#1 Distribution of LOCATION OF PRIMARY ASSIGNMENT

Table showing distribution LOCATION OF PRIMARY ASSIGNMENT of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
RURAL 99 51
URBAN 93 48
NA 2 1

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 51% were deployed to RURAL, 48% were deployed to URBAN, while 1% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution LOCATION OF PRIMARY ASSIGNMENT of Corp Members

#2 Distribution of IN WHICH SECTOR

Table showing distribution IN WHICH SECTOR of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
EDUCATION 129 66
HEALTH 20 10
AGRICULTURE 3 2
INFRASTRUCTURE 30 15
NA 12 6

Table and Figure below shows that 66% were deployed to EDUCATION sectors, 10% were deployed to HEALTH sectors, 2% were deployed to AGRICULTURE sectors, 15% were deployed to INFRASTRUCTURE sectors , while 6% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution IN WHICH SECTOR of Corp Members

#3 Distribution of NATURE OF PLACEMENT

Table showing distribution LOCATION OF PRIMARY ASSIGNMENT of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
PUBLIC 87 45
PRIVATE 106 55
NA 1 1

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 45% were deployed to PUBLIC sectors, 55% were deployed to PRIVATE sectors, while 1% of respondents did not respond to the question.

#4 Distribution of HOW RELEVANT WAS THE FIELD OF STUDY

Table showing distribution HOW RELEVANT WAS THE FIELD OF STUDY of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
RELEVANT 172 89
NOT RELEVANT 20 10
NA 2 1

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 89% were deployed to RELEVANT sectors, 10% were deployed to NOT RELEVANT sectors, while 1% of respondents did not respond to the question.

#5 Distribution of ASSESSMENT OF ATTITUDE OF PERMANENT STAFF

Table showing distribution ASSESSMENT OF ATTITUDE OF PERMANENT STAFF of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY CORDIAL 107 55
CORDIAL 76 39
UNFRIENDLY 7 4
NA 4 2

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 55% were deployed to VERY CORDIAL sectors, 39% were deployed to CORDIAL sectors, 4% were deployed to UNFRIENDLY sectors while NA% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution ASSESSMENT OF ATTITUDE OF PERMANENT STAFF of Corp Members

#6 Distribution of DEGREE OF JOB SATISFACTION

Table showing distribution ASSESSMENT OF ATTITUDE OF PERMANENT STAFF of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY HIGH 60 31
HIGH 118 61
LOW 15 8
NA 1 1

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 31% were deployed to VERY HIGH sectors, 61% were deployed to HIGH sectors, 8% were deployed to LOW sectors while 1% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution DEGREE OF JOB SATISFACTION of Corp Members

#7 Distribution of WERE YOU GIVEN ACCOMMODATION

Table showing distribution WERE YOU GIVEN ACCOMMODATION of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
ACCOMODATED BY EMPLOYER 31 16
RENTED ACCOMMODATION 92 47
STAYED WITH A RELATION/ FRIEND 67 35
CORPERS LODGE 1 1
STAYED IN MCAN/NCCF/NACC LODGE 3 2
NA 0 0

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 16% were deployed to ACCOMODATED BY EMPLOYER sectors, 47% were deployed to RENTED ACCOMMODATION sectors, 35% were deployed to STAYED WITH A RELATION/ FRIEND sectors, 1% were deployed to CORPERS LODGE sectors, 2% were deployed to STAYED IN MCAN/NCCF/NACC LODGE sectors, while 0% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution WERE YOU GIVEN ACCOMMODATION of Corp Members

#8 Distribution of HOW EFFECTIVE WAS YOUR CDS GROUP

Table showing distribution HOW EFFECTIVE WAS YOUR CDS GROUP of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 96 49
EFFECTIVE 82 42
NOT EFFECTIVE 5 3
NA 11 6

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 49% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 42% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 3% were deployed to NOT EFFECTIVE sectors, while 6% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW EFFECTIVE WAS YOUR CDS GROUP of Corp Members

#9 Distribution of ASSESSMENT OF INTERACTION BETWEEN GROUP MEMBERS TOWARDS THE CDS PROGRAMS

Table showing distribution ASSESSMENT OF INTERACTION BETWEEN GROUP MEMBERS TOWARDS THE CDS PROGRAMS of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY CORDIAL 85 44
CORDIAL 95 49
UNFRIENDLY 2 1
NA 12 6

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 44% were deployed to VERY CORDIAL sectors, 49% were deployed to CORDIAL sectors, 1% were deployed to UNFRIENDLY sectors, while 6% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution ASSESSMENT OF INTERACTION BETWEEN GROUP MEMBERS TOWARDS THE CDS PROGRAMS of Corp Members

#10 Distribution of HOW SUPPORTIVE WAS THE HOST COMMUNITY TO THE PROJECT

Table showing distribution HOW SUPPORTIVE WAS THE HOST COMMUNITY TO THE PROJECT of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
SUPPORTIVE 74 38
INDIFFERENT 32 16
NOT SUPPORTIVE 18 9
NA 70 36

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 38% were deployed to SUPPORTIVE sectors, 16% were deployed to INDIFFERENT sectors, 9% were deployed to NOT SUPPORTIVE sectors, while 36% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW SUPPORTIVE WAS THE HOST COMMUNITY TO THE PROJECT of Corp Members

#11 Distribution of DO YOU INTEND TO SUSTAIN THE SKILL(S) ACQUIRED

Table showing distribution DO YOU INTEND TO SUSTAIN THE SKILL(S) ACQUIRED of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
YES 109 56
NO 25 13
NA 60 31

