Results
Summary Demographic Table
Table 1 . summary Distribution of all variables
| label | levels | all |
|---|---|---|
| AGE_FATHER | Mean (SD) | 36.3 (6.4) |
| EDUCATION | Mean (SD) | 4.8 (1.5) |
| AGE_MOTHER | Mean (SD) | 36.5 (4.4) |
| AGE_CHILD | Mean (SD) | 8.5 (2.0) |
| GENDER_CHILD | 1 | 11 (14.1) |
| 2 | 67 (85.9) | |
| CHILD_GRADE | 0 | 3 (3.8) |
| 1 | 65 (83.3) | |
| 2 | 10 (12.8) | |
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | Mean (SD) | 2.3 (1.0) |
| CPQ_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 70.0 (13.9) |
| PSS_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 63.2 (3.7) |
| PSDQ_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 47.0 (18.0) |
| CBCL_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 87.7 (17.1) |
| RELIGION | HINDU | 66 (84.6) |
| MUSLIM | 12 (15.4) | |
| SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | LOW | 38 (48.7) |
| MIDDLE | 23 (29.5) | |
| HIGH | 17 (21.8) |
SUMMARY TABLE BY PARENTING STYLE
| label | levels | AUTHORITARIAN | AUTHORITATIVE | PERMISSIVE | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGE_FATHER | Mean (SD) | 36.9 (6.2) | 38.3 (5.9) | 34.8 (6.5) | 0.171 |
| EDUCATION | Mean (SD) | 5.0 (1.3) | 4.7 (1.7) | 4.7 (1.5) | 0.826 |
| AGE_MOTHER | Mean (SD) | 37.1 (4.4) | 37.3 (4.9) | 35.6 (4.1) | 0.450 |
| AGE_CHILD | Mean (SD) | 8.0 (2.1) | 9.4 (2.2) | 8.4 (1.8) | 0.119 |
| GENDER_CHILD | 1 | 7 (25.9) | 1 (5.6) | 3 (9.1) | 0.087 |
| 2 | 20 (74.1) | 17 (94.4) | 30 (90.9) | ||
| CHILD_GRADE | 0 | 2 (7.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.0) | 0.163 |
| 1 | 22 (81.5) | 13 (72.2) | 30 (90.9) | ||
| 2 | 3 (11.1) | 5 (27.8) | 2 (6.1) | ||
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | Mean (SD) | 2.3 (1.1) | 2.3 (1.0) | 2.3 (1.1) | 0.993 |
| CPQ_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 78.2 (11.9) | 58.7 (15.6) | 69.5 (9.4) | <0.001 |
| PSS_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 62.9 (4.0) | 63.0 (3.3) | 63.5 (3.7) | 0.879 |
| PSDQ_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 48.2 (16.7) | 66.2 (12.6) | 35.5 (11.1) | <0.001 |
| CBCL_TOTAL | Mean (SD) | 92.9 (16.0) | 78.7 (15.3) | 88.3 (17.3) | 0.013 |
| RELIGION | HINDU | 19 (70.4) | 16 (88.9) | 31 (93.9) | 0.036 |
| MUSLIM | 8 (29.6) | 2 (11.1) | 2 (6.1) | ||
| SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | LOW | 16 (59.3) | 5 (27.8) | 17 (51.5) | <0.001 |
| MIDDLE | 9 (33.3) | 2 (11.1) | 12 (36.4) | ||
| HIGH | 2 (7.4) | 11 (61.1) | 4 (12.1) |
ASSOCIATION OF PARENT’s EDUCATION WITH ADHD SYMPTOMS
The scatter plots above show relationship between PARENT EDUCATION on X axis and CPQ_TOTAL on Y axis. Graphically, we see that as EDUCATION increases, CPQ_TOTAL also increases . On a formal statistical linear regression analysis, we that line of best fit (blue line signifying line with least square difference) also has a positive slope implying a positive correlation. The gray shaded error around blue line signifies 95% confidence interval of linear regression line of best fit. The correlation between two variables is Non-Significant . The Pearson’s correlation between EDUCATION and CPQ_TOTAL is 0.15 with 95% Confidence Interval of -0.08 to 0.36. the t statistic is 1.32 The p value is 0.19 .The degree of freedom is 76. In formal statistical notation this expressed as t(76)= 1.32, P= 0.19. r(Pearson) = 0.15 95% C.I. [-0.08-0.36]. n= 78. The correlation is summmarised in table below
Table Summarizing correlation between EDUCATION and CPQ TOTAL
