Rongbin_Ye
1/21/2020
As a gourmet, one of the largest concerns is the food security. From a macro perspective, both different facility owners and inspectors would love to know the result of their inspection so they can prepare appropriate resources for additional work or improvement.
The data has been scrapped directly from the records of Chicago City Hall website. The original training data contains 199943 records in total. After the data manipulation, I restricted the conditions to four major elements: 1. Facility Type: School, Bakery, Restaurant, and school. 2. Risk TYpe: Risk 1(High), Risk 2(Medium), Risk 3(Low) 3. Location(Longtitude & Latitude) The summary is as follow:
## Results Risk Latitude Longitude
## fail:1178 risk 1 (high) :4713 Min. :41.65 Min. :-87.91
## pass:4412 risk 2 (medium): 838 1st Qu.:41.85 1st Qu.:-87.71
## risk 3 (low) : 39 Median :41.89 Median :-87.67
## Mean :41.89 Mean :-87.68
## 3rd Qu.:41.94 3rd Qu.:-87.63
## Max. :42.02 Max. :-87.53
## Ftype
## bakery : 96
## catering : 40
## restaurant:4691
## school : 763
##
##
“Chicago”
The basic model used here is the logstic model, regarding the existing independent variables, categorical and numeric. The model summary is as follow:
##
## Call:
## glm(formula = Results ~ Ftype + Risk + Latitude + Longitude,
## family = binomial, data = main_data)
##
## Deviance Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.8951 0.6164 0.6942 0.7014 0.8613
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) -20.85360 46.09521 -0.452 0.65098
## Ftypecatering 0.36929 0.46524 0.794 0.42734
## Ftyperestaurant 0.27524 0.24528 1.122 0.26180
## Ftypeschool 0.24201 0.26022 0.930 0.35236
## Riskrisk 2 (medium) 0.26347 0.09881 2.667 0.00766 **
## Riskrisk 3 (low) -0.20933 0.37100 -0.564 0.57260
## Latitude -0.24903 0.47078 -0.529 0.59682
## Longitude -0.36843 0.57176 -0.644 0.51933
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 5756.9 on 5589 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 5747.6 on 5582 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 5763.6
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4
The model performs effectively but requires time to run on the server at this stage.
Before showing the real app, hereby I provide a summary of the UI elements. The sidepanel includes 4 major inputs groups.
This app provides a convinent, powerful, reiliable predictor for any one interested in the subject.
Thank You and lets try it out.
“Chicago Food”