Dependent Variables by Year (At Acct Level)
Year Mktg MQLs Visits Pipeline Units
2016 0 11 11 11 1
2017 0 262 249 188 29
2018 194 354 311 299 52
2019 2180 295 225 224 62
2020 2491 149 107 97 28

Percent Free & Reduced Lunch

Local Revenue

Federal Revenue

Instructional Expenditures

Total Students

Hispanic Student Population

Agency Type

Dependent Variables by Agency Type
AgencyType n Mktg MQLs Visits Pipeline Units
79 3 0 0 0 0
1-Regular local school district that is NOT a component of a supervisory union 45894 4813 1058 894 812 171
2-Local school district that is a component of a supervisory union 797 38 2 2 2 1
3-Supervisory union administrative center (or county superintendent’s office serving the same purpose) 8 1 1 0 0 0
4-Regional Education Service Agency (RESA) 80 9 10 7 5 0
5-State agency providing elementary and/or secondary level instruction 5 1 0 0 0 0
7-Independent Charter District 5 0 0 0 0 0

Hot Spot Analysis

The purpose of this analysis is to understand where PDRs have devoted time, where they have been most efficacious in getting leads to move downfunnel, and what trends can we see across time.

I have two key recommendations across this entire analysis:

  1. It seems like we have room to increase the volume of people we speak to. And, I don’t mean we should ‘spray and pray’. I think we can be strategic about who we target. The decreasing number of people we speak to definitely has downstream implications.

  2. I think we need to build a better feedback loop between the data and PDRs/PDEs. We have so many K-12 accounts without connections to LEA IDs; the data in SF for K-12 is 2 years behind what is in the national database and our backend; and a lot of firmographic data is not at the fingertips of PDRs/PDEs.

Next Steps:

  1. I’d love to provide the PDRs and PDEs with a set of accounts that have not received attention lately BUT could be viable based on the findings below.

  2. Start a project to update information in SF.

  3. Provide the PDEs/PDRs with a dashboard to help filter schools - if they want this.

Baseline on Key Metrics

For the baselines, these are good to keep in mind when you look at the same metrics cut in various ways. Note that PLtoVisit and PLtoSQL are roughly the same, meaning that when we get a visit, we tend to convert those accounts to pipeline.

Dependent Variables by Quarter
PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
650 9.3% 6.5% 6.0% 1.5%

Looking at Key Metrics Across Quarters

The natural first place to start is with viewing key metrics across the quarters. All dates are in CY.

Instances where you see PLtoSQL > PLtoVisit means there was no visit logged, suggesting we jumped from a phone call to a proposal.

Key Thoughts:

  1. With the exceptino of CY20 Q2, we have been decreasing the number of people we speak to in the market.
  2. Across Calendar Year 19, we see decreasing efficacy across all of the metrics, with a small blip for PLtoVisit and PLtoSQL in Q3.
  3. The trend in CY 19 continued into the beginning of 2020 and then COVID hit, blowing up PL to Unit.
  4. Bright Spot: The past couple of quarters have shown some positive movements on the key metrics; we have not returned to CY19 averages.
Dependent Variables by Quarter
Outreach Quarter PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
2019.1 832 13.6% 10.0% 10.9% 2.6%
2019.2 751 11.7% 7.7% 8.0% 2.8%
2019.3 703 12.8% 9.7% 8.1% 1.8%
2019.4 627 10.7% 6.5% 5.6% 1.4%
2020.1 539 6.7% 4.3% 3.3% 0.9%
2020.2 1025 3.5% 1.9% 1.9% 0.5%
2020.3 563 7.6% 6.6% 6.0% 1.2%
2020.4 425 8.0% 6.1% 4.5% 1.2%
2021.1 160 11.2% 6.2% 1.2% 0.0%

Let’s start to understand what’s happening beneath the movements in the key metrics. First, we break the key metrics out by state, for all of the data, to see if there are States where we spend a lot of time and underperform or vice versa.

