Background

Cleft conditions, commonly referred to as orofacial clefts, includes all cleft lip and cleft palate birth defects [1]. Orofacial clefts occur when a baby’s lip and/or palate do not form properly during early pregnancy. Cleft lip occurs when the lip does not come together during development, separating the lip either on one side (unilateral) or on both sides (bilateral) [2]. Cleft palate occurs when the roof of the mouth fails to join together resulting in an opening in either the front of the palate, the back of the palate, or both [1]. The lip and palate develop separately during pregnancy, therefore, a baby can have either cleft lip, cleft palate, or both cleft lip and cleft palate [2]. Orofacial clefts are one of the most common birth defects in the United States [2, 3]. While the exact cause for most cases of orofacial clefts is unknown. It is believed that a combination of environmental factors, mothers behaviors during early pregnancy (what she eats/drinks and medicine consumed), and genetic factors may contribute to orofacial clefts [1, 2].

Methodology

The Alaska Birth Defects Registry (ABDR) registers birth defects as reported from health care providers using International Classification of Disease (ICD) billing codes. The use of these ICD codes can lead to misclassification of diagnosed conditions. Prior to this report, all prevalence estimates were based on the number of unique children reported to ABDR with an ICD code representing a specified condition regardless of case confirmation status.

The estimates in this report were derived by conducting medical record review and case confirmation of a random sample of cases of the condition reported to ABDR. The confirmation probability from the sample was used to develop informed estimates of the actual diagnosed defect prevalence. See defect prevalence calculation for a complete explanation of the methodology used for generating estimates.

While this report provides the most precise estimates, caution should be used in interpreting prevalence estimates based on conditions with <30 annual reports, as they are potentially vulnerable to large year-to-year variation.

For explanations of table columns see column descriptions.

All Oral Facial Clefts

According to the 2014 annual report released by the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN), the prevalence of all orofacial clefts for 29 U.S. States from 2007-2011 was 14.5 per 10,000 live births.[3]

In Alaska, during 2007-2015, the prevalence of all orofacial clefts was 32.4 per 10,000 live births.
Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Total 406 330.7 101978 32.4 (29.1, 36.0)
Notes: 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Lip

Cleft Lip Prevalence

According to the 2014 annual report released by the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN), the prevalence of cleft lip was for 29 U.S. States from 2007-2011 was 3.1 per 10,000 live births.[3]

In Alaska, during 2007-2015, the prevalence of cleft lip was 4.9 per 10,000 live births.
Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Total 107 49.5 101978 4.9 (3.6, 6.4)
Notes: 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Lip Trend

Prevalence per 10,000 births of Cleft Lip during 2007-2015 by three-year moving averages, with 95% confidence interval band and Poisson estimated fitted line.

The p-value test for trend detected no significant increase or decrease in the number of live births with cleft lip during 2007-2015. See p-value estimate
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
0.03888 0.01686 2.30637 0.06922

Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI) Predicted Prevalence†
2007-2009 10.7 5.7 11261.7 5.0 (2.1, 10.8) 4.4
2008-2010 9.7 5.2 11404.0 4.5 (1.8, 9.8) 4.6
2009-2011 9.3 4.9 11404.7 4.3 (1.6, 9.4) 4.8
2010-2012 11.0 5.1 11354.0 4.5 (1.8, 9.8) 5.0
2011-2013 13.3 6.0 11349.0 5.2 (2.3, 11.1) 5.2
2012-2014 14.0 6.2 11334.7 5.5 (2.3, 11.1) 5.4
2013-2015 14.0 6.7 11377.0 5.8 (2.5, 11.5) 5.6
Notes: Each row is based on three-year moving averages; Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; 95% CI=95% Confidence Interval

† Estimated rate based on Poisson model

Cleft Lip Regional Distribution

Distribution of cleft lip in Alaska by Public Health Region of maternal residence at the time of birth. A description of regional breakdowns can be found here. Data suppressed for # of reports < 6.

Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Anchorage 31 13.3 41815 3.2 (1.8, 5.3)
Gulf Coast 11 4.5 6313 7.1 (2.6, 16.2)
Interior 20 8.3 18534 4.5 (2.2, 8.5)
Mat-Su 11 4.6 12081 3.8 (1.3, 8.5)
Northern 7 2.9 7114 4.1 (0.9, 10.2)
Southeast 7 2.9 6375 4.6 (1, 11.3)
Southwest 20 8.1 9746 8.3 (4.2, 16.2)
Notes: Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; Data suppressed for # of reports < 6; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Lip Demographics

Some subgroups may be more at risk for having a baby with a cleft lip. This section provides the descriptive epidemiology of specified maternal, birth, and child characteristics identified from the birth certificate.
Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Sex
  Female 39 16.6 49462 3.4 (2.0, 5.2)
  Male 68 28.1 52516 5.3 (3.7, 7.7)
Birth weight (grams)
  <2500 11 4.5 5925 7.5 (2.7, 17.3)
  2500+ 96 40.2 95890 4.2 (3.1, 5.7)
Maternal age
  12-19 10 4.1 8043 5.1 (2.0, 12.7)
  20-24 40 16.4 28015 5.9 (3.5, 9.3)
  25-29 23 9.9 30852 3.2 (1.6, 5.5)
  30-34 23 9.6 22480 4.3 (2.1, 7.6)
  35-39 - - 10015 3.4 (1.1, 8.8)
  40+ - - 2543 -
Maternal race
  Alaska Native/American Indian 48 19.5 25801 7.6 (4.7, 11.5)
  Asian/Pacific Islander - - 9399 2.8 (0.7, 7.7)
  Black - - 4134 -
  White 49 20.9 61287 3.4 (2.1, 5.0)
Maternal education (years)
  <12 13 5.4 9778 5.5 (2.2, 11.9)
  12 53 21.8 36724 5.9 (3.8, 8.7)
  12+ 40 17.1 52380 3.3 (2.0, 5.2)
Marital status
  Married 54 22.9 64510 3.5 (2.3, 5.2)
  Unmarried 52 21.4 37078 5.8 (3.7, 8.7)
Maternal smoking use
  Reported smoking 26 10.6 14467 7.3 (3.8, 12.7)
  Reported not smoking 77 32.5 85927 3.8 (2.6, 5.3)
Medicaid (mother or child)
  Medicaid 83 33.9 51554 6.6 (4.6, 9.0)
  non-Medicaid 24 10.8 50311 2.1 (1.1, 3.7)
Father on birth certificate
  None 6 2.5 5559 4.5 (1.1, 13.0)
  Present 101 42.2 96419 4.4 (3.2, 5.9)
Notes: Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; Data suppressed for # of reports < 6; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Palate

Cleft Palate Prevalence

According to the 2014 annual report released by the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN), the prevalence of cleft palate for 29 U.S. States from 2007-2011 was 5.9 per 10,000 live births.[3]

In Alaska, during 2007-2015, the prevalence of cleft palate was 13.6 per 10,000 live births.
Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Total 202 138.5 101978 13.6 (11.5, 16.0)
Notes: 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Palate Trend

Prevalence per 10,000 births of cleft palate during 2007-2015 by three-year moving averages, with 95% confidence interval band and Poisson estimated fitted line.
The p-value test for trend detected a significant increase in the number of live births with cleft palate during 2007-2015. See p-value estimate
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
0.01840 0.00693 2.65612 0.04509

Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI) Predicted Prevalence†
2007-2009 19.0 14.3 11261.7 12.8 (7.2, 20.5) 13.0
2008-2010 22.0 15.6 11404.0 13.7 (8.0, 21.7) 13.2
2009-2011 22.7 15.6 11404.7 13.7 (8.0, 21.7) 13.5
2010-2012 23.7 15.7 11354.0 13.8 (8.1, 21.7) 13.7
2011-2013 22.0 15.0 11349.0 13.2 (7.6, 21.0) 14.0
2012-2014 23.7 15.9 11334.7 14.0 (8.3, 22.2) 14.2
2013-2015 24.7 17.1 11377.0 15.0 (9.2, 23.6) 14.5
Notes: Each row is based on three-year moving averages; Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; 95% CI=95% Confidence Interval

