6.1 CSA practices implementation (general)

Household level indicators are calculated based on the responses from the household heads.

Percentage of adopting households corresponding to the number of household (heads) that reported having implement at least one of the CSA practices.

6.1.1 CSA practices implementation (by practice and gender)

Percentage of households (heads), and of female-headed or male-headed households that implement CSA practices

	N	Cattle shed and manure improvement	Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Minimum or Zero Tillage	Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	System of Rice Intensification (SRI)
Households	138	22%	47%	28%	5%	28%	4%
Male-headed household	102	25%	47%	30%	5%	28%	5%
Female-headed household	36	14%	47%	19%	6%	28%	0%

6.1.2 CSA practices implementation (by community)

Percentage of households (heads) who implement CSA practices across the different CSV communities.

6.2 CSA Adoption drivers (by practice and gender)

Percentage of farmers (male or female) reporting a specific driver or motivation for their household to adopt a CSA practice

This indicator corresponds to the number of farmers that reported a specific adoption driver over the total that responded the motivation question.

CSA Practices	N	In Response to a Climate Event	Learning from Libird	New Market Opportunities	Other	Testing with CIAT/ NOMASI / CCAFS - Do Tham Gia Mô Hình Ca CIAT/NOMASI/CCAFS	To Adapt to Future Climate Shocks
Cattle shed and manure improvement	53	0%	26%	11%	36%	0%	26%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	119	1%	18%	74%	4%	0%	3%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	67	3%	16%	51%	7%	0%	22%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	12	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	61	2%	79%	7%	0%	0%	13%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	9	0%	0%	11%	0%	67%	22%

6.2.1 Adoption drivers for Cattle shed and manure improvement (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting a specific driver or motivation to adopt a CSA practice, who responded to the question : “What was the main reason for implementing Cattle shed and manure improvement?”

Gender	N	Learning from Libird	New Market Opportunities	Other	To Adapt to Future Climate Shocks
Female	28	18%	14%	36%	32%
Male	25	36%	8%	36%	20%

6.2.2 Adoption drivers for Improved maize seeds (high yielding) (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting a specific driver or motivation to adopt a CSA practice, who responded to the question : “What was the main reason for implementing Improved maize seeds (high yielding)?”

Gender	N	In Response to a Climate Event	Learning from Libird	New Market Opportunities	Other	To Adapt to Future Climate Shocks
Female	61	0%	16%	80%	2%	2%
Male	58	2%	21%	67%	7%	3%

6.2.3 Adoption drivers for Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance) (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting a specific driver or motivation to adopt a CSA practice, who responded to the question : “What was the main reason for implementing Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)?”

Gender	N	In Response to a Climate Event	Learning from Libird	New Market Opportunities	Other	To Adapt to Future Climate Shocks
Female	33	3%	18%	52%	9%	18%
Male	34	3%	15%	50%	6%	26%

6.2.4 Adoption drivers for Minimum or Zero Tillage (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting a specific driver or motivation to adopt a CSA practice, who responded to the question : “What was the main reason for implementing Minimum or Zero Tillage?”

Gender	N	Learning from Libird
Female	7	100%
Male	5	100%

6.2.5 Adoption drivers for System of Rice Intensification (SRI) (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting a specific driver or motivation to adopt a CSA practice, who responded to the question : “What was the main reason for implementing System of Rice Intensification (SRI)?”

Gender	N	New Market Opportunities	Testing with CIAT/ NOMASI / CCAFS - Do Tham Gia Mô Hình Ca CIAT/NOMASI/CCAFS	To Adapt to Future Climate Shocks
Female	4	0%	50%	50%
Male	5	20%	80%	0%

6.2.6 Adoption drivers for Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting a specific driver or motivation to adopt a CSA practice, who responded to the question : “What was the main reason for implementing Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production?”

