Rpub link:
http://rpubs.com/ssufian/533918
Github link:
https://github.com/ssufian/Data_606
If you have access to data on an entire population, say the size of every house in Ames, Iowa, it’s straight forward to answer questions like, “How big is the typical house in Ames?” and “How much variation is there in sizes of houses?”. If you have access to only a sample of the population, as is often the case, the task becomes more complicated. What is your best guess for the typical size if you only know the sizes of several dozen houses? This sort of situation requires that you use your sample to make inference on what your population looks like.
In the previous lab, ``Sampling Distributions’’, we looked at the population data of houses from Ames, Iowa. Let’s start by loading that data set.
## Order PID MS.SubClass MS.Zoning Lot.Frontage Lot.Area Street Alley
## 1 1 526301100 20 RL 141 31770 Pave <NA>
## 2 2 526350040 20 RH 80 11622 Pave <NA>
## 3 3 526351010 20 RL 81 14267 Pave <NA>
## 4 4 526353030 20 RL 93 11160 Pave <NA>
## 5 5 527105010 60 RL 74 13830 Pave <NA>
## 6 6 527105030 60 RL 78 9978 Pave <NA>
## Lot.Shape Land.Contour Utilities Lot.Config Land.Slope Neighborhood
## 1 IR1 Lvl AllPub Corner Gtl NAmes
## 2 Reg Lvl AllPub Inside Gtl NAmes
## 3 IR1 Lvl AllPub Corner Gtl NAmes
## 4 Reg Lvl AllPub Corner Gtl NAmes
## 5 IR1 Lvl AllPub Inside Gtl Gilbert
## 6 IR1 Lvl AllPub Inside Gtl Gilbert
## Condition.1 Condition.2 Bldg.Type House.Style Overall.Qual Overall.Cond
## 1 Norm Norm 1Fam 1Story 6 5
## 2 Feedr Norm 1Fam 1Story 5 6
## 3 Norm Norm 1Fam 1Story 6 6
## 4 Norm Norm 1Fam 1Story 7 5
## 5 Norm Norm 1Fam 2Story 5 5
## 6 Norm Norm 1Fam 2Story 6 6
## Year.Built Year.Remod.Add Roof.Style Roof.Matl Exterior.1st Exterior.2nd
## 1 1960 1960 Hip CompShg BrkFace Plywood
## 2 1961 1961 Gable CompShg VinylSd VinylSd
## 3 1958 1958 Hip CompShg Wd Sdng Wd Sdng
## 4 1968 1968 Hip CompShg BrkFace BrkFace
## 5 1997 1998 Gable CompShg VinylSd VinylSd
## 6 1998 1998 Gable CompShg VinylSd VinylSd
## Mas.Vnr.Type Mas.Vnr.Area Exter.Qual Exter.Cond Foundation Bsmt.Qual
## 1 Stone 112 TA TA CBlock TA
## 2 None 0 TA TA CBlock TA
## 3 BrkFace 108 TA TA CBlock TA
## 4 None 0 Gd TA CBlock TA
## 5 None 0 TA TA PConc Gd
## 6 BrkFace 20 TA TA PConc TA
## Bsmt.Cond Bsmt.Exposure BsmtFin.Type.1 BsmtFin.SF.1 BsmtFin.Type.2
## 1 Gd Gd BLQ 639 Unf
## 2 TA No Rec 468 LwQ
## 3 TA No ALQ 923 Unf
## 4 TA No ALQ 1065 Unf
## 5 TA No GLQ 791 Unf
## 6 TA No GLQ 602 Unf
## BsmtFin.SF.2 Bsmt.Unf.SF Total.Bsmt.SF Heating Heating.QC Central.Air
## 1 0 441 1080 GasA Fa Y
## 2 144 270 882 GasA TA Y
## 3 0 406 1329 GasA TA Y
## 4 0 1045 2110 GasA Ex Y
## 5 0 137 928 GasA Gd Y
## 6 0 324 926 GasA Ex Y
## Electrical X1st.Flr.SF X2nd.Flr.SF Low.Qual.Fin.SF Gr.Liv.Area
## 1 SBrkr 1656 0 0 1656
## 2 SBrkr 896 0 0 896
## 3 SBrkr 1329 0 0 1329
## 4 SBrkr 2110 0 0 2110
## 5 SBrkr 928 701 0 1629
## 6 SBrkr 926 678 0 1604
## Bsmt.Full.Bath Bsmt.Half.Bath Full.Bath Half.Bath Bedroom.AbvGr
## 1 1 0 1 0 3
## 2 0 0 1 0 2
## 3 0 0 1 1 