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Degree of Freedom | T statistic | Correlation | 95 % C.I. | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDUCATION | CPQ_TOTAL | 76 | 1.32 | 0.15 | -0.08-0.36 | 0.19 |
ASSOCIATION of SES with ADHD
In this Figure we see Box plot of CPQ_TOTAL in 3 sub-groups of SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS : LOW,MIDDLE and HIGH respectively .The individual jittered data points of CPQ_TOTAL are overlaid over transparent Boxplot for better visualisation. We see distribution of data in individual sub-groups of SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS based on these box-plots. The lower edge of box plot represents -first quartile (Q1), Horizontal bar represents the median, Upper edge represnts third quartile (Q3), Two black lines (whiskers) emanating from box-plots signify range of non-outlier data for the particular sub-group. Lower whisker represents minimum(Q1- 1.5 interquartile range) non-outlier limit of CPQ_TOTAL and upper whisker represnts maximum(Q1+1.5interquartile range) of CPQ_TOTAL .Any data beyond whiskers of box-plots represents outliers in the sub-groups The big brown point in the box-plots represents mean CPQ_TOTAL of 3 groups and it has been annotated in the figure itself Summary Statistics of the groups is presented in table below
SUMMARY Table OF CPQ TOTAL WITH SES
| Group | n | Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | 38 | 77.842 | 10.757 | 78.5 | 58 | 97 |
| MIDDLE | 23 | 69.391 | 10.076 | 66.0 | 55 | 88 |
| HIGH | 17 | 53.235 | 8.445 | 52.0 | 41 | 72 |
ONE-way ANOVA
We find that One-way ANOVA was significant for Group effect of SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS on CPQ_TOTAL. In statistical notation it is expressed as F(2,75)=<0.01. The Effect size(Omega -Squared) of this One-way ANOVA test was 0.482 .RELIGION WITH PARENTING STYLE
The Dodged bar chart above represents individual counts representing frequency of RELIGION categories MUSLIM and HINDU in categories AUTHORITARIAN,AUTHORITATIVE and PERMISSIVE belonging to group PARENTING_STYLE. HINDUs has highest percentage 19/27 ( 70.37 % ) in group AUTHORITARIAN group . HINDUs also have highest percentage 16/18 ( 88.89 % ) AUTHORITATIVE group . HINDU religion also has highest percentage 31/33 ( 93.94 % ) in group PERMISSIVE To formally check for association between groups we performed pearson chi-square test .
we found a Significant association between RELIGION and PARENTING_STYLE. The chi-square statistic was 6.67 . The degree of freedom was 2 and P value was 0.04 .Contingency and Proportion table are shown below
| PARENTING_STYLE | RELIGION | n | value | 95 % Confidence Interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHORITARIAN | HINDU | 19 | 19/27 ( 70.37 %) | 51.75% - 84.88% |
| AUTHORITARIAN | MUSLIM | 8 | 8/27 ( 29.63 %) | 15.12% - 48.25% |
| AUTHORITATIVE | HINDU | 16 | 16/18 ( 88.89 %) | 68.88% - 97.62% |
| AUTHORITATIVE | MUSLIM | 2 | 2/18 ( 11.11 %) | 2.38% - 31.12% |
| PERMISSIVE | HINDU | 31 | 31/33 ( 93.94 %) | 81.95% - 98.72% |
| PERMISSIVE | MUSLIM | 2 | 2/33 ( 6.06 %) | 1.28% - 18.05% |
| AUTHORITARIAN | AUTHORITATIVE | PERMISSIVE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HINDU | 19 | 16 | 31 |
| MUSLIM | 8 | 2 | 2 |
RELIGION WITH SYMPTOMS
The mean CPQ TOTAL in HINDUS [ 69.15 ± 13.52 ] was non-significantly lower than MUSLIMS [ 74.58 ± 15.36 ] . The mean difference was -5.43 and 95 % confidence interval of the difference was ( -15.57 - 4.71 ) . The p value was 0.27 . The t statistic was -1.15 and degree of freedom of the Welch unpaired two-sample t test was 14.27 .In Formal statistical notation this result is expressed as : t(14.27) = -1.15, p= 0.27.