Gender	N	In Response to a Climate Event	Learning from Libird	New Market Opportunities	To Adapt to Future Climate Shocks
Female	29	3%	76%	10%	10%
Male	32	0%	81%	3%	16%

6.3 Involvement in CSA implementation (by practice and gender)

Percentage of farmers (male and female) reporting specific levels of involvement in the implementation of the CSA practice, who answered the question: “Where you the person in charge of doing most of the work/activities associated to the implementation of the CSA practice?”

CSA Practices	Gender	N	I did most of the work	I did not do anything	I equally contributed	I equally contributed (with spouse)	I equally contributed (with spouse) - Tôi làm cùng vi các thành viên khác	I just helped
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Female	28	11%	0%	79%	4%	0%	7%
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Male	26	15%	4%	65%	0%	0%	15%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Female	61	23%	0%	67%	5%	0%	5%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Male	59	15%	2%	68%	2%	0%	14%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Female	33	18%	0%	76%	3%	0%	3%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Male	36	6%	6%	67%	3%	0%	19%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Female	7	14%	0%	57%	29%	0%	0%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Male	5	20%	0%	80%	0%	0%	0%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Female	33	24%	12%	39%	12%	0%	12%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Male	32	38%	0%	38%	3%	0%	22%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Female	4	0%	0%	25%	0%	25%	50%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Male	5	60%	0%	40%	0%	0%	0%

6.3.1 Doing most of the CSA implementation

6.3.2 Just helped in the CSA implementation

6.3.3 Did not participate in CSA implementation

6.3.4 Contributed in CSA implementation

6.4 CSA dis-adoption (general)

Percentage of non-adopting households (female and male-headed) that reported having dis-adopted at least one CSA practice before in the household.

6.4.1 CSA dis-adoption (by practice and gender)

Percentage of households (heads), and of female-headed or male-headed households that answered “Yes” to the question; “Was this practice implemented before in your household?”

CSA Practices		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Households	72	8%
	Female-headed household	21	5%
	Male-headed household	51	10%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Households	65	38%
	Female-headed household	16	25%
	Male-headed household	49	43%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Households	76	42%
	Male-headed household	53	43%
	Female-headed household	23	39%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Households	73	16%
	Male-headed household	54	15%
	Female-headed household	19	21%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Households	70	0%
	Female-headed household	17	0%
	Male-headed household	53	0%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Households	70	29%
	Female-headed household	24	21%
	Male-headed household	46	33%

6.5 CSA dis-adoption drivers (by practice and gender)

Percentage of farmers (male and female) reporting a specific driver or motivation to dis-adopt a CSA practice; who responded to the question: “What was the main reason why your household stopped implementing the practices?”

CSA Practices	N	Did not Generate Economic Benefits	Did not Help to Adapt to Climate/Weather Related Events	Other	Required a Lot of Work	Very Expensive to Implement
Cattle shed and manure improvement	11	0%	0%	100%	0%	0%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	46	28%	2%	37%	33%	0%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	54	31%	0%	54%	15%	0%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	20	55%	0%	25%	20%	0%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	30	10%	0%	13%	57%	20%

6.5.1 CSA dis-adoption drivers for Cattle shed and manure improvement (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting different drivers of CSA dis-adoption, who answered the question: “What was the main reason why your household stopped Cattle shed and manure improvement?”

Gender	N	Other
Female	5	100%
Male	6	100%

6.5.2 CSA dis-adoption drivers for Improved maize seeds (high yielding) (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting different drivers of CSA dis-adoption, who answered the question: “What was the main reason why your household stopped Improved maize seeds (high yielding)?”

Gender	N	Did not Generate Economic Benefits	Did not Help to Adapt to Climate/Weather Related Events	Other	Required a Lot of Work
Female	24	25%	0%	42%	33%
Male	22	32%	5%	32%	32%

6.5.3 CSA dis-adoption drivers for Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance) (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting different drivers of CSA dis-adoption, who answered the question: “What was the main reason why your household stopped Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)?”