  1. Illinois, Missouri, Virginia, Kansas, and Arizona are states where we see strong PL to Unit. Kansas and Arizona are on the smaller side of our focus.
  2. Texas, PA, Ohio, and Michigan all get a lot of attention without as much of a return.
  3. And, it looks as though some states are very difficult to get to visit and beyond: New Hampshire, Nevada, Louisiana, Alabama, etc. Perhaps, we only attend to these states when a lead comes in Warm?
  4. For States like Kentucky and Mississippi, et al., where have seen some pipeline yet have not closed Units, we need some more context on what is happening before making any decision regarding how to allocation attention.
Dependent Variables by State
PrimaryState PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
TX 659 7.6% 4.1% 4.7% 0.6%
CA 540 5.6% 3.9% 3.5% 1.7%
NY 486 8.2% 5.8% 5.1% 1.2%
IL 334 14.1% 10.2% 10.5% 3.9%
PA 275 8.4% 5.5% 4.4% 0.7%
OH 258 10.5% 8.1% 5.8% 0.4%
MO 245 11.0% 8.2% 9.4% 2.4%
VA 223 14.3% 11.2% 10.8% 2.2%
MI 220 13.2% 10.5% 6.8% 0.5%
NJ 193 9.8% 6.7% 5.7% 1.6%
WI 184 7.1% 4.3% 4.3% 1.6%
MA 143 10.5% 6.3% 7.0% 1.4%
IN 130 6.2% 2.3% 4.6% 1.5%
GA 120 6.7% 5.8% 5.8% 1.7%
KS 115 22.6% 17.4% 12.2% 5.2%
MN 113 7.1% 4.4% 4.4% 1.8%
NC 101 6.9% 5.0% 5.0% 1.0%
WA 89 14.6% 13.5% 11.2% 1.1%
KY 86 9.3% 2.3% 3.5% 0.0%
OR 84 7.1% 6.0% 3.6% 1.2%
CT 83 8.4% 7.2% 2.4% 0.0%
FL 82 4.9% 2.4% 1.2% 0.0%
AZ 79 16.5% 12.7% 12.7% 7.6%
MS 77 5.2% 1.3% 2.6% 0.0%
SC 71 11.3% 9.9% 7.0% 4.2%
CO 62 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 0.0%
NM 56 12.5% 8.9% 10.7% 5.4%
OK 44 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0%
AL 40 10.0% 10.0% 7.5% 0.0%
IA 40 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
LA 40 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AR 38 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TN 37 13.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7%
NE 35 22.9% 17.1% 17.1% 2.9%
ME 30 6.7% 3.3% 6.7% 0.0%
RI 29 10.3% 10.3% 6.9% 3.4%
UT 29 13.8% 10.3% 6.9% 0.0%
NH 26 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MD 22 9.1% 4.5% 9.1% 0.0%
NV 20 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AK 13 30.8% 23.1% 15.4% 7.7%
SD 13 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0%
ND 12 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WV 12 16.7% 8.3% 8.3% 0.0%
DE 8 12.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0%
ID 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
DC 7 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VT 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WY 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MT 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Key Metrics by Locale

  1. There are PLs with ‘NA’ meaning the data is missing. This is because the accounts in SF do not have an LEA ID tagged to them. In a subsequent round of this, I’ll have that patched. I went through the data yesterday and tagged about 261 Accounts which had an MQL or Visit in the last year.
  2. We spend most of our time talking to Large Suburbs and they convert at the average, meaning most of our Units are for these types of schools.
  3. Surprisingly, Town: Distant and City: Mid Size stand out as performing well across all parts of the funnel.
  4. Whatever is buried in NA, Mid Sized Suburbs, and Remote seem to be underperforming locales.
Dependent Variables by Locale
Locale PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
21-Suburb: Large 1673 10.3% 7.5% 7.1% 1.5%
NA 1147 5.5% 2.7% 2.1% 0.4%
41-Rural: Fringe 480 10.0% 6.7% 6.9% 1.7%
32-Town: Distant 426 12.9% 10.1% 8.9% 2.6%
42-Rural: Distant 333 9.6% 6.9% 6.9% 2.1%
13-City: Small 322 10.2% 7.1% 6.5% 1.6%
12-City: Mid-size 257 12.8% 8.2% 8.9% 3.9%
33-Town: Remote 242 10.3% 6.6% 5.8% 1.7%
31-Town: Fringe 229 6.6% 6.1% 4.8% 1.7%
11-City: Large 216 10.6% 7.4% 6.5% 1.9%
22-Suburb: Mid-size 161 8.7% 6.8% 4.3% 0.6%
23-Suburb: Small 94 7.4% 6.4% 6.4% 3.2%
43-Rural: Remote 45 11.1% 8.9% 6.7% 0.0%

Town Distant and State

We wanted to take a quick look at the why Town Distant locales appear to be doing well. Seems to be driven by out-performance in a few key states: NY, IL, KY, and NE.