| Group | n | Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HINDU | 66 | 69.152 | 13.522 | 67.5 | 41 | 97 |
| MUSLIM | 12 | 74.583 | 15.359 | 77.5 | 47 | 96 |
PARENT’S EDUCATION , PARENTING STYLE
In this Figure we see Box plot of EDUCATION in 3 sub-groups of PARENTING_STYLE : AUTHORITARIAN,AUTHORITATIVE and PERMISSIVE respectively .The individual jittered data points of EDUCATION are overlaid over transparent Boxplot for better visualisation. We see distribution of data in individual sub-groups of PARENTING_STYLE based on these box-plots. The lower edge of box plot represents -first quartile (Q1), Horizontal bar represents the median, Upper edge represnts third quartile (Q3), Two black lines (whiskers) emanating from box-plots signify range of non-outlier data for the particular sub-group. Lower whisker represents minimum(Q1- 1.5 interquartile range) non-outlier limit of EDUCATION and upper whisker represnts maximum(Q1+1.5interquartile range) of EDUCATION .Any data beyond whiskers of box-plots represents outliers in the sub-groups The big brown point in the box-plots represents mean EDUCATION of 3 groups and it has been annotated in the figure itself Summary Statistics of the groups is presented in table below
SUMMARY Table OF EDUCATION WITH PARENTING STYLE
| Group | n | Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHORITARIAN | 27 | 4.963 | 1.255 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| AUTHORITATIVE | 18 | 4.722 | 1.674 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| PERMISSIVE | 33 | 4.727 | 1.547 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
ONE-way ANOVA
We find that One-way ANOVA was non-significant for Group effect of PARENTING_STYLE on EDUCATION. In statistical notation it is expressed as F(2,75)=0.8. The Effect size(Omega -Squared) of this One-way ANOVA test was 0.006 .
SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS WITH PARENTING STYLE
The Dodged bar chart above represents individual counts representing frequency of SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS categories LOW,MIDDLE and HIGH in categories AUTHORITARIAN,AUTHORITATIVE and PERMISSIVE belonging to group PARENTING_STYLE. Subgroup LOW has highest percentage 16/27 ( 59.26 % ) in group AUTHORITARIAN . Subgroup HIGH has highest percentage 11/18 ( 61.11 % ) in group AUTHORITATIVE . Subgroup LOW has highest percentage 17/33 ( 51.52 % ) in group PERMISSIVE . To formally check for association between groups we performed pearson chi-square test .
