Re-analysis settings

## [1] "Subsetting only the designs with a control group set to 1."
## [1] "Subsetting only experiential designs set to 1."

RMA for mixed reappraisal

Reproducing the RMA for mixed reappraisal

## 
## Random-Effects Model (k = 6; tau^2 estimator: REML)
## 
## tau^2 (estimated amount of total heterogeneity): 0.4493 (SE = 0.3573)
## tau (square root of estimated tau^2 value):      0.6703
## I^2 (total heterogeneity / total variability):   81.36%
## H^2 (total variability / sampling variability):  5.36
## 
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 5) = 28.2877, p-val < .0001
## 
## Model Results:
## 
## estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub 
##   0.8800  0.3071  2.8652  0.0042  0.2780  1.4820  ** 
## 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Meta-analysis and bias correction

For reappraise emotional response, reappraise emotional stimulus, and reappraise via perspective taking, respectively

## Warning in weightfunct(d, v, steps = c(0.025, 0.5, 1), mods = NULL, weights
## = NULL, : At least one of the p-value intervals contains three or fewer
## effect sizes, which may lead to estimation problems. Consider re-specifying
## the cutpoints.

## Warning in weightfunct(d, v, steps = c(0.025, 0.5, 1), mods = NULL, weights
## = NULL, : At least one of the p-value intervals contains three or fewer
## effect sizes, which may lead to estimation problems. Consider re-specifying
## the cutpoints.
## $`reappraise emotional response`
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`RMA results`
## 
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 24; method: REML)
## 
## Variance Components:
## 
##             estim    sqrt  nlvls  fixed  factor 
## sigma^2    0.1071  0.3272     21     no   study 
## 
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 23) = 65.7706, p-val < .0001
## 
## Model Results:
## 
## estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub 
##   0.2973  0.0893  3.3311  0.0009  0.1224  0.4723  *** 
## 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Prediction interval`
## 95% PI LB 95% PI UB 
##    -0.367     0.962 
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$Heterogeneity
##        Tau        I^2 
##  0.3272405 66.8054767 
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`p-curve`
##                mean
## fullp   0.002910926
## fullp33 0.927888568
## halfp   0.013503131
## halfp33 0.999167646
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Proportion of significant results`
## [1] 0.2083333
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM ES estimate`
## [1] 0.5346
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM confidence interval`
## [1] 0.0646 1.0045
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM p-value`
## [1] 0.0258
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`$`Whether PET or PEESE was used`
## [1] "PEESE"
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE ES estimate`
## [1] 0.103
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE confidence interval`
## [1] -0.559  0.765
## 
## $`reappraise emotional response`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE p-value`
## pval 
## 0.76 
## 
## 
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`RMA results`
## 
## Random-Effects Model (k = 14; tau^2 estimator: REML)
## 
## tau^2 (estimated amount of total heterogeneity): 0.0386 (SE = 0.0380)
## tau (square root of estimated tau^2 value):      0.1965
## I^2 (total heterogeneity / total variability):   40.25%
## H^2 (total variability / sampling variability):  1.67
## 
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 13) = 21.4423, p-val = 0.0646
## 
## Model Results:
## 
## estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub 
##   0.2494  0.0842  2.9621  0.0031  0.0844  0.4144  ** 
## 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Prediction interval`
## 95% PI LB 95% PI UB 
##    -0.170     0.668 
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$Heterogeneity
## Tau I^2 
##   0   0 
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`p-curve`
##                mean
## fullp   0.003170873
## fullp33 0.913058582
## halfp   0.025634283
## halfp33 0.989144455
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Proportion of significant results`
## [1] 0.2142857
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM ES estimate`
## [1] 0.0981
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM confidence interval`
## [1] -0.3892  0.5855
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM p-value`
## [1] 0.6931
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`$`Whether PET or PEESE was used`
## [1] "PET"
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE ES estimate`
## [1] 0.408
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE confidence interval`
## [1] -0.402  1.218
## 
## $`reappraise emotional stimulus`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE p-value`
##  pval 
## 0.323 
## 
## 
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`RMA results`
## 
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 25; method: REML)
## 
## Variance Components:
## 
##             estim    sqrt  nlvls  fixed  factor 
## sigma^2    0.1217  0.3488     21     no   study 
## 
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 24) = 71.0501, p-val < .0001
## 
## Model Results:
## 
## estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub 
##   0.4862  0.0924  5.2617  <.0001  0.3051  0.6673  *** 
## 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Prediction interval`
## 95% PI LB 95% PI UB 
##    -0.221     1.193 
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$Heterogeneity
##        Tau        I^2 
##  0.3487946 67.9723015 
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`p-curve`
##                   mean
## fullp   0.000001476615
## fullp33 0.983276594570
## halfp   0.000510865738
## halfp33 0.999992827766
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Proportion of significant results`
## [1] 0.56
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM ES estimate`
## [1] -0.0073
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM confidence interval`
## [1] -0.7055  0.6909
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`$`4PSM p-value`
## [1] 1.0163
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`$`Whether PET or PEESE was used`
## [1] "PET"
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE ES estimate`
## [1] -0.182
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE confidence interval`
## [1] -1.032  0.667
## 
## $`reappraise via perspective taking`$`Publication bias`$`PET-PEESE p-value`
##  pval 
## 0.674

Funnel plots

Funnel plots for reappraise emotional response, reappraise emotional stimulus, and reappraise via perspective taking, respectively