DiamondsDataModel
Chenggang Tu
09/29/2019
Initial Visualization
ggplot(diamonds, aes(cut,price)) + geom_boxplot()
ggplot(diamonds, aes(color,price)) + geom_boxplot()
ggplot(diamonds, aes(clarity,price)) + geom_boxplot()
ggplot(diamonds, aes(carat, price)) +
geom_hex(bins=50)
Subset Data and replot
diamonds2 <- diamonds %>%
filter(carat <= 2.5) %>%
mutate(lprice = log2(price), lcarat = log2(carat))
ggplot(diamonds2, aes(lcarat, lprice)) +
geom_hex(bins=50)
Simple model and visualization
mod_diamond <- lm(lprice ~ lcarat, data = diamonds2)
grid <- diamonds2 %>%
data_grid(carat = seq_range(carat, 20)) %>%
mutate(lcarat = log2(carat)) %>%
add_predictions(mod_diamond, "lprice") %>%
mutate(price = 2 ^ lprice)
ggplot(diamonds2, aes(carat, price)) +
geom_hex(bins = 50) +
geom_line(data = grid, color = "green", size = 1)
Add residuals and plot
diamonds2 <- diamonds2 %>%
add_residuals(mod_diamond, "lresid")
ggplot(diamonds2, aes(lcarat, lresid)) +
geom_hex(bins = 50)
ggplot(diamonds2, aes(cut,lresid)) + geom_boxplot()
ggplot(diamonds2, aes(color,lresid)) + geom_boxplot()
ggplot(diamonds2, aes(clarity,lresid)) + geom_boxplot()
Four parameter model and visualization
mod_diamond2 <- lm(
lprice ~ lcarat + color + cut + clarity, diamonds2
)
grid <- diamonds2 %>%
data_grid(cut, .model = mod_diamond2) %>%
add_predictions(mod_diamond2)
grid## # A tibble: 5 x 5
## cut lcarat color clarity pred
## <ord> <dbl> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
## 1 Fair -0.515 G VS2 11.2
## 2 Good -0.515 G VS2 11.3
## 3 Very Good -0.515 G VS2 11.4
## 4 Premium -0.515 G VS2 11.4
## 5 Ideal -0.515 G VS2 11.4ggplot(grid, aes(cut, pred)) +
geom_point()
Plot residuals of four parameter model
diamonds2 <- diamonds2 %>%
add_residuals(mod_diamond2, "lresid2")
ggplot(diamonds2, aes(lcarat, lresid2)) +
geom_hex(bins = 50)
diamonds2 %>%
filter(abs(lresid2) > 1) %>%
add_predictions(mod_diamond2) %>%
mutate(pred = round(2^pred)) %>%
select(price, pred, carat:table, x:z) %>%
arrange(price)## # A tibble: 16 x 11
## price pred carat cut color clarity depth table x y z
## <int> <dbl> <dbl> <ord> <ord> <ord> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1013 264 0.25 Fair F SI2 54.4 64 4.3 4.23 2.32
## 2 1186 284 0.25 Premium G SI2 59 60 5.33 5.28 3.12
## 3 1186 284 0.25 Premium G SI2 58.8 60 5.33 5.28 3.12
## 4 1262 2644 1.03 Fair E I1 78.2 54 5.72 5.59 4.42
## 5 1415 639 0.35 Fair G VS2 65.9 54 5.57 5.53 3.66
## 6 1415 639 0.35 Fair G VS2 65.9 54 5.57 5.53 3.66
## 7 1715 576 0.32 Fair F VS2 59.6 60 4.42 4.34 2.61
## 8 1776 412 0.290 Fair F SI1 55.8 60 4.48 4.41 2.48
## 9 2160 314 0.34 Fair F I1 55.8 62 4.72 4.6 2.6
## 10 2366 774 0.3 Very Good D VVS2 60.6 58 4.33 4.35 2.63
## 11 3360 1373 0.51 Premium F SI1 62.7 62 5.09 4.96 3.15
## 12 3807 1540 0.61 Good F SI2 62.5 65 5.36 5.29 3.33
## 13 3920 1705 0.51 Fair F VVS2 65.4 60 4.98 4.9 3.23
## 14 4368 1705 0.51 Fair F VVS2 60.7 66 5.21 5.11 3.13
## 15 10011 4048 1.01 Fair D SI2 64.6 58 6.25 6.2 4.02
## 16 10470 23622 2.46 Premium E SI2 59.7 59 8.82 8.76 5.25Question #1
In the plot of lcarat vs. lprice, there are some bright vertical strips. What do they represent?
The distribution of the variable “carat” is integer variables and the result we got are not integers (Being logged). Brighter means higer count.
