It is the Milestone Report for the Coursera Data Science Capstone project. In this capstone, we will be applying data science in the area of natural language processing. The project is sponsored by SwiftKey.
This milestone report describes the exploratory data analysis of the Capstone Dataset.
The following tasks has been performed for this report.
# Preload necessary R librabires
library(dplyr)
##
## Attaching package: 'dplyr'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter, lag
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
##
## intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
library(doParallel)
## Loading required package: foreach
## Loading required package: iterators
## Loading required package: parallel
library(stringi)
library(SnowballC)
library(tm)
## Loading required package: NLP
library(ggplot2)
##
## Attaching package: 'ggplot2'
## The following object is masked from 'package:NLP':
##
## annotate
The data is from HC Corpora with access to 4 languages, but only English will be used. The dataset has three files includes en_US.blogs.txt, en_US.news.txt, and en_US.twitter.txt. The data loaded from Coursera Link to local machine and will be read from local disk.
if(!file.exists("Coursera-SwiftKey.zip")) {
download.file("https://d396qusza40orc.cloudfront.net/dsscapstone/dataset/Coursera-SwiftKey.zip", "Coursera-SwiftKey.zip")
unzip("Coursera-SwiftKey.zip")
}
con <- file("final/en_US/en_US.blogs.txt","r")
blogs <- readLines(con)
close(con)
con <- file("final/en_US/en_US.news.txt","rb")
news <- readLines(con)
close(con)
con <- file("final/en_US/en_US.twitter.txt","r")
twitter <- readLines(con, skipNul = TRUE)
close(con)
Calculate some summary stats for each file: Size in Megabytes, number of entries (rows), total characters and length of longest entry.
# Get file sizes
blogs_size <- file.info("final/en_US/en_US.blogs.txt")$size / 1024 ^ 2
news_size <- file.info("final/en_US/en_US.news.txt")$size / 1024 ^ 2
twitter_size <- file.info("final/en_US/en_US.twitter.txt")$size / 1024 ^ 2
pop_summary <- data.frame('File' = c("Blogs","News","Twitter"),
"FileSizeinMB" = c(blogs_size, news_size, twitter_size),
'NumberofLines' = sapply(list(blogs, news, twitter), function(x){length(x)}),
'TotalCharacters' = sapply(list(blogs, news, twitter), function(x){sum(nchar(x))}),
TotalWords = sapply(list(blogs,news,twitter),stri_stats_latex)[4,],
'MaxCharacters' = sapply(list(blogs, news, twitter), function(x){max(unlist(lapply(x, function(y) nchar(y))))})
)
pop_summary
## File FileSizeinMB NumberofLines TotalCharacters TotalWords MaxCharacters
## 1 Blogs 200.4242 899288 208361438 37746231 40835
## 2 News 196.2775 1010242 203791405 34623841 11384
## 3 Twitter 159.3641 2360148 162385035 30556566 213
This dataset is fairly large. We emphasize that you don’t necessarily need to load the entire dataset in to build your algorithms. At least initially, you might want to use a smaller subset of the data.
To build models you don’t need to load in and use all of the data. Often relatively few randomly selected rows or chunks need to be included to get an accurate approximation to results that would be obtained using all the data.
Since the data are so big (see above Population summary table) we are only going to proceed with a subset (e,g, 5% of each file) as running the calculations using the big files will be really slow.. Then we are going to clean the data and convert to a corpus.
set.seed(2020)
# Remove all non english characters as they cause issues
blogs <- iconv(blogs, "latin1", "ASCII", sub="")
news <- iconv(news, "latin1", "ASCII", sub="")
twitter <- iconv(twitter, "latin1", "ASCII", sub="")
# Set sample percentage
percent <- 0.05
# Binomial sampling of the data and create the relevant files
samp_blogs <- blogs[as.logical(rbinom(length(blogs),1,percent))]
samp_news <- news[as.logical(rbinom(length(news),1,percent))]
samp_twitter <- twitter[as.logical(rbinom(length(twitter),1,percent))]
samp_data <- c(samp_blogs,samp_news,samp_twitter)
# remove temporary variables
rm(blogs, news, twitter, samp_blogs, samp_news, samp_twitter)
The final selected text data needs to be cleaned to be used in the word prediction model.