Dependent Variables by Primary State, Distant Towns
Locale PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
TX 56 12.5% 5.4% 8.9% 1.8%
NY 38 15.8% 13.2% 13.2% 5.3%
WI 31 6.5% 3.2% 3.2% 0.0%
OH 30 20.0% 16.7% 6.7% 3.3%
CA 29 6.9% 3.4% 3.4% 0.0%
MO 22 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 4.5%
KS 21 42.9% 38.1% 33.3% 14.3%
IL 19 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% 10.5%
VA 19 15.8% 10.5% 10.5% 0.0%
MI 17 5.9% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0%
MN 15 13.3% 6.7% 6.7% 0.0%
KY 12 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OR 12 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IN 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
UT 7 28.6% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0%
AL 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AR 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NC 6 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0%
NE 6 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16.7%
OK 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WA 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
FL 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
GA 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IA 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MS 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PA 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SC 5 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0%
MA 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MD 4 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%
TN 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LA 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ME 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NM 2 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AK 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AZ 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SD 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VT 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WV 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Mid Size City and State

When we do more and more cuts on these metrics, we get to smaller sample sizes. Even so, it is interesting to see which States are behind the success of each Locale. In this case, we see some States which have not popped before: Georgia, Missouri, Arizona. The N gets small for these states. However, does success in Arizona Mid Sized Cities create a blueprint for neighboring States: Nevada, New Mexico, Utah.

On the other side of the coin, Virginia, Kansas, and Florida have not performed well here. What makes them different from the other States?

Dependent Variables by Primary State, Mid Sized City
Locale PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
TX 48 12.5% 8.3% 10.4% 0.0%
CA 39 10.3% 5.1% 2.6% 2.6%
VA 25 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
GA 12 41.7% 33.3% 33.3% 16.7%
KS 12 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
FL 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IL 10 60.0% 50.0% 60.0% 40.0%
CT 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MI 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WA 9 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 0.0%
MO 7 42.9% 28.6% 28.6% 14.3%
OR 6 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CO 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MA 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NC 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AZ 4 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%
MN 4 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%
ND 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OH 4 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%
IA 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NM 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NY 3 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
RI 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SD 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AL 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IN 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NV 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PA 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
UT 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ID 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MS 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MT 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SC 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WI 1 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Key Metrics by Locale - Last 2 Quarters

Checking to see if the aggregated data and the recent quarters are show different results.

We see that Rural Fringe and Rural Distant are not performing as well as they have in the past. Town Distant and Suburb Large appear to remain aligned with past performance. And notably, City Mid Size is seriously struggling, as compared to previous quarters.

Dependent Variables by Locale (for CY20 H2)
Locale PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
21-Suburb: Large 302 10.6% 8.3% 7.0% 1.3%
NA 144 3.5% 2.1% 2.8% 1.4%
41-Rural: Fringe 93 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 0.0%
32-Town: Distant 77 9.1% 9.1% 7.8% 0.0%
42-Rural: Distant 68 5.9% 5.9% 4.4% 1.5%
13-City: Small 55 9.1% 7.3% 7.3% 1.8%
11-City: Large 54 9.3% 5.6% 5.6% 1.9%
12-City: Mid-size 46 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%
33-Town: Remote 41 7.3% 7.3% 2.4% 2.4%
31-Town: Fringe 37 8.1% 5.4% 2.7% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size 36 11.1% 11.1% 5.6% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small 20 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
43-Rural: Remote 15 13.3% 6.7% 6.7% 0.0%

Illinois by Locale

Illinois seems to be a bright spot and I wanted to see if there was anything of interest beneath the surface. In fact, what you see is some surprisingly high conversion rates for Locales where we tend to spend less time overall.

