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_96",
      "description": "Can be stirred up easily.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_97R",
      "description": "Am out for my own personal gain.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_98",
      "description": "Want every detail taken care of.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_99R",
      "description": "Do not have an assertive personality.",
      "value": "5. strongly disagree,\n4. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n2. agree,\n1. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_100",
      "description": "See the beauty in things that others might not notice.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_1",
      "description": "I have decided on the direction I want to follow in life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_2",
      "description": "I know what I want to do with my future.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_3",
      "description": "I have a clear view on my future.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_4",
      "description": "I have made a choice concerning some of my plans for the future.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_5",
      "description": "I know what I want to achieve in my life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_6",
      "description": "Plans for the future offer me a sense of security.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_7",
      "description": "Future plans give me self-confidence.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_8",
      "description": "Because of the path of life I have mapped out, I feel certain about myself.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_9",
      "description": "I sense that the direction I want to take in life will really suit me.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_10",
      "description": "I value my plans for the future very much.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_11",
      "description": "I think about the direction I want to take in my life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_12",
      "description": "I think a lot about how I see my future.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_13",
      "description": "I try to figure out regularly which lifestyle would suit me.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_14",
      "description": "I think about what to do with my life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_15",
      "description": "I try to find out which lifestyle would be good for me.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_16",
      "description": "I think about the future plans I have made.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_17",
      "description": "I talk regularly with other people about the plans for the future I have made.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_18",
      "description": "I work out for myself if the goals I put forward in life really suit me.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_19",
      "description": "I try to find out regularly what other people think about the specific direction I want to take in my life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_20",
      "description": "I think a lot about the future plans I strive for.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_21",
      "description": "I keep looking for the direction I want to take in my life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_22",
      "description": "I am doubtful about what I really want to achieve in life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_23",
      "description": "I keep wondering which direction my life has to take.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_24",
      "description": "I worry about what I want to do with my future.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_25",
      "description": "It is hard to stop thinking about the direction I want to follow in life.",
      "value": "1. strongly disagree,\n2. disagree,\n3. neither agree nor disagree,\n4. agree,\n5. strongly agree",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_1",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel tired out for no good reason?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_2",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel nervous?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_3",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel so nervous that nothing could calm you down?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_4",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel hopeless?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_5",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel restless or fidgety?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_6",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel so restless you could not sit still?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_7",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel depressed?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_8",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel that everything was an effort?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_9",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel so sad that nothing could cheer you up?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_10",
      "description": "During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel worthless?",
      "value": "1. none of the time,\n2. a little of the time,\n3. some of the time,\n4. most of the time,\n5. all of the time",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_1",
      "description": "Is outgoing, sociable.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_2",
      "description": "Is compassionate, has a soft heart.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_3R",
      "description": "Tends to be disorganized.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_4R",
      "description": "Is relaxed, handles stress well.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_5R",
      "description": "Has few artistic interests.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_6",
      "description": "Has an assertive personality.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_7",
      "description": "Is respectful, treats others with respect.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_8R",
      "description": "Tends to be lazy.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_9R",
      "description": "Stays optimistic after experiencing a setback.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_10",
      "description": "Is curious about many different things.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_11R",
      "description": "Rarely feels excited or eager.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_12R",
      "description": "Tends to find fault with others.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_13",
      "description": "Is dependable, steady.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_14",
      "description": "Is moody, has up and down mood swings.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_15",
      "description": "Is inventive, finds clever ways to do things.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_16R",
      "description": "Tends to be quiet.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_17R",
      "description": "Feels little sympathy for others.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_18",
      "description": "Is systematic, likes to keep things in order.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_19",
      "description": "Can be tense.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_20",
      "description": "Is fascinated by art, music, or literature.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_21",
      "description": "Is dominant, acts as a leader.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_22R",
      "description": "Starts arguments with others.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_23R",
      "description": "Has difficulty getting started on tasks.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_24R",
      "description": "Feels secure, comfortable with self.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_25R",
      "description": "Avoids intellectual, philosophical discussions.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_26R",
      "description": "Is less active than other people.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_27",
      "description": "Has a forgiving nature.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_28R",
      "description": "Can be somewhat careless.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_29R",
      "description": "Is emotionally stable, not easily upset.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_30R",
      "description": "Has little creativity.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_31R",
      "description": "Is sometimes shy, introverted.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_32",