we found a Significant association between SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS and PARENTING_STYLE. The chi-square statistic was 21.76 . The degree of freedom was 4 and P value was <0.001 .Contingency and Proportion table are shown below
| PARENTING_STYLE | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | n | value | 95 % Confidence Interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHORITARIAN | LOW | 16 | 16/27 ( 59.26 %) | 40.57% - 76.08% |
| AUTHORITARIAN | MIDDLE | 9 | 9/27 ( 33.33 %) | 17.95% - 52.09% |
| AUTHORITARIAN | HIGH | 2 | 2/27 ( 7.41 %) | 1.57% - 21.7% |
| AUTHORITATIVE | LOW | 5 | 5/18 ( 27.78 %) | 11.48% - 50.6% |
| AUTHORITATIVE | MIDDLE | 2 | 2/18 ( 11.11 %) | 2.38% - 31.12% |
| AUTHORITATIVE | HIGH | 11 | 11/18 ( 61.11 %) | 38.34% - 80.62% |
| PERMISSIVE | LOW | 17 | 17/33 ( 51.52 %) | 34.94% - 67.84% |
| PERMISSIVE | MIDDLE | 12 | 12/33 ( 36.36 %) | 21.65% - 53.36% |
| PERMISSIVE | HIGH | 4 | 4/33 ( 12.12 %) | 4.23% - 26.29% |
| AUTHORITARIAN | AUTHORITATIVE | PERMISSIVE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | 16 | 5 | 17 |
| MIDDLE | 9 | 2 | 12 |
| HIGH | 2 | 11 | 4 |
ASSOCIATION of SES with PARENTAL STRESS
In this Figure we see Box plot of PSS_TOTAL in 3 sub-groups of SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS : LOW,MIDDLE and HIGH respectively .The individual jittered data points of PSS_TOTAL are overlaid over transparent Boxplot for better visualisation. We see distribution of data in individual sub-groups of SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS based on these box-plots. The lower edge of box plot represents -first quartile (Q1), Horizontal bar represents the median, Upper edge represnts third quartile (Q3), Two black lines (whiskers) emanating from box-plots signify range of non-outlier data for the particular sub-group. Lower whisker represents minimum(Q1- 1.5 interquartile range) non-outlier limit of PSS_TOTAL and upper whisker represnts maximum(Q1+1.5interquartile range) of PSS_TOTAL .Any data beyond whiskers of box-plots represents outliers in the sub-groups The big brown point in the box-plots represents mean PSS_TOTAL of 3 groups and it has been annotated in the figure itself Summary Statistics of the groups is presented in table below
SUMMARY Table OF PSS TOTAL WITH SES
| Group | n | Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | 38 | 63.579 | 3.438 | 63 | 57 | 70 |
| MIDDLE | 23 | 63.087 | 4.209 | 63 | 54 | 70 |
| HIGH | 17 | 62.412 | 3.501 | 63 | 56 | 68 |
ONE-way ANOVA
We find that One-way ANOVA was non-significant for Group effect of SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS on PSS_TOTAL. In statistical notation it is expressed as F(2,75)=0.55. The Effect size(Omega -Squared) of this One-way ANOVA test was 0.016 .ASSOCIATION of PARENTING STYLE with PARENTAL STRESS
In this Figure we see Box plot of PSS_TOTAL in 3 sub-groups of PARENTING_STYLE : AUTHORITARIAN,AUTHORITATIVE and PERMISSIVE respectively .The individual jittered data points of PSS_TOTAL are overlaid over transparent Boxplot for better visualisation. We see distribution of data in individual sub-groups of PARENTING_STYLE based on these box-plots. The lower edge of box plot represents -first quartile (Q1), Horizontal bar represents the median, Upper edge represnts third quartile (Q3), Two black lines (whiskers) emanating from box-plots signify range of non-outlier data for the particular sub-group. Lower whisker represents minimum(Q1- 1.5 interquartile range) non-outlier limit of PSS_TOTAL and upper whisker represnts maximum(Q1+1.5interquartile range) of PSS_TOTAL .Any data beyond whiskers of box-plots represents outliers in the sub-groups The big brown point in the box-plots represents mean PSS_TOTAL of 3 groups and it has been annotated in the figure itself Summary Statistics of the groups is presented in table below