3
## 4 1 0 2 1 3
## 5 0 0 2 1 3
## 6 0 0 2 1 3
## Kitchen.AbvGr Kitchen.Qual TotRms.AbvGrd Functional Fireplaces
## 1 1 TA 7 Typ 2
## 2 1 TA 5 Typ 0
## 3 1 Gd 6 Typ 0
## 4 1 Ex 8 Typ 2
## 5 1 TA 6 Typ 1
## 6 1 Gd 7 Typ 1
## Fireplace.Qu Garage.Type Garage.Yr.Blt Garage.Finish Garage.Cars
## 1 Gd Attchd 1960 Fin 2
## 2 <NA> Attchd 1961 Unf 1
## 3 <NA> Attchd 1958 Unf 1
## 4 TA Attchd 1968 Fin 2
## 5 TA Attchd 1997 Fin 2
## 6 Gd Attchd 1998 Fin 2
## Garage.Area Garage.Qual Garage.Cond Paved.Drive Wood.Deck.SF
## 1 528 TA TA P 210
## 2 730 TA TA Y 140
## 3 312 TA TA Y 393
## 4 522 TA TA Y 0
## 5 482 TA TA Y 212
## 6 470 TA TA Y 360
## Open.Porch.SF Enclosed.Porch X3Ssn.Porch Screen.Porch Pool.Area Pool.QC
## 1 62 0 0 0 0 <NA>
## 2 0 0 0 120 0 <NA>
## 3 36 0 0 0 0 <NA>
## 4 0 0 0 0 0 <NA>
## 5 34 0 0 0 0 <NA>
## 6 36 0 0 0 0 <NA>
## Fence Misc.Feature Misc.Val Mo.Sold Yr.Sold Sale.Type Sale.Condition
## 1 <NA> <NA> 0 5 2010 WD Normal
## 2 MnPrv <NA> 0 6 2010 WD Normal
## 3 <NA> Gar2 12500 6 2010 WD Normal
## 4 <NA> <NA> 0 4 2010 WD Normal
## 5 MnPrv <NA> 0 3 2010 WD Normal
## 6 <NA> <NA> 0 6 2010 WD Normal
## SalePrice
## 1 215000
## 2 105000
## 3 172000
## 4 244000
## 5 189900
## 6 195500
In this lab we’ll start with a simple random sample of size 60 from the population. Specifically, this is a simple random sample of size 60. Note that the data set has information on many housing variables, but for the first portion of the lab we’ll focus on the size of the house, represented by the variable Gr.Liv.Area
.
## [1] 2696 1092 1535 1593 2640 1717
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 864 1194 1528 1618 1794 3627
## [1] 572.2454
ans:
The distribution is nearly normal with a right skew to it. The Typical size is around 1250. By eyballing
it, the number with the highest frequency is around 1250. This could be interpreted as the average.
hist(samp,breaks=15, probability = TRUE)
meanarea = mean(samp)
sdarea = sd(samp)
x <- 450:3600
y <- dnorm(x = x, mean = meanarea , sd = sdarea)
lines(x = x, y = y, col = "red")
## [1] 1499.69
## [1] 505.5089
ans:
Not identical but similar is expected. This distribution borne out of sample size of 60 shows. It is
quite normal but right skewed. The population mean is not too far off from the sample and Std. Dev. is
higher than the sample but not too terribly far off as well.
One of the most common ways to describe the typical or central value of a distribution is to use the mean. In this case we can calculate the mean of the sample using,
## [1] 1618.2
Return for a moment to the question that first motivated this lab: based on this sample, what can we infer about the population? Based only on this single sample, the best estimate of the average living area of houses sold in Ames would be the sample mean, usually denoted as \(\bar{x}\) (here we’re calling it sample_mean
). That serves as a good point estimate but it would be useful to also communicate how uncertain we are of that estimate. This can be captured by using a confidence interval.