The data can be cleaned using techniues such as removing whitespaces, numbers, URLs, punctuations and profanity etc.
sample_data <- VCorpus(VectorSource(samp_data)) # load the data as a corpus
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, content_transformer(tolower))
# Removing Profanity Words using one of the available dictionaries of 1384 words.
profanity_words = readLines("http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~biglou/resources/bad-words.txt")
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data,removeWords, profanity_words)
# Replacing special chars with space
toSpace <- content_transformer(function(x, pattern) gsub(pattern, " ", x))
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, toSpace, "(f|ht)tp(s?)://(.*)[.][a-z]+")
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, toSpace, "@[^\\s]+")
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, tolower) # convert to lowercase
#sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, removeWords, stopwords("en"))#remove english stop words
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, removePunctuation) # remove punctuation
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, removeNumbers) # remove numbers
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, stripWhitespace) # remove extra whitespaces
#sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, stemDocument) # initiate stemming
sample_data <- tm_map(sample_data, PlainTextDocument)
sample_corpus <- data.frame(text=unlist(sapply(sample_data,'[',"content")),stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
head(sample_corpus)
## text
## 1 the one thing that was astounding though was the support from the marshals they were all phenomenal for being out in the rain for so long and remaining so cheery and supportive they were an amazing bunch owing to the nature of the course and very few closed roads meant that supporters who knew the area were able to skip around the course and a few people were seen about or times which was also super
## 2 the anc had earlier approached the south gauteng high court to grant us leave to appeal its earlier ruling that the singing of the freedom song was unconstitutional and fitted the of incitement
## 3 i have it on good authority that everyone in this company particularly the strikers recieved gifts in the companyorganised secret santa i also know that the strikers attended the companyfunded xmas party where they partook in the companyfunded luncheon they also recieved vouchers to the value of k from the company as xmas gifts
## 4 and i very much doubt if it will end there because of all the foregoing factors and the immediate crisis murdoch faces bskybs movers know that he must do this dealor wind up in very bad shape as a business there may also come a point at which bskyb find murdoch himself simply too toxic to have as a buyer anyway
## 5 im sad you cant be with us but we know youll be watching i dont know if you ever got to eat at longhorn or not but i hear they cook a really mean steak
## 6 len woodbyrne joe oreilly development at francis street dublin central dublin has a range of apartments on offer
Now the corpus sample_data has cleaned data. We need to format this cleaned data in to a fromat which is most useful for NLP. The format is N-grams stored in Term Document Matrices or Document Term Matrix. we use a Document Term Matrix (DTM) representation: documents as the rows, terms/words as the columns, frequency of the term in the document as the entries. Because the number of unique words in the corpus the dimension can be large. Ngram models are created to explore word frequences. We can use RWeka package to create unigrams, bigrams, and trigrams.
review_dtm <- DocumentTermMatrix(sample_data)
review_dtm
## <<DocumentTermMatrix (documents: 213068, terms: 140393)>>
## Non-/sparse entries: 3402264/29909853460
## Sparsity : 100%
## Maximal term length: 94
## Weighting : term frequency (tf)
Unigram Analysis shows that which words are the most frequent and what their frequency is. Unigram is based on individual words.
unigrams <- DocumentTermMatrix(sample_data, control = list(tokenize = "words"))
Bigram Analysis shows that which words are the most frequent and what their frequency is. Bigram is based on two word combinations.
BigramTokenizer <- function(x) {
unlist(lapply(ngrams(words(x), 2), paste, collapse = " "), use.names = FALSE)
}
bigrams <- DocumentTermMatrix(sample_data, control = list(tokenize = BigramTokenizer))
Trigram Analysis shows that which words are the most frequent and what their frequency is. Trigram is based on three word combinations.
trigramTokenizer <- function(x) {
unlist(lapply(ngrams(words(x), 3), paste, collapse = " "), use.names = FALSE)
}
trigrams <- DocumentTermMatrix(sample_data, control = list(tokenize = trigramTokenizer))
Quadgram Analysis shows that which words are the most frequent and what their frequency is. Quadgram is based on four word combinations.