Gender	N	Did not Generate Economic Benefits	Other	Required a Lot of Work
Female	27	30%	59%	11%
Male	27	33%	48%	19%

6.5.4 CSA dis-adoption drivers for Minimum or Zero Tillage (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting different drivers of CSA dis-adoption, who answered the question: “What was the main reason why your household stopped Minimum or Zero Tillage?”

Gender	N	Did not Generate Economic Benefits	Other	Required a Lot of Work
Female	11	64%	27%	9%
Male	9	44%	22%	33%

6.5.5 CSA dis-adoption drivers for System of Rice Intensification (SRI) (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting different drivers of CSA dis-adoption, who answered the question: “What was the main reason why your household stopped System of Rice Intensification (SRI)?”

Gender	N	Did not Generate Economic Benefits	Other	Required a Lot of Work	Very Expensive to Implement
Female	14	7%	21%	50%	21%
Male	16	12%	6%	62%	19%

Outcomes of CSA practices

6.6 Effect (perceived) on production (by practice)

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting perceived effects of the CSA practice on yield/production, who responded to the question: “What was the effect of the practices on your household production?”

Practices	N	Decreased Production	I Can’t Say Because it Was New	Increased Production	Increased Production - Sn Lung Tang	No Effect
Cattle shed and manure improvement	53	0%	6%	55%	0%	40%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	119	1%	3%	95%	0%	2%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	67	6%	3%	70%	0%	21%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	12	0%	17%	58%	0%	25%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	61	2%	2%	97%	0%	0%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	9	0%	0%	78%	22%	0%

6.6.1 Perceived effect of Cattle shed and manure improvement on yield/production

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting perceived effects of the CSA practice on yield/production, who responded to the question: What was the effect of Cattle shed and manure improvement on your household production?

Gender	N	I Can’t Say Because it Was New	Increased Production	No Effect
Female	28	4%	61%	36%
Male	25	8%	48%	44%

6.6.2 Perceived effect of Improved maize seeds (high yielding) on yield/production

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting perceived effects of the CSA practice on yield/production, who responded to the question: What was the effect of Improved maize seeds (high yielding) on your household production?

Gender	N	Decreased Production	I Can’t Say Because it Was New	Increased Production	No Effect
Female	61	2%	2%	93%	3%
Male	58	0%	3%	97%	0%

6.6.3 Perceived effect of Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance) on yield/production

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting perceived effects of the CSA practice on yield/production, who responded to the question: What was the effect of Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance) on your household production?

Gender	N	Decreased Production	I Can’t Say Because it Was New	Increased Production	No Effect
Female	33	6%	0%	70%	24%
Male	34	6%	6%	71%	18%

6.6.4 Perceived effect of Minimum or Zero Tillage on yield/production

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting perceived effects of the CSA practice on yield/production, who responded to the question: What was the effect of Minimum or Zero Tillage on your household production?

Gender	N	I Can’t Say Because it Was New	Increased Production	No Effect
Female	7	14%	71%	14%
Male	5	20%	40%	40%

6.6.5 Perceived effect of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) on yield/production

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting perceived effects of the CSA practice on yield/production, who responded to the question: What was the effect of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) on your household production?

Gender	N	Increased Production	Increased Production - Sn Lung Tang
Female	4	75%	25%
Male	5	80%	20%

6.6.6 Perceived effect of Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production on yield/production

Percentage of farmers (female and male) reporting perceived effects of the CSA practice on yield/production, who responded to the question: What was the effect of Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production on your household production?

Gender	N	Decreased Production	I Can’t Say Because it Was New	Increased Production
Female	29	0%	3%	97%
Male	32	3%	0%	97%

6.7 Use of additional CSA production

Percentage of households (heads) that answered “Yes” to the questions: “Did you in the household sell this additional production?” or “Did you in the household use this additional production for the household consumption?”