Dependent Variables by Locale in Illinois
Locale PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
21-Suburb: Large 126 15.1% 9.5% 8.7% 1.6%
NA 122 8.2% 4.9% 5.7% 1.6%
32-Town: Distant 19 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% 10.5%
31-Town: Fringe 14 28.6% 28.6% 28.6% 21.4%
41-Rural: Fringe 13 7.7% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0%
12-City: Mid-size 10 60.0% 50.0% 60.0% 40.0%
13-City: Small 10 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
42-Rural: Distant 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
33-Town: Remote 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
11-City: Large 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Looking at performance by OpEx

The quartiles are determined by where we devote attention (read: outreach) and not by the quartiles which exist within the market. Quartiles: 1M - 36M, 36M - 70M, 70M - 170M, 170M+

Often, we see linear ordering, with larger schools more likely to buy. In this case, we see that small schools and large schools are less likely to purchase than the schools in the middle.

Dependent Variables by Opex Quartiles
opex_quart PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
[1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 1118 8.8% 6.4% 5.7% 1.2%
(3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 1120 11.6% 8.8% 7.9% 2.2%
(6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 1116 10.9% 7.7% 7.3% 2.2%
(1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 1117 9.9% 6.9% 6.7% 1.7%
NA 1154 5.5% 2.8% 2.2% 0.5%