† Estimated rate based on Poisson model

Cleft Palate Regional Distribution

Distribution of cleft palate in Alaska by Public Health Region of maternal residence at the time of birth. A description of regional breakdowns can be found here. Data suppressed for # of reports < 6.

Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Anchorage 72 49.5 41815 11.8 (8.9, 15.5)
Gulf Coast 20 12.6 6313 20 (11, 33.2)
Interior 34 23.1 18534 12.5 (8.3, 18.6)
Mat-Su 12 9.4 12081 7.8 (4, 14.1)
Northern 22 13.9 7114 19.5 (10.8, 31.2)
Southeast 13 8.7 6375 13.6 (6.5, 24.7)
Southwest 29 18.4 9746 18.9 (11.7, 29.2)
Notes:Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; Data suppressed for # of reports < 6; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Palate Demographics

Some subgroups may be more at risk for having a baby with a cleft palate. This section provides the descriptive epidemiology of specified maternal, birth, and child characteristics identified from the birth certificate.

Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Sex
  Female 94 63.5 49462 12.8 (10.0, 16.3)
  Male 108 72.1 52516 13.7 (10.9, 17.3)
Birth weight (grams)
  <2500 29 17.6 5925 29.6 (18.0, 45.9)
  2500+ 173 118.0 95890 12.3 (10.3, 14.7)
Maternal age
  12-19 23 14.7 8043 18.2 (10.4, 29.2)
  20-24 53 35.9 28015 12.8 (9.0, 17.4)
  25-29 57 38.7 30852 12.6 (9.0, 16.9)
  30-34 43 29.0 22480 12.9 (9.0, 18.5)
  35-39 - - 10015 13.9 (7.6, 22.2)
  40+ - - 2543 -
Maternal race
  Alaska Native/American Indian 95 58.9 25801 22.8 (17.4, 29.1)
  Asian/Pacific Islander 12 8.8 9399 9.3 (4.4, 16.8)
  Black 6 4.3 4134 10.3 (3.9, 24.8)
  White 87 62.2 61287 10.2 (7.9, 13.0)
Maternal education (years)
  <12 28 17.8 9778 18.2 (10.9, 27.8)
  12 93 60.2 36724 16.4 (12.7, 21.0)
  12+ 74 53.0 52380 10.1 (7.6, 13.0)
Marital status
  Married 99 69.6 64510 10.8 (8.5, 13.5)
  Unmarried 102 65.3 37078 17.6 (13.8, 22.3)
Maternal smoking use
  Reported smoking 53 32.9 14467 22.7 (15.7, 31.2)
  Reported not smoking 140 97.3 85927 11.3 (9.3, 13.8)
Medicaid (mother or child)
  Medicaid 147 93.7 51554 18.2 (14.7, 22.1)
  non-Medicaid 55 41.9 50311 8.3 (6.0, 11.1)
Father on birth certificate
  None 16 10.2 5559 18.3 (9.9, 33.1)
  Present 186 125.4 96419 13.0 (10.9, 15.4)
Notes: Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; Data suppressed for # of reports < 6; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Lip with Cleft Palate

Cleft Lip with Cleft Palate Prevalence

According to the 2014 annual report released by the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN), the prevalence of cleft lip with cleft palate for 29 U.S. States from 2007-2011 was 5.6 per 10,000 live births.[3]

In Alaska, during 2007-2015, the prevalence of cleft lip with cleft palate was 14.0 per 10,000 live births.
Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Total 97 142.7 101978 14.0 (11.8, 16.4)
Notes: 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Lip with Cleft Palate Trend

Prevalence per 10,000 births of cleft lip with cleft palate during 2007-2015 by three-year moving averages, with 95% confidence interval band and Poisson estimated fitted line.