quadgramTokenizer <- function(x) {
unlist(lapply(ngrams(words(x), 4), paste, collapse = " "), use.names = FALSE)
}
quadgrams <- DocumentTermMatrix(sample_data, control = list(tokenize = quadgramTokenizer))
Now we can perform exploratory analysis on the tidy data. For each Term Document Matrix, we list the most common unigrams, bigrams, trigrams and fourgrams. It would be interesting and helpful to find the most frequently occurring words in the data.
unigrams_frequency <- sort(colSums(as.matrix(removeSparseTerms(unigrams, 0.99))),decreasing = TRUE)
unigrams_freq_df <- data.frame(word = names(unigrams_frequency), frequency = unigrams_frequency)
head(unigrams_freq_df, 10)
## word frequency
## the the 237452
## and and 119657
## for for 54524
## that that 51856
## you you 46562
## with with 35747
## was was 31165
## this this 27012
## have have 26675
## are are 24743
unigrams_freq_df %>%
filter(frequency > 10000) %>%
ggplot(aes(reorder(word,-frequency), frequency)) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity") +
ggtitle("Unigrams with frequencies > 10000") +
xlab("Unigrams") + ylab("Frequency") +
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45, hjust = 1))
bigrams_frequency <- sort(colSums(as.matrix(removeSparseTerms(bigrams, 0.995))),decreasing = TRUE)
bigrams_freq_df <- data.frame(word = names(bigrams_frequency), frequency = bigrams_frequency)
head(bigrams_freq_df, 10)
## word frequency
## of the of the 21650
## in the in the 20492
## to the to the 10803
## for the for the 9994
## on the on the 9908
## to be to be 8219
## at the at the 7094
## and the and the 6241
## in a in a 5907
## with the with the 5263
Here, create generic function to plot the top 30 frequences for Bigrams and Trigrams.
hist_plot <- function(data, label) {
ggplot(data[1:30,], aes(reorder(word, -frequency), frequency)) +
labs(x = label, y = "Frequency") +
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 60, size = 12, hjust = 1)) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity", fill = I("grey50"))
}
hist_plot(bigrams_freq_df, "30 Most Common Bigrams")
trigrams_frequency <- sort(colSums(as.matrix(removeSparseTerms(trigrams, 0.999))),decreasing = TRUE)
trigrams_freq_df <- data.frame(word = names(trigrams_frequency), frequency = trigrams_frequency)
head(trigrams_freq_df, 10)
## word frequency
## one of the one of the 1737
## a lot of a lot of 1399
## thanks for the thanks for the 1180
## to be a to be a 896
## going to be going to be 873
## out of the out of the 771
## the end of the end of 767
## i want to i want to 730
## be able to be able to 682
## it was a it was a 669
hist_plot(trigrams_freq_df, "30 Most Common Trigrams")
quadgrams_frequency <- sort(colSums(as.matrix(removeSparseTerms(quadgrams, 0.9997))),decreasing = TRUE)
quadgrams_freq_df <- data.frame(word = names(quadgrams_frequency), frequency = quadgrams_frequency)
head(quadgrams_freq_df, 10)
## word frequency
## the end of the the end of the 406
## at the end of at the end of 332
## the rest of the the rest of the 327
## for the first time for the first time 305
## thanks for the follow thanks for the follow 291
## at the same time at the same time 279
## one of the most one of the most 230
## is going to be is going to be 220
## to be able to to be able to 203
## when it comes to when it comes to 203
hist_plot(quadgrams_freq_df, "30 Most Common Quadgrams")
It concludes the exploratory analysis. As a further step a model will be created and integrated into a Shiny app for word prediction.
The corpus has been converted to N-grams stored in Document Term Matrix (DTM) and then converted to data frames of frequencies. This format should be useful for predicting the next word in a sequence of words. For example, when looking at a string of 3 words the most likely next word can be guessed by investigating all 4-grams starting with these three words and chosing the most frequent one.
For the Shiny applicaiton, the plan is to create an application with a simple interface where the user can enter a string of text. Our prediction model will then give a list of suggested words to update the next word.