Opex Quartile and State

  1. There are States where we do perform better the larger the school’s operating expense: Illinois and California roughly follow this pattern.
  2. There are some States where we only succeed in certain quartiles: Georgia (highest quartile), Oregon (lowest quartile), Tennessee (highest quartile).
  3. There are some states where our success is located more closely towards the median: Texas, New Mexico, and Minnesota.
  4. There are some States where our success is peripatetic: New York, Missouri, Arizona.
Dependent Variables by Opex Quartiles & State
Primary State OpEx Quartile PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
AK [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 2 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
AK (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 9 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1%
AK (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AL [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 17 5.9% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0%
AL (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AL (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 11 18.2% 18.2% 18.2% 0.0%
AL (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 7 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 0.0%
AL NA 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AR [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 15 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AR (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AR (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 10 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AR (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AR NA 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
AZ [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 16 12.5% 12.5% 6.2% 6.2%
AZ (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 13 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 15.4%
AZ (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 11 27.3% 18.2% 18.2% 9.1%
AZ (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 12 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3%
AZ NA 27 14.8% 7.4% 11.1% 3.7%
CA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 46 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 93 4.3% 3.2% 3.2% 2.2%
CA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 131 6.1% 3.8% 3.1% 2.3%
CA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 158 7.6% 5.1% 4.4% 1.9%
CA NA 112 5.4% 4.5% 4.5% 0.9%
CO [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 10 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0.0%
CO (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CO (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CO (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 18 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CO NA 20 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CT [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 7 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CT (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 20 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CT (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 18 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 0.0%
CT (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 22 9.1% 9.1% 4.5% 0.0%
CT NA 16 6.2% 6.2% 0.0% 0.0%
DC NA 7 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
DE (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
DE (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
DE NA 6 16.7% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0%
FL [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
FL (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
FL (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
FL (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 59 5.1% 3.4% 1.7% 0.0%
FL NA 11 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
GA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 15 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
GA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 17 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
GA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 24 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
GA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 34 23.5% 20.6% 20.6% 5.9%
GA NA 30 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 14 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 15 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IA NA 2 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
ID [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ID (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ID (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ID (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ID NA 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IL [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 39 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 2.6%
IL (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 47 17.0% 10.6% 10.6% 2.1%
IL (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 66 18.2% 12.1% 12.1% 4.5%
IL (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 60 21.7% 18.3% 18.3% 10.0%
IL NA 122 8.2% 4.9% 5.7% 1.6%
IN [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 59 5.1% 1.7% 3.4% 0.0%
IN (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 26 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8%
IN (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 20 20.0% 5.0% 15.0% 5.0%
IN (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
IN NA 14 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
KS [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 40 32.5% 30.0% 20.0% 7.5%
KS (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 26 11.5% 11.5% 11.5% 11.5%
KS (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 20 35.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0%
KS (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 16 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 0.0%
KS NA 13 15.4% 15.4% 7.7% 0.0%
KY [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 16 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
KY (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 11 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0%
KY (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 27 7.4% 3.7% 7.4% 0.0%
KY (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 11 18.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
KY NA 21 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 5 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LA NA 17 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 25 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 4.0%
MA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 31 16.1% 9.7% 9.7% 0.0%
MA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 27 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 0.0%
MA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 13 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MA NA 47 12.8% 4.3% 6.4% 2.1%
MD [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MD (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 4 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%
MD (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MD (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 10 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0%
MD NA 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ME [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 15 6.7% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0%
ME (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 8 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 0.0%
ME (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ME NA 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MI [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 81 12.3% 11.1% 7.4% 0.0%
MI (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 54 16.7% 13.0% 7.4% 1.9%
MI (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 33 18.2% 15.2% 15.2% 0.0%
MI (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 14 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MI NA 38 10.5% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0%
MN [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 27 7.4% 3.7% 3.7% 0.0%
MN (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 15 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7%
MN (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 27 11.1% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%
MN (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 18 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 0.0%
MN NA 26 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MO [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 62 4.8% 3.2% 4.8% 1.6%
MO (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 82 14.6% 12.2% 13.4% 3.7%
MO (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 31 12.9% 12.9% 12.9% 3.2%
MO (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 30 20.0% 13.3% 13.3% 3.3%