SUMMARY Table OF PSS TOTAL WITH SES
| Group | n | Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHORITARIAN | 27 | 62.926 | 3.951 | 63 | 54 | 70 |
| AUTHORITATIVE | 18 | 63.000 | 3.254 | 63 | 57 | 70 |
| PERMISSIVE | 33 | 63.485 | 3.743 | 63 | 56 | 70 |
ONE-way ANOVA
We find that One-way ANOVA was non-significant for Group effect of PARENTING_STYLE on PSS_TOTAL. In statistical notation it is expressed as F(2,75)=0.82. The Effect size(Omega -Squared) of this One-way ANOVA test was 0.005 .ASSOCIATION of PARENTING STYLE with ADHD SYMPTOMS
In this Figure we see Box plot of CPQ_TOTAL in 3 sub-groups of PARENTING_STYLE : AUTHORITARIAN,AUTHORITATIVE and PERMISSIVE respectively .The individual jittered data points of CPQ_TOTAL are overlaid over transparent Boxplot for better visualisation. We see distribution of data in individual sub-groups of PARENTING_STYLE based on these box-plots. The lower edge of box plot represents -first quartile (Q1), Horizontal bar represents the median, Upper edge represnts third quartile (Q3), Two black lines (whiskers) emanating from box-plots signify range of non-outlier data for the particular sub-group. Lower whisker represents minimum(Q1- 1.5 interquartile range) non-outlier limit of CPQ_TOTAL and upper whisker represnts maximum(Q1+1.5interquartile range) of CPQ_TOTAL .Any data beyond whiskers of box-plots represents outliers in the sub-groups The big brown point in the box-plots represents mean CPQ_TOTAL of 3 groups and it has been annotated in the figure itself Summary Statistics of the groups is presented in table below
SUMMARY Table OF PSS TOTAL WITH SES
| Group | n | Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHORITARIAN | 27 | 78.185 | 11.916 | 81.0 | 55 | 97 |
| AUTHORITATIVE | 18 | 58.667 | 15.624 | 54.5 | 41 | 94 |
| PERMISSIVE | 33 | 69.455 | 9.364 | 69.0 | 51 | 95 |
ONE-way ANOVA
We find that One-way ANOVA was significant for Group effect of PARENTING_STYLE on CPQ_TOTAL. In statistical notation it is expressed as F(2,75)=<0.01. The Effect size(Omega -Squared) of this One-way ANOVA test was 0.28 .ASSOCIATION OF PARENT’s PSS_TOTAL WITH ADHD SYMPTOMS
The scatter plots above show relationship between CPQ_TOTAL on X axis and PSS_TOTAL on Y axis. Graphically, we see that as CPQ_TOTAL increases, PSS_TOTAL also increases . On a formal statistical linear regression analysis, we that line of best fit (blue line signifying line with least square difference) also has a positive slope implying a positive correlation. The gray shaded error around blue line signifies 95% confidence interval of linear regression line of best fit. The correlation between two variables is Significant . The Pearson’s correlation between CPQ_TOTAL and PSS_TOTAL is 0.28 with 95% Confidence Interval of 0.06 to 0.47. the t statistic is 2.55 The p value is 0.01 .The degree of freedom is 76. In formal statistical notation this expressed as t(76)= 2.55, P= 0.01. r(Pearson) = 0.28 95% C.I. [0.06-0.47]. n= 78. The correlation is summmarised in table below
Table Summarizing correlation between PSS_TOTAL and CPQ TOTAL
