Repeated Measures for Life Engagement, w/ only the positive questions
#Loading the dataset that has been reset into a long version
data.test4 <- read.csv("/Volumes/TOSHIBA EXT/Dropbox/ADULT STUDY/adult_study011615.csv")
# Load the psych package
library(psych)
items <- c("LET2", "LET4", "LET6")
scaleKey <- c(1, 1, 1)
data.test4$meanLET <- scoreItems(scaleKey, items=data.test4[,items], delete=FALSE)$score
library(reshape2); library(car)
## Warning: package 'car' was built under R version 3.1.2
##
## Attaching package: 'car'
##
## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## logit
data <- data.test4[,c("ID", "GROUP", "wave", "meanLET")]
data <- dcast(data, ID + GROUP ~ wave, mean, value.var = "meanLET")
data[,3:5] <- apply(data[,3:5],2,function(x) recode(x, "NaN = NA") )
Create new data set with ID Group baseline meanLET and wave so that we have Baseline, time 1 and 2 to compare to
data2 <- as.data.frame(mapply(c,data[,1:4], data[,c(1:3,5)]))
data2$wave <- rep(1:2, each=89)
names(data2) <- c("ID", "GROUP", "BASELINE", "meanLET", "WAVE")
Drop the cases where participants did not complete the intervention completely
#data2 <- data2[-c(which(data2$GROUP ==2)),]
Intention to treat model (ITT) where we keep the cases who dropped out and did not complete the study (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention-to-treat_analysis).
data2[which(data2$GROUP ==2), "GROUP"] <- 1
For lme to work GROUP and ID need to be seen as factors
data2$GROUP <-as.factor(data2$GROUP)
data2$ID <-as.factor(data2$ID)
Describe the meanLET variable by the GROUP variable
describeBy(data2[,3:4], group = data2$GROUP)
## group: 0
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew
## BASELINE 1 86 4.02 0.70 4.00 4.08 0.49 2 5 3 -0.73
## meanLET 2 59 4.12 0.76 4.33 4.21 0.49 2 5 3 -0.92
## kurtosis se
## BASELINE 0.38 0.08
## meanLET 0.18 0.10
## --------------------------------------------------------
## group: 1
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew
## BASELINE 1 88 3.79 0.77 4.00 3.84 0.99 2.00 5 3.00 -0.55
## meanLET 2 54 4.27 0.64 4.33 4.34 0.49 2.67 5 2.33 -0.90
## kurtosis se
## BASELINE -0.35 0.08
## meanLET 0.15 0.09
Create a plot that visualizes meanLET variable by the GROUP variable
library(ggplot2)
##
## Attaching package: 'ggplot2'
##
## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## %+%
Take a look at the residuals
residual <- lm(meanLET ~ BASELINE, data=data2)$residual
Plot the residuals to see that they are random
plot(density(residual))# A density plot
qqnorm(residual) # A quantile normal plot to checking normality
qqline(residual)
Checking the different between intervention and control groups residuals. This allows us to control for individual unsystematic differences.
data2$residual <- NA
sel1 <- which(!is.na(data2$meanLET))
sel2 <- which(!is.na(data2$BASELINE))
data2$residual[intersect(sel1,sel2)] <- residual
qplot(GROUP, meanLET, data=data2, geom="boxplot")
## Warning: Removed 65 rows containing non-finite values (stat_boxplot).
Plot of the difference between intervention and control groups.
qplot(GROUP, residual, data=data2, geom="boxplot")
## Warning: Removed 69 rows containing non-finite values (stat_boxplot).
Two way repeated measures ======================================================== Graphing the Two-Way Interaction. Both meanLET and the Residuals
# Load the nlme package
library(nlme)
with(data2, boxplot(meanLET ~ WAVE + GROUP))
with(data2, boxplot(residual ~ WAVE + GROUP))
Comparing Basline to Wave 2 and 3 by Group.
fullModel <- lme(meanLET ~ GROUP * WAVE + BASELINE, random = ~1 | ID, data = data2, method = "ML", na.action = "na.omit")
Explanation of significance:
We asses the significance of our models by comparing them from the baseline model using the anova() function.
(Intercept): Where everything is 0
GROUP1: Is there a difference between group. If it is significant than there is a difference and the treatment had an effect.
WAVE: Asseses whether the effects gets bigger beteen time 2 and 3 (does not have to be significant)
BASELINE: Should not be significant. If it is then it shows that there is a difference between groups before the treatment.
GROUP1:WAVE: If this is significant then it means that the effect was either fleeting or it happened after the treatment i.e. between time 2 and 3.
summary(fullModel)
## Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood
## Data: data2
## AIC BIC logLik
## 174.7 193.6 -80.36
##
## Random effects:
## Formula: ~1 | ID
## (Intercept) Residual
## StdDev: 0.3649 0.3843
##
## Fixed effects: meanLET ~ GROUP * WAVE + BASELINE
## Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value
## (Intercept) 1.4176 0.3655 66 3.879 0.0002
## GROUP1 0.2221 0.2566 66 0.866 0.3897
## WAVE 0.0094 0.1120 38 0.084 0.9334
## BASELINE 0.6597 0.0819 66 8.055 0.0000
## GROUP1:WAVE 0.0453 0.1637 38 0.276 0.7837
## Correlation:
## (Intr) GROUP1 WAVE BASELI
## GROUP1 -0.353
## WAVE -0.364 0.597
## BASELINE -0.880 0.034 -0.065
## GROUP1:WAVE 0.247 -0.882 -0.684 0.047
##
## Standardized Within-Group Residuals:
## Min Q1 Med Q3 Max
## -3.78174 -0.35659 0.05225 0.39335 2.31472
##
## Number of Observations: 109
## Number of Groups: 69
Table with P-values
| Value | Std.Error | DF | t-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 1.4176 | 0.3655 | 66.0000 | 3.8789 | 0.0002 |
| GROUP1 | 0.2221 | 0.2566 | 66.0000 | 0.8658 | 0.3897 |
| WAVE | 0.0094 | 0.1120 | 38.0000 | 0.0841 | 0.9334 |
| BASELINE | 0.6597 | 0.0819 | 66.0000 | 8.0552 | 0.0000 |
| GROUP1:WAVE | 0.0453 | 0.1637 | 38.0000 | 0.2764 | 0.7837 |
``` Table with confidence intervals
| est. | lower | upper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 1.4176 | 0.7049 | 2.1304 |
| GROUP1 | 0.2221 | -0.2782 | 0.7225 |
| WAVE | 0.0094 | -0.2121 | 0.2309 |
| BASELINE | 0.6597 | 0.4999 | 0.8194 |
| GROUP1:WAVE | 0.0453 | -0.2785 | 0.3691 |