Screening and Validation: Sargasso Sea Case Study
Screening and Validation: Sargasso Sea Case Study
Screening and Validation: Sargasso Sea Case Study
Laurence Kell & Brian Luckhurst 4th May 2020
Review the progress on developing an Ecosystem Report Card for ICCAT including the development of status and pressure indicators and reference levels
- Review adequacy of existing indicators against proposed new ones, and progress on the development of methods for screening and validation
- Review development of case studies and ecoregions
Sargasso Sea Case Study
Validation of indicators for assessed and unassessed stocks
Link to habitat
Extend to Endangered, Threatened and Protected Species
Risk Base Approaches
Risk is an uncertainty that matters, what matters are management objectives.
- Risk based approaches, e.g.
- NAFO: objective driven, depends on the identification of ecosystem-based management units
- takes an hierarchical approach to addresses the effects of the ecosystem plus fishing on the target stocks by defining sustainable harvest rates by sequentially considering i) sustainability at the ecosystem, ii) multispecies and iii) stock.
- Australia: Ecological Risk Assessment takes an hierarchical approach that depends on the level of data and knowledge
- ICES stocks are assigned a category depending on quality of data available, i.e. from
- Full quantitative assessment,
- Trends based on CPUE
- Length Based Indicators (LBIs)
- NAFO: objective driven, depends on the identification of ecosystem-based management units
Unassessed Stocks
- A variety of data poor methods are available i.e.
- Catch Only
- Length Based Indicators
- Productivity Susceptibility Analysis
- Test using data rich stocks
Catch Only Methods
Kell, L.T., and Sharma, R., 2021. AN EVALUATION OF DATA POOR APPROACHES FOR THE EVALUATION OF STOCK STATUS IN LARGE ECOSYSTEMS USING ONLY LANDINGS DATA.xxxx. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(x), pp.xx-xxx.
Kell, L.T., Sharma, R., and Winker, H., 2021. EVALUATION OF DATA POOR APPROACHES FOR EVALUATING STOCK STATUS AND TRENDS: CROSS TESTING USING INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(x), pp.xx-xxx.
Kell, L.T., Sharma, R., and Winker, H., 2021. EVALUATION OF DATA POOR APPROACHES FOR EVALUATING STOCK STATUS AND TRENDS: SELF TESTING USING BIOMASS BASED ASSESSMENT MODELS. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(x), pp.vxx-xxx.
Summary
To validate data poor methods, estimates from data rich stock assessments were used to siumulate scenarios related to different level of information and knowledge.
- Methods tested were i) Catch Only Methods (COMs) based on biomass dynamics; ii) Length Based Indicators (LBIs); and iii) life history characteristucs to estimate Productivity (\(r\)) as used in Productivity and Susceptibility Analysis (PSA).
- The data rich datasets used were i) https://www.ramlegacy.org; ii) ICCAT Jabba assessments; and iii) ICCAT Stock Synthesis assessments.
- Although the RAM database provides a large sample of stocks with different characteristics the results can be difficult to interpret as the details vary, e.g. the assumptions used when fitting for values of difficult to estinate parameters and how data conflicts are addressed.
- Therefore the COM analysis was repeated for the ICCAT assessments using a self-test and a cross-test.
- Evaluation depends on how the estimates could be used in management advice, i.e. to estimate current stock status relative to reference points, or trends.
- COMs performed poorly, both when depletion was know or priors based on life histories were provided. This was particularly true if only a short time series of ctach was available
Self Test
Operating Model was based on JABBA assessments, i.e. where the assumptoins used in fitting corresponded to the method tested
Cross Test
Operating Model was based on an integrated age/length based assessment (SS3)
Length Based Indicators
Kell, L.T., and Sharma, R., 2021. NON-STATIONARITY IN PRODUCTIVITY. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(x), pp.xx-xxx.
DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES BASED ON LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS, …
Summary
ICES have proposed a variety of Length Based Indicators (LBIs) in data poor situtations
- Time series are constructed from length frequencies distributions, i.e. means, modes and upper and lower percentiles; and then
- Compared to a variety of reference levels based on life history characteristics
- Used as proxy \(MSY\) reference points or indicators of overfishing
- Used the length compositions from SS3 to generate time series and
- Life history parameters from FishBase to estimate reference levels
- Performance was variable both across fleets and between indicator type, therefore in data poor cases it will be inporartant to devlop screening methods for indicators and to indentify the Value of improved sampling.
- The results also indicate that the length compositions used in the ICCAT assessments are infomation poor and often in conflict. More effort should go into developing appropriate diagnostics (e.g. Carvalho et al.)
Fishing Mortality relative to \(F_{MSY}\)
Length Base Indicators: Mean Length and \(L_{opt}\)
Proxy for \(MSY\)
Length Based Indicators \(25^{th}\): Percentile and \(L_{mat}\)
Proxy for growth overfishng
Length Based Indicators: Blue Marlin
Productivity; population growth rate (\(r\))
Used in Ecological Risk Analysis (ERA) for data pootr stocks as part of Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA), or to derive priors for both data rich and data poor assessments.