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 56% were deployed to YES sectors, 13% were deployed to NO sectors, while 31% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution DO YOU INTEND TO SUSTAIN THE SKILL(S) ACQUIRED of Corp Members

#12 Distribution of DID YOU HAVE ACCESS TO ANY FINANCIAL SUPPORT

Table showing distribution DID YOU HAVE ACCESS TO ANY FINANCIAL SUPPORT of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
YES 15 8
NO 121 62
21 1 1
NA 57 29

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 8% were deployed to YES sectors, 62% were deployed to NO sectors, while 1% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution DID YOU HAVE ACCESS TO ANY FINANCIAL SUPPORT of Corp Members

#13 Distribution of OPINION ABOUT NYSC SCHEME BEFORE MOBILISATION FOR NATIONAL SERVICE

Table showing distribution OPINION ABOUT NYSC SCHEME BEFORE MOBILISATION FOR NATIONAL SERVICE of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
RELEVANT TO NATION BUILDING 165 85
NOT RELEVANT TO NATIONAL BUILDING 21 11
NA 8 4

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 85% were deployed to RELEVANT TO NATION BUILDING sectors, 11% were deployed to NOT RELEVANT TO NATIONAL BUILDING sectors, while 4% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution OPINION ABOUT NYSC SCHEME BEFORE MOBILISATION FOR NATIONAL SERVICE of Corp Members

#14 Distribution of OPINION CHANGE FROM PARTICIPATION IN NYSC

Table showing distribution OPINION CHANGE FROM PARTICIPATION IN NYSC of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
YES 55 28
NO 130 67
NA 9 5

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 28% were deployed to YES sectors, 67% were deployed to NO sectors, while 5% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution OPINION CHANGE FROM PARTICIPATION IN NYSC of Corp Members

#15 Assessment of Selected NYSC objectives In this series only certain selected Objectives will be assessed amoung Corp members.

##15.1 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS DISCIPLINE AMONG CORPS MEMBERS

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS DISCIPLINE AMONG CORPS MEMBERS of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 90 46
EFFECTIVE 91 47
INEFFECTIVE 5 3
VERY INEFFECTIVE 1 1
NA 7 4

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 46% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 47% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 3% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 1% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 4% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS DISCIPLINE AMONG CORPS MEMBERS of Corp Members

##15.2 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS PATRIOTISM

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS PATRIOTISM of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 84 43
EFFECTIVE 93 48
INEFFECTIVE 5 3
VERY INEFFECTIVE 1 1
NA 11 6

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 43% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 48% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 3% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 1% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 6% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS PATRIOTISM of Corp Members

##15.3 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS THE ADAPTABILITY

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS THE ADAPTABILITY of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 83 43
EFFECTIVE 91 47
INEFFECTIVE 6 3
VERY INEFFECTIVE 0 0
NA 14 7

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 43% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 47% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 3% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 0% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 7% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS THE ADAPTABILITY of Corp Members

##15.4 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS TEAM SPIRIT

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS TEAM SPIRIT of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 92 47
EFFECTIVE 84 43
INEFFECTIVE 6 3
VERY INEFFECTIVE 1 1
NA 11 6

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 47% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 43% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 3% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 1% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 6% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS TEAM SPIRIT of Corp Members

##15.5 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS THE INTEGRATION

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS THE INTEGRATION of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 79 41
EFFECTIVE 94 48
INEFFECTIVE 3 2
VERY INEFFECTIVE 1 1
NA 17 9

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 41% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 48% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 2% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 1% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 9% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS THE INTEGRATION of Corp Members

##15.6 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS NATIONAL GROWTH

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS NATIONAL GROWTH of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 70 36
EFFECTIVE 93 48
INEFFECTIVE 12 6
VERY INEFFECTIVE 6 3
NA 13 7

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 36% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 48% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 6% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 3% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 7% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS NATIONAL GROWTH of Corp Members

##15.7 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS SELF RELIANCE

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS SELF RELIANCE of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 95 49
EFFECTIVE 74 38
INEFFECTIVE 5 3
VERY INEFFECTIVE 4 2
NA 16 8

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 49% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 38% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 3% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 2% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 8% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS SELF RELIANCE of Corp Members

##15.8 Distribution of HOW WILL YOU ASSESS NATIONAL UNITY

Table showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS NATIONAL UNITY of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
VERY EFFECTIVE 100 52
EFFECTIVE 71 37
INEFFECTIVE 10 5
VERY INEFFECTIVE 3 2
NA 10 5

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 52% were deployed to VERY EFFECTIVE sectors, 37% were deployed to EFFECTIVE sectors, 5% were deployed to INEFFECTIVE sectors, 2% were deployed to VERY INEFFECTIVE sectors, while 5% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution HOW WILL YOU ASSESS NATIONAL UNITY of Corp Members

#16 Distribution of ARE YOU WILLING TO STAY BACK IN YOUR STATE OFDEPLOYMENT

Table showing distribution ARE YOU WILLING TO STAY BACK IN YOUR STATE OFDEPLOYMENT of Corp Members

Frequency & Percentage
Frequency Percentage (%)
YES 62 32
NO 116 60
NA 16 8

The coressponding Table and Chart indicatess that 32% were deployed to YES sectors, 60% were deployed to NO sectors, while 8% of respondents did not respond to the question.

Charts showing distribution ARE YOU WILLING TO STAY BACK IN YOUR STATE OFDEPLOYMENT of Corp Members