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Degree of Freedom | T statistic | Correlation | 95 % C.I. | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSS_TOTAL | CPQ_TOTAL | 76 | 2.55 | 0.28 | 0.06-0.47 | 0.01 |
ASSOCIATION OF PARENT’s TOTAL_CHILDREN WITH ADHD SYMPTOMS
The scatter plots above show relationship between TOTAL_CHILDREN on X axis and CPQ_TOTAL on Y axis. Graphically, we see that as TOTAL_CHILDREN increases, CPQ_TOTAL also increases . On a formal statistical linear regression analysis, we that line of best fit (blue line signifying line with least square difference) also has a positive slope implying a positive correlation. The gray shaded error around blue line signifies 95% confidence interval of linear regression line of best fit. The correlation between two variables is Non-Significant . The Pearson’s correlation between TOTAL_CHILDREN and CPQ_TOTAL is 0.22 with 95% Confidence Interval of -0.01 to 0.42. the t statistic is 1.93 The p value is 0.06 .The degree of freedom is 76. In formal statistical notation this expressed as t(76)= 1.93, P= 0.06. r(Pearson) = 0.22 95% C.I. [-0.01-0.42]. n= 78. The correlation is summmarised in table below
Table Summarizing correlation between TOTAL_CHILDREN and CPQ TOTAL
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Degree of Freedom | T statistic | Correlation | 95 % C.I. | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | CPQ_TOTAL | 76 | 1.93 | 0.22 | -0.01-0.42 | 0.06 |
Correlation Matrix of all numeric variables
| Variable1 | Variable2 | Correlation | pvalue | significance | Confidence_Interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ_TOTAL | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | -0.68 | <0.001 | Significant | -0.79–0.54 |
| CBCL_TOTAL | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | -0.51 | <0.001 | Significant | -0.66–0.32 |
| CPQ_TOTAL | CBCL_TOTAL | 0.44 | <0.001 | Significant | 0.24-0.61 |
| GENDER_CHILD | CBCL_TOTAL | -0.42 | <0.001 | Significant | -0.58–0.21 |
| EDUCATION | CHILD_GRADE | 0.40 | <0.001 | Significant | 0.2-0.58 |
| GENDER_CHILD | CPQ_TOTAL | -0.40 | <0.001 | Significant | -0.57–0.2 |
| AGE_MOTHER | CHILD_GRADE | 0.39 | <0.001 | Significant | 0.19-0.57 |
| GENDER_CHILD | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | 0.33 | 0.00359 | Significant | 0.11-0.51 |
| AGE_CHILD | CPQ_TOTAL | -0.32 | 0.0039 | Significant | -0.51–0.11 |
| AGE_MOTHER | CPQ_TOTAL | 0.32 | 0.00405 | Significant | 0.11-0.51 |
| AGE_MOTHER | PSS_TOTAL | 0.30 | 0.00849 | Significant | 0.08-0.49 |
| AGE_CHILD | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | 0.29 | 0.0101 | Significant | 0.07-0.48 |
| EDUCATION | AGE_CHILD | 0.29 | 0.0106 | Significant | 0.07-0.48 |
| CPQ_TOTAL | PSS_TOTAL | 0.28 | 0.0126 | Significant | 0.06-0.47 |
| EDUCATION | TOTAL_CHILDREN | 0.27 | 0.0152 | Significant | 0.05-0.47 |
| AGE_CHILD | CBCL_TOTAL | -0.27 | 0.0178 | Significant | -0.46–0.05 |
| AGE_MOTHER | TOTAL_CHILDREN | 0.27 | 0.0187 | Significant | 0.05-0.46 |
| CHILD_GRADE | CBCL_TOTAL | -0.24 | 0.031 | Significant | -0.44–0.02 |
| AGE_FATHER | EDUCATION | 0.24 | 0.0326 | Significant | 0.02-0.44 |
| EDUCATION | AGE_MOTHER | 0.23 | 0.0415 | Significant | 0.01-0.43 |
| AGE_CHILD | PSDQ_TOTAL | 0.23 | 0.0456 | Significant | 0-0.43 |
| AGE_CHILD | GENDER_CHILD | 0.23 | 0.0459 | Significant | 0-0.43 |
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | CPQ_TOTAL | 0.22 | 0.0572 | Non-Significant | -0.01-0.42 |
| AGE_CHILD | CHILD_GRADE | 0.21 | 0.0599 | Non-Significant | -0.01-0.42 |