Question #2
If log(price) = a_0 + a_1 * log(carat), what does that say about the relationship between price and carat?
mod_log <- lm(log2(price) ~ log2(carat), data = diamonds)
mod_log##
## Call:
## lm(formula = log2(price) ~ log2(carat), data = diamonds)
##
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept) log2(carat)
## 12.189 1.676tibble(carat = seq(0.25, 5, by = 0.25)) %>%
add_predictions(mod_log) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = carat, y = 2^pred)) +
geom_line() +
labs(x = "carat", y = "price")
###It means that price = exp(a_0)*carat^(a_1). The estimated relationship between carat and price is not linear. If x increases n, then y increases n^a1.Question #3
Extract the diamonds that have very high and very low residuals. Is there anything unusual about these diamonds? Are they particularly bad or good, or do you think these are pricing errors?
# Use this chunk to place your code for extracting the high and low residuals
diamonds2 <- diamonds %>%
filter(carat <= 2.5) %>%
mutate(lprice = log2(price), lcarat = log2(carat))
mod_diamond <- lm(lprice ~ lcarat, data = diamonds2)
diamonds2 <- diamonds2 %>%
add_residuals(mod_diamond,'lresid')
summary(diamonds2$lresid)## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## -1.964068 -0.245488 -0.008442 0.000000 0.239301 1.934855diamonds3 <- diamonds2 %>% filter(lresid > quantile(lresid)[[3]] | lresid < quantile(lresid)[[1]] )
table(diamonds3$cut)##
## Fair Good Very Good Premium Ideal
## 317 1651 5515 6477 12946table(diamonds3$clarity)##
## I1 SI2 SI1 VS2 VS1 VVS2 VVS1 IF
## 1 836 4321 7340 5304 4208 3225 1671diamonds3 %>%
ggplot(aes(clarity,price))+
geom_boxplot()+
facet_grid(~cut)
### Yes, there are pricing errors. The betterQuestion #4
Does the final model, mod_diamonds2, do a good job of predicting diamond prices? Would you trust it to tell you how much to spend if you were buying a diamond and why?
# Use this chunk to place your code for assessing how well the model predicts diamond prices
mod1 <- lm(lprice ~ lcarat + color + clarity + cut, data = diamonds2)
summary(mod1)##
## Call:
## lm(formula = lprice ~ lcarat + color + clarity + cut, data = diamonds2)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.17388 -0.12437 -0.00094 0.11920 2.78322
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 12.206978 0.001693 7211.806 < 2e-16 ***
## lcarat 1.886239 0.001124 1677.809 < 2e-16 ***
## color.L -0.633998 0.002910 -217.872 < 2e-16 ***
## color.Q -0.137580 0.002676 -51.409 < 2e-16 ***
## color.C -0.022072 0.002503 -8.819 < 2e-16 ***
## color^4 0.016570 0.002297 7.213 5.54e-13 ***
## color^5 -0.002828 0.002169 -1.304 0.192
## color^6 0.003533 0.001971 1.793 0.073 .
## clarity.L 1.308155 0.005179 252.598 < 2e-16 ***
## clarity.Q -0.334090 0.004839 -69.047 < 2e-16 ***
## clarity.C 0.178423 0.004140 43.093 < 2e-16 ***
## clarity^4 -0.088059 0.003298 -26.697 < 2e-16 ***
## clarity^5 0.035885 0.002680 13.389 < 2e-16 ***
## clarity^6 -0.001371 0.002327 -0.589 0.556
## clarity^7 0.048221 0.002051 23.512 < 2e-16 ***
## cut.L 0.173866 0.003386 51.349 < 2e-16 ***
## cut.Q -0.050346 0.002980 -16.897 < 2e-16 ***
## cut.C 0.019129 0.002583 7.407 1.31e-13 ***
## cut^4 -0.002410 0.002066 -1.166 0.243
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 0.1916 on 53795 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.9828, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9828
## F-statistic: 1.706e+05 on 18 and 53795 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16diamonds2 %>%
add_predictions(mod1) %>%
mutate(pred = 2 ^ pred) %>%
select(price, pred) %>%
mutate(se = predict(mod1, se.fit = TRUE)$se.fit,
low_ci = pred - se * 2,
upper_ci = pred + se * 2,
correct = if_else(price >= low_ci & price <= upper_ci, TRUE, FALSE)) %>%
summarize(prop_correct = mean(correct))## # A tibble: 1 x 1
## prop_correct
## <dbl>
## 1 0.0000743### It is not a very good model as the predictors are not normalized and treated equally (It is not too bad though). I would get a better model for a more accurate prediction.