The p-value test for trend detected a significant increase in the number of live births with cleft lip with cleft palate during 2007-2015. See p-value estimate
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
0.07883 0.01521 5.18407 0.00351

Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI) Predicted Prevalence†
2007-2009 6.7 13.7 11261.7 12.2 (6.8, 19.7) 10.9
2008-2010 7.3 13.7 11404.0 12.0 (6.7, 19.5) 11.8
2009-2011 7.3 13.3 11404.7 11.6 (6.5, 19.1) 12.8
2010-2012 8.3 14.1 11354.0 12.4 (6.9, 19.9) 13.8
2011-2013 12.3 16.9 11349.0 14.8 (8.7, 22.8) 15.0
2012-2014 15.7 19.0 11334.7 16.7 (10.3, 25.4) 16.2
2013-2015 17.3 20.7 11377.0 18.2 (11.7, 27.5) 17.5
Notes: Each row is based on three-year moving averages; Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; 95% CI=95% Confidence Interval

† Estimated rate based on Poisson model

Cleft Lip with Cleft Palate Regional Distribution

Distribution of cleft lip with cleft palate in Alaska by Public Health Region of maternal residence at the time of birth. A description of regional breakdowns can found here. Data suppressed for # of reports < 6.
Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Anchorage 32 21.6 41815 5.2 (3.3, 7.7)
Gulf Coast 11 7.3 6313 11.6 (5.5, 22.8)
Interior 22 14.7 18534 8 (4.5, 12.7)
Mat-Su - - 12081 -
Northern 8 5.4 7114 7.5 (3.1, 16.4)
Southeast - - 6375 -
Southwest 15 10.0 9746 10.3 (5.6, 18.9)
Notes:Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; Data suppressed for # of reports < 6; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Cleft Lip with Cleft Palate Demographics

Some subgroups may be more at risk for having a baby with a cleft lip with cleft palate. This section provides the descriptive epidemiology of specified maternal, birth, and child characteristics identified from the birth certificate.

Reports Defects Births Prevalence (95% CI)
Sex
  Female 37 25.0 49462 5.0 (3.3, 7.2)
  Male 60 40.2 52516 7.7 (5.6, 10.4)
Birth weight (grams)
  <2500 16 10.6 5925 17.9 (9.3, 31.0)
  2500+ 81 54.6 95890 5.7 (4.3, 7.3)
Maternal age
  12-19 - - 8043 7.5 (3.5, 16.2)
  20-24 33 22.1 28015 7.9 (5.2, 11.9)
  25-29 18 12.2 30852 4.0 (2.2, 6.8)
  30-34 20 13.5 22480 6.0 (3.4, 9.9)
  35-39 14 9.4 10015 9.3 (4.8, 17.1)
  40+ - - 2543 -
Maternal race
  Alaska Native/American Indian 42 28.0 25801 10.9 (7.5, 15.7)
  Asian/Pacific Islander - - 9399 4.3 (1.7, 10.9)
  Black - - 4134 -
  White 45 30.4 61287 5.0 (3.4, 7.0)
Maternal education (years)
  <12 15 10.0 9778 10.2 (5.6, 18.8)
  12 41 27.5 36724 7.5 (5.1, 10.7)
  12+ 37 25.0 52380 4.8 (3.2, 7.0)
Marital status
  Married 53 35.7 64510 5.5 (3.9, 7.5)
  Unmarried 43 28.8 37078 7.8 (5.2, 10.9)
Maternal smoking use
  Reported smoking 18 12.0 14467 8.3 (4.8, 14.5)
  Reported not smoking 74 49.8 85927 5.8 (4.3, 7.5)
Medicaid (mother or child)
  Medicaid 71 47.5 51554 9.2 (6.9, 12.1)
  non-Medicaid 26 17.7 50311 3.5 (2.1, 5.4)
Father on birth certificate
  None - - 5559 -
  Present - - 96419 6.4 (4.9, 8.1)
Notes: Prevalence reported per 10,000 live births; Data suppressed for # of reports < 6; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval

Technical notes

Column descriptions

# Reports: Unless otherwise noted, the number of unique reports of the defect received by ABDR during the specified birth year(s). Each report represents a unique child with the specified defect.