MO NA 40 5.0% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0%
MS [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 36 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MS (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 24 8.3% 4.2% 4.2% 0.0%
MS (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 5 40.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0%
MS (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MS NA 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MT (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NC [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 12 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0%
NC (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 13 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0%
NC (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 22 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 4.5%
NC (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 21 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NC NA 33 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ND (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 4 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ND (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ND NA 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NE [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 8 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
NE (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 14 35.7% 21.4% 21.4% 0.0%
NE (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 5 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0%
NE (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 5 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0%
NE NA 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NH [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NH (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 15 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NH NA 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NJ [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 21 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NJ (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 39 7.7% 7.7% 5.1% 0.0%
NJ (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 49 18.4% 16.3% 14.3% 6.1%
NJ (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 25 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 0.0%
NJ NA 59 8.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NM [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 9 22.2% 11.1% 22.2% 0.0%
NM (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 12 25.0% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7%
NM (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 12 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3%
NM (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 12 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 0.0%
NM NA 11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NV (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NV (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NV NA 12 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NY [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 144 10.4% 7.6% 7.6% 2.1%
NY (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 98 12.2% 9.2% 8.2% 2.0%
NY (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 127 4.7% 3.9% 3.9% 0.8%
NY (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 43 9.3% 2.3% 2.3% 0.0%
NY NA 74 4.1% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0%
OH [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 69 7.2% 2.9% 1.4% 0.0%
OH (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 65 9.2% 7.7% 3.1% 0.0%
OH (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 71 15.5% 14.1% 12.7% 1.4%
OH (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 32 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 0.0%
OH NA 21 14.3% 9.5% 4.8% 0.0%
OK [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OK (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OK (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 10 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0%
OK (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OK NA 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OR [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 22 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 4.5%
OR (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 12 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OR (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 25 12.0% 12.0% 4.0% 0.0%
OR (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 6 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OR NA 19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 43 11.6% 7.0% 7.0% 0.0%
PA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 61 9.8% 6.6% 4.9% 0.0%
PA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 58 12.1% 6.9% 6.9% 1.7%
PA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 33 9.1% 9.1% 6.1% 3.0%
PA NA 80 2.5% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0%
RI [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
RI (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 9 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1%
RI (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 4 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%
RI (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
RI NA 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SC [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SC (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 14 14.3% 14.3% 7.1% 0.0%
SC (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 18 16.7% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1%
SC (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 20 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 5.0%
SC NA 11 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0%
SD [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SD (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 4 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%
SD (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SD NA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TN [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 6 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TN (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TN (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 6 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TN (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 5 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0%
TN NA 14 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TX [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 91 11.0% 7.7% 5.5% 0.0%
TX (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 104 11.5% 4.8% 7.7% 2.9%
TX (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 103 6.8% 3.9% 4.9% 1.0%
TX (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 243 7.0% 4.1% 5.3% 0.0%
TX NA 118 3.4% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%
UT [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
UT (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 9 33.3% 33.3% 22.2% 0.0%
UT (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
UT (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 17 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 20 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0%
VA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 80 21.2% 17.5% 17.5% 3.8%
VA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 36 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 0.0%
VA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 60 18.3% 11.7% 10.0% 3.3%
VA NA 27 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 0.0%
VT [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VT (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VT (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VT NA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WA [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 13 15.4% 15.4% 15.4% 7.7%
WA (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 11 18.2% 18.2% 18.2% 0.0%
WA (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WA (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 40 22.5% 20.0% 15.0% 0.0%
WA NA 20 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WI [1.31e+06,3.61e+07] 71 7.0% 4.2% 5.6% 0.0%
WI (3.61e+07,6.97e+07] 46 4.3% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0%
WI (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 38 10.5% 10.5% 7.9% 5.3%
WI (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 10 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 10.0%
WI NA 19 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WV (6.97e+07,1.7e+08] 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WV (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WV NA 6 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0%
WY (1.7e+08,5.96e+09] 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WY NA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Free & Reduced Lunch Quartiles

