Week 15: Model-evaluation quiz [answers]
A total of 12 students completed this quiz (status: 2022-02-21 09:17:32). The correct answers are highlighted in green in the bar plots below. If you don’t understand why an answer is correct, or why an answer isn’t correct, please ask on Teams.
Part 1 (1): assumptions and statistical modelling
Which acronym is helpful to remember the 4 model assumptions?
What might happen if model assumptions are not met?
Is it true that t-tests, ANOVAs and linear regressions are all parametric models?
You have fitted linear regression models in previous workshops. What’s new when we run a t-test or an ANOVA as linear model using lm?
Why would we use an linear model instead of running a t-test or an ANOVA?
Part 1 (2): residuals and normality
Which of the following is not a correct paraphrase of residuals?
Which statement is correct for a good model (generally speaking)?
A positively skewed distribution has a …
A skew of 3.5 indicates
Which of the following transformations is routinely used in the literature to correct for positive skew, especially for rts?
A random variable x with a kurtosis of 3 is…
Answer: A normal distribution has a kurtosis of 3. You might be thinking of ‘excess kurtosis’ for which 0 is indicating normality and values larger than 2 are indicative for a leptokurtic distribution.
Part 2: independence of residuals
Independence of residuals means that there should be (or little) ….
Residuals should be distributed around an imaginary horizontal line …
Two groups meet the equality / homogeneity of variance assumption when:
Two groups may have unequal variances if one group is more diverse so for example when comparing:
What does linearity refer to?
Ooops! Read all answers again. You got this :)
Can linearity be violated for continuous predictors?
Answer: The linearlity assumption can be violated for continuous predictors.
Can linearity be violated for categorical predictors?
Answer: The linearlity assumption cannot be violated for categorical predictors because there is no benefit in assuming anything but a linear relationship between categorical predictors and its outcome variable.