CSA Practices	N	Use	Percentage of households
Cattle shed and manure improvement	15	Sale	67%
Cattle shed and manure improvement	15	Consumption	93%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	63	Sale	51%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	63	Consumption	87%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	25	Sale	48%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	25	Consumption	92%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	3	Sale	67%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	3	Consumption	100%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	5	Sale	40%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	5	Consumption	100%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	38	Sale	82%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	38	Consumption	100%

6.8 Perceived CSA effect on income

Percentage of farmers that answered “Yes”to the question:“Compare to before its implementation, has [the CSA practice] generated additional income for the household?”

CSA Practices	N	Percentage of farmers
Cattle shed and manure improvement	53	58%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	119	53%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	67	40%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	12	50%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	9	44%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	61	82%

6.8.1 Perceived CSA effect on income (by gender)

Percentage of farmers (male and female) implementing CSA that answered “Yes”to the question:“Compare to before its implementation, has [the CSA practice] generated additional income for the household?”

CSA Practices	Gender	N	Percentage of farmers
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Female	28	64%
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Male	25	52%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Female	61	52%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Male	58	53%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Female	33	39%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Male	34	41%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Female	7	43%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Male	5	60%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Female	4	50%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Male	5	40%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Female	29	83%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Male	32	81%

6.9 Use of additional CSA related income (by practice)

Percentage of CSA adopting households (heads) reporting specific uses of the additional income who answered the question: “In your household, what did you use this additional income for?”

CSA Practices	N	Buying agricultural inputs / assets or services	Buying food	Buying non-agricultural assets or services	I cannot say	We saved it
Cattle shed and manure improvement	17	76%	18%	6%	0%	0%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	35	74%	11%	6%	6%	3%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	16	75%	0%	12%	0%	12%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	3	67%	0%	0%	0%	33%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	34	71%	12%	18%	0%	0%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	2	50%	0%	50%	0%	0%

6.10 Perceived effect of CSA practices on food access and diversity

Percentage of farmers, (male and female) implementing CSA practices who answered “Yes” to the question: “Because of the implementation of the practice, did the number of month where you are usually concerned of having enough food for your household decreased (compare to not having it)?”
Percentage of farmers, (male and female) implementing CSA practices who answered “Yes” to the question: “Has implementation of the practice allowed for having more variety of products for consumption in your household (compared to not having the practice)?”

		Improved food access		Food diversification
CSA Practices		N	Percentage	N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Farmers	53	45%	53	49%
	Female	28	43%	28	46%
	Male	25	48%	25	52%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Farmers	119	59%	119	42%
	Female	61	56%	61	36%
	Male	58	62%	58	48%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Farmers	67	54%	67	57%
	Female	33	48%	33	52%
	Male	34	59%	34	62%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Farmers	12	58%	12	58%
	Female	7	43%	7	43%
	Male	5	80%	5	80%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Farmers	61	77%	61	95%
	Female	29	66%	29	97%
	Male	32	88%	32	94%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Farmers	9	78%	9	78%
	Female	4	50%	4	50%
	Male	5	100%	5	100%

6.10.1 Perceived effect of CSA practices on food access (by gender)

6.10.2 Perceived effect of CSA practices on food diversity (by gender)

6.11 Perceived effect of CSA practices on climate vulnerability

Percentage of CSA implementing farmers (female and male) that answered Yes to the question: Do you personally think that having the crop rotation effectively allowed your household to be less affected or recover quicker from experienced weather related shocks/events?

CSA Practices		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Farmers	53	92%
	Female	28	93%
	Male	25	92%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Farmers	119	34%
	Female	61	26%
	Male	58	43%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Farmers	67	69%
	Female	33	64%
	Male	34	74%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Farmers	12	58%
	Female	7	57%
	Male	5	60%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Farmers	61	98%
	Female	29	100%
	Male	32	97%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Farmers	9	67%
	Female	4	50%
	Male	5	80%

6.11.1 Perceived effect of CSA practices on climate vulnerability (by gender)

Percentage of CSA implementing farmers (female and male) who answered “Yes”to the question: Do you personally think that having the CSA practices effectively allowed your household to be less affected or recover quicker from experienced weather related shocks/events?