Interestingly, there does not seem to be any distinct pattern between the lunch quartiles and our success at any part of the funnel. The uniformity is interesting in and of itself. However, uniformity is often produced by the variuos interplay of underlying distributions.

Dependent Variables by Reduced and Free Lunch Quartiles
Lunch Quartile PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
[0,0.295] 1040 11.2% 7.9% 7.2% 2.0%
(0.295,0.468] 1037 9.8% 7.1% 7.0% 1.7%
(0.468,0.643] 1038 10.7% 8.2% 6.9% 1.8%
(0.643,1.01] 1038 9.3% 6.6% 6.7% 1.9%
NA 1472 6.7% 3.7% 3.1% 0.6%

Free & Reduced Lunch Quartiles & Locale

Large Suburbs are where we spend a lot of our time and they also happen to be a place where we are successful across all of the Lunch quartiles. That is, a decent amount of the uniformity is driven by another variable, the Locale, which is itself a proxy for a few other variables.

For other Locales, there are potentially some sweet spots:

  1. Large Cities in the Second Quartile
  2. Mid Sized Cities in the Fourth Quartile
  3. Remote Rural or Distant Towns in the First Quartile (smaller N here)
Dependent Variables by Locale and Reduced & Free Lunch Quartiles
Locale Lunch Quartile PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
11-City: Large [0,0.295] 23 8.7% 4.3% 8.7% 0.0%
11-City: Large (0.295,0.468] 16 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 12.5%
11-City: Large (0.468,0.643] 44 11.4% 6.8% 6.8% 2.3%
11-City: Large (0.643,1.01] 119 8.4% 5.9% 4.2% 0.0%
11-City: Large NA 14 21.4% 14.3% 7.1% 7.1%
12-City: Mid-size [0,0.295] 36 8.3% 2.8% 8.3% 2.8%
12-City: Mid-size (0.295,0.468] 47 10.6% 4.3% 4.3% 0.0%
12-City: Mid-size (0.468,0.643] 63 11.1% 7.9% 7.9% 3.2%
12-City: Mid-size (0.643,1.01] 88 14.8% 12.5% 12.5% 6.8%
12-City: Mid-size NA 23 21.7% 8.7% 8.7% 4.3%
13-City: Small [0,0.295] 32 12.5% 6.2% 6.2% 0.0%
13-City: Small (0.295,0.468] 86 11.6% 8.1% 8.1% 2.3%
13-City: Small (0.468,0.643] 94 10.6% 8.5% 7.4% 2.1%
13-City: Small (0.643,1.01] 83 9.6% 7.2% 6.0% 1.2%
13-City: Small NA 27 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
21-Suburb: Large [0,0.295] 644 11.5% 8.2% 7.6% 1.7%
21-Suburb: Large (0.295,0.468] 381 8.9% 6.6% 6.6% 1.3%
21-Suburb: Large (0.468,0.643] 253 10.7% 7.5% 5.5% 1.2%
21-Suburb: Large (0.643,1.01] 280 7.9% 5.7% 6.4% 1.8%
21-Suburb: Large NA 115 13.0% 10.4% 10.4% 0.9%
22-Suburb: Mid-size [0,0.295] 37 8.1% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size (0.295,0.468] 54 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 1.9%
22-Suburb: Mid-size (0.468,0.643] 34 5.9% 5.9% 2.9% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size (0.643,1.01] 22 13.6% 9.1% 4.5% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size NA 14 14.3% 7.1% 7.1% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small [0,0.295] 18 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small (0.295,0.468] 37 8.1% 8.1% 8.1% 2.7%
23-Suburb: Small (0.468,0.643] 13 15.4% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small (0.643,1.01] 17 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9%
23-Suburb: Small NA 9 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1%
31-Town: Fringe [0,0.295] 63 9.5% 7.9% 7.9% 1.6%
31-Town: Fringe (0.295,0.468] 78 7.7% 7.7% 6.4% 3.8%
31-Town: Fringe (0.468,0.643] 54 3.7% 3.7% 1.9% 0.0%
31-Town: Fringe (0.643,1.01] 31 3.2% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0%
31-Town: Fringe NA 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
32-Town: Distant [0,0.295] 27 14.8% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0%
32-Town: Distant (0.295,0.468] 92 12.0% 8.7% 8.7% 2.2%
32-Town: Distant (0.468,0.643] 145 17.9% 15.2% 12.4% 4.1%
32-Town: Distant (0.643,1.01] 126 8.7% 5.6% 7.9% 2.4%
32-Town: Distant NA 36 8.3% 8.3% 5.6% 0.0%
33-Town: Remote [0,0.295] 6 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7%
33-Town: Remote (0.295,0.468] 42 11.9% 9.5% 7.1% 0.0%
33-Town: Remote (0.468,0.643] 60 6.7% 5.0% 3.3% 0.0%
33-Town: Remote (0.643,1.01] 101 10.9% 5.0% 5.9% 3.0%
33-Town: Remote NA 33 9.1% 6.1% 6.1% 0.0%
41-Rural: Fringe [0,0.295] 123 8.9% 5.7% 6.5% 2.4%
41-Rural: Fringe (0.295,0.468] 113 12.4% 7.1% 7.1% 0.9%
41-Rural: Fringe (0.468,0.643] 135 10.4% 8.1% 7.4% 2.2%
41-Rural: Fringe (0.643,1.01] 86 10.5% 7.0% 8.1% 1.2%
41-Rural: Fringe NA 23 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
42-Rural: Distant [0,0.295] 29 20.7% 17.2% 13.8% 13.8%
42-Rural: Distant (0.295,0.468] 85 8.2% 4.7% 5.9% 1.2%
42-Rural: Distant (0.468,0.643] 135 8.9% 6.7% 7.4% 1.5%
42-Rural: Distant (0.643,1.01] 58 6.9% 6.9% 6.9% 0.0%
42-Rural: Distant NA 26 11.5% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote [0,0.295] 2 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote (0.295,0.468] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote (0.468,0.643] 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote (0.643,1.01] 27 14.8% 11.1% 7.4% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote NA 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NA NA 1147 5.5% 2.7% 2.1% 0.4%

Proportion Hispanic

The middle two quartiles appear to perform better than the extremes.

Dependent Variables by Proportion Hispanic Quartiles
Hispanic Quartile PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
[0,0.0467] 1114 9.4% 6.9% 6.5% 1.3%
(0.0467,0.118] 1114 11.8% 8.9% 8.1% 2.2%
(0.118,0.32] 1114 11.9% 8.6% 8.3% 2.2%
(0.32,0.998] 1113 7.8% 5.5% 4.9% 1.6%
NA 1170 5.8% 2.7% 2.2% 0.5%

