| Variable | Overall, N = 951 | request, N = 521 | response, N = 51 | routine, N = 381 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHA Accepted | ||||
| accepted | 55 (58%) | 34 (65%) | 4 (80%) | 17 (45%) |
| not accepted | 40 (42%) | 18 (35%) | 1 (20%) | 21 (55%) |
| Year | ||||
| 2019 | 21 (22%) | 10 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (29%) |
| 2014 | 15 (16%) | 8 (15%) | 1 (20%) | 6 (16%) |
| 2015 | 15 (16%) | 7 (13%) | 1 (20%) | 7 (18%) |
| 2016 | 15 (16%) | 8 (15%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (18%) |
| 2017 | 15 (16%) | 11 (21%) | 1 (20%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| 2018 | 14 (15%) | 8 (15%) | 2 (40%) | 4 (11%) |
| Quarter | ||||
| 3 | 28 (29%) | 13 (25%) | 1 (20%) | 14 (37%) |
| 4 | 26 (27%) | 11 (21%) | 2 (40%) | 13 (34%) |
| 1 | 25 (26%) | 13 (25%) | 2 (40%) | 10 (26%) |
| 2 | 16 (17%) | 15 (29%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Recipient | ||||
| KY | 10 (11%) | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (20%) | 7 (18%) |
| WI | 9 (9.5%) | 6 (12%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| MA | 8 (8.4%) | 7 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| UT | 7 (7.4%) | 6 (12%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| NYC | 6 (6.3%) | 4 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| NYS | 6 (6.3%) | 3 (5.8%) | 1 (20%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| FL | 5 (5.3%) | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (20%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| NJ | 5 (5.3%) | 4 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| CA | 4 (4.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (11%) |
| ME | 4 (4.2%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| MN | 4 (4.2%) | 3 (5.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| WA | 4 (4.2%) | 3 (5.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| CO | 3 (3.2%) | 2 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| MD | 3 (3.2%) | 2 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| MO | 3 (3.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| NH | 3 (3.2%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| CT | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (0%) |
| IA | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| LA | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| NM | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| OR | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| RI | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| SC | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| UH | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| VT | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (0%) |
| Problem category | ||||
| Data or information gap | 40 (42%) | 14 (27%) | 2 (40%) | 24 (63%) |
| Need for technical expertise | 24 (25%) | 18 (35%) | 1 (20%) | 5 (13%) |
| Potential disease cluster/increased rates | 11 (12%) | 9 (17%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Potential exposure | 11 (12%) | 6 (12%) | 1 (20%) | 4 (11%) |
| Potential association between health and exposure | 9 (9.5%) | 5 (9.6%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (11%) |
| Primary EH topic | ||||
| Multiple | 18 (19%) | 7 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (29%) |
| Lead poisoning | 11 (12%) | 7 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (11%) |
| Cancer | 9 (9.5%) | 9 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Air Quality | 7 (7.4%) | 6 (12%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (0%) |
| Radon | 7 (7.4%) | 4 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| Asthma | 4 (4.2%) | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Biomonitoring | 4 (4.2%) | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Community drinking water | 4 (4.2%) | 4 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Carbon monoxide poisoning | 3 (3.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (20%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Community characteristics | 3 (3.2%) | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Heat Stress Illness | 3 (3.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| Populations and Vulnerabilities | 3 (3.2%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Climate change | 2 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Drought | 2 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Immunization | 2 (2.1%) | 2 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Private well water | 2 (2.1%) | 2 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Toxic Substance Releases | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Vector-Borne Disease | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| ALS | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Community design | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Hazardous waste site | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Lyme Disease | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Obesity | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Pesticide Exposures | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Reproductive and Birth Outcomes | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Secondary EH topic | ||||