Kell, L.T., Taylor, N., and Palma C., 2021. VALIDATION OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS FOR DATA LIMITED STOCKS. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(x), pp.xx-xxx. Length Based Indicators
Summary
Take \(F_{MSY}\) (or \(H_{MSY}\) based on harvest rate) from data rich stocks as the “best” estimatre of productivity and then compare to life history parameters and estimates of \(r\) based upon them.
- Although there are correlations between \(H_{MSY}\) and life history parameters and the estimates of $r, it is poor
- Ranking species on the basis of their productivity is robust for identifying stocks with low productivity
- As productivity increases the relationship between \(H_{MSY}\) and life history parameters becomes less clear
- Therefore although it appears that life history parameters can be used to identify the stocks with low productivity, it is more difficult to derive priors for data rich assessments.
Ranking
Identifcation of the least productive stocks is robust
Habitat
Arrizabalaga, H., Dufour, F., Kell, L., Merino, G., Ibaibarriaga, L., Chust, G., Irigoien, X., Santiago, J., Murua, H., Fraile, I. and Chifflet, M., 2015. Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 113, pp.102-112.
Summary
Look at variability in habitat for main tuna stocks, this integrates a variety of factors both related to environment and impacts of fishing, it also provides an indicator that is easy to interpret and can be used to compare between regions, time periods and stocks.
- The changes in Sargasso Sea habitat has been the same as in the N Atlantic
- Albacore habitat has declined, but is fairly stable now
- Swordfish habitat appears to be the mirror image of Albacore, i.e. has increased
- Both tropical spp habitat has increased
- Bluefin appears to vary with not trend
- Whilst Skipjack habitat shows no clear trend but appears to be more variable
Indicators
Non-stationarity
Kell,L.T., Sharma,R., Winker, H., Kitakado4,T., and Mosqueira,I. 2021. NON-STATIONARITY IN PRODUCTIVITY OF TROPICAL TUNA AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM BASED FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap.
Summary
- In age-structured models density dependence is mainly accounted for by the stock recruitment relationship. Cury et al. (2014), however, showed that in most cases the stock-recruitment relationship used to estimate productivity and determine reference points, has poor estimation/predictive power and the environmental has a larger effect on productivity
- In ICCAT assessments growth, maturation and natural mortality are assumed not to have varied despite the large changes in the environment and stock biomass seen, indicators for such demographic processes should be developed.
- The presence of clockwise cycling in surplus production in the tuna assessments is due to recruitment anomalies, this implies that future catches are driven by incoming year classes possibly due to environmental drivers rather than a production function.
- This has consequences for management based on target and limit reference points, since it follows that future biomass trends can not be predicted from current biomass based on setting total allowable catches.
- Management Strategy Evaluations for data rich stocks should also take into account such processes (see Sharma et al.,) and MSE could be used to develop indicators for data poor stocks.
Tropical Tunas
Surplus Production
\(B_t+1\) = \(B_t\) - \(C_t\) + \(SP\)
Process Error
\(B_t+1\) = \(B_t\) - \(C_t\) + \(SP\)
Yellowfin and Indian Ocean Dipole
Sargasso Sea Case Study
ICCAT has recently amended its Convention (PLE_108/2019) to include, inter alia, that the Commission and its Members, in conducting work under this Convention, shall act to:
- apply the precautionary approach and an ecosystem approach to fisheries management in accordance with relevant internationally agreed standards and, as appropriate, recommended practices and procedures;
- use the best scientific evidence available;
- protect biodiversity in the marine environment;
Summary
Conduct an Ecosystem Diagnostic Analysis (EDA) and then develop a Strategic Action Plan (SAP) for the Sargasso Sea.
This will be done in collaboration with ICCAT, but also others in the region and globablly, i.e. FAO, the other tuna RFMOs, NAFO, ICES, WECAFC and others.
Tasks
- Indicators for assessed and unassessed stocks
- Link to habitat
Extend to Endangered, Threatened and Protected Species
- How to improve our ability to integrate observations made by different platforms covering different spatial extents at different grain sizes?
- EAFM requires documenting and identifying factors that determine the distribution, abundance, movement, demographics, physical or genetic characteristics, behaviour of ecosystem components.
A need to develop and enhance observational and model-based techniques that will allow the use cross-scale information to advance our understanding of the Atlantic ecosystem and how it changes over time.
Scale
Remote Sensing
Fishing
Eff Dis
```
AIS data
What if?
You could integrate satellite ocean data for a range of environmental parameters, animal telemetry data for various species from IMOS, IOOS-ATN RFMOs and fisheries catch/effort data by species, and AIS
Summary
- Data sources
- Take a systemic approach
- Risk based approaches, i.e.
- Define objectives
- Evaluate how uncertainty impacts on achieving objectives
Challenge
- How to improve our ability to integrate observations made by different platforms covering different spatial extents at different grain sizes?
- A need to develop and enhance observational and model-based techniques that will allow the use cross-scale information to advance our understanding of the Atlantic ecosystem and how it changes over time.
- This requires documenting and identifying factors that determine the distribution, abundance, movement, demographics, physical or genetic characteristics, behaviour of ecosystem components.
Conclusions
- Need for data
- Need for data
- Need for data, …
- Need to analyse existing datasets to see if they are fit for purpose
- Identify data gaps and knowledge needs
- Integration of data sets
- Validation, i.e. through simulation and cross validation
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Sargasso Sea Commission (SSC)