I sampled 6 sites in the Honey Creek watershed on 2019-08-26. 5 sites were on Honey Creek proper, 4 sites were downstream of the outflow of Mammoth Spring and were limestone influenced; 1 site was above Mammoth Spring and is considered freestone.
An additional site was sampled on Kish Creek, just upstream of the mouth of Honey Creek in Reedsville, PA.
| Date | Time | Site | Lat | Long | temp_c | do_mg_l | spc_us_cm | ph | turb_ntu | water_sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8/26/2019 | 940 | Honey Ck mouth | 40.66164 | -77.59612 | 15.7 | 9.53 | 224.9 | 7.40 | 11.6 | Y |
| 8/26/2019 | 950 | Kish Ck @ confluence | 40.66153 | -77.59651 | 14.5 | 11.01 | 400.4 | 7.58 | 3.8 | N |
| 8/26/2019 | 1000 | Honey Ck @ Reedsville Playground | 40.66858 | -77.59108 | 15.6 | 10.22 | 270.3 | 8.07 | 12.1 | Y |
| 8/26/2019 | 1020 | Honey Ck Rd | 40.68129 | -77.56295 | 15.3 | 10.42 | 261.6 | 8.09 | 11.3 | Y |
| 8/26/2019 | 1035 | Honey Ck Rd 2 | 40.68894 | -77.55834 | 15.2 | 9.15 | 253.6 | 7.80 | 13.2 | Y |
| 8/26/2019 | 1045 | Honey Ck Upstream | 40.70170 | -77.54155 | 17.9 | 9.43 | 86.7 | 8.01 | 4.7 | Y |
Pretty consistent downstream of Mammoth Spring (~15 C), but was elevated upstream (17.9 C).
Also consistent in Honey Creek below Mammoth Spring, but much lower above.
Elevated below Mammoth Spring (11-13 NTU), but much lower in Kish Creek (3.8) and upstream of Mammoth Spring (4.7)
pH is the real concern if lime is being concentrated in the stream channel. However, pH readings were not very elevated nearest to the source of the influence (Mammoth Spring), compared to upstream.
I’m unsure as to how pH values may be different with different air/water temperatures, but there is a definite ‘plume’ evident at the Mouth of Honey Creek (right); Kish Creek is shown on the left. Picture taken 2019-08-25 at 1700. Conditions looked very similar this morning (2019-08-26).