| Community drinking water | 2 (33%) | 2 (40%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) |
| COPD | 1 (17%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) |
| Life Expectancy | 1 (17%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) |
| Populations and Vulnerabilities | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (NA%) | 1 (100%) |
| Traffic | 1 (17%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (0%) |
| Tertiary EH topic | ||||
| Comminuty characteristics | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (NA%) |
| Noise Pollution | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 0 (NA%) | 0 (NA%) |
| Tracking data and tools leveraged | 76 (80%) | 43 (83%) | 4 (80%) | 29 (76%) |
| Tracking role: active or passive | ||||
| Active | 80 (84%) | 44 (85%) | 5 (100%) | 31 (82%) |
| Passive | 15 (16%) | 8 (15%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (18%) |
| Tracking role | ||||
| Provided expertise or recommendations | 36 (38%) | 21 (40%) | 3 (60%) | 12 (32%) |
| Enhanced surveillance | 32 (34%) | 19 (37%) | 1 (20%) | 12 (32%) |
| Provided training, outreach, or education | 12 (13%) | 2 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (26%) |
| Analyzed data | 11 (12%) | 9 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Conducted an investigation | 4 (4.2%) | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (20%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Output reported | 84 (88%) | 47 (90%) | 5 (100%) | 32 (84%) |
| Output category | ||||
| Additional data | 26 (31%) | 19 (40%) | 1 (20%) | 6 (19%) |
| Tool | 17 (20%) | 9 (19%) | 1 (20%) | 7 (22%) |
| Report | 12 (14%) | 8 (17%) | 2 (40%) | 2 (6.2%) |
| Communication material | 10 (12%) | 3 (6.4%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (22%) |
| Resource | 10 (12%) | 7 (15%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (9.4%) |
| Training | 4 (4.8%) | 1 (2.1%) | 1 (20%) | 2 (6.2%) |
| Presentation | 3 (3.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (9.4%) |
| Recommendation | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.1%) |
| Web exposure | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.1%) |
| Output led to action | 59 (72%) | 33 (73%) | 5 (100%) | 21 (66%) |
| Action actor | ||||
| Other actor | 65 (68%) | 39 (75%) | 4 (80%) | 22 (58%) |
| Tracking | 21 (22%) | 8 (15%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (34%) |
| Both | 9 (9.5%) | 5 (9.6%) | 1 (20%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| Other actors | ||||
| State Goverment | 37 (45%) | 22 (46%) | 2 (40%) | 13 (45%) |
| Local Government | 19 (23%) | 12 (25%) | 2 (40%) | 5 (17%) |
| Community Members | 8 (9.8%) | 6 (12%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (6.9%) |
| NGO or Non-profit | 5 (6.1%) | 3 (6.2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (6.9%) |
| Academic Institution | 4 (4.9%) | 2 (4.2%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (3.4%) |
| Multiple | 3 (3.7%) | 2 (4.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.4%) |
| Federal Government | 2 (2.4%) | 1 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.4%) |
| Unclear | 2 (2.4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (6.9%) |
| Media | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.4%) |
| Private company | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.4%) |
| Action category | ||||
| Developed training, outreach campaign, or educational materials | 25 (26%) | 9 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 16 (42%) |
| Improved data quality and access | 23 (24%) | 13 (25%) | 1 (20%) | 9 (24%) |
| Improved or informed public health program or intervention | 13 (14%) | 9 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (11%) |
| Provided information in response to concern | 13 (14%) | 11 (21%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Informed impact assessment or city planning | 10 (11%) | 4 (7.7%) | 1 (20%) | 5 (13%) |
| Identified potential source of exposure | 6 (6.3%) | 4 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Inform new policy, legislation, or regulation | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (0%) |
| Issued health alerts and advisories | 2 (2.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.6%) |
| Implemented intervention to prevent exposures | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (20%) | 0 (0%) |
| Impact evidence | ||||
| Not yet | 58 (61%) | 32 (62%) | 4 (80%) | 22 (58%) |
| No | 28 (29%) | 15 (29%) | 1 (20%) | 12 (32%) |
| Yes | 9 (9.5%) | 5 (9.6%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (11%) |
|
1
n (%)
|
||||