y<-c(8.8,12.4,14.8,18.2,20.8)
X<-c(5.6,6.3,7,7.7,8.4)
model1<-lm(y~X)
summary(model1)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = y ~ X)
##
## Residuals:
## 1 2 3 4 5
## -0.24 0.38 -0.20 0.22 -0.16
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) -14.8000 1.0365 -14.28 0.000744 ***
## X 4.2571 0.1466 29.04 8.97e-05 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 0.3246 on 3 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.9965, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9953
## F-statistic: 843.1 on 1 and 3 DF, p-value: 8.971e-05
plot(X,y)
abline(model1, col='red')
The equation of the regression line (rounded to the nearest hundredth) is:
y = 4.26 - 14.8X
\[ f(x,y) = 24x - 6xy^2 - 8y^3 \] Calculate the first and second derivatives with respect to x, y and both x and y.
$$ f_{x} = 24 - 6y^2 \ f_{y} = -12xy - 24y^2 \ f_{xx} = 0 \ f_{yy} = -12x - 48y \ f_{xy} = -12y \ f_{yx} = -12y \
$$ The critical points are obtained by setting the first partial derivatives to 0
\[ f_{x} = 24 - 6y^2 = 0 \\ 6y^2 = 24\\ Therefore\,y=+2\, or\, y=-2 \] Substituting this in the other first order partial derivative equation we get: when y = +2 \[ f_{y} = -12xy - 24y^2 = 0 \\ -24x=96\\ x=-4 \] when y = -2 \[ f_{y} = -12xy - 24y^2 = 0 \\ 24x=96\\ x=4 \] Therefore the critical points are (-4,2) and (4,-2) Plugging these values back into the function gives us the following:
multif<-function(x,y) {
24*x - 6*x*y^2 - 8*y^3
}
(w<-multif(-4,2))
## [1] -64
(v<-multif(4,-2))
## [1] 64
In order to apply the second derivative test, calculate the discriminant as follows: \[ D = f_{xx}f_{yy}-f^2_{xy}\\ =0-(-12y)^2\\ =-144y^2 \] Since y = 2 or -2, y^2 = 4 Therefore the discriminant D<=0, which indicates that all the critical points are saddle points. So the local maxima, minima and saddle points of this function are: (-4,2,-64) and (4,-2, 64)
Revenue = Price x Quantity Therefore, the revenue function R(x,y) = x(81-21x+17y) + y(40+11x-23y) \[ 81x-21x^2+17xy+40y+11xy-23y^2 \\ = -21x^2+81x+28xy-23y^2+40y \]
Substituting the price of the 2 brands in the revenue function, we get:
rev<-function(x,y){
-21*x^2+81*x+28*x*y-23*y^2+40*y
}
revenue<-rev(2.3,4.1)
revenue
## [1] 116.62
The total revenue for R(2.3,4.1) is $116.62
Expressing the cost function of the product based on quantities produced in the 2 factories and the fixed number of total units across the 2 factories, we get:
\[ C(x,y)=1/6x^2 + 1/6y^2 + 7x + 25y + 700 \\ x+y=96 \] Using Lagrange multipliers, we set the gradients of the 2 functions above as an equation below:
\[ \nabla f(x,y) = \lambda \nabla g(x,y) \] This gives the following:
\[f_{x}(x,y)= \lambda g_{x}(x,y) \]
\[ f_{y}(x,y)= \lambda g_{y}(x,y) \] Setting the constraint function as follows: \[ g(x,y)=0 \] We get: \[ x+y-96=0 \] Taking the partial derivative of the cost function with respect to x, we get \[C_{x}= \lambda g_{x} \\ 1/3x+7 = \lambda \]
Taking the partial derivative of the cost function with respect to y, we get \[C_{y}= \lambda g_{y} \\ 1/3y+25 = \lambda \]
\[ 1/3x+7 = 1/3y+25 \\ x = 3*(1/3y+18) = y+54 \] Substituting in the constraint function, we get
\[ y + 54 + y - 96 = 0 \\ 2y = 42 \\ y = 21 \\ x = 21 + 54 = 75 \] Therefore to minimize the weekly cost, the company must produce 75 units in it’s LA plant and 21 units in its Denver plant.
$$ _{R} (e^{(8x+3y)}dA ; R: 2 x 4, and, 2 y 4
$$ Separating the double integral into 2 separate integrals in x and y, we get:
\[ \int e^{8x}dx \int e^{3y}dy \\ = (|1/8e^{8x}|_{x=2}^{4})\,(|1/3e^{3y}|_{y=2}^{4}) \\ = 1/8(e^{32}-e^{16}).1/3(e^{12}-e^{6}) \\ = 1/24(e^{32}-e^{16})(e^{12}-e^{6}) \]