Data description

Table 1. Charasteristics of patients at admission in rehab centers
var Overall Missing
N 152
Age Event (Mean (Sd)) 52.3 (18.0) 0.0
Sex = M (%) 95 (62.5) 0.0
Days Icu (Mean (Sd)) 45.4 (20.1) 0.0
Etiology (%) 0.0
Tbi 54 (35.5)
Vascular 77 (50.7)
Anoxic 15 (9.9)
Infective 2 (1.3)
Neoplastic 4 (2.6)
Mixed 0 (0.0)
Diagnosis (%) 0.0
Emersion 39 (25.7)
Mcs 54 (35.5)
Vs 59 (38.8)
Lcf (Mean (Sd)) 3.1 (1.3) 0.0
Tracheo = Yes (%) 135 (88.8) 0.0
Breath (%) 5.9
Autonomous 58 (40.6)
Autonomous + O2 80 (55.9)
Mechanical 5 (3.5)
Feed (%) 0.7
Oral 11 (7.3)
Parenteral 2 (1.3)
Ng-Tube 63 (41.7)
Peg 75 (49.7)
Cateth = Yes (%) 147 (96.7) 0.0
Bedsore = Yes (%) 55 (36.2) 0.0
Asworth = Yes (%) 31 (20.4) 0.0
Craniolac = Yes (%) 32 (21.1) 0.0
Psh Tot Cat (%) 0.7
Unlikely 105 (69.5)
Possible 30 (19.9)
Probable 16 (10.6)
Nr Crisis (%) 6.6
None 113 (79.6)
<3 14 (9.9)
3-5 14 (9.9)
>5 1 (0.7)
Treatment (%) 0.0
None 24 (10.8)
Opioids 10 (4.5)
Benzos 22 (9.9)
Barbiturate 6 (2.7)
Beta Blockers 69 (31.1)
Alpha Blockers 16 (7.2)
Dopa Antagonist 3 (1.4)
Baclofen 17 (7.7)
Other 55 (24.8)
Table 2. Charasteristics of patients after 4 months from rehab start
var Overall Missing
N 152
Diagnosis (%) 0.0
Dead 2 (1.3)
Discharged 12 (7.9)
Emersion 76 (50.0)
Mcs 32 (21.1)
Vs 30 (19.7)
Lcf (Mean (Sd)) 4.1 (1.7) 9.2
Tracheo = Yes (%) 78 (56.5) 9.2
Breath (%) 9.9
Autonomous 112 (81.8)
Autonomous + O2 25 (18.2)
Mechanical 0 (0.0)
Feed (%) 9.2
Oral 55 (39.9)
Parenteral 1 (0.7)
Ng-Tube 11 (8.0)
Peg 71 (51.4)
Cateth = Yes (%) 60 (43.5) 9.2
Bedsore = Yes (%) 38 (27.5) 9.2
Asworth = Yes (%) 45 (32.6) 9.2
Craniolac = Yes (%) 23 (16.7) 9.2
Psh Tot Cat (%) 9.9
Unlikely 114 (83.2)
Possible 13 (9.5)
Probable 10 (7.3)
Nr Crisis (%) 16.4
None 101 (79.5)
<3 16 (12.6)
3-5 4 (3.1)
>5 6 (4.7)
Treatment (%) 0.0
None 90 (55.6)
Opioids 2 (1.2)
Benzos 25 (15.4)
Barbiturate 1 (0.6)
Beta Blockers 15 (9.3)
Alpha Blockers 2 (1.2)
Dopa Antagonist 1 (0.6)
Baclofen 14 (8.6)
Other 12 (7.4)
Table 3. Charasteristics of patients at discharge
var Overall Missing
N 152
Diagnosis (%) 0.0
Dead 4 (2.6)
Emersion 95 (62.5)
Mcs 34 (22.4)
Vs 19 (12.5)
Lcf (Mean (Sd)) 4.7 (2.0) 2.6
Tracheo = Yes (%) 54 (36.5) 2.6
Breath (%) 2.6
Autonomous 126 (85.1)
Autonomous + O2 21 (14.2)
Mechanical 1 (0.7)
Feed (%) 3.9
Oral 74 (50.7)
Parenteral 1 (0.7)
Ng-Tube 3 (2.1)
Peg 68 (46.6)
Cateth = Yes (%) 44 (29.7) 2.6
Bedsore = Yes (%) 21 (14.2) 2.6
Asworth = Yes (%) 43 (29.1) 2.6
Craniolac = Yes (%) 13 (8.8) 2.6
Psh Tot Cat (%) 3.3
Unlikely 137 (93.2)
Possible 5 (3.4)
Probable 5 (3.4)
Nr Crisis (%) 8.6
None 116 (83.5)
<3 15 (10.8)
3-5 5 (3.6)
>5 3 (2.2)
Days Rehab (Mean (Sd)) 164.4 (75.9) 0.0
Gos Cat (%) 0.0
Death 4 (2.6)
Vegetative State 39 (25.7)
Severe Disability 82 (53.9)
Moderate Disability 14 (9.2)
Low Disability 13 (8.6)
Treatment (%) 0.0
None 119 (77.8)
Opioids 0 (0.0)
Benzos 12 (7.8)
Barbiturate 0 (0.0)
Beta Blockers 11 (7.2)
Alpha Blockers 1 (0.7)
Dopa Antagonist 0 (0.0)
Baclofen 6 (3.9)
Other 4 (2.6)

Descriptive Plots (Captions are below the figures)

Figure 1. Neurological condition by time

Figure 1. Neurological condition by time

Figure 2. LCF by time

Figure 2. LCF by time

Figure 3. Number of Patients on tracheostomy by time

Figure 3. Number of Patients on tracheostomy by time

Figure 4. Number of Patients on assisted ventilation (B) by time

Figure 4. Number of Patients on assisted ventilation (B) by time

Figure 4. Number of Patients on assisted feeding by time

Figure 4. Number of Patients on assisted feeding by time

Figure 5. Number of Patients on urinary catheterization by time

Figure 5. Number of Patients on urinary catheterization by time

Figure 6. Number of Patients with bedsore by time

Figure 6. Number of Patients with bedsore by time

Figure 6. Number of Patients with spasticity (measured by Asworth scale) by time

Figure 6. Number of Patients with spasticity (measured by Asworth scale) by time

Figure 7. Number of Patients with Luckenschadel by time

Figure 7. Number of Patients with Luckenschadel by time

Figure 8. Number of ISP crisis by PSH scale and time

Figure 8. Number of ISP crisis by PSH scale and time

Figure 9. GOS by Nr. ISP Crisis (A) and PSH score results (B) during Week 1

Figure 9. GOS by Nr. ISP Crisis (A) and PSH score results (B) during Week 1

Figure 10. GOS by Nr. ISP Crisis (A) and PSH score results (B) anytime during follow-up

Figure 10. GOS by Nr. ISP Crisis (A) and PSH score results (B) anytime during follow-up