This initial report describes a basic analyse of the dataset from the Emergency Medicine National Clinical Assessment, the report objective is to compare the student’s ratings within an institution to the general consortium.
Initially, to have a general view of the dataset, it was created a table to illustrate the number of forms compleated by each institution. Table 1 was arranged in a decreasing way, except for the last variable of the table that shows the total number of forms.
Table 1 - Institutions number of forms.
Institution Name | Number of Forms |
---|---|
Texas Tech | 1233 |
East Carolina University | 1095 |
University of Arizona | 867 |
University of Florida, Jax | 773 |
University of Missouri | 517 |
University of Colorado | 501 |
University of Nevada, Las Vegas | 487 |
Regions | 442 |
University of Pennsylvania | 392 |
Michigan State | 364 |
Reading Hospital | 344 |
University of Arizona, Phoenix | 321 |
Harvard | 203 |
Kaweah Delta | 195 |
Training | 6 |
All Institutions | 7740 |
Secondly, a graph to demonstrate the entrustable professional activity ratings obtained by the institutions was created. Figure 1 was developed as a bar graph representing the percentage of results (Pre-Entrustable, Mostly Entrustable, Fully Entrustable and Outstanding) achieved by the institutions, beyond that, is possible to observe the number of times each response appears in the forms.
Observing Figure 1 is possible to know which institution is trusted to perform in a given health care activity.
Figure 1 - Institutions ratings.