6.12 CSA effect on Gender dimensions

6.12.1 Perceived CSA effect on labor time

Percentage of CSA implementing farmers (male and female) who answered the question: Because of the CSA practices, did you personally take more, less or the same amount of time in agricultural activities?

CSA Practices		N	Less time	More time	More time - mt nhiu thi gian hon	Same amount of time	Same amount of time - thi gian không thay di
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Farmers	53	96%	0%	0%	4%	0%
	Female	28	93%	0%	0%	7%	0%
	Male	25	100%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Farmers	119	11%	48%	0%	41%	0%
	Female	61	8%	56%	0%	36%	0%
	Male	58	14%	40%	0%	47%	0%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Farmers	67	10%	3%	0%	87%	0%
	Female	33	6%	3%	0%	91%	0%
	Male	34	15%	3%	0%	82%	0%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Farmers	12	75%	8%	0%	17%	0%
	Female	7	71%	14%	0%	14%	0%
	Male	5	80%	0%	0%	20%	0%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Farmers	61	89%	2%	0%	10%	0%
	Female	29	79%	3%	0%	17%	0%
	Male	32	97%	0%	0%	3%	0%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Farmers	9	0%	67%	11%	11%	11%
	Female	4	0%	50%	25%	25%	0%
	Male	5	0%	80%	0%	0%	20%

Increasing labor time

No effect on labor time

Decreasing labor time

6.12.2 Perceived effect over access/control on CSA related income (by practice)

Percentage of CSA implementing male and female farmers, who answered Yes to the question: Did you personally decide or participate in the decision on how to use the money earned from the implementation of the practice?

CSA Practices		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Female	18	94%
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Male	13	92%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Female	32	0%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Male	31	0%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Female	13	0%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Male	14	0%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Female	3	33%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Male	3	100%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Female	24	92%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Male	26	96%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Female	2	50%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Male	2	50%

6.12.3 Decision making on CSA implementation (by practice; gender disaggregated)

Percentage of CSA implementing male and female farmers, who answered the question: “Did you participate in the process of deciding to implement the practices on your farm?”

CSA Practices		N	Decided alone	Did not participate in the decision	Was a joint decision	Was a joint decision - có, dó là s quyt dnh cùng nhau
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Female	28	0%	4%	96%	0%
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Male	26	15%	0%	85%	0%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Female	61	10%	10%	80%	0%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Male	59	20%	0%	80%	0%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Female	33	18%	6%	76%	0%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Male	36	19%	11%	69%	0%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Female	7	0%	14%	86%	0%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Male	5	20%	0%	80%	0%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Female	33	6%	6%	88%	0%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Male	32	19%	0%	81%	0%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Female	4	0%	25%	50%	25%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Male	5	60%	0%	20%	20%

6.12.4 Participation decision making on CSA dis-adoption

Percentage of implementing, male and female farmers, who answered yes to the question: Did you personally decide or participate in the decision to stop implementing the practice?

CSA Practices		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Female	5	80%
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Male	6	100%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Female	24	96%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Male	22	91%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Female	27	89%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Male	27	96%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Female	11	91%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Male	9	100%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Female	14	93%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Male	16	94%

6.13 Sources of CSA learning

Percentage of implementing farmers (male and female) who answered the question: How did you personally learn to implement the practice?