We can calculate a 95% confidence interval for a sample mean by adding and subtracting 1.96 standard errors to the point estimate (See Section 4.2.3 if you are unfamiliar with this formula).
se <- sd(samp) / sqrt(60)
lower <- sample_mean - 1.96 * se
upper <- sample_mean + 1.96 * se
c(lower, upper)
## [1] 1473.402 1762.998
This is an important inference that we’ve just made: even though we don’t know what the full population looks like, we’re 95% confident that the true average size of houses in Ames lies between the values lower and upper. There are a few conditions that must be met for this interval to be valid.
ans:
The central limit theorem is needed for confidence intervals to be valid. However, it is also necessary
that the data be collected from random samples. Confidence intervals will not remedy poorly collected
data. Lastly, the larger the sample size the better, but the common practice in real life is n >=30 should
be enough.
ans:
95% confidence means that we used a procedure that works 95% of the time to get this interval.
That is, 95% of all intervals produced by the procedure will contain their corresponding parameters.
For any one particular interval, the true population percentage is either inside the interval or outside
the interval.
In this case we have the luxury of knowing the true population mean since we have data on the entire population. This value can be calculated using the following command:
## [1] 1499.69
ans:
Yes it does, The confidence interval ranges from 1312 to 1576.001. However our sample mean is 1444
which is within our interval. Now the population mean is also 1444 which is also within this interval.
ans:
sampling my confidence interval, I found it to be between 1325 to 1613; which still captures my sample
mean of 1444. And I would expect that 95% of the time, my interval will capture the true population mean
as well
#Create empty vectors where we can save the means and standard deviations that will be calculated from each sample.
samp_mean <- rep(NA,50)
samp_sd <- rep(NA, 50)
n <- 50
for (i in 1:50){
samp <- sample(population, n) #obtain a sample of size n = 50 from the population
samp_mean[i] <- mean(samp) #save sample mean in ith element of samp_mean
samp_sd[i] <- sd(samp) #save sample sd in ith element of samp_sd
}
#length(samp_mean)
#Construct the confidence intervals
lower_1 <- samp_mean - 1.96 * samp_sd / sqrt(n)
upper_1<- samp_mean + 1.96 * samp_sd/ sqrt(n)
## [1] 1372.189
## [1] 1637.011
Using R, we’re going to recreate many samples to learn more about how sample means and confidence intervals vary from one sample to another. Loops come in handy here (If you are unfamiliar with loops, review the Sampling Distribution Lab).
Here is the rough outline:
But before we do all of this, we need to first create empty vectors where we can save the means and standard deviations that will be calculated from each sample. And while we’re at it, let’s also store the desired sample size as n
.
Now we’re ready for the loop where we calculate the means and standard deviations of 50 random samples.
for(i in 1:50){
samp <- sample(population, n) # obtain a sample of size n = 60 from the population
samp_mean[i] <- mean(samp) # save sample mean in ith element of samp_mean
samp_sd[i] <- sd(samp) # save sample sd in ith element of samp_sd
}
Lastly, we construct the confidence intervals.
lower_vector <- samp_mean - 1.96 * samp_sd / sqrt(n)
upper_vector <- samp_mean + 1.96 * samp_sd / sqrt(n)
Lower bounds of these 50 confidence intervals are stored in lower_vector
, and the upper bounds are in upper_vector
. Let’s view the first interval.
## [1] 1468.431 1672.236
ans:
In this particular sampling run, 3% of the proportion lies outside of the confidence intervals
This is not exactly to the confidence level we would should expect but that maybe due to margin of error
sampling
```r
plot_ci(lower_vector, upper_vector, mean(population))
```
<img src="s_suf-confidence_intervals_files/figure-html/plot-ci-1.png" width="672" />
Vector <- data.frame(lower_vector, upper_vector)
meanp <- mean(population)
left <- sum(Vector$upper_vector < meanp)
right <- sum(Vector$lower_vector > meanp)
noMeanIncluded <- left + right
noMeanIncluded
## [1] 4
## [1] 0.07
For a 90% confidence:
\(z^⋆=1.65\)
for a 99% confidence:
\(z^⋆=1.58\)
lower_vector2 <- samp_mean - 1.65 * samp_sd / sqrt(n)
upper_vector2 <- samp_mean + 1.65 * samp_sd / sqrt(n)
lower_vector2[1]
## [1] 1484.548
## [1] 1672.236
plot_ci
function, plot all intervals and calculate the proportion of intervals that include the true population mean. How does this percentage compare to the confidence level selected for the intervals?ans:
Again, due to uncertainty in sampling, 98% include the population mean. This proportion is not necesarily
the same as our confidence level but actually better; yet again due to sampling error