# Defects: The estimated true number of reports that are diagnosed defects based on medical record review and case confirmation.

# Births: The number of live births among Alaskan residents that occurred in Alaska during the specified birth year(s).

Prevalence (95% CI): The estimated diagnosed prevalence of the condition and corresponding 95% Confidence Interval. (For information on how the defect prevalence was estimated see below).

Defect prevalence calculation

The estimated defect prevalence was calculated using a Bayesian approach based on the reported prevalence, PPV and 1-NPV (see formula below).

Through medical records review and case confirmation of a random sample of reported cases, the defect prevalence is calculated as:

\[PPV (Positive Predictive Value) = p(defect|report)\] \[NPV (Negative Predictive Value) = p(\overline{defect}|\overline{report})\]

\[p(defect) \approx [p(report)\cdot PPV]+[p(\overline{report})\cdot (1-NPV)]\]

For cleft conditions, many cases were determined to be a different cleft defect than what was reported. Therefore, an additional intra-conditional probability was calculated and applied to the prevalence estimates. This probability accounts for the misclassified cleft conditions that were reported. In addition, a number of individuals were reported for more than one, or all three possible cleft conditions. For these individuals a separate PPV and NPV was calculated and applied.

Defect prevalence estimates are a more accurate estimation of the actual diagnosed prevalance of birth defects compared to the reported prevalance estimates in Alaska. ABDR obtains reports from medical providers using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes that are extracted from individual systems which when aggregated may not reflect true diagnostics. Caution should be used when interpreting and comparing the reported prevalence estimates with national estimates.

See Data analysis methods for more information.

P-value estimate

To evaluate the trend over time and account for under/over-dispersion we constructed a quasi-Poisson regression model. This model assumes the variance is a linear function of the mean, and models the estimated number of annual defects by year with a natural log (ln) offset of the annual births. P-values < 0.05 are considered significant, which indicates that the predicted slope is significantly different from a slope of zero.

Data suppression

For region and demographic data tables, values are suppressed based on the number of reports received during the observation period. Counts less than 6 are suppressed (as indicated by ‘-’ in the table). For regions or demographics with only one cell count suppressed a second is suppressed to eliminate the ability to back-calculate the estimate.

References

[1] Facts about Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate | CDC. (2017). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 22 March 2019, from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/cleftlip.html

[2] Introduction to Cleft & Craniofacial Conditions - ACPA Family Services. (2019). Cleftline.org. Retrieved 22 March 2019, from https://cleftline.org/family-resources/introduction-to-cleft-craniofacial-conditions/

[3] Mai, C. T., Cassell, C. H., Meyer, R. E., Isenburg, J., Canfield, M. A., Rickard, R., … & Cho, S. J. (2014). Birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2007 to 2011: Highlighting orofacial clefts. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 100(11), 895-904.

Suggested Citation

State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health, Section of Women’s, Children’s, and Family Health. Alaska Birth Defects Registry Condition Report: Cleft Conditions, Alaska, 2007-2015. Updated October 30, 2019. Available at: http://rpubs.com/AK_ABDR/cleft_Conds.

Contact

Alaska Birth Defects Registry (ABDR)
3601 C Street, Suite 358
Anchorage, AK 99503
(907) 269-3400 phone
(907) 754-3529 fax

Updated: October 30, 2019
Code source: R:\ABDR\Analysis_New\ABDR_CASECONF\cond_reports\Published_reports\cleft_conds07_15.Rmd