| EDUCATION | PSS_TOTAL | 0.21 | 0.0668 | Non-Significant | -0.01-0.41 |
| AGE_CHILD | PSS_TOTAL | -0.21 | 0.0682 | Non-Significant | -0.41-0.02 |
| CHILD_GRADE | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | 0.20 | 0.0828 | Non-Significant | -0.03-0.4 |
| CHILD_GRADE | PSDQ_TOTAL | 0.20 | 0.0846 | Non-Significant | -0.03-0.4 |
| AGE_FATHER | AGE_CHILD | 0.19 | 0.0901 | Non-Significant | -0.03-0.4 |
| AGE_FATHER | PSS_TOTAL | 0.16 | 0.167 | Non-Significant | -0.07-0.37 |
| AGE_FATHER | PSDQ_TOTAL | 0.16 | 0.172 | Non-Significant | -0.07-0.37 |
| AGE_MOTHER | PSDQ_TOTAL | 0.16 | 0.172 | Non-Significant | -0.07-0.37 |
| PSDQ_TOTAL | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | 0.15 | 0.177 | Non-Significant | -0.07-0.36 |
| CHILD_GRADE | TOTAL_CHILDREN | 0.15 | 0.181 | Non-Significant | -0.07-0.36 |
| EDUCATION | CPQ_TOTAL | 0.15 | 0.19 | Non-Significant | -0.08-0.36 |
| GENDER_CHILD | TOTAL_CHILDREN | -0.13 | 0.245 | Non-Significant | -0.35-0.09 |
| AGE_FATHER | CHILD_GRADE | 0.13 | 0.268 | Non-Significant | -0.1-0.34 |
| PSS_TOTAL | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | -0.12 | 0.277 | Non-Significant | -0.34-0.1 |
| AGE_MOTHER | AGE_CHILD | -0.12 | 0.286 | Non-Significant | -0.34-0.1 |
| CPQ_TOTAL | PSDQ_TOTAL | -0.12 | 0.315 | Non-Significant | -0.33-0.11 |
| AGE_FATHER | CBCL_TOTAL | -0.10 | 0.381 | Non-Significant | -0.32-0.12 |
| AGE_FATHER | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | 0.10 | 0.384 | Non-Significant | -0.13-0.32 |
| PSS_TOTAL | PSDQ_TOTAL | -0.10 | 0.393 | Non-Significant | -0.31-0.13 |
| EDUCATION | CBCL_TOTAL | -0.09 | 0.412 | Non-Significant | -0.31-0.13 |
| GENDER_CHILD | CHILD_GRADE | -0.09 | 0.415 | Non-Significant | -0.31-0.13 |
| EDUCATION | PSDQ_TOTAL | 0.09 | 0.427 | Non-Significant | -0.13-0.31 |
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | PSS_TOTAL | 0.09 | 0.429 | Non-Significant | -0.13-0.31 |
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | -0.09 | 0.433 | Non-Significant | -0.31-0.14 |
| AGE_MOTHER | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | -0.08 | 0.46 | Non-Significant | -0.3-0.14 |
| AGE_MOTHER | GENDER_CHILD | -0.08 | 0.498 | Non-Significant | -0.3-0.15 |
| GENDER_CHILD | PSDQ_TOTAL | -0.07 | 0.527 | Non-Significant | -0.29-0.15 |
| PSDQ_TOTAL | CBCL_TOTAL | -0.07 | 0.535 | Non-Significant | -0.29-0.15 |
| EDUCATION | GENDER_CHILD | -0.05 | 0.642 | Non-Significant | -0.27-0.17 |
| GENDER_CHILD | PSS_TOTAL | 0.04 | 0.727 | Non-Significant | -0.18-0.26 |
| AGE_FATHER | GENDER_CHILD | -0.03 | 0.771 | Non-Significant | -0.25-0.19 |
| CHILD_GRADE | PSS_TOTAL | 0.03 | 0.774 | Non-Significant | -0.19-0.25 |
| AGE_FATHER | TOTAL_CHILDREN | 0.03 | 0.783 | Non-Significant | -0.19-0.25 |
| PSS_TOTAL | CBCL_TOTAL | 0.03 | 0.802 | Non-Significant | -0.19-0.25 |
| EDUCATION | SOCIOECONOMIC_STATUS | 0.02 | 0.851 | Non-Significant | -0.2-0.24 |
| AGE_CHILD | TOTAL_CHILDREN | -0.02 | 0.895 | Non-Significant | -0.24-0.21 |
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | CBCL_TOTAL | -0.01 | 0.916 | Non-Significant | -0.23-0.21 |
| AGE_FATHER | CPQ_TOTAL | 0.01 | 0.942 | Non-Significant | -0.21-0.23 |
| AGE_MOTHER | CBCL_TOTAL | 0.01 | 0.951 | Non-Significant | -0.22-0.23 |
| CHILD_GRADE | CPQ_TOTAL | -0.01 | 0.953 | Non-Significant | -0.23-0.22 |
| AGE_FATHER | AGE_MOTHER | -0.01 | 0.958 | Non-Significant | -0.23-0.22 |
| TOTAL_CHILDREN | PSDQ_TOTAL | 0.00 | 0.979 | Non-Significant | -0.23-0.22 |