CSA Practices		N	family member or neighbor	Libird	Self-learning	Training by technical assistance by other institution
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Farmers	53	36%	36%	17%	11%
	Female	28	46%	29%	14%	11%
	Male	25	24%	44%	20%	12%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Farmers	119	57%	30%	9%	3%
	Female	61	62%	33%	2%	3%
	Male	58	52%	28%	17%	3%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Farmers	67	46%	27%	18%	9%
	Female	33	42%	27%	21%	9%
	Male	34	50%	26%	15%	9%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Farmers	12	0%	100%	0%	0%
	Female	7	0%	100%	0%	0%
	Male	5	0%	100%	0%	0%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Farmers	61	8%	92%	0%	0%
	Female	29	10%	90%	0%	0%
	Male	32	6%	94%	0%	0%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Farmers	9	0%	100%	0%	0%
	Female	4	0%	100%	0%	0%
	Male	5	0%	100%	0%	0%

Female sources of CSA knowledge

Male sources of CSA knowledge

6.14 Access to CSA training

Percentage farmers (male and female) who answered “from Training by technical assistance by other institution” or “From CCAFS training / demonstrations”, to the question: “How did you personally learn to implement water terraces?”

CSA Practice		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Farmers	103	52%
	Female	48	52%
	Male	55	53%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Farmers	152	36%
	Female	76	38%
	Male	76	34%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Farmers	90	38%
	Female	45	36%
	Male	45	40%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Farmers	51	94%
	Female	27	96%
	Male	24	92%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Farmers	83	92%
	Female	39	92%
	Male	44	91%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Farmers	36	94%
	Female	22	95%
	Male	14	93%

6.14.1 Access to training in CSA practices (gender)

6.15 CSA awareness

Percentage of farmers (male and female) participating anyhow on a CSA practice related activity (answered “Yes, I did most” or “No, I just helped” to the questions: “Were you the person in charge of doing most of the work/activities associated to CSA practice?”) or not implementing but saying “Yes” to the question: “having heard about [the CSA practice]?”

CSA Practices		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Farmers	250	72%
	Female	130	69%
	Male	120	75%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Farmers	250	93%
	Female	130	92%
	Male	120	95%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Farmers	250	80%
	Female	130	78%
	Male	120	82%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Farmers	250	54%
	Female	130	49%
	Male	120	59%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Farmers	250	72%
	Female	130	65%
	Male	120	80%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Farmers	250	49%
	Female	130	49%
	Male	120	49%

6.16 CSA interest by non-adopters

Percentage of non CSA implementing farmers (male and female) who answered “Yes”to the question: “Would you like to receive more information on CSA practices?”

CSA Practice		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Famers	196	80%
	Female	102	77%
	Male	94	82%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Famers	130	81%
	Female	69	81%
	Male	61	80%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Famers	181	74%
	Female	97	71%
	Male	84	77%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Famers	238	83%
	Female	123	82%
	Male	115	84%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Famers	185	84%
	Female	97	82%
	Male	88	86%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Famers	241	84%
	Female	126	83%
	Male	115	84%

6.17 Farer to farmer knowledge dissemination

Percentage of farmers (female and male) who responded “Yes” to the question: “Did you personally teach the practice to someone beyond the household members?”

CSA Practices		N	Percentage
Cattle shed and manure improvement	Farmers	53	70%
	Female	28	57%
	Male	25	84%
Improved maize seeds (high yielding)	Farmers	119	72%
	Female	61	67%
	Male	58	78%
Improved rice seeds (high yielding + drought tolerance)	Farmers	67	63%
	Female	33	55%
	Male	34	71%
Minimum or Zero Tillage	Farmers	12	67%
	Female	7	57%
	Male	5	80%
Solar-based irrigation + vegetable production	Farmers	61	72%
	Female	29	62%
	Male	32	81%
System of Rice Intensification (SRI)	Farmers	9	44%
	Female	4	25%
	Male	5	60%

6.17.1 Dissemination of CSA knowledge from farmer to farmer (by gender)

Percentage of famers (male and female) who answered “Yes” to the question: “Did you personally teach the practice to someone beyond the household members?”

CSA Practices