      "description": "Is helpful and unselfish with others.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_33",
      "description": "Keeps things neat and tidy.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_34",
      "description": "Worries a lot.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_35",
      "description": "Values art and beauty.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_36R",
      "description": "Finds it hard to influence people.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_37R",
      "description": "Is sometimes rude to others.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_38",
      "description": "Is efficient, gets things done.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_39",
      "description": "Often feels sad.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_40",
      "description": "Is complex, a deep thinker.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_41",
      "description": "Is full of energy.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_42R",
      "description": "Is suspicious of others’ intentions.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_43",
      "description": "Is reliable, can always be counted on.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_44R",
      "description": "Keeps their emotions under control.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_45R",
      "description": "Has difficulty imagining things.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_46",
      "description": "Is talkative.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_47R",
      "description": "Can be cold and uncaring.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_48R",
      "description": "Leaves a mess, doesn’t clean up.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_49R",
      "description": "Rarely feels anxious or afraid.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_50R",
      "description": "Thinks poetry and plays are boring.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_51R",
      "description": "Prefers to have others take charge.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_52",
      "description": "Is polite, courteous to others.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_53",
      "description": "Is persistent, works until the task is finished.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_54",
      "description": "Tends to feel depressed, blue.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_55R",
      "description": "Has little interest in abstract ideas.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_56",
      "description": "Shows a lot of enthusiasm.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_57",
      "description": "Assumes the best about people.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_58R",
      "description": "Sometimes behaves irresponsibly.",
      "value": "5. disagree strongly,\n4. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n2. agree a little,\n1. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_59",
      "description": "Is temperamental, gets emotional easily.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi2_60",
      "description": "Is original, comes up with new ideas.",
      "value": "1. disagree strongly,\n2. disagree a little,\n3. neutral; no opinion,\n4. agree a little,\n5. agree strongly",
      "maxValue": 5,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "engcomf",
      "description": "Comfort with English",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_selfesteem",
      "description": "General Self-Esteem 10 RSE items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_positive",
      "description": "Positive Self-Esteem 5 RSE items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "rse_negative",
      "description": "Negative Self-Esteem 5 RSE items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_agreeableness",
      "description": "Agreeableness Domain 20 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_conscientiousness",
      "description": "Conscientiousness Domain 20 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_extraversion",
      "description": "Extraversion Domain 20 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_neuroticism",
      "description": "Neuroticism Domain 20 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_opennessdomain",
      "description": "Openness Domain 20 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_assertiveness",
      "description": "Assertiveness Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_compassion",
      "description": "Compassion Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_enthusiasm",
      "description": "Enthusiasm Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_industriousness",
      "description": "Industriousness Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_intellect",
      "description": "Intellect Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_opennessaspect",
      "description": "Openness Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_orderliness",
      "description": "Orderliness Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_politeness",
      "description": "Politeness Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_volatility",
      "description": "Volatility Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfas_withdrawal",
      "description": "Withdrawal Aspect 10 BFAS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_extraversion",
      "description": "Extraversion Domain 12 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_agreeableness",
      "description": "Agreeableness Domain 12 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_conscientiousness",
      "description": "Conscientiousness Domain 12 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_negative",
      "description": "Negative Emotionality Domain 12 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_openmindedness",
      "description": "Open-Mindedness Domain 12 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_sociability",
      "description": "Sociability Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_compassion",
      "description": "Compassion Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_organization",
      "description": "Organization Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_anxiety",
      "description": "Anxiety Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_aesthetic",
      "description": "Aesthetic Sensitivity Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_assertiveness",
      "description": "Assertiveness Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_respectfulness",
      "description": "Respectfulness Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_productiveness",
      "description": "Productiveness Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_depression",
      "description": "Depression Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_intellect",
      "description": "Intellectual Curiosity Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_energy",
      "description": "Energy Level Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_trust",
      "description": "Trust Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_responsibility",
      "description": "Responsibility Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_volatility",
      "description": "Volatility Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "bfi_imagination",
      "description": "Creative Imagination Facet 4 BFI items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_commitmaking",
      "description": "Commitment Making 5 DIDS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_commitid",
      "description": "Identification with Commitment 5 DIDS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_explorebreadth",
      "description": "Exploration in Breadth 5 DIDS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_exploredepth",
      "description": "Exploration in Depth 5 DIDS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dids_explorerum",
      "description": "Ruminative Exploration 5 DIDS items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "k10_distress",
      "description": "Psychological Distress 10 K10 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_admiration",
      "description": "Admiration NARQ 9 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_rivalry",
      "description": "Rivalry NARQ 9 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_grandiosity",
      "description": "Grandiosity NARQ 3 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_uniqueness",
      "description": "Uniqueness NARQ 3 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_aggressiveness",
      "description": "Aggressiveness NARQ 3 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_supremacy",
      "description": "Supremacy NARQ 3 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_charmingness",
      "description": "Charmingness NARQ 3 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "narq_devaluation",
      "description": "Devaluation NARQ 3 items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    }
  ]
}`