Dice rolls. (3.6, p. 92) If you roll a pair of fair dice, what is the probability of
This is impossible, as all values on a fair die are integers. The probability of a sum of 1 is 0.
There are 6 x 6 = 36 possibilities for the sum of two independent rolls. There are 4 outcomes which result in a sum of 5. The probability is 1/9.
Only one combination will result in a sum of 12. The probability is 1/36.
Poverty and language. (3.8, p. 93) The American Community Survey is an ongoing survey that provides data every year to give communities the current information they need to plan investments and services. The 2010 American Community Survey estimates that 14.6% of Americans live below the poverty line, 20.7% speak a language other than English (foreign language) at home, and 4.2% fall into both categories.
No. They are not mutually exclusive, a person can do both.
library(VennDiagram)
## Loading required package: grid
## Loading required package: futile.logger
grid.newpage()
draw.pairwise.venn(area1 = 0.146,
area2 = 0.207,
cross.area = 0.042,
fill = c("blue", "red"),
category = c("Poor", "Foreign"))
P_poor <- 0.146
P_foreign <- 0.207
P_foreignAndPoor <- 0.042
P_anglophoneAndPoor <- P_poor - P_foreignAndPoor
P_anglophoneAndPoor
## [1] 0.104
P_foreignOrPoor <- P_poor + P_foreign - P_foreignAndPoor
P_foreignOrPoor
## [1] 0.311
P_notPoorAndAnglophone <- (1 - P_poor) * (1 - P_foreign)
P_notPoorAndAnglophone
## [1] 0.677222
Since the majority of Americans appear to live above the poverty line and speak only English at home, these do not appear to be independent variables.
Assortative mating. (3.18, p. 111) Assortative mating is a nonrandom mating pattern where individuals with similar genotypes and/or phenotypes mate with one another more frequently than what would be expected under a random mating pattern. Researchers studying this topic collected data on eye colors of 204 Scandinavian men and their female partners. The table below summarizes the results. For simplicity, we only include heterosexual relationships in this exercise.
(78 + 23 + 13 + 19 + 11) / 204 = 0.7058824
78 / 114 = 0.6842105
19 / 54 = 0.3518519 11 / 36 = 0.3055556
The counts of respondents with same-colored eyes are clearly larger than any individual other combinations. Partners’ eye colors do not appear to be independent.
Books on a bookshelf. (3.26, p. 114) The table below shows the distribution of books on a bookcase based on whether they are nonfiction or fiction and hardcover or paperback.
(28/95) * (59/94) = 0.1849944
((59/95) * (28/94)) + ((13/95) * (27/94)) = 0.2243001
(72/95) * (28/95) = 0.2233795
Since there are nearly a hundred books on the shelf, replacing or not replacing for a single trial doesn’t affect the probability too much. If there were 4 consecutive pulls without replacement, the answers would diverge more against 4 pulls with replacement.
Baggage fees. (3.34, p. 124) An airline charges the following baggage fees: $25 for the first bag and $35 for the second. Suppose 54% of passengers have no checked luggage, 34% have one piece of checked luggage and 12% have two pieces. We suppose a negligible portion of people check more than two bags.
probability <- c(0.54, 0.34, 0.12)
price <- c(0, 25, 60)
mu <- sum(price * probability)
dev <- sd(price * probability)
mu
## [1] 15.7
dev
## [1] 4.578573
passengers <- 120
noquote(c("expected revenue:", mu * passengers))
## [1] expected revenue: 1884
noquote(c("standard deviation:", dev * passengers))
## [1] standard deviation: 549.428794294584
noquote("example simulation")
## [1] example simulation
set.seed(69420)
sum(sample(price, size = passengers,
prob = probability, replace = TRUE))
## [1] 2070
Income and gender. (3.38, p. 128) The relative frequency table below displays the distribution of annual total personal income (in 2009 inflation-adjusted dollars) for a representative sample of 96,420,486 Americans. These data come from the American Community Survey for 2005-2009. This sample is comprised of 59% males and 41% females.
The distribution is almost normal, with a fat right tail.
resident makes less than $50,000 per year?
P(less than 50k) = 62.2%
Note any assumptions you make.
Assuming these figures apply evenly to male and female participants:
P(female and less than 50k) = 0.25502 0.622 * 0.41 = 25.502%
P(less than 50k | female) = 0.718
ExpectedP(less than 50k | female) = P(female and less than 50k) / P(female) = 0.622
Of course our assumption is incorrect……