The probability can be expressed as probability of red, plus the probability of blue marbles. \[ \frac{54}{54+9+75}+\frac{75}{54+9+75} \]
(p1<-round( (54/(54+9+75))+(75/(54+9+75)),2))
## [1] 0.93
this is simply the number of yellow golf balls over the total
\[ \frac{20}{19+20+24+17} \]
(p2<-round(20/(19+20+24+17),2))
## [1] 0.25
Converting table into dataframe:
library(knitr)
Housing <- c("Apartment","Dorm","With Parent(s)","Sorority/Fraternity House","Other")
Males <- c(81,116,215,130,129)
Females <- c(228,79,252,97,72)
df <- data.frame(Housing,Males,Females)
colnames(df) <- c("Housing Type","Males","Females")
kable(df,full_width = F,caption = "Gender and Residence of Customers")
| Housing Type | Males | Females |
|---|---|---|
| Apartment | 81 | 228 |
| Dorm | 116 | 79 |
| With Parent(s) | 215 | 252 |
| Sorority/Fraternity House | 130 | 97 |
| Other | 129 | 72 |
What is the probability that a customer is not male or does not live with parents? Write your answer as a fraction or a decimal number rounded to four decimal places.
we can take our two probabilities, we have to make sure that the intersection of the probabilities are accounted for so we are not double counting. in this case, for probability that they will not live with parents, we will not double count the 252 for females. this probability is going to include every part of the table except males who live with parents (215/total)
\[ 1 - \frac{215}{1399} \]
sum=81+116+215+130+129+228+79+252+97+72
round(1-215/1399, 2)
## [1] 0.85
The following events are dependent. People frequently go to the gym to do cardio and exercise in order to lose weight
choose(8,3) * choose(7,3) * choose(3,1)
## [1] 5880
These events are independent.
7)The newly elected president needs to decide the remaining 8 spots available in the cabinet he/she is appointing. If there are 14 eligible candidates for these positions (where rank matters), how many different ways can the members of the cabinet be appointed?
We can compute this via the following function
permutations <- function(n,k)
{
choose(n,k) * factorial(k)
}
permutations(14, 8)
## [1] 121080960
p8_n<-choose(9,0)*choose(4,1)*choose(9,3)
p8_k<-choose((9+4+9),4)
p8<-p8_n/p8_k
round(p8, 4)
## [1] 0.0459
factorial(11)/factorial(7)
## [1] 7920
\[ \frac{11!}{7!}=\frac{11\cdot10\cdot9\cdot8\cdot7!}{7!}=11\cdot10\cdot9\cdot8=7920 \]
33% of subscribers are not over the age of 34
w <- pbinom(3, size=4, prob=0.5) - pbinom(2, size=4, prob=0.5)
l <- 1 - w
w1<-w*97
l1<-l*30
4*0.5^4*(97) + (1+4+6+1)* 0.5^4 * (-30)
## [1] 1.75
Step 2. If you played this game 559 times how much would you expect to win or lose? (Losses must be entered as negative.)
round(559*(w1-l1), 2)
## [1] 978.25
(9*2*7+3*4*7+9*4+9+1)*0.5^9*(23-26)
## [1] -1.5
Step 2. If you played this game 994 times how much would you expect to win or lose? (Losses must be entered as negative.)
994 * (-1.5)
## [1] -1491
prob_Liar <- 0.2
prob_Truth <- 0.8
senstivity <- 0.59
specificity <- 0.90
prob_detect_liar <- 0.59 * prob_Liar
prob_detect_truth <- 0.90 * prob_Truth
prob_false_detect_liar <- (1-0.59)*prob_Liar
prob_false_detect_truth <- (1-0.9)*prob_Truth
prob_detect_liar /(prob_detect_liar + prob_false_detect_truth)
## [1] 0.5959596
prob_detect_truth / (prob_detect_truth + prob_false_detect_liar)
## [1] 0.8977556
We should consider use of inclusion exclusion formula
\[ P(liar\bigcup { detect\_ liar)=P(liar)+P(detect\_ liar)-P(liar\bigcap { detect\_ liar)}} \\ =0.2+0.59-0.118\\ =0.672 \]