Proportion Hispanic & Locale

  1. Locales where the highest proportion of Hispanic students translates into Units: Fringe Rural, Fringe Town, and Small Suburb
  2. Locales where a lower proportion of Hispanic students translates into Units: Large and Mid-Sized cities, Distant Rural, and also Small Suburbs.
  3. Large Suburbs where this is a decent sized proportion of Hispanic students seems to be a sweet spot.
Dependent Variables by Opex Quartiles
Locale Hispanic Quartile PLs PLtoMQL PLtoVisit PLtoSQL PLtoUnit
11-City: Large [0,0.0467] 4 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%
11-City: Large (0.0467,0.118] 28 10.7% 3.6% 7.1% 3.6%
11-City: Large (0.118,0.32] 65 10.8% 6.2% 7.7% 1.5%
11-City: Large (0.32,0.998] 118 10.2% 8.5% 5.9% 1.7%
11-City: Large NA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
12-City: Mid-size [0,0.0467] 11 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0%
12-City: Mid-size (0.0467,0.118] 54 24.1% 18.5% 20.4% 11.1%
12-City: Mid-size (0.118,0.32] 84 10.7% 4.8% 7.1% 3.6%
12-City: Mid-size (0.32,0.998] 97 6.2% 5.2% 4.1% 0.0%
12-City: Mid-size NA 11 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1%
13-City: Small [0,0.0467] 36 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 2.8%
13-City: Small (0.0467,0.118] 91 19.8% 12.1% 11.0% 2.2%
13-City: Small (0.118,0.32] 97 9.3% 7.2% 6.2% 2.1%
13-City: Small (0.32,0.998] 97 2.1% 1.0% 1.0% 0.0%
13-City: Small NA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
21-Suburb: Large [0,0.0467] 293 13.0% 9.2% 9.9% 1.7%
21-Suburb: Large (0.0467,0.118] 438 11.4% 8.7% 7.3% 1.1%
21-Suburb: Large (0.118,0.32] 502 11.8% 8.8% 8.8% 2.6%
21-Suburb: Large (0.32,0.998] 439 5.7% 3.6% 3.0% 0.5%
21-Suburb: Large NA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size [0,0.0467] 39 5.1% 2.6% 2.6% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size (0.0467,0.118] 47 14.9% 12.8% 6.4% 2.1%
22-Suburb: Mid-size (0.118,0.32] 53 5.7% 3.8% 3.8% 0.0%
22-Suburb: Mid-size (0.32,0.998] 22 9.1% 9.1% 4.5% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small [0,0.0467] 33 6.1% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
23-Suburb: Small (0.0467,0.118] 27 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small (0.118,0.32] 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
23-Suburb: Small (0.32,0.998] 24 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 8.3%
31-Town: Fringe [0,0.0467] 76 6.6% 6.6% 5.3% 0.0%
31-Town: Fringe (0.0467,0.118] 82 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 1.2%
31-Town: Fringe (0.118,0.32] 27 7.4% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0%
31-Town: Fringe (0.32,0.998] 44 9.1% 9.1% 6.8% 6.8%
32-Town: Distant [0,0.0467] 137 11.7% 8.8% 5.8% 1.5%
32-Town: Distant (0.0467,0.118] 95 12.6% 11.6% 10.5% 2.1%
32-Town: Distant (0.118,0.32] 95 15.8% 13.7% 12.6% 4.2%
32-Town: Distant (0.32,0.998] 99 12.1% 7.1% 8.1% 3.0%
33-Town: Remote [0,0.0467] 78 9.0% 6.4% 6.4% 0.0%
33-Town: Remote (0.0467,0.118] 28 14.3% 10.7% 10.7% 3.6%
33-Town: Remote (0.118,0.32] 45 15.6% 11.1% 6.7% 0.0%
33-Town: Remote (0.32,0.998] 87 8.0% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4%
33-Town: Remote NA 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
41-Rural: Fringe [0,0.0467] 173 4.0% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0%
41-Rural: Fringe (0.0467,0.118] 143 8.4% 4.9% 5.6% 2.1%
41-Rural: Fringe (0.118,0.32] 101 18.8% 12.9% 10.9% 2.0%
41-Rural: Fringe (0.32,0.998] 62 16.1% 11.3% 14.5% 4.8%
41-Rural: Fringe NA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
42-Rural: Distant [0,0.0467] 203 8.9% 5.4% 5.4% 2.5%
42-Rural: Distant (0.0467,0.118] 77 10.4% 9.1% 7.8% 2.6%
42-Rural: Distant (0.118,0.32] 29 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 0.0%
42-Rural: Distant (0.32,0.998] 22 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0%
42-Rural: Distant NA 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote [0,0.0467] 31 12.9% 12.9% 9.7% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote (0.0467,0.118] 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote (0.118,0.32] 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote (0.32,0.998] 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
43-Rural: Remote NA 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NA NA 1147 5.5% 2.